The Western Arctic Linkage Experiment (WALE): Overview and Synthesis

A. D. McGuire U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska

Search for other papers by A. D. McGuire in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
J. E. Walsh International Arctic Research Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska

Search for other papers by J. E. Walsh in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
J. S. Kimball Flathead Lake Biological Station, Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Polson, Montana

Search for other papers by J. S. Kimball in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
J. S. Clein Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska

Search for other papers by J. S. Clein in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
S. E. Euskirchen Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska

Search for other papers by S. E. Euskirchen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
S. Drobot University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by S. Drobot in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
U. C. Herzfeld University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by U. C. Herzfeld in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
J. Maslanik University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by J. Maslanik in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
R. B. Lammers Water Systems Analysis Group, Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire

Search for other papers by R. B. Lammers in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M. A. Rawlins Water Systems Analysis Group, Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire

Search for other papers by M. A. Rawlins in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
C. J. Vorosmarty Water Systems Analysis Group, Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire

Search for other papers by C. J. Vorosmarty in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
T. S. Rupp Department of Forest Sciences, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska

Search for other papers by T. S. Rupp in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
W. Wu National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by W. Wu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
M. Calef Department of Geography and Planning, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York

Search for other papers by M. Calef in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The primary goal of the Western Arctic Linkage Experiment (WALE) was to better understand uncertainties of simulated hydrologic and ecosystem dynamics of the western Arctic in the context of 1) uncertainties in the data available to drive the models and 2) different approaches to simulating regional hydrology and ecosystem dynamics. Analyses of datasets on climate available for driving hydrologic and ecosystem models within the western Arctic during the late twentieth century indicate that there are substantial differences among the mean states of datasets for temperature, precipitation, vapor pressure, and radiation variables. Among the studies that examined temporal trends among the alternative climate datasets, there is not much consensus on trends among the datasets. In contrast, monthly and interannual variations of some variables showed some correlation across the datasets. The application of hydrology models driven by alternative climate drivers revealed that the simulation of regional hydrology was sensitive to precipitation and water vapor differences among the driving datasets and that accurate simulation of regional water balance is limited by biases in the forcing data. Satellite-based analyses for the region indicate that vegetation productivity of the region increased during the last two decades of the twentieth century because of earlier spring thaw, and the temporal variability of vegetation productivity simulated by different models from 1980 to 2000 was generally consistent with estimates based on the satellite record for applications driven with alternative climate datasets. However, the magnitude of the fluxes differed by as much as a factor of 2.5 among applications driven with different climate data, and spatial patterns of temporal trends in carbon dynamics were quite different among simulations. Finally, the study identified that the simulation of fire by ecosystem models is particularly sensitive to alternative climate datasets, with little or no fire simulated for some datasets. The results of WALE identify the importance of conducting retrospective analyses prior to coupling hydrology and ecosystem models with climate system models. For applications of hydrology and ecosystem models driven by projections of future climate, the authors recommend a coupling strategy in which future changes from climate model simulations are superimposed on the present mean climate of the most reliable datasets of historical climate.

* Corresponding author address: A. D. McGuire, 214 Irving I Building, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775. ffadm@uaf.edu

This article included in Western Arctic Linkage Experiment (WALE) special collection.

Abstract

The primary goal of the Western Arctic Linkage Experiment (WALE) was to better understand uncertainties of simulated hydrologic and ecosystem dynamics of the western Arctic in the context of 1) uncertainties in the data available to drive the models and 2) different approaches to simulating regional hydrology and ecosystem dynamics. Analyses of datasets on climate available for driving hydrologic and ecosystem models within the western Arctic during the late twentieth century indicate that there are substantial differences among the mean states of datasets for temperature, precipitation, vapor pressure, and radiation variables. Among the studies that examined temporal trends among the alternative climate datasets, there is not much consensus on trends among the datasets. In contrast, monthly and interannual variations of some variables showed some correlation across the datasets. The application of hydrology models driven by alternative climate drivers revealed that the simulation of regional hydrology was sensitive to precipitation and water vapor differences among the driving datasets and that accurate simulation of regional water balance is limited by biases in the forcing data. Satellite-based analyses for the region indicate that vegetation productivity of the region increased during the last two decades of the twentieth century because of earlier spring thaw, and the temporal variability of vegetation productivity simulated by different models from 1980 to 2000 was generally consistent with estimates based on the satellite record for applications driven with alternative climate datasets. However, the magnitude of the fluxes differed by as much as a factor of 2.5 among applications driven with different climate data, and spatial patterns of temporal trends in carbon dynamics were quite different among simulations. Finally, the study identified that the simulation of fire by ecosystem models is particularly sensitive to alternative climate datasets, with little or no fire simulated for some datasets. The results of WALE identify the importance of conducting retrospective analyses prior to coupling hydrology and ecosystem models with climate system models. For applications of hydrology and ecosystem models driven by projections of future climate, the authors recommend a coupling strategy in which future changes from climate model simulations are superimposed on the present mean climate of the most reliable datasets of historical climate.

* Corresponding author address: A. D. McGuire, 214 Irving I Building, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775. ffadm@uaf.edu

This article included in Western Arctic Linkage Experiment (WALE) special collection.

Save
  • Alley, R. B. Coauthors 2003. Abrupt climate change. Science 299:20052010.

  • Armstrong, R. L. and M. J. Brodzik. 1995. An Earth-gridded SSM/I data set for cryospheric studies and global change monitoring. Adv. Space Res. 16:155163.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chapin III, F. S. Coauthors 2000. Feedbacks from arctic and boreal ecosystems to climate. Global Change Biol. 6:S211S223.

  • Chapin III, F. S. Coauthors 2005a. Role of land-surface changes in arctic summer warming. Science 310:657660.

  • Chapin III, F. S. Coauthors 2005b. Polar systems. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends, The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, H. Hassan, R. Scholes, and N. Ash, Eds., Island Press, 717–743.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chapin III, F. S. Coauthors 2006. Summary and synthesis: Past and future changes in the Alaskan boreal forest. Alaska’s Changing Boreal Forest, F. S. Chapin, III, et al., Eds., Oxford University Press, 332–338.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Clein, J. S., A. D. McGuire, E. S. Euskirchen, and M. P. Calef. 2007. The effects of different climate input data sets on simulated carbon dynamics in the western Arctic. Earth Interactions 11. [Available online at http://EarthInteractions.org.].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Curry, J. A., W. B. Rossow, D. Randall, and J. L. Schramm. 1996. Overview of Arctic cloud and radiation conditions. J. Climate 9:17311764.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Drobot, S., J. Maslanik, U. C. Herzfeld, C. Fowler, and W. Wu. 2006. Uncertainty in temperature and precipitation datasets over terrestrial regions of the western Arctic. Earth Interactions 10. [Available online at http://EarthInteractions.org.].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Euskirchen, S. E. Coauthors 2006. Importance of recent shifts in soil thermal dynamics on growing season length, productivity, and carbon sequestration in terrestrial high-latitude ecosystems. Global Change Biol. 12:731750.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Euskirchen, S. E., A. D. McGuire, and F. S. Chapin III. 2007. Energy feedbacks to the climate system due to reduced high latitude snow cover during 20th Century warming. Global Change Biol. 13:24252438.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hamon, W. R. 1963. Computation of direct runoff amounts from storm rainfall. Int. Assoc. Sci. Hydrol. Publ. 63:5262.

  • Herzfeld, U. C., S. Drobot, W. Wu, C. Fowler, and J. Maslanik. 2007. Spatio-temporal climate model validation: Case studies for MM5 over northwestern Canada and Alaska. Earth Interactions 11. [Available online at http://EarthInteractions.org.].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hinzman, L. D. Coauthors 2005. Evidence and implications of recent climate change in northern Alaska and other arctic regions. Climatic Change 72:251298.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hobbie, J. E. Coauthors 1994. Long-term measurements at the arctic LTER site. Ecological Time Series, T. M. Powell and J. H. Steele, Eds., Chapman and Hall, 391–409.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Johannessen, O. M. Coauthors 2004. Arctic climate change: Observed and modelled temperature and sea-ice variability. Tellus 56A:328341.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jones, P. D. and A. Moberg. 2003. Hemispheric and large scale air temperature variations: An extensive revision and an update to 2001. J. Climate 16:206223.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jones, P. D., T. J. Osborn, K. R. Briffa, C. K. Folland, B. Horton, L. V. Alexander, D. E. Parker, and N. A. Rayner. 2001. Adjusting for sampling density in grid-box land and ocean surface temperature time series. J. Geophys. Res. 106:33713380.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kalnay, E. Coauthors 1996. The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 77:437471.

  • Kane, D. L. and W. S. Reeburgh. 1998. Introduction to the special section: Land-Air-Ice-Interactions (LAII) Flux Study. J. Geophys. Res. 103:2891328915.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kimball, J. S., K. C. McDonald, and M. Zhao. 2006. Spring thaw and the effect on terrestrial vegetation productivity in the western Arctic observed from satellite microwave and optical remote sensing. Earth Interactions 10. [Available online at http://EarthInteractions.org.].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kimball, J. S. Coauthors 2007. Climate driven increases in boreal and arctic vegetation productivity: Evidence of decreasing stability of the northern high latitude terrestrial carbon reservoir. Earth Interactions 11. [Available online at http://EarthInteractions.org.].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kistler, R. Coauthors 2001. The NCEP–NCAR 50-Year Reanalysis: Monthly means CD-ROM and documentation. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 82:247267.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McGuire, A. D. and F. S. Chapin III. 2006. Climate feedbacks in the Alaskan Boreal Forest. Alaska’s Changing Boreal Forest, F. S. Chapin, III, et al., Eds., Oxford University Press, 309–322.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McGuire, A. D., M. Sturm, and F. S. Chapin III. 2003. Arctic Transitions in the Land-Atmosphere System (ATLAS): Background, objectives, results, and future directions. J. Geophys. Res. 108.8166, doi:10.1029/2002JD002367.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McGuire, A. D., M. Apps, F. S. Chapin III, R. Dargaville, and M. D. Flannigan. 2004. Land cover disturbances and feedbacks to the climate system in Canada and Alaska. Land Change Science: Observing, Monitoring, and Understanding Trajectories of Change on the Earth’s Surface, G. Gutman et al., Eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, 139–161.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McGuire, A. D., F. S. Chapin III, J. E. Walsh, and C. Wirth. 2006. Integrated regional changes in arctic climate feedbacks: Implications for the global climate system. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 31:6191.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McGuire, A. D. Coauthors 2007. Responses of high latitude ecosystems to global change: Potential consequences for the climate system. Terrestrial Ecosystems in a Changing World, J. G. Canadell, D. E. Pataki, and L. F. Pitelka, Eds., The IGBP Series, Springer-Verlag, 297–310.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mitchell, T. D. and P. D. Jones. 2005. An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated high-resolution grids. Int. J. Climatol. 25:693712.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Monteith, J. L. 1965. Evaporation and environment. The State of Movement of Water in Living Organisms, G. E. Fogg, Ed., Cambridge University Press, 205–233.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Overland, J. E., M. C. Spillane, and N. N. Soreide. 2004. Integrated analysis of physical and biological Pan-Arctic change. Climatic Change 63:291322.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rawlins, M. A., R. B. Lammers, S. Frolking, B. M. Fekete, and C. J. Vorosmarty. 2003. Simulating pan-Arctic runoff with a macro-scale terrestrial water balance model. Hydrol. Processes 17:25212539.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rawlins, M. A., S. Frolking, R. B. Lammers, and C. J. Vorosmarty. 2006. Effects of uncertainty in climate inputs on simulated evapotranspiration and runoff in the western Arctic. Earth Interactions 10. [Available online at http://EarthInteractions.org.].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rupp, T. S., A. M. Starfield, and F. S. Chapin III. 2000. A frame-based spatially explicit model of subarctic vegetation response to climatic change: Comparison with a point model. Landscape Ecol. 15:383400.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rupp, T. S., X. Chen, M. Olson, and A. D. McGuire. 2007. Sensitivity of simulated boreal fire dynamics to uncertainties in climate drivers. Earth Interactions 11. [Available online at http://EarthInteractions.org.].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Serreze, M. C. and J. A. Francis. 2006. The Arctic amplification debate. Climatic Change 76:241264.

  • Serreze, M. C., J. E. Walsh, F. S. Chapin III, T. Osterkamp, and M. Dyurgerov. 2000. Observational evidence of recent change in the northern high-latitude environment. Climatic Change 46:159207.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Serreze, M. C., M. P. Clark, and D. H. Bromwich. 2003. Monitoring precipitation over the arctic terrestrial drainage system: Data requirements, shortcomings, and applications of atmospheric reanalysis. J. Hydrometeor. 4:387407.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stow, D., A. Hope, A. D. McGuire, D. Verbyla, and J. Gamon. 2004. Remote sensing of vegetation and land-cover changes in Arctic tundra ecosystems. Remote Sens. Environ. 89:281308.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Uppala, S. M. Coauthors 2005. The ERA-40 re-analysis. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc. 131:29613012.

  • Willmott, C. J. and K. Matsuura. 1995. Smart interpolation of annually averaged air temperature in the United States. J. Appl. Meteor. 34:25772586.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wu, W., A. H. Lynch, S. Drobot, J. Maslanik, A. D. McGuire, and U. Herzfeld. 2007. Comparative analysis of the western Arctic surface climate among observations and model simulations. Earth Interactions 11. [Available online at http://EarthInteractions.org.].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 644 391 27
PDF Downloads 41 24 2