Radar-Based Quantitative Precipitation Estimation for the Cool Season in Complex Terrain: Case Studies from the NOAA Hydrometeorology Testbed

Jian Zhang NOAA/OAR/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Jian Zhang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Youcun Qi Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China, and Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, and NOAA/OAR/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Youcun Qi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
David Kingsmill Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Science, University of Colorado, and NOAA/OAR/Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by David Kingsmill in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Kenneth Howard NOAA/OAR/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Kenneth Howard in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

This study explores error sources of the National Weather Service operational radar-based quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) during the cool season over the complex terrain of the western United States. A new, operationally geared radar QPE was developed and tested using data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Hydrometeorology Testbed executed during the 2005/06 cool season in Northern California. The new radar QPE scheme includes multiple steps for removing nonprecipitation echoes, constructing a seamless hybrid scan reflectivity field, applying vertical profile of reflectivity (VPR) corrections to the reflectivity, and converting the reflectivity into precipitation rates using adaptive ZR relationships. Specific issues in radar rainfall accumulations were addressed, which include wind farm contaminations, blockage artifacts, and discontinuities due to radar overshooting. The new radar QPE was tested in a 6-month period of the 2005/06 cool season and showed significant improvements over the current operational radar QPE (43% reduction in bias and 30% reduction in root-mean-square error) when compared with gauges. In addition, the new technique minimizes various radar artifacts and produces a spatially continuous rainfall product. Such continuity is important for accurate hydrological model predictions. The new technique is computationally efficient and can be easily transitioned into operations. One of the largest remaining challenges is obtaining accurate radar QPE over the windward slopes of significant mountain ranges, where low-level orographic enhancement of precipitation is not resolved by the operational radars leading to underestimation. Additional high-resolution and near-surface radar observations are necessary for more accurate radar QPE over these regions.

Corresponding author address: Jian Zhang, 120 David L. Boren Blvd., Norman, OK 73072. E-mail: jian.zhang@noaa.gov

Abstract

This study explores error sources of the National Weather Service operational radar-based quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) during the cool season over the complex terrain of the western United States. A new, operationally geared radar QPE was developed and tested using data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Hydrometeorology Testbed executed during the 2005/06 cool season in Northern California. The new radar QPE scheme includes multiple steps for removing nonprecipitation echoes, constructing a seamless hybrid scan reflectivity field, applying vertical profile of reflectivity (VPR) corrections to the reflectivity, and converting the reflectivity into precipitation rates using adaptive ZR relationships. Specific issues in radar rainfall accumulations were addressed, which include wind farm contaminations, blockage artifacts, and discontinuities due to radar overshooting. The new radar QPE was tested in a 6-month period of the 2005/06 cool season and showed significant improvements over the current operational radar QPE (43% reduction in bias and 30% reduction in root-mean-square error) when compared with gauges. In addition, the new technique minimizes various radar artifacts and produces a spatially continuous rainfall product. Such continuity is important for accurate hydrological model predictions. The new technique is computationally efficient and can be easily transitioned into operations. One of the largest remaining challenges is obtaining accurate radar QPE over the windward slopes of significant mountain ranges, where low-level orographic enhancement of precipitation is not resolved by the operational radars leading to underestimation. Additional high-resolution and near-surface radar observations are necessary for more accurate radar QPE over these regions.

Corresponding author address: Jian Zhang, 120 David L. Boren Blvd., Norman, OK 73072. E-mail: jian.zhang@noaa.gov
Save
  • Andrieu, H., and Creutin J. D. , 1995: Identification of vertical profiles of radar reflectivity for hydrological applications using an inverse method. Part I: Formulation. J. Appl. Meteor., 34, 225239.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Andrieu, H., Creutin J. D. , Delrieu G. , and Faure D. , 1997: Use of a weather radar for the hydrology of a mountainous area. Part I: Radar measurements interpretation. J. Hydrol., 125, 125.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Austin, P. M., 1987: Relation between measured radar reflectivity and surface rainfall. Mon. Wea. Rev., 115, 10531070.

  • Bellon, A., Lee G.-W. , and Zawadzki I. , 2005: Error statistics of VPR corrections in stratiform precipitation. J. Appl. Meteor., 44, 9981015.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Berenguer, M., Sempere-Torres D. , Corral C. , and Sanchez-Diezma R. , 2006: A fuzzy logic technique for identifying nonprecipitating echoes in radar scans. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 23, 11571180.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brown, R. A., Wood V. T. , and Barker T. W. , 2002: Improved detection using negative elevation angles for mountaintop WSR-88Ds: Simulation of KMSX near Missoula, Montana. Wea. Forecasting, 17, 223237.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Creutin, J.-D., Andrieu H. , and Faure D. , 1997: Use of a weather radar for the hydrology of a mountainous area. Part II: Radar measurements validation. J. Hydrol., 125, 2644.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Delrieu, G., Creutin J. D. , and Andrieu H. , 1995: Simulation of radar mountain returns using a digitized terrain model. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 12, 10381049.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Doviak, R. J., and Zrnic D. S. , 1993: Doppler Radar and Weather Observations. 2nd ed. Academic Press, 562 pp.

  • Fulton, R. A., Breidenbach J. P. , Seo D. J. , Miller D. A. , and O’Bannon T. , 1998: The WSR-88D rainfall algorithm. Wea. Forecasting, 13, 377395.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Germann, U., and Joss J. , 2002: Mesobeta profiles to extrapolate radar precipitation measurements above the Alps to the ground level. J. Appl. Meteor., 41, 542557.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gourley, J. J., Jorgensen D. P. , Matrosov S. Y. , and Flamig Z. L. , 2009: Evaluation of incremental improvements to quantitative precipitation estimates in complex terrain. J. Hydrometeor., 10, 15071520.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Greene, D. R., and Clark R. A. , 1972: Vertically integrated liquid water—A new analysis tool. Mon. Wea. Rev., 100, 548552.

  • Joss, J., and Waldvogel A. , 1969: Raindrop size distribution and sampling size errors. J. Atmos. Sci., 26, 566569.

  • Joss, J., and Waldvogel A. , 1990: Precipitation measurement and hydrology, A review. Radar in Meteorology, D. Atlas, Ed., Amer. Meteor. Soc., 577–606.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kessinger, C., Ellis S. , and Van Andel J. , 2003: The radar echo classifier: A fuzzy logic algorithm for the WSR-88D. Preprints, Third Conf. on Artificial Applications to the Environmental Sciences, Long Beach, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., P1.6. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/annual2003/techprogram/paper_54946.htm.]

  • Kitchen, M., Brown R. , and Davies A. G. , 1994: Real-time correction of weather radar data for the effects of bright band, range and orographic growth in widespread precipitation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 120, 12311254.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koistinen, J., 1991: Operational correction of radar rainfall errors due to the vertical reflectivity profile. Preprints, 25th Int. Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Paris, France, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 91–94.

  • Lakshmanan, V., Fritz A. , Smith T. , Hondl K. , and Stumpf G. J. , 2007: An automated technique to quality control radar reflectivity data. J. Appl. Meteor., 46, 288305.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Langston, C., and Zhang J. , 2004: An automated algorithm for radar beam occultation. Preprints, 11th Conf. on Aviation, Range, and Aerospace Meteorology, Hyannis, MA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., P5.16. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/11aram22sls/techprogram/paper_81932.htm.]

  • Lin, Y., and Mitchell K. E. , 2005: The NCEP Stage II/IV hourly precipitation analyses: Development and applications. Preprints, 19th Conf. on Hydrology, San Diego, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., P1.2. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/Annual2005/techprogram/paper_83847.htm.]

  • Maddox, R., Zhang J. , Gourley J. J. , and Howard K. , 2002: Weather radar coverage over the contiguous United States. Wea. Forecasting, 17, 927934.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marshall, J. S., Hitschfeld W. , and Gunn K. L. S. , 1955: Advances in radar weather. Adv. Geophys., 2, 156.

  • Martner, B. E., Yuter S. E. , White A. B. , Matrosov S. Y. , Kingsmill D. E. , and Ralph F. M. , 2008: Raindrop size distributions and rain characteristics in California coastal rainfall for periods with and without a radar bright band. J. Hydrometeor., 9, 408425.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Matrosov, S. Y., Clark K. A. , and Kingsmill D. E. , 2007: A polarimetric radar approach to identify rain, melting-layer, and snow regions for applying corrections to vertical profiles of reflectivity. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 46, 154166.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • O’Bannon, T., 1997: Using a “terrain-based” hybrid scan to improve WSR-88D precipitation estimates. Preprints, 28th Int. Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Austin, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 506–507.

  • Park, H.-S., Ryzhkov A. V. , Zrnić D. S. , and Kim K.-E. , 2009: The hydrometeor classification algorithm for the polarimetric WSR-88D: Description and application to an MCS. Wea. Forecasting, 24, 730748.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rosenfeld, D., Wolff D. B. , and Atlas D. , 1993: General probability-matched relations between radar reflectivity and rain rate. J. Appl. Meteor., 32, 5072.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ryzhkov, A. V., Schuur T. J. , Burgess D. W. , Heinselman P. L. , Giangrande S. E. , and Zrnic D. S. , 2005: The Joint Polarization Experiment: Polarimetric rainfall measurements and hydrometeor classification. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 86, 809824.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Seo, D.-J., Breidenbach J. , Fulton R. , Miller D. , and O’Bannon T. , 2000: Real-time adjustment of range-dependent biases in WSR-88D rainfall estimates due to nonuniform vertical profile of reflectivity. J. Hydrometeor., 1, 222240.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Westrick, K. J., Mass C. F. , and Colle B. A. , 1999: The limitations of the WSR-88D radar network for quantitative precipitation measurement over coastal western United States. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 80, 22892298.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • White, A. B., Jordan J. R. , Martner B. E. , and Bartram B. W. , 2000: Extending the dynamic range of an S-band radar for cloud and precipitation studies. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 17, 12261234.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • White, A. B., Neiman P. L. , Ralph F. M. , Kingsmill D. E. , and Persson P. , 2003: Coastal orographic rainfall processes observed by radar during the California Land-Falling Jets Experiment. J. Hydrometeor., 4, 264282.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Williams, C. R., Gage K. S. , Clark W. , and Kucera P. , 2005: Monitoring the reflectivity calibration of a scanning radar using a profiling radar and a disdrometer. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 22, 10041018.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilson, J. W., and Brandes E. A. , 1979: Radar measurement of rainfall—A summary. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 60, 10481058.

  • Zawadzki, I., 1984: Factors affecting the precision of radar measurement of rain. Preprints, 22nd Int. Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Zurich, Switzerland, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 251–256.

  • Zhang, J., and Qi Y. , 2010: A real-time algorithm for the correction of bright band effects in radar-derived precipitation estimation. J. Hydrometeor., 11, 11571171.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, J., Wang S. , and Clarke B. , 2004: WSR-88D reflectivity quality control using horizontal and vertical reflectivity structure. Preprints, 11th Conf. on Aviation, Range, and Aerospace Meteorology, Hyannis, MA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., P5.4. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/11aram22sls/techprogram/paper_81858.htm.]

  • Zhang, J., and Coauthors, 2011: National Mosaic and Multi-sensor QPE (NMQ) system: Description, results, and future plans. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 92, 13211338.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1526 580 78
PDF Downloads 520 111 9