Downscaling Ensemble Weather Predictions for Improved Week-2 Hydrologic Forecasting

Xiaoli Liu Department of Civil Engineering, School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Search for other papers by Xiaoli Liu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Paulin Coulibaly Department of Civil Engineering, School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Search for other papers by Paulin Coulibaly in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

This study investigates the use of large-scale ensemble weather predictions provided by the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Global Forecast System [GFS; formerly known as Medium-Range Forecast (MRF)] for improving week-2 hydrologic forecasting. The ensemble weather predictor variables are used to downscale daily precipitation and temperature series at two meteorological stations in the Saguenay watershed in northeastern Canada. Three data-driven methods—namely, the statistical downscaling model (SDSM), the time-lagged feed-forward neural network (TLFN), and evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR)—are used as comparative downscaling models. The downscaled results of the best models are used as additional inputs in two hydrological models, namely Hydrologiska Byråns Vattenbalansavdelning (HBV2005) and a Bayesian neural network (BNN)-based hydrologic model, for up to 14-day-ahead reservoir inflow and river flow forecasting. The performance of the two hydrologic models is compared, the ultimate objective being to improve week-2 (7–14-day ahead) forecasts. To identify a suitable approach for using the ensemble weather data in the downscaling experiments, six scenarios are evaluated. It is found that the best approach to downscaling the ensemble weather predictions is to use the means of the predictor members derived from the two grid points closest to the local meteorological station of interest. The downscaling results show that all three models have a relatively good performance in downscaling daily temperature series, but the results are in general less accurate for daily precipitation. The TLFN and EPR models have quite close performance in most cases, and they both perform better than SDSM. The hydrologic forecasting results show that for both reservoir inflow and river flow, the HBV model has better performance when downscaled meteorological predictions are included, while there is no significant improvement for the BNN model. For the week-2 forecast, an improvement of about 18% on average is obtained for both streamflow and reservoir inflow forecasts. However, for the spring season where accurate peak flow forecast is of main concern, an improvement of about 26% on average is achieved. It is also shown that using only downscaled temperature in spring reservoir inflow forecasting, the improvements for week 2 range from 16% to 24%. Overall, the forecast results show that large-scale ensemble weather predictions can be effectively exploited through statistical downscaling tools for improved week-2 hydrologic forecasts. The forecast results also indicate that even imperfect medium-range (week 2) weather predictions can be very useful for producing significantly improved week-2 hydrologic forecasts.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Paulin Coulibaly, Department of Civil Engineering, School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton ON L8S 4L7, Canada. E-mail: couliba@mcmaster.ca

Abstract

This study investigates the use of large-scale ensemble weather predictions provided by the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Global Forecast System [GFS; formerly known as Medium-Range Forecast (MRF)] for improving week-2 hydrologic forecasting. The ensemble weather predictor variables are used to downscale daily precipitation and temperature series at two meteorological stations in the Saguenay watershed in northeastern Canada. Three data-driven methods—namely, the statistical downscaling model (SDSM), the time-lagged feed-forward neural network (TLFN), and evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR)—are used as comparative downscaling models. The downscaled results of the best models are used as additional inputs in two hydrological models, namely Hydrologiska Byråns Vattenbalansavdelning (HBV2005) and a Bayesian neural network (BNN)-based hydrologic model, for up to 14-day-ahead reservoir inflow and river flow forecasting. The performance of the two hydrologic models is compared, the ultimate objective being to improve week-2 (7–14-day ahead) forecasts. To identify a suitable approach for using the ensemble weather data in the downscaling experiments, six scenarios are evaluated. It is found that the best approach to downscaling the ensemble weather predictions is to use the means of the predictor members derived from the two grid points closest to the local meteorological station of interest. The downscaling results show that all three models have a relatively good performance in downscaling daily temperature series, but the results are in general less accurate for daily precipitation. The TLFN and EPR models have quite close performance in most cases, and they both perform better than SDSM. The hydrologic forecasting results show that for both reservoir inflow and river flow, the HBV model has better performance when downscaled meteorological predictions are included, while there is no significant improvement for the BNN model. For the week-2 forecast, an improvement of about 18% on average is obtained for both streamflow and reservoir inflow forecasts. However, for the spring season where accurate peak flow forecast is of main concern, an improvement of about 26% on average is achieved. It is also shown that using only downscaled temperature in spring reservoir inflow forecasting, the improvements for week 2 range from 16% to 24%. Overall, the forecast results show that large-scale ensemble weather predictions can be effectively exploited through statistical downscaling tools for improved week-2 hydrologic forecasts. The forecast results also indicate that even imperfect medium-range (week 2) weather predictions can be very useful for producing significantly improved week-2 hydrologic forecasts.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Paulin Coulibaly, Department of Civil Engineering, School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton ON L8S 4L7, Canada. E-mail: couliba@mcmaster.ca
Save
  • Arheimer, B., and Brandt M. , 1998: Modelling nitrogen transport and retention in the catchments of southern Sweden. Ambio, 27, 471480.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology, 2000: Artificial neural networks in hydrology. II: Hydrologic applications. J. Hydrol. Eng., 5, 124137.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bergström, S., 1976: Development and application of a conceptual runoff model for Scandinavian catchments. SMHI Rep. 7, 134 pp.

  • Bergström, S., Carlsson B. , Gardelin M. , Lindstroem G. , Pettersson A. , and Rummukainen M. , 2001: Climate change impacts on runoff in Sweden—Assessments by global climate models, dynamical downscaling and hydrological modeling. Climate Res., 16, 101112.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brandt, M., 1990: Simulation of runoff and nitrate transport from mixed basins in Sweden. Nord. Hydrol., 21, 1334.

  • Coulibaly, P., 2003: Impact of meteorological predictions on real-time spring flow forecasting. Hydrol. Processes, 17, 37913801.

  • Coulibaly, P., 2004: Downscaling daily extreme temperatures with genetic programming. Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L16203, doi:10.1029/2004GL020075.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Coulibaly, P., Anctil F. , and Bobee B. , 2001: Multivariate reservoir inflow forecasting using temporal neural networks. J. Hydrol. Eng., 6, 367376.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Coulibaly, P., Dibike Y. B. , and Anctil F. , 2005: Downscaling precipitation and temperature with temporal neural networks. J. Hydrometeor., 6, 483495.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davidson, J. W., Savic D. A. , and Walters G. A. , 2000: Approximators for the Colebrook-White formula obtained through a hybrid regression method. Proc. 13th Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in Water Resources, Calgary, Canada, University of Calgary, 983–989.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dibike, Y. B., and Coulibaly P. , 2005: Hydrologic impact of climate change in the Saguenay watershed: Comparison of downscaling methods and hydrologic models. J. Hydrol., 307, 145163.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dibike, Y. B., and Coulibaly P. , 2007: Validation of hydrological models for climate scenario simulation: The case of Saguenay watershed in Quebec. Hydrol. Processes, 21, 31233135.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Georgakakos, K. P., and Hudlow M. D. , 1984: Quantitative precipitation forecast techniques for use in hydrologic forecasting. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 65, 11861200.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Giustolisi, O., and Savic D. A. , 2005: A symbolic data-driven technique based on evolutionary polynomial regression. J. Hydroinformatics, 8, 207222.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goswami, M., and O’Connor K. , 2007: Real-time flow forecasting in the absence of quantitative precipitation forecasts: A multi-model approach. J. Hydrol., 334, 125140.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hamill, T. M., Whitaker J. S. , and Wei X. , 2004: Ensemble reforecasting: Improving medium-range forecast skill using retrospective forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 14341447.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hay, L. E., and Clark M. P. , 2003: Use of statistically and dynamically downscaled atmospheric model output for hydrologic simulations in three mountainous basins in the western United States. J. Hydrol., 282, 5675.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hay, L. E., Wilby R. L. , and Leavesley G. H. , 2000: A comparison of delta change and downscaled GCM scenarios for three mountainous basins in the United States. J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc., 36, 387397.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kalnay, E., and Coauthors, 1996: The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77, 437471.

  • Karunasinghe, D., and Liong S. , 2006: Chaotic time series prediction with a global model: Artificial neural network. J. Hydrol., 323, 92105.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Khan, M. S., and Coulibaly P. , 2006: Bayesian neural network for rainfall-runoff modeling. Water Resour. Res., 42, W07409, doi:10.1029/2005WR003971.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Khan, M. S., and Coulibaly P. , 2010: Assessing hydrologic impact of climate change with uncertainty estimates: Bayesian neural network approach. J. Hydrometeor., 11, 482495.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koza, J. R., 1992: Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Natural Selection. MIT Press, 835 pp.

  • Lazo, J. K., Morss R. E. , and Demuth J. L. , 2009: 300 billion served: Sources, perceptions, uses, and values of weather forecasts. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 90, 785798.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leung, L. R., Hamlet A. F. , Lettenmaier D. P. , and Kumar A. , 1999: Simulations of the ENSO hydroclimate signals in the Pacific Northwest Columbia River basin. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 80, 23132329.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lidén, R., and Harlin J. , 2000: Analysis of conceptual rainfall-runoff modeling performance in different climates. J. Hydrol., 238, 231247.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lindström, G., Gardelin M. , Johansson B. , Persson M. , and Bergström S. , 1996: HBV-96-En areellt fordelad model for vattenkrafthydrologin. Swedish Meteorologic and Hydrologic Institute Rep. RH 12, 97 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, X., Coulibaly P. , and Evora N. , 2008: Comparison of data-driven methods for downscaling ensemble weather forecasts. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 615624.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Principe, J. C., Euliano N. R. , and Lefebvre W. C. , 2000: Neural and Adaptive Systems: Fundamentals through Simulations. John Wiley, 647 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sivakumar, B., Jayawardena A. , and Fernando T. , 2002: River flow forecasting: Use of phase-space reconstruction and artificial neural networks approaches. J. Hydrol., 265, 225245.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilby, R. L., Hay L. E. Jr., Gutowski W. J. , Arritt R. W. , Takle E. S. , Pan Z. , Leavesley G. H. , and Clark M. P. , 2000: Hydrological responses to dynamically and statistically downscaled climate model output. Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 11991202.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilby, R. L., Dawson C. W. , and Barrow E. M. , 2002: SDSM—A decision support tool for the assessment of regional climate change impacts. Environ. Modell. Software, 17, 145159.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 377 221 21
PDF Downloads 105 42 3