Temporal Variability of Land–Atmosphere Coupling and Its Implications for Drought over the Southeast United States

Joshua K. Roundy Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey

Search for other papers by Joshua K. Roundy in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Craig R. Ferguson Department of Hydrology and Water Resources Engineering, Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Search for other papers by Craig R. Ferguson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Eric F. Wood Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey

Search for other papers by Eric F. Wood in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Droughts represent a significant source of social and economic damage in the southeast United States. Having sufficient warning of these extreme events enables managers to prepare for and potentially mitigate the severity of their impacts. A seasonal hydrologic forecast system can provide such warning, but current forecast skill is low during the convective season when precipitation is affected by regionally varying land surface heat flux contributions. Previous studies have classified regions into coupling regimes based on the tendency of surface soil moisture anomalies to trigger convective rainfall. Until now, these classifications have been aimed at assessing the long-term dominant feedback signal. Sufficient focus has not been placed on the temporal variability that underlies this signal. To better understand this aspect of coupling, a new classification methodology suitable at daily time scales is developed. The methodology is based on the joint probability space of surface soil moisture, convective triggering potential, and the low-level humidity index. The methodology is demonstrated over the U.S. Southeast using satellite remote sensing, reanalysis, and hydrological model data. The results show strong persistence in coupling events that is linked to the land surface state. A coupling-based drought index shows good agreement with the temporal and spatial variability of drought and highlights the role of coupling in drought recovery. The implications of the findings for drought and forecasting are discussed.

Corresponding author address: Joshua K. Roundy, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Engineering Quad, Room E2009A P, Princeton, NJ 08544. E-mail: jroundy@princeton.edu

Abstract

Droughts represent a significant source of social and economic damage in the southeast United States. Having sufficient warning of these extreme events enables managers to prepare for and potentially mitigate the severity of their impacts. A seasonal hydrologic forecast system can provide such warning, but current forecast skill is low during the convective season when precipitation is affected by regionally varying land surface heat flux contributions. Previous studies have classified regions into coupling regimes based on the tendency of surface soil moisture anomalies to trigger convective rainfall. Until now, these classifications have been aimed at assessing the long-term dominant feedback signal. Sufficient focus has not been placed on the temporal variability that underlies this signal. To better understand this aspect of coupling, a new classification methodology suitable at daily time scales is developed. The methodology is based on the joint probability space of surface soil moisture, convective triggering potential, and the low-level humidity index. The methodology is demonstrated over the U.S. Southeast using satellite remote sensing, reanalysis, and hydrological model data. The results show strong persistence in coupling events that is linked to the land surface state. A coupling-based drought index shows good agreement with the temporal and spatial variability of drought and highlights the role of coupling in drought recovery. The implications of the findings for drought and forecasting are discussed.

Corresponding author address: Joshua K. Roundy, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Engineering Quad, Room E2009A P, Princeton, NJ 08544. E-mail: jroundy@princeton.edu
Save
  • Atlas, R., Wolfson N. , and Terry J. , 1993: The effect of SST and soil-moisture anomalies on GLA model simulations of the 1988 U.S. summer drought. J. Climate, 6, 20342048.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Betts, A. K., 2004: Understanding hydrometeorology using global models. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 85, 16731688.

  • Betts, A. K., 2009: Land–surface–atmosphere coupling in observations and models. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 1, 18 pp. [Available online at http://james.agu.org/index.php/JAMES/article/view/v1n4.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dirmeyer, P. A., Koster R. D. , and Guo Z. , 2006: Do global models properly represent the feedback between land and atmosphere? J. Hydrometeor., 7, 11771198.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ducharne, A., Koster R. D. , Suarez M. J. , Stieglitz M. , and Kumar P. , 2000: A catchment-based approach to modeling land surface processes in a general circulation model: 2. Parameter estimation and model demonstration. J. Geophys. Res., 105, 24 82324 838.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ferguson, C. R., and Wood E. F. , 2011: Observed land–atmosphere coupling from satellite remote sensing and reanalysis. J. Hydrometeor., 12, 12211254.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Findell, K. L., and Eltahir E. A. B. , 2003a: Atmospheric controls on soil moisture–boundary layer interactions. Part I: Framework development. J. Hydrometeor., 4, 552569.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Findell, K. L., and Eltahir E. A. B. , 2003b: Atmospheric controls on soil moisture–boundary layer interactions. Part II: Feedbacks within the continental United States. J. Hydrometeor., 4, 570583.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Guo, Z., and Coauthors, 2006: GLACE: The Global Land–Atmosphere Coupling Experiment. Part II: Analysis. J. Hydrometeor., 7, 611625.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koster, R. D., Suarez M. J. , Ducharne A. , Stieglitz M. , and Kumar P. , 2000: A catchment-based approach to modeling land surface processes in a general circulation model: 1. Model structure. J. Geophys. Res., 105, 24 80924 822.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koster, R. D., and Coauthors, 2004: Regions of strong coupling between soil moisture and precipitation. Science, 305, 11381140.

  • Koster, R. D., and Coauthors, 2006: GLACE: The Global Land–Atmosphere Coupling Experiment. Part I: Overview. J. Hydrometeor., 7, 590610.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koster, R. D., and Coauthors, 2010: Contribution of land surface initialization to subseasonal forecast skill: First results from a multi-model experiment. Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L02402, doi:10.1029/2009GL041677.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koster, R. D., and Coauthors, 2011: The second phase of the Global Land–Atmosphere Coupling Experiment: Soil moisture contributions to subseasonal forecast skill. J. Hydrometeor., 12, 805822.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lavers, D., Luo L. F. , and Wood E. F. , 2009: A multiple model assessment of seasonal climate forecast skill for applications. Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L23711, doi:10.1029/2009GL041365.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liang, X., Lettenmaier D. P. , Wood E. F. , and Burges S. J. , 1994: A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models. J. Geophys. Res., 99, 14 41514 428.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Luo, L. F., Wood E. F. , and Pan M. , 2007: Bayesian merging of multiple climate model forecasts for seasonal hydrological predictions. J. Geophys. Res., 112, D10102, doi:10.1029/2006JD007655.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Owe, M., de Jeu R. , and Holmes T. , 2008: Multisensor historical climatology of satellite-derived global land surface moisture. J. Geophys. Res., 113, F01002, doi:10.1029/2007JF000769.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Palmer, T. N., and Anderson D. L. T. , 1994: The prospects for seasonal forecasting—A review paper. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 120, 755793.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reichle, R. H., Koster R. D. , De Lannoy G. J. M. , Forman B. A. , Liu Q. , Mahanama S. P. P. , and Toure A. , 2011: Assessment and enhancement of MERRA land surface hydrology estimates. J. Climate, 24, 63226338.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rienecker, M. M., and Coauthors, 2011: MERRA: NASA’s Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications. J. Climate, 24, 36243648.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Entekhabi D. , and Bras R. L. , 1991: Nonlinear dynamics of soil moisture at climate scales: 1. Stochastic analysis. Water Resour. Res., 27, 18991906.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Santanello, J. A., Peters-Lidard C. D. , and Kumar S. V. , 2011: Diagnosing the sensitivity of local land–atmosphere coupling via the soil moisture–boundary layer interaction. J. Hydrometeor., 12, 766786.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Seager, R., Tzanova A. , and Nakamura J. , 2009: Drought in the southeastern United States: Causes, variability over the last millennium, and the potential for future hydroclimate change. J. Climate, 22, 50215045.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sud, Y. C., Mocko D. M. , Lau K. M. , and Atlas R. , 2003: Simulating the Midwestern U.S. drought of 1988 with a GCM. J. Climate, 16, 39463965.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Susskind, J., Blaisdell J. M. , Iredell L. , and Keita F. , 2011: Improved temperature sounding and quality control methodology using AIRS/AMSU data: The AIRS Science Team Version 5 retrieval algorithm. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 49, 883907.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Svoboda, M., and Coauthors, 2002: The drought monitor. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 83, 11811190.

  • Taylor, C. M., de Jeu R. A. M. , Guichard F. , Harris P. P. , and Dorigo W. A. , 2012: Afternoon rain more likely over drier soils. Nature, 489, 423426.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Trenberth, K. E., and Guillemot C. J. , 1996: Physical processes involved in the 1988 drought and 1993 floods in North America. J. Climate, 9, 12881298.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilhite, D. A., 2000: Drought as a natural hazard: Concepts and definitions. Drought: A Global Assessment., D. A. Wilhite, Ed., Hazards and Disaster Series, Vol. 2, Routledge, 3–18.

  • Xia, Y., and Coauthors, 2012: Continental-scale water and energy flux analysis and validation for the North American Land Data Assimilation System project phase 2 (NLDAS-2): 1. Intercomparison and application of model products. J. Geophys. Res., 117, D03109, doi:10.1029/2011JD016048.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1593 778 97
PDF Downloads 1068 242 19