Planning for an Uncertain Future: Climate Change Sensitivity Assessment toward Adaptation Planning for Public Water Supply

Tim Bardsley Western Water Assessment, Salt Lake City, Utah

Search for other papers by Tim Bardsley in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Andrew Wood National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Andrew Wood in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Mike Hobbins Physical Sciences Division, NOAA/Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Mike Hobbins in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Tracie Kirkham Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities, Salt Lake City, Utah

Search for other papers by Tracie Kirkham in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Laura Briefer Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities, Salt Lake City, Utah

Search for other papers by Laura Briefer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jeff Niermeyer Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities, Salt Lake City, Utah

Search for other papers by Jeff Niermeyer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Steven Burian University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah

Search for other papers by Steven Burian in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Assessing climate change risk to municipal water supplies is often conducted by hydrologic modeling specific to local watersheds and infrastructure to ensure that outputs are compatible with existing planning frameworks and processes. This study leverages the modeling capacity of an operational National Weather Service River Forecast Center to explore the potential impacts of future climate-driven hydrologic changes on factors important to planning at the Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities (SLC). Hydrologic modeling results for the study area align with prior research in showing that temperature changes alone will lead to earlier runoff and reduced runoff volume. The sensitivity of average annual flow to temperature varies significantly between watersheds, averaging −3.8% °F−1 and ranging from −1.8% to −6.5% flow reduction per degree Fahrenheit of warming. The largest flow reductions occur during the high water demand months of May–September. Precipitation drives hydrologic response more strongly than temperature, with each 1% precipitation change producing an average 1.9% runoff change of the same sign. This paper explores the consequences of climate change for the reliability of SLC's water supply system using scenarios that include hydrologic changes in average conditions, severe drought scenarios, and future water demand test cases. The most significant water management impacts will be earlier and reduced runoff volume, which threaten the system's ability to maintain adequate streamflow and storage to meet late-summer water demands.

Corresponding author address: Tim Bardsley, Western Water Assessment, 2242 W. North Temple, Salt Lake City, UT 84116. E-mail address: wwa.bardsley@gmail.com

This article is included in the Human Impact on Climate Extremes for Water Resources Infrastructure Design, Operations, and Risk Management special collection.

Abstract

Assessing climate change risk to municipal water supplies is often conducted by hydrologic modeling specific to local watersheds and infrastructure to ensure that outputs are compatible with existing planning frameworks and processes. This study leverages the modeling capacity of an operational National Weather Service River Forecast Center to explore the potential impacts of future climate-driven hydrologic changes on factors important to planning at the Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities (SLC). Hydrologic modeling results for the study area align with prior research in showing that temperature changes alone will lead to earlier runoff and reduced runoff volume. The sensitivity of average annual flow to temperature varies significantly between watersheds, averaging −3.8% °F−1 and ranging from −1.8% to −6.5% flow reduction per degree Fahrenheit of warming. The largest flow reductions occur during the high water demand months of May–September. Precipitation drives hydrologic response more strongly than temperature, with each 1% precipitation change producing an average 1.9% runoff change of the same sign. This paper explores the consequences of climate change for the reliability of SLC's water supply system using scenarios that include hydrologic changes in average conditions, severe drought scenarios, and future water demand test cases. The most significant water management impacts will be earlier and reduced runoff volume, which threaten the system's ability to maintain adequate streamflow and storage to meet late-summer water demands.

Corresponding author address: Tim Bardsley, Western Water Assessment, 2242 W. North Temple, Salt Lake City, UT 84116. E-mail address: wwa.bardsley@gmail.com

This article is included in the Human Impact on Climate Extremes for Water Resources Infrastructure Design, Operations, and Risk Management special collection.

Save
  • Anderson, E. A., 1973: National Weather Service River Forecast System: Snow Accumulation and Ablation Model. NOAA Tech. Memo. NWS Hydro-17, 87 pp.

  • Barnett, T. P., J. C. Adam, and D. P. Lettenmaier, 2005: Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions. Nature, 438, 303309.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barnett, T. P., and Coauthors, 2008: Human-induced changes in the hydrology of the western United States. Science,319, 1080–1083, doi:10.1126/science.1152538.

  • Brown, C., and R. L. Wilby, 2012: An alternate approach to assessing climate risks. Eos, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union,92, 401–402.

  • Bureau of Reclamation, 2011: SECURE Water Act section 9503(c): Reclamation Climate Change and Water 2011. Bureau of Reclamation Rep., 226 pp. [Available online at http://www.usbr.gov/climate/SECURE/docs/SECUREWaterReport.pdf.]

  • Bureau of Reclamation, cited 2012: Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study. [Available online at http://www.usbr.gov/lc/region/programs/crbstudy.html.]

  • Burnash, R. J. C., 1995: The NWS River Forecast System—Catchment modeling. in Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, V. P. Singh, Ed., Water Resources, 311–366.

  • Burnash, R. J. C., R. L. Ferral, and R. A. McGuire, 1973: A generalized streamflow simulation system: Conceptual modeling for digital computers. Joint Federal and State River Forecast Center, U.S. National Weather Service, and California Department of Water Resources Tech. Rep., 204 pp.

  • Chambers, J. C., 2008: Climate change and the Great Basin. USDA Forest Service General Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-204, 4 pp.

  • Clow, D. W., 2010: Changes in the timing of snowmelt and streamflow in Colorado: A response to recent warming. J. Climate, 23, 22932306.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Craig, R. K., 2010: “Stationarity is dead”—Long live transformation: Five principles for climate chang adaptation law. Harvard Environ. Law Rev., 34, 9–75.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Deser, C., R. Knutti, S. Solomon, and A. S. Phillips, 2012: Communication of the role of natural variability in future North American climate. Nat. Climate Change, 2, 775779, doi:10.1038/nclimate1562.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Farnsworth, R. K., E. S. Thompson, and E. L. Peck, 1982: Evaporation atlas for the contiguous 48 United States. NOAA Tech. Rep. NWS 33, 37 pp. [Available online at http://www.weather.gov/oh/hdsc/PMP_related_studies/TR33.pdf.]

  • Gangopadhyay, S., and T. Pruitt, 2011: West-wide climate risk assessments: Bias-corrected and spatially downscaled surface water projections. Bureau of Reclamation Tech. Memo. 86-68210-2011-01, 138 pp.

  • Gillies, R. S., S. Wang, and M. Booth, 2012: Observational and synoptic analyses of the winter precipitation regime over Utah. J. Climate, 25, 46794698.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hamlet, A. F., P. W. Mote, M. P. Clark, and D. P. Lettenmaier, 2005: Effects of temperature and precipitation variability on snowpack trends in the western United States. J. Climate, 18, 45454561.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harding, B. L., A. W. Wood, and J. R. Prairie, 2012: The implications of climate change scenario selection for future streamflow projection in the upper Colorado River basin. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 39894007, doi:10.5194/hess-16-3989-2012.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hobbins, M., A. W. Wood, D. Streubel, and K. Werner, 2012: what drives the variability of evaporative demand across the conterminous United States? J. Hydrometeor., 13, 11951214.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoerling, M., D. Lettenmaier, D. Cayan, and B. Udall, 2009: Reconciling projections of Colorado River streamflow. Southwest Hydrol., 8, 2031.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Karl, T. R., J. M. Melillo, and T. C. Peterson, Eds., 2009: Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States. Cambridge University Press, 188 pp.

  • Knowles, N., M. D. Dettinger, and D. R. Cayan, 2006: Trends in snowfall versus rainfall in the western United States. J. Climate, 19, 45454559.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Maurer, E. P., L. Brekke, T. Pruitt, and P. B. Duffy, 2007: Fine-resolution climate projections enhance regional climate change impact studies. Eos, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, 88, 504.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mills, E., E. Klotz, T. Stonely, M. Waters, and L. Summers, 2003: Utah's M&I water conservation plan. Utah Division of Water Resources Rep., 44 pp. [Available online at http://www.conservewater.utah.gov/Final71403AACC.pdf.]

  • Milly, P. C. D., K. A. Dunne, and A. V. Vecchia, 2005: Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate. Nature, 438, 347350.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Milly, P. C. D., J. Betancourt, M. Falkenmark, R. M. Hersh, Z. W. Kundzewicz, D. P. Lettenmaier, and R. J. Stouffer, 2008: Stationarity is dead: Whither water management? Science, 348, 573574.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mitchell, K. E., and Coauthors, 2004: The multi-institution North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS): Utilizing multiple GCIP products and partners in a continental distributed hydrological modeling system. J. Geophys. Res., 109, D07S90, doi:10.1029/2003JD003823.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mote, P. W., 2006: Climate-driven variability and trends in mountain snowpack in western North America. J. Climate, 19, 62096220.

  • Nash, L. L., and P. Gleick, 1991: The sensitivity of streamflow in the Colorado Basin to climatic changes. J. Hydrol., 125, 221241.

  • Ray, A. J., J. J. Barsugli, K. B. Averyt, K. Wolter, M. Hoerling, N. Doesken, B. Udall, and R. S. Webb, 2008: Climate change in Colorado: A synthesis to support water resources management and adaptation Colorado Water Conservation Board Western Water Assessment Rep., 58 pp.

  • Rotstayn, L. D., M. L. Roderick, and G. D. Farquhar, 2006: A simple pan-evaporation model for analysis of climate simulations: Evaluation over Australia. Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L17715, doi:10.1029/2006GL027114.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Serreze, M. C., M. P. Clark, R. L. Armstrong, D. A. McGinnis, and R. L. Pulwarty, 1999: Characteristics of the western U.S. snowpack from Snowpack Telemetry (SNOTEL) data. Water Resour. Res., 35, 21452160.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stewart, T. S., D. R. Cayan, and M. D. Dettinger, 2005: Changes toward earlier streamflow timing across western North America. J. Climate, 18, 11361155.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wood, A. W., L. R. Leung, V. Sridhar, and D. P. Lettenmaier, 2004: Hydrologic implications of dynamic and statistical approaches to downscaling climate model outputs. Climatic Change, 62, 189216.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Woodbury, M., M. Balso, D. Yates, and L. Kaatz, 2012: Joint Front Range Climate Change Vulnerability Study. Water Research Foundation Rep., 148 pp.

  • Woodhouse, C. A., D. M. Meko, G. M. MacDonald, D. W. Stahle, and E. R. Cook, 2010: A 1,200-year perspective of 21st century drought in southwestern North America, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 21 28321 288, doi:10.1073/pnas.0911197107.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1710 606 130
PDF Downloads 515 169 12