Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Sensitivity of Hydrological Simulations of Southeastern United States Watersheds to Temporal Aggregation of Rainfall

Satish Bastola Center for Ocean–Atmospheric Prediction Studies, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida

Search for other papers by Satish Bastola in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
Vasubandhu Misra Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, and Center for Ocean–Atmospheric Prediction Studies, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida

Search for other papers by Vasubandhu Misra in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Aug 2013
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-096.1
Page(s):
1334–1344
Restricted access

Abstract

This study investigates the sensitivity of the performance of hydrological models to certain temporal variations of precipitation over the southeastern United States (SEUS). Because of observational uncertainty in the estimates of rainfall variability at subdaily scales, the analysis is conducted with two independent rainfall datasets that resolve the diurnal variations. In addition, three hydrological models are used to account for model uncertainty. Results show that the temporal aggregation of subdaily rainfall can translate into a markedly higher volume error in flow simulated by the hydrological models. For the selected watersheds in the SEUS, the volume error is found to be high (~35%) for a 30-day aggregation in some of the selected watersheds. Hydrological models tend to underestimate flow in these watersheds with a decrease in temporal variability in precipitation. Furthermore, diminishing diurnal amplitude by removing subdaily rainfall corresponding to times of climatological daily maximum and minimum has a detrimental effect on the hydrological simulation. This theoretical experiment resulted in the underestimation of flow, with a disproportionate volume error (of as high as 77% in some watersheds). Observations indicate that over the SEUS variations of diurnal variability of rainfall explain a significant fraction of the seasonal variance throughout the year, with especially strong fractional variance explained in the boreal summer season. The results suggest that, should diurnal variations of precipitation get modulated either from anthropogenic or natural causes in the SEUS, there will be a significant impact on the streamflow in the watersheds. These conclusions are quite robust since both observational and model uncertainties have been considered in the analysis.

Corresponding author address: Vasubandhu Misra, Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, Florida State University, 1017 Academic Way, 404 Love Building, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4520. E-mail: vmisra@fsu.edu

Abstract

This study investigates the sensitivity of the performance of hydrological models to certain temporal variations of precipitation over the southeastern United States (SEUS). Because of observational uncertainty in the estimates of rainfall variability at subdaily scales, the analysis is conducted with two independent rainfall datasets that resolve the diurnal variations. In addition, three hydrological models are used to account for model uncertainty. Results show that the temporal aggregation of subdaily rainfall can translate into a markedly higher volume error in flow simulated by the hydrological models. For the selected watersheds in the SEUS, the volume error is found to be high (~35%) for a 30-day aggregation in some of the selected watersheds. Hydrological models tend to underestimate flow in these watersheds with a decrease in temporal variability in precipitation. Furthermore, diminishing diurnal amplitude by removing subdaily rainfall corresponding to times of climatological daily maximum and minimum has a detrimental effect on the hydrological simulation. This theoretical experiment resulted in the underestimation of flow, with a disproportionate volume error (of as high as 77% in some watersheds). Observations indicate that over the SEUS variations of diurnal variability of rainfall explain a significant fraction of the seasonal variance throughout the year, with especially strong fractional variance explained in the boreal summer season. The results suggest that, should diurnal variations of precipitation get modulated either from anthropogenic or natural causes in the SEUS, there will be a significant impact on the streamflow in the watersheds. These conclusions are quite robust since both observational and model uncertainties have been considered in the analysis.

Corresponding author address: Vasubandhu Misra, Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, Florida State University, 1017 Academic Way, 404 Love Building, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4520. E-mail: vmisra@fsu.edu
Save
Cover Journal of Hydrometeorology
Journal of Hydrometeorology

  • Alley, W. M., 1984: On the treatment of evapotranspiration, soil moisture accounting and aquifer recharge in monthly water balance models. Water Resour. Res., 20, 1137–1149.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bastola, S., and Misra V. , 2013: Evaluation of dynamically downscaled reanalysis precipitation data for hydrological application. Hydrol. Processes, doi:10.1002/hyp.9734, in press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bastola, S., and Murphy C. , 2013: Sensitivity of the performance of a conceptual rainfall runoff model to the temporal sampling of calibration data. Hydrol. Res., doi:10.2166/nh.2012.061, in press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bastola, S., Murphy C. , and Sweeney J. , 2011a: The role of hydrological modelling uncertainties in climate change impact assessments of Irish river catchments. Adv. Water Resour., 34, 562–567, doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.01.008.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bastola, S., Murphy C. , and Sweeney J. , 2011b: Evaluation of the transferability of hydrological model parameters for simulations under changed climatic conditions. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 8, 5891–5915, doi:10.5194/hessd-8-5891-2011.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Beven, K., and Binley A. M. , 1992: The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrol. Processes, 6, 279–298.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Blöschl, G., and Sivapalan M. , 1995: Scale issues in hydrological modelling: A review. Hydrol. Processes, 9, 251–290.

  • Boyle, D., 2001: Multicriteria calibration of hydrologicalmodels. PhD dissertation, Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona.

  • Christensen, J. H., and Christensen O. B. , 2003: Climate modelling: Severe summertime flooding in Europe. Nature, 421, 805–806.

  • Clark, A. J., Gallus W. A. , and Chen T.-C. , 2007: Comparison of the diurnal precipitation cycle in convection-resolving and non-convection-resolving mesoscale models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 3456–3473.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cullmann, J., Mishra V. , and Peters R. , 2006: Flow analysis with WaSiM-ETH—Model parameter sensitivity at different scales. Adv. Geosci., 9, 73–77, doi:10.5194/adgeo-9-73-2006.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Finnerty, B. D., Smith B. M. , Seo D. J. , Koren V. , and Moglen G. E. , 1997: Space–time scale sensitivity of the Sacramento model to radar gauge precipitation inputs. J. Hydrol., 203, 21–38.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Giambelluca, T. W., and Oki D. S. , 1987: Temporal disaggregation of monthly rainfall data for water balance modeling. IAHS Publ., 168, 255–267.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Janowiak, J. E., Kousky V. E. , and Joyce R. J. , 2005: Diurnal cycle of precipitation determined from the CMORPH high spatial and temporal resolution global precipitation analyses. J. Geophys. Res., 110, D23105, doi:10.1029/2005JD006156.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Joyce, R. J., Janowiak J. E. , Arkin P. A. , and Xie P. , 2004: CMORPH: A method that produces global precipitation estimates from passive microwave and infrared data at high spatial and temporal resolution. J. Hydrometeor., 5, 487–503.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Klemes, V., 1986: Operational testing of hydrologic simulation models. Hydrol. Sci. J., 31, 13–24.

  • Krajewski, W. F., Lakshmi V. , Georgakakos K. P. , and Jai S. C. , 1991: A monte carlo study of rainfall sampling effect on a distributed catchment model. Water Resour. Res., 27, 119–128.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lin, Y., and Mitchell K. E. , 2005: The NCEP Stage II/IV hourly precipitation analyses: Development and applications. Preprints, 19th Conf. on Hydrology, San Diego, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 1.2. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/83847.pdf.]

  • Littlewood, I. G., and Croke B. F. W. , 2008: Data time-step dependency of conceptual rainfall-streamflow model parameters: An empirical study with implications for regionalization. Hydrol. Sci. J., 53, 685–695.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Madsen, H., 2000: Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall–runoff model using multiple objectives. J. Hydrol., 235, 276–288.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Maraun, D., and Coauthors, 2010: Precipitation downscaling under climate change: Recent developments to bridge the gap between dynamical models and the end user. Rev. Geophys., 48, RG3003, doi:10.1029/2009RG000314.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Meehl, G. A., and Coauthors, 2007: Global climate projections. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, S. Solomon et al., Eds., Cambridge University Press, 747–845.

  • Michaud, J. D., and Sorooshian S. , 1994: Comparison of simple versus complex distributed runoff models on a semiarid watershed. Water Resour. Res., 30, 593–605.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Misra, V., Moeller L. , Stefanova L. , Chan S. , O'Brien J. J. , Smith T. J. III, and Plant N. , 2011: The influence of the Atlantic Warm Pool on the Florida panhandle sea breeze. J. Geophys. Res., 116, D00Q06, doi:10.1029/2010JD015367.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe J. V. , 1970: River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol., 10, 282–290.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • O'Loughlin, F., Bruen M. , and Wagener T. , 2013: Parameter sensitivity of a watershed-scale flood forecasting model as a function of modelling time-step. Hydrol. Res., 44, 334–350, doi:10.2166/nh.2012.157.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schaake, J., Cong S. , and Duan Q. , 2006. U.S Mopex data set, IAHS Publ.,307, 9–28. [Available online at https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/333681.pdf.]

  • STARDEX, 2004. STARDEX diagnostic extremes indices software user information. STARDEX Doc., 15 pp. [Available online at http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/projects/stardex/deis/Diagnostic_tool.pdf.]

  • Stefanova, L., Misra V. , Chan S. , Griffin M. , O'Brien J. J. , and Smith T. J. III, 2012: A proxy for high-resolution regional reanalysis for the southeast United States: Assessment of precipitation variability in dynamically downscaled reanalyses. Climate Dyn., 38, 2449–2466, doi:10.1007/s00382-011-1230-y.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sugawara, M., 1995: Tank model. Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, V. P. Singh, Ed., Water Resource Publications, 165–214.

  • Wagener, T., 2007: Can we model the hydrologic implications of environmental change? Hydrol. Processes, 21, 3233–3236, doi:10.1002/hyp.6873.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wang, Y., He B. , and Takase K. , 2009: Effects of temporal resolution on hydrological model parameters and its impact on prediction of river discharge. Hydrol. Sci. J., 54, 886–898.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wu, Z., and Huang N. E. , 2009: Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: A noise-assisted data analysis method. Adv. Adapt. Data Anal., 1, 1–41.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wu, Z., Huang N. E. , Wallace J. M. , Smoliak B. V. , and Chen X. , 2011: On the time-varying trend in global-mean surface temperature. Climate Dyn., 37, 759–773, doi:10.1007/s00382-011-1128-8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 87 0 0
Full Text Views 520 341 35
PDF Downloads 98 43 7