Markov Chain Models for Hydrological Drought Characteristics

Dilek Eren Akyuz Department of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey

Search for other papers by Dilek Eren Akyuz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Mehmetcik Bayazit Department of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey

Search for other papers by Mehmetcik Bayazit in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Bihrat Onoz Department of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey

Search for other papers by Bihrat Onoz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Estimation of drought characteristics such as probabilities and return periods of droughts of various lengths is of major importance in drought forecast and management and in solving water resources problems related to water quality and navigation. This study aims at applying first- and second-order Markov chain models to dry and wet periods of annual streamflow series to reproduce the stochastic structure of hydrological droughts. Statistical evaluation of drought duration and intensity is usually carried out using runs analysis. First-order Markov chain model (MC1) for dry and wet periods is not adequate when autocorrelation of the original hydrological series is high. A second-order Markov chain model (MC2) is proposed to estimate the probabilities and return periods of droughts. Results of these models are compared with those of a simulation study assuming a lag-1 autoregressive [AR(1)] process widely used to model annual streamflows. Probability distribution and return periods of droughts of various lengths are estimated and compared with the results of MC1 and MC2 models using efficacy evaluation statistics. It is found that the MC2 model in general gives results that are in better agreement with simulation results as compared with the MC1 model. Skewness is found to have little effect on return periods except when autocorrelation is very high. MC1 and MC2 models are applied to droughts observed in some annual streamflow series, with the result that the MC2 model has a relatively good agreement considering the limited duration of the records.

Corresponding author address: Mehmetcik Bayazit, Department of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak, Istanbul 34469, Turkey. E-mail: mbayazit@itu.edu.tr

Abstract

Estimation of drought characteristics such as probabilities and return periods of droughts of various lengths is of major importance in drought forecast and management and in solving water resources problems related to water quality and navigation. This study aims at applying first- and second-order Markov chain models to dry and wet periods of annual streamflow series to reproduce the stochastic structure of hydrological droughts. Statistical evaluation of drought duration and intensity is usually carried out using runs analysis. First-order Markov chain model (MC1) for dry and wet periods is not adequate when autocorrelation of the original hydrological series is high. A second-order Markov chain model (MC2) is proposed to estimate the probabilities and return periods of droughts. Results of these models are compared with those of a simulation study assuming a lag-1 autoregressive [AR(1)] process widely used to model annual streamflows. Probability distribution and return periods of droughts of various lengths are estimated and compared with the results of MC1 and MC2 models using efficacy evaluation statistics. It is found that the MC2 model in general gives results that are in better agreement with simulation results as compared with the MC1 model. Skewness is found to have little effect on return periods except when autocorrelation is very high. MC1 and MC2 models are applied to droughts observed in some annual streamflow series, with the result that the MC2 model has a relatively good agreement considering the limited duration of the records.

Corresponding author address: Mehmetcik Bayazit, Department of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak, Istanbul 34469, Turkey. E-mail: mbayazit@itu.edu.tr
Save
  • Abramowitz, M., and Stegun I. A. , 1965: Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Vol. 2. Dover Publications, Inc., 1045 pp.

  • Bayazit, M., 2001: Discussion of “Return period and risk of hydrologic events I: Mathematical formulation.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 6, 358361.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bayazit, M., and Onoz B. , 2005: Probabilities and return periods of multisite droughts. Hydrol. Sci. J., 50, 605615.

  • Cancelliere, A., and Salas J. D. , 2004: Drought length probabilities for periodic-stochastic hydrologic data. Water Resour. Res., 40, W02503, doi:10.1029/2002WR001750.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cancelliere, A., and Salas J. D. , 2010: Drought probabilities and return period for annual streamflow series. J. Hydrol., 391, 7789, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.008.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chin, E. H., 1977: Modeling daily precipitation occurrence process with Markov Chain. Water Resour. Res., 13, 949956.

  • Chung, C., and Salas J. D. , 2000: Drought occurrence probabilities and risk of dependent hydrological process. J. Hydrol. Eng., 5, 259268.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dracup, J. A., Lee K. S. , and Paulson E. G. Jr., 1980: On the statistical characteristics of drought events. Water Resour. Res., 16, 289296, doi:10.1029/WR016i002p00289.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Feller, W., 1968: An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications. 3rd ed. Vol. 1. Wiley, 499 pp.

  • Fernandez, B., and Salas J. D. , 1999: Return period and risk of hydrologic events I: Mathematical formulation. J. Hydrol. Eng., 4, 297307.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gonzalez, J., and Valdes J. , 2003: Bivariate drought recurrence analysis using tree ring reconstruction. J. Hydrol. Eng., 8, 247258.

  • Lall, L., Rajagopalan B. , and Tarboton D. G. , 1996: A nonparametric wet/dry spell model for resampling daily precipitation. Water Resour. Res., 32, 28032823.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Loaiciga, H. A., and Marino M. A. , 1991: Recurrence interval of geophysical events. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 117, 367382, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1991)117:3(367).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lowry, W. P., and Guthrie D. , 1968: Markov chains of order greater than one. Mon. Wea. Rev., 96, 798801.

  • McMahon, T. A., and Mein R. G. , 1986: River and Reservoir Yield. Water Resources Publications, 368 pp.

  • Mishra, A. K., and Singh V. P. , 2011: Drought modeling—A review. J. Hydrol., 403, 157175.

  • Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe J. V. , 1970: River flow forecasting through conceptual models. J. Hydrol., 10, 282290.

  • Owen, D. B., 1962: Handbook of Statistical Tables. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 580 pp.

  • Roldàn, J., and Woolhiser D. A. , 1982: Stochastic daily precipitation models: 1. A comparison of occurrence processes. Water Resour. Res., 18, 14511459.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schoof, J. T., and Pryor S. C. , 2008: On the proper order of Markov chain model for daily precipitation occurrence in the contiguous United States. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 47, 24772486.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schwager, S. J., 1983: Run probabilities on sequences of Markov-dependent trials. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., 78, 168175.

  • Sen, Z., 1976: Wet and dry periods of annual flow series. J. Hydraul. Div., Amer. Soc. Civ. Eng., 102, 15031514.

  • Sen, Z., 1990: Critical drought analysis by second-order Markov-chain. J. Hydrol., 120, 183202.

  • Sharma, T. C., 2000: Drought parameters in relation to truncation levels. Hydrol. Processes, 14, 12791288.

  • Sharma, T. C., and Panu U. S. , 2008: Drought analysis of monthly hydrological sequences: A case study of Canadian rivers. Hydrol. Sci. J., 53, 503518.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sharma, T. C., and Panu U. S. , 2010: Analytical procedures for weekly hydrological droughts: A case of Canadian rivers. Hydrol. Sci. J., 55, 7992.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shiau, J., and Shen H. W. , 2001: Recurrence analysis of hydrologic droughts of differing severity. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 27, 3040.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yevjevich, V., 1972: Stochastic Processes in Hydrology. Water Resources Publications, 295 pp.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1024 236 27
PDF Downloads 866 182 18