On the Hydrologic Adjustment of Climate-Model Projections: The Potential Pitfall of Potential Evapotranspiration

P. C. D. Milly U.S. Geological Survey, Princeton, New Jersey

Search for other papers by P. C. D. Milly in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Krista A. Dunne U.S. Geological Survey, Princeton, New Jersey

Search for other papers by Krista A. Dunne in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Hydrologic models often are applied to adjust projections of hydroclimatic change that come from climate models. Such adjustment includes climate-bias correction, spatial refinement (“downscaling”), and consideration of the roles of hydrologic processes that were neglected in the climate model. Described herein is a quantitative analysis of the effects of hydrologic adjustment on the projections of runoff change associated with projected twenty-first-century climate change. In a case study including three climate models and 10 river basins in the contiguous United States, the authors find that relative (i.e., fractional or percentage) runoff change computed with hydrologic adjustment more often than not was less positive (or, equivalently, more negative) than what was projected by the climate models. The dominant contributor to this decrease in runoff was a ubiquitous change in runoff (median −11%) caused by the hydrologic model’s apparent amplification of the climate-model-implied growth in potential evapotranspiration. Analysis suggests that the hydrologic model, on the basis of the empirical, temperature-based modified Jensen–Haise formula, calculates a change in potential evapotranspiration that is typically 3 times the change implied by the climate models, which explicitly track surface energy budgets. In comparison with the amplification of potential evapotranspiration, central tendencies of other contributions from hydrologic adjustment (spatial refinement, climate-bias adjustment, and process refinement) were relatively small. The authors’ findings highlight the need for caution when projecting changes in potential evapotranspiration for use in hydrologic models or drought indices to evaluate climate-change impacts on water.

* Corresponding author address: P. C. D. Milly, NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, 201 Forrestal Road, Princeton, NJ 08540-6649. cmilly@usgs.gov

This article included in Integrated Watershed-Scale Response to Climate Change in Selected Basins across the United States special collection.

Abstract

Hydrologic models often are applied to adjust projections of hydroclimatic change that come from climate models. Such adjustment includes climate-bias correction, spatial refinement (“downscaling”), and consideration of the roles of hydrologic processes that were neglected in the climate model. Described herein is a quantitative analysis of the effects of hydrologic adjustment on the projections of runoff change associated with projected twenty-first-century climate change. In a case study including three climate models and 10 river basins in the contiguous United States, the authors find that relative (i.e., fractional or percentage) runoff change computed with hydrologic adjustment more often than not was less positive (or, equivalently, more negative) than what was projected by the climate models. The dominant contributor to this decrease in runoff was a ubiquitous change in runoff (median −11%) caused by the hydrologic model’s apparent amplification of the climate-model-implied growth in potential evapotranspiration. Analysis suggests that the hydrologic model, on the basis of the empirical, temperature-based modified Jensen–Haise formula, calculates a change in potential evapotranspiration that is typically 3 times the change implied by the climate models, which explicitly track surface energy budgets. In comparison with the amplification of potential evapotranspiration, central tendencies of other contributions from hydrologic adjustment (spatial refinement, climate-bias adjustment, and process refinement) were relatively small. The authors’ findings highlight the need for caution when projecting changes in potential evapotranspiration for use in hydrologic models or drought indices to evaluate climate-change impacts on water.

* Corresponding author address: P. C. D. Milly, NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, 201 Forrestal Road, Princeton, NJ 08540-6649. cmilly@usgs.gov

This article included in Integrated Watershed-Scale Response to Climate Change in Selected Basins across the United States special collection.

Save
  • Brutsaert, W. H. , 1982. Evaporation into the Atmosphere: Theory, History, and Applications. D. Reidel, 299 pp.

  • Choudhury, B. J. , 1999. Evaluation of an empirical equation for annual evaporation using field observations and results from a biophysical model. J. Hydrol. 216:99110.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dai, A. , K. E. Trenberth , and T. Qian , 2004. A global dataset of Palmer Drought Severity Index for 1870–2002: Relationship with soil moisture and effects of surface warming. J. Hydrometeor. 5:11171130.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hay, L. E. , S. L. Markstrom , R. S. Regan , and R. L. Viger , 2010. Integrated watershed scale response to climate change for selected basins across the United States. Earth Interactions in press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jensen, M. E. , D. C. N. Robb , and C. E. Franzoy , 1970. Scheduling irrigations using climate-crop-soil data. J. Irrig. Drain. Div. 96:2538.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Maurer, E. P. , A. W. Wood , J. C. Adam , D. P. Lettenmaier , and B. Nijssen , 2002. A long-term hydrologically based dataset of land surface fluxes and states for the conterminous United States. J. Climate 15:32373251.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Milly, P. C. D. , 1994. Climate, soil water storage, and the average annual water balance. Water Resour. Res. 30:21432156.

  • Nakicenovic, N. , and Coauthors , 2000. Special Report on Emissions Scenarios. Cambridge University Press, 599 pp.

  • Priestley, C. H. B. , and R. J. Taylor , 1972. On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Mon. Wea. Rev. 100:8192.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Slatyer, R. O. , and I. C. McIlroy , 1961. Practical Microclimatology. CSIRO, 310 pp.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1415 580 125
PDF Downloads 416 143 12