Tropical Cyclones and Associated Environmental Fields in CMIP6 models

Suzana J. Camargo aLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY
bColumbia Climate School, Columbia University, New York, NY

Search for other papers by Suzana J. Camargo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Michael K. Tippett cDepartment of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, NY

Search for other papers by Michael K. Tippett in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Adam H. Sobel aLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY
cDepartment of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, NY

Search for other papers by Adam H. Sobel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Chia-Ying Lee aLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY

Search for other papers by Chia-Ying Lee in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Boniface Fosu dDepartment of Geosciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS

Search for other papers by Boniface Fosu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Kevin I. Hodges eNational Centre for Atmospheric Science and Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Kevin I. Hodges in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The authors analyze the environmental fields associated with tropical cyclone (TC) activity in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) models, as well as the TC-like storms in those models. First, the model biases in the historical climatological means of chosen environmental fields are evaluated against the fifth generation of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasting (ECMWF) atmospheric reanalysis (ERA5). Second, we show that the interannual variability of these fields is typically much smaller in models than in reanalysis. Applying a mean bias correction to these fields before calculating tropical cyclone genesis indices improves the variability of the modeled indices compared to those in reanalysis, as well as the means, due to the nonlinear dependence of the indices on these fields. The authors consider how these environmental fields change in the CMIP6 models, using three future scenarios separately as well as combining scenarios and times according to specific greenhouse warming levels. Multiple proxies for TC activity are considered and we show that the signs of the future changes are dependent on the choice of genesis index. The relationship between climate sensitivity and potential intensity change across the multi-model ensemble is examined. The statistics of the TC-like structures in the historical simulations are also examined, using the number of tropical cyclones (NTC) and accumulated cyclone energy (ACE) as diagnostics, including calculations of the percentage changes in NTC and ACE at the end of the 21C as compared with the 20C. Large decreases in both of these quantities are found in the highest emission scenario.

© 2025 American Meteorological Society. This is an Author Accepted Manuscript distributed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Suzana J. Camargo, suzana@ldeo.columbia.edu

Abstract

The authors analyze the environmental fields associated with tropical cyclone (TC) activity in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) models, as well as the TC-like storms in those models. First, the model biases in the historical climatological means of chosen environmental fields are evaluated against the fifth generation of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasting (ECMWF) atmospheric reanalysis (ERA5). Second, we show that the interannual variability of these fields is typically much smaller in models than in reanalysis. Applying a mean bias correction to these fields before calculating tropical cyclone genesis indices improves the variability of the modeled indices compared to those in reanalysis, as well as the means, due to the nonlinear dependence of the indices on these fields. The authors consider how these environmental fields change in the CMIP6 models, using three future scenarios separately as well as combining scenarios and times according to specific greenhouse warming levels. Multiple proxies for TC activity are considered and we show that the signs of the future changes are dependent on the choice of genesis index. The relationship between climate sensitivity and potential intensity change across the multi-model ensemble is examined. The statistics of the TC-like structures in the historical simulations are also examined, using the number of tropical cyclones (NTC) and accumulated cyclone energy (ACE) as diagnostics, including calculations of the percentage changes in NTC and ACE at the end of the 21C as compared with the 20C. Large decreases in both of these quantities are found in the highest emission scenario.

© 2025 American Meteorological Society. This is an Author Accepted Manuscript distributed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Suzana J. Camargo, suzana@ldeo.columbia.edu
Save