Abstract
Density-driven steric seawater changes are a leading-order contributor to global mean sea level rise. However, inter-model differences in the magnitude and spatial patterns of steric sea level rise exist at regional scales and often emerge during the spin-up and pre-industrial control integrations of climate models. Steric sea level results from an eddy-permitting climate model, GFDL-CM4, are compared with a lower resolution counterpart, GFDL-ESM4. The results from both models are examined through basin-scale heat budgets and watermass analysis, and we compare the patterns of ocean heat uptake, redistribution, and sea level differ in ocean-only (i.e. OMIP) and coupled climate configurations. After correcting for model drift, both GFDL-CM4 and GFDL-ESM4 simulate nearly equivalent ocean heat content change and global sea level rise during the historical period. However, the GFDL-CM4 model exhibits as much as a 40% increase in surface ocean heat uptake in the Southern Ocean and subsequent increases in horizontal export to other ocean basins after bias correction. The results suggest regional differences in the processes governing Southern Ocean heat export, such as the formation of AAIW, SPMW, and gyre transport between the two models, and that sea level changes in these models cannot be fully bias-corrected. Since the process-level differences between the two models are evident in the preindustrial control simulations of both models, these results suggest that the control simulations are important for identifying and correcting sea-level related model biases.
© 2024 American Meteorological Society. This is an Author Accepted Manuscript distributed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).
