Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Evaluation of Radar Precipitation Estimates from the National Mosaic and Multisensor Quantitative Precipitation Estimation System and the WSR-88D Precipitation Processing System over the Conterminous United States

Wanru Wu NOAA/NWS/Office of Hydrologic Development, Silver Spring, Maryland

Search for other papers by Wanru Wu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
David Kitzmiller NOAA/NWS/Office of Hydrologic Development, Silver Spring, Maryland

Search for other papers by David Kitzmiller in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Shaorong Wu NOAA/NWS/Office of Hydrologic Development, Silver Spring, Maryland, and TCAssociates, Inc., Springfield, Virginia

Search for other papers by Shaorong Wu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Jun 2012
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-064.1
Page(s):
1080–1093
Restricted access

Abstract

This study evaluated 24-, 6-, and 1-h radar precipitation estimated from the National Mosaic and Multisensor Quantitative Precipitation Estimation System (NMQ) and the Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) Precipitation Processing System (PPS) over the conterminous United States (CONUS) for the warm season April–September 2009 and the cool season October 2009–March 2010. Precipitation gauge observations from the Automated Surface Observing System (ASOS) were used as the ground truth. Gridded StageIV multisensor precipitation estimates were applied for supplementary verification. The comparison of the two systems consisted of a series of analyses including the linear correlation coefficient (CC) and the root-mean-square error (RMSE) between the radar precipitation estimates and the gauge observations, large precipitation amount detection categorical scores, and the reliability of precipitation amount distribution. Data stratified for the 12 CONUS River Forecast Centers (RFCs) and for the cold rains events with bright-band effects were analyzed additionally. Major results are 1) the linear CC of NMQ versus ASOS are generally higher than that of PPS versus ASOS over CONUS, while the spatial variations stratified by the RFCs may switch with seasons; 2) compared to the precipitation distribution of ASOS, NMQ shows less deviation than PPS; 3) for the cold rains verified against ASOS, NMQ has higher CC and PPS has lower RMSE for 6-h and higher RMSE for 1-h cold rains; and 4) for the precipitation detection categorical scores, either NMQ or PPS can be superior, depending on the time interval and season. The verification against StageIV gridded precipitation estimates showed that NMQ consistently had higher correlations and lower biases than did PPS.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Wanru Wu, Hydrology Laboratory, Office of Hydrologic Development, National Weather Service, NOAA, 1325 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910. E-mail: wanru.wu@noaa.gov

Abstract

This study evaluated 24-, 6-, and 1-h radar precipitation estimated from the National Mosaic and Multisensor Quantitative Precipitation Estimation System (NMQ) and the Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) Precipitation Processing System (PPS) over the conterminous United States (CONUS) for the warm season April–September 2009 and the cool season October 2009–March 2010. Precipitation gauge observations from the Automated Surface Observing System (ASOS) were used as the ground truth. Gridded StageIV multisensor precipitation estimates were applied for supplementary verification. The comparison of the two systems consisted of a series of analyses including the linear correlation coefficient (CC) and the root-mean-square error (RMSE) between the radar precipitation estimates and the gauge observations, large precipitation amount detection categorical scores, and the reliability of precipitation amount distribution. Data stratified for the 12 CONUS River Forecast Centers (RFCs) and for the cold rains events with bright-band effects were analyzed additionally. Major results are 1) the linear CC of NMQ versus ASOS are generally higher than that of PPS versus ASOS over CONUS, while the spatial variations stratified by the RFCs may switch with seasons; 2) compared to the precipitation distribution of ASOS, NMQ shows less deviation than PPS; 3) for the cold rains verified against ASOS, NMQ has higher CC and PPS has lower RMSE for 6-h and higher RMSE for 1-h cold rains; and 4) for the precipitation detection categorical scores, either NMQ or PPS can be superior, depending on the time interval and season. The verification against StageIV gridded precipitation estimates showed that NMQ consistently had higher correlations and lower biases than did PPS.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Wanru Wu, Hydrology Laboratory, Office of Hydrologic Development, National Weather Service, NOAA, 1325 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910. E-mail: wanru.wu@noaa.gov
Save
Cover Journal of Hydrometeorology
Journal of Hydrometeorology

  • Benjamin, S. G., and Coauthors, 2004: An hourly assimilation–forecast cycle: The RUC. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 495–518.

  • Ciach, G. J., 2003: Local random errors in tipping-bucket rain gauge measurements. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 20, 752–759.

  • Fulton, R., 1998: WSR-88D polar-to-HRAP mapping. National Weather Service, Hydrologic Research Laboratory Tech. Memo. 9-9-01, 33 pp. [Available online at http://www.nws.noaa.gov/oh/hrl/papers/wsr88d/hrapmap.pdf.]

  • Fulton, R., 2005: Multisensor Precipitation Estimator (MPE) workshop. Advanced Hydrologic Applications Course, Kansas City, MO, National Weather Service Training Center, 74 pp. [Available online at http://www.nws.noaa.gov/oh/hrl/papers/wsr88d/MPE_workshop_NWSTC_lecture2_121305.pdf.]

  • Fulton, R., Breidenbach J. , Seo D.-J. , Miller D. , and O’Bannon T. , 1998: The WSR-88D rainfall algorithm. Wea. Forecasting, 13, 377–395.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Giangrande, S., and Ryzhkov A. , 2008: Estimation of rainfall based on the results of polarimetric echo classification. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 47, 2445–2462.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kitzmiller, D., and Coauthors, 2011: Evolving multisensor precipitation estimation methods: Their impacts on flow prediction using a distributed hydrologic model. J. Hydrometeor, 12, 1414–1431.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kitzmiller, D., Miller D. , Fulton R. , and Ding F. , 2012: Radar and multisensor precipitation estimation techniques in National Weather Service hydrologic operations. J. Hydrol. Eng., in press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Langston, C., Zhang J. , and Howard K. , 2007: Four-dimensional dynamic radar mosaic. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 24, 776–790.

  • Lin, Y., and Mitchell K. E. , 2005: The NCEP Stage II/IV hourly precipitation analyses: Development and applications. Preprints, 19th Conf. on Hydrology, San Diego, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 1.2. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/Annual2005/techprogram/paper_83847.htm.]

  • Maddox, R., Zhang J. , Gourley J. , and Howard K. , 2002: Weather radar coverage over the contiguous United States. Wea. Forecasting, 17, 927–934.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Reed, S. M., and Maidment D. R. , 1999: Coordinate transformations for using NEXRAD data in GIS-based hydrologic modeling. J. Hydrol. Eng., 4, 174–182.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schaake, J., 1989: Importance of the HRAP grid for operational hydrology. Preprints, United States/People’s Republic of China Flood Forecasting Symp., Portland, OR, NOAA/NWS, 331–355.

  • Seo, D.-J., Kondragunta C. R. , Kitzmiller D. , Howard K. , Zhang J. , and Vasiloff S. , 2005: The National Mosaic and Multisensor QPE (NMQ) Project—Status and plans for a community testbed for high-resolution multisensor quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) over the United States. Preprints, 19th Conf. on Hydrology, San Diego, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 1.3. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/Annual2005/techprogram/paper_86485.htm.]

  • Sprinthall, R. C., 2003: Basic Statistical Analysis. 7th ed. Pearson, 672 pp.

  • Vasiloff, S., and Coauthors, 2007: Improving QPE and very short term QPF: An initiative for a community-wide integrated approach. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 88, 1899–1911.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wilson, J., and Brandes E. A. , 1979: Radar measurement of rainfall—A summary. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 60, 1048–1058.

  • Zhang, J., Howard K. , and Gourley J. J. , 2005: Constructing three-dimensional multiple-radar reflectivity mosaics: Examples of convective storms and stratiform rain echoes. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 22, 30–42.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zhang, J., and Coauthors, 2011: National Mosaic and Multi-Sensor QPE (NMQ) System: Description, results, and future plans. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 92, 1321–1338.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1112 622 50
PDF Downloads 309 67 7