The Importance of Spring and Autumn Atmospheric Conditions for the Evaporation Regime of Lake Superior

C. Spence Environment Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Search for other papers by C. Spence in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
P. D. Blanken Department of Geography, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by P. D. Blanken in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
J. D. Lenters School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska

Search for other papers by J. D. Lenters in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
N. Hedstrom Environment Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Search for other papers by N. Hedstrom in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Feedbacks between ice extent and evaporation have long been suspected to be important for Lake Superior evaporation because it is during autumn and winter when latent heat fluxes are highest. Recent direct measurements of evaporation made at the Stannard Rock Lighthouse have provided new information on the physical controls on Lake Superior evaporation, in particular that evaporation can react within hours to days to a change in synoptic conditions. However, the large heat capacity of the lake creates a strong seasonal cycle of energy storage and release. There is a complex interaction among heat storage, evaporation, and ice cover that is highly dependent on atmospheric conditions in the spring and autumn “shoulder seasons.” Small changes in conditions in November and March caused by synoptic-scale events can have profound impacts on annual evaporation, the extent of ice cover, and the length of the ice-covered period. Early winter air temperatures in November and December dictate the nature of ice formation and much of the winter evaporative flux. Decreased ice cover, by itself, does not necessarily lead to enhanced annual evaporation losses. Rather, a combination of low ice cover and warm spring air temperatures, leading to an early breakup, can significantly lengthen the next evaporation season and cause greater cumulative water loss the subsequent year. The influence of individual synoptic events on annual evaporation is notable enough that the research community should ensure that their role is properly captured in numerical models to provide sound predictions of future Laurentian Great Lakes evaporation regimes.

Corresponding author address: Christopher Spence, Environment Canada, 11 Innovation Blvd., Saskatoon, SK S7N 3H5, Canada. E-mail: chris.spence@ec.gc.ca

Abstract

Feedbacks between ice extent and evaporation have long been suspected to be important for Lake Superior evaporation because it is during autumn and winter when latent heat fluxes are highest. Recent direct measurements of evaporation made at the Stannard Rock Lighthouse have provided new information on the physical controls on Lake Superior evaporation, in particular that evaporation can react within hours to days to a change in synoptic conditions. However, the large heat capacity of the lake creates a strong seasonal cycle of energy storage and release. There is a complex interaction among heat storage, evaporation, and ice cover that is highly dependent on atmospheric conditions in the spring and autumn “shoulder seasons.” Small changes in conditions in November and March caused by synoptic-scale events can have profound impacts on annual evaporation, the extent of ice cover, and the length of the ice-covered period. Early winter air temperatures in November and December dictate the nature of ice formation and much of the winter evaporative flux. Decreased ice cover, by itself, does not necessarily lead to enhanced annual evaporation losses. Rather, a combination of low ice cover and warm spring air temperatures, leading to an early breakup, can significantly lengthen the next evaporation season and cause greater cumulative water loss the subsequent year. The influence of individual synoptic events on annual evaporation is notable enough that the research community should ensure that their role is properly captured in numerical models to provide sound predictions of future Laurentian Great Lakes evaporation regimes.

Corresponding author address: Christopher Spence, Environment Canada, 11 Innovation Blvd., Saskatoon, SK S7N 3H5, Canada. E-mail: chris.spence@ec.gc.ca
Save
  • Angel, J. R., and Kunkel K. E. , 2010: The response of Great Lakes water levels to future climate scenarios with an emphasis on Lake Michigan-Huron. J. Great Lakes Res., 36, 5158.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Assel, R. A., Quinn F. H. , and Sellinger C. E. , 2004: Hydroclimatic factors of the recent recod drop in Laurentian Great Lakes water levels. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 85, 11431146.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Austin, J. A., and Colman S. M. , 2007: Lake Superior summer water temperatures are increasing more rapidly than regional air temperatures: A positive ice-albedo feedback. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L06604, doi:10.1029/2006GL029021.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baldocchi, D. D., Hicks B. B. , and Meyers T. P. , 1988: Measuring biosphere–atmosphere exchanges of biologically related gases with micrometeorological methods. Ecology, 69, 13311340.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Beletsky, D., Saylor J. H. , and Schwab D. J. , 1999: Mean circulation in the Great Lakes. J. Great Lakes Res., 25, 7893.

  • Blanken, P. D., and Coauthors, 2000: Eddy covariance measurements of evaporation from Great Slave Lake, Northwest Territories, Canada. Water Resour. Res., 36, 10691077.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Blanken, P. D., Spence C. , Hedstrom N. , and Lenters J. D. , 2011: Evaporation from Lake Superior: 1. Physical controls and processes. J. Great Lakes Res., 37, 707716.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Croley, T. E., and Assel R. A. , 2002: Great Lakes evaporation model sensitivities and errors. Proc. Second Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modeling Conference. Las Vegas, NV, Subcommittee on Hydrology of the Interagency Advisory Committee on Water Data, 12 pp. [Available online at http://www.glerl.noaa.gov/pubs/fulltext/2002/20020004.pdf.]

  • Derecki, J. A., 1981: Operational estimates of Lake Superior evaporation based on IFYGL findings. Water Resour. Res., 17, 14531462.

  • Desai, A. R., Austin J. A. , Bennington V. , and McKinley G. A. , 2009: Stronger winds over a large lake in response to weakening air-to-lake temperature gradient. Nat. Geosci., 2, 855858.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gerbush, M. R., Kristovich D. A. R. , and Laird N. F. , 2008: Mesoscale boundary layer and heat flux variations over pack ice–covered Lake Erie. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 47, 668682.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gronewold, A. D., Clites A. H. , Hunter T. S. , and Stow C. A. , 2011: An appraisal of the Great Lakes advanced hydrologic prediction system. J. Great Lakes Res., 37, 577583.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hanrahan, J. L., Kravtsov S. V. , and Roebber P. J. , 2010: Connecting past and present climate variability to the water levels of Lakes Michigan and Huron. Geophys. Res. Lett.,37, L01701, doi:10.1029/2009GL041707.

  • Horst, T. W., 1997: A simple formula for attenuation of eddy fluxes measured with first order response scalar sensors. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 94, 517520.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kundzewicz, Z. W., and Stakhiv E. Z. , 2010: Are climate models “ready for prime time” in water resources management applications, or is more research needed? Hydrol. Sci. J., 55, 10851089.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Laird, N. F., and Kristovich D. A. R. , 2002: Variations of sensible and latent heat fluxes from a Great Lakes buoy and associated synoptic weather patterns. J. Hydrometeor., 3, 312.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lenters, J. D., 2004: Trends in Lake Superior water budget since 1948: A weakening seasonal cycle. J. Great Lakes Res., 30, 2040.

  • Lofgren, B. M., and Zhu Y. , 2000: Surface energy fluxes on the Great Lakes based on satellite observed surface temperatures 1992 to 1995. J. Great Lakes Res., 26, 305314.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Massman, W. J., 2000: A simple method for estimating frequency response corrections for eddy covariance systems. Agric. For. Meteor., 104, 185198.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mishra, V., Cherkauer K. A. , and Bowling L. C. , 2011: Changing thermal feedbacks in the Great Lakes region: Role of ice cover feedbacks. Global Planet. Change, 75, 155172.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Morton, F. I., 1967: Evaporation from large deep lakes. Water Resour. Res., 3, 181200.

  • Neff, B. P., and Nicholas J. R. , 2005: Uncertainty in the Great Lakes water balance. USGS Scientific Investigations Rep. 2004-5100, 42 pp. [Available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2004/5100/pdf/SIR2004-5100.pdf.]

  • Schertzer, W. M., 1978: Energy budget and monthly evaporation estimates for Lake Superior, 1973. J. Great Lakes Res., 4, 320330.

  • Schuepp, P. H., LeClerc M. Y. , MacPherson J. L. , and Desjardines R. L. , 1990: Footprint prediction of scalar fluxes from analytical solutions of the diffusion equation. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 36, 355373.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Spence, C., Blanken P. D. , Hedstrom N. , Fortin V. , and Wilson H. , 2011: Evaporation from Lake Superior: 2. Spatial distribution and variability. J. Great Lakes Res., 37, 717724.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stow, C. A., Lamon E. C. , Kratz T. K. , and Sellinger C. E. , 2008: Lake level coherence supports common driver. Eos, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, 89, 389390.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tanny, J., Cohen S. , Assouline S. , Lange F. , Grava A. , Berger D. , Teltch B. , and Parlange M. B. , 2007: Evaporation from a small water reservoir: Direct measurements and estimates. J. Hydrol., 351, 218229.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, J., Bai X. , Leshkevich G. , Colton M. , Clites A. , and Lofgren B. , 2010: Severe ice cover on Great Lakes during winter 2008–2009. Eos, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, 91, 4142.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, J., Bai X. , Hu H. , Clites A. , Colton M. , and Lofgren B. , 2012: Temporal and spatial variability of Great Lakes ice cover, 1973–2010. J. Climate, 25, 13181329.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Webb, E. K., Pearman G. I. , and Leuning R. , 1980: Correction of flux measurements for density effects due to heat and water vapour transfer. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,106, 85–100.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 397 0 0
Full Text Views 917 538 62
PDF Downloads 322 98 13