Variations in Streamflow Response to Large Hurricane-Season Storms in a Southeastern U.S. Watershed

Xing Chen Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Xing Chen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Mukesh Kumar Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Mukesh Kumar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Brian L. McGlynn Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Brian L. McGlynn in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Floods caused by hurricane storms are responsible for tremendous economic and property losses in the United States. To minimize flood damages associated with large hurricane-season storms, it is important to be able to predict streamflow amount in response to storms for a range of hydroclimatological conditions. However, this is challenging considering that streamflow response exhibits appreciable variability even for hurricane-season storms that deliver similar precipitation amounts. As such, better estimates of event responses require refined understanding of the causes of flood response variability. Here, a physically based, distributed hydrologic model and supporting hydrologic datasets are used to identify and evaluate dominant hydrologic controls on streamflow amount variability. The analysis indicates that variability in flood response in the Lake Michie watershed is primarily driven by antecedent soil moisture conditions near the land surface and evapotranspiration during postevent streamflow recession periods, which in turn is a function of precipitation history and prevailing vegetation and meteorological conditions. Presented results and ensuing analyses could help prioritize measurements during observation campaigns and could aid in risk management by providing look-up diagrams to quickly evaluate flood responses given prior information about hurricane storm size.

Corresponding author address: Mukesh Kumar, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, 450 Research Dr., LSRC A207A, Durham, NC 27708. E-mail: mukesh.kumar@duke.edu

Abstract

Floods caused by hurricane storms are responsible for tremendous economic and property losses in the United States. To minimize flood damages associated with large hurricane-season storms, it is important to be able to predict streamflow amount in response to storms for a range of hydroclimatological conditions. However, this is challenging considering that streamflow response exhibits appreciable variability even for hurricane-season storms that deliver similar precipitation amounts. As such, better estimates of event responses require refined understanding of the causes of flood response variability. Here, a physically based, distributed hydrologic model and supporting hydrologic datasets are used to identify and evaluate dominant hydrologic controls on streamflow amount variability. The analysis indicates that variability in flood response in the Lake Michie watershed is primarily driven by antecedent soil moisture conditions near the land surface and evapotranspiration during postevent streamflow recession periods, which in turn is a function of precipitation history and prevailing vegetation and meteorological conditions. Presented results and ensuing analyses could help prioritize measurements during observation campaigns and could aid in risk management by providing look-up diagrams to quickly evaluate flood responses given prior information about hurricane storm size.

Corresponding author address: Mukesh Kumar, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, 450 Research Dr., LSRC A207A, Durham, NC 27708. E-mail: mukesh.kumar@duke.edu
Save
  • Ashley, S. T., and Ashley W. S. , 2008: Flood fatalities in the United States. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 47, 805–818, doi:10.1175/2007JAMC1611.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bhatt, G., Kumar M. , and Duffy C. J. , 2008: Bridging the gap between geohydrologic data and integrated hydrologic modeling. Proc. iEMSs 2008: Int. Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol. 2, Barcelona, Spain, International Environmental Modelling and Software Society, 743–750. [Available online at www.iemss.org/iemss2008/uploads/Main/Vol2-iEMSs2008-Proceedings.pdf.]

  • Bhatt, G., Kumar M. , and Duffy C. J. , 2014: A tightly coupled GIS and distributed hydrologic modeling framework. Environ. Modell. Software, 62, 70–84, doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.08.003.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Blake, E. S., Landsea C. W. , and Gibney E. J. , 2007: The deadliest, costliest, and most intense United States tropical cyclones from 1851 to 2006 (and other frequently requested hurricane facts). NOAA Tech. Memo. NWS TPC-5, 43 pp. [Available online at www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/NWS-TPC-5.pdf.]

  • Carney, C. B., and Hardy A. V. , 1967: North Carolina hurricanes: A listing and description of tropical cyclones which have affected the state. Rev. ed. U.S. Government Printing Office, 40 pp.

  • Castillo, V. M., Gomez-Plaza A. , and Martinez-Mena M. , 2003: The role of antecedent soil water content in the runoff response of semiarid catchments: A simulation approach. J. Hydrol., 284, 114–130, doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00264-6.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Changnon, S., 2009: Characteristics of severe Atlantic hurricanes in the United States: 1949–2006. Nat. Hazards, 48, 329–337, doi:10.1007/s11069-008-9265-z.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Changnon, S., and Changnon J. , 1992: Temporal fluctuations in weather disasters: 1950–1989. Climatic Change, 22, 191–208, doi:10.1007/BF00143027.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dale, V. H., and Coauthors, 2001: Climate change and forest disturbances: Climate change can affect forests by altering the frequency, intensity, duration, and timing of fire, drought, introduced species, insect and pathogen outbreaks, hurricanes, windstorms, ice storms, or landslides. BioScience, 51, 723–734, doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0723:CCAFD]2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Easterling, D. R., Meehl G. A. , Parmesan C. , Changnon S. A. , Karl T. R. , and Mearns L. O. , 2000: Climate extremes: Observations, modeling, and impacts. Science, 289, 2068–2074, doi:10.1126/science.289.5487.2068.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Elsenbeer, H., Lorieri D. , and Bonell M. , 1995: Mixing model approaches to estimate storm flow sources in an overland flow-dominated tropical rain forest catchment. Water Resour. Res., 31, 2267–2278, doi:10.1029/95WR01651.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Elsner, J. B., 2007: Granger causality and Atlantic hurricanes. Tellus, 59A, 476–485, doi:10.1111/j.1600-0870.2007.00244.x.

  • Emanuel, K. A., 1987: The dependence of hurricane intensity on climate. Nature, 326, 483–485, doi:10.1038/326483a0.

  • Emanuel, K. A., Sundararajan R. , and Williams J. , 2008: Hurricanes and global warming: Results from downscaling IPCC AR4 simulations. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 89, 347–367, doi:10.1175/BAMS-89-3-347.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goldenberg, S. B., Landsea C. W. , Mestas-Nuñez A. M. , and Gray W. M. , 2001: The recent increase in Atlantic hurricane activity: Causes and implications. Science, 293, 474–479, doi:10.1126/science.1060040.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hardy, A. V., and Carney C. B. , 1963: North Carolina hurricanes: A descriptive listing of tropical cyclones which have affected the state. U.S. Government Printing Office, 26 pp.

  • Jones, J. P., Sudicky E. A. , and McLaren R. G. , 2008: Application of a fully-integrated surface–subsurface flow model at the watershed-scale: A case study. Water Resour. Res., 44, W03407, doi:10.1029/2006WR005603.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Knutson, T. R., and Tuleya R. E. , 2004: Impact of CO2-induced warming on simulated hurricane intensity and precipitation: Sensitivity to the choice of climate model and convective parameterization. J. Climate, 17, 3477–3495, doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<3477:IOCWOS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kopec, R. J., and Clay J. W. , 1975: Climate and air quality. North Carolina Atlas: Portrait of a Changing Southern State, J. W. Clay, D. M. Orr Jr., and A. W. Stuart, Eds., University of North Carolina Press, 92–111 pp.

  • Kumar, M., 2009: Toward a hydrologic modeling system. Ph.D. thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, 274 pp.

  • Kumar, M., Bhatt G. , and Duffy C. J. , 2009a: An efficient domain decomposition framework for accurate representation of geodata in distributed hydrologic models. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 23, 1569–1596, doi:10.1080/13658810802344143.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kumar, M., Duffy C. J. , and Salvage K. M. , 2009b: A second-order accurate, finite volume-based, integrated hydrologic modeling (FIHM) framework for simulation of surface and subsurface flow. Vadose Zone J., 8, 873–890, doi:10.2136/vzj2009.0014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kumar, M., Bhatt G. , and Duffy C. J. , 2010: An object-oriented shared data model for GIS and distributed hydrologic models. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 24, 1061–1079, doi:10.1080/13658810903289460.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Landsea, C., 2007: Counting Atlantic tropical cyclones back to 1900. Eos, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, 88, 197–202, doi:10.1029/2007EO180001.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mann, M. E., and Emanuel K. A. , 2006: Atlantic hurricane trends linked to climate change. Eos, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, 87, 233–241, doi:10.1029/2006EO240001.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mitchell, K. E., and Coauthors, 2004: The multi-institution North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS): Utilizing multiple GCIP products and partners in a continental distributed hydrological modeling system. J. Geophys. Res., 109, D07S90, doi:10.1029/2003JD003823.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MRLC, cited 2013: National Land Cover Database 2006. [Available online at www.mrlc.gov/nlcd2006.php.]

  • NCDWR, cited 2014: Ground water level database detail. North Carolina Division of Water Resources. [Available online at http://ncwater.org/Data_and_Modeling/Ground_Water_Databases/leveldetail.php?quado=F**43X1.]

  • NOAA, cited 2013a: Preliminary report: Hurricane Fran. [Available online at www.nhc.noaa.gov/1996fran.html.]

  • NOAA, cited 2013b: Historical hurricane tracks. [Available online at http://coast.noaa.gov/hurricanes/.]

  • Pielke, R. A., Landsea C. , Mayfield M. , Laver J. , and Pasch R. , 2005: Hurricanes and global warming. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 86, 1571–1575, doi:10.1175/BAMS-86-11-1571.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Qu, Y., and Duffy C. J. , 2007: A semidiscrete finite volume formulation for multiprocess watershed simulation. Water Resour. Res., 43, W08419, doi:10.1029/2006WR005752.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Refsgaard, J. C., and Storm B. , 1996: Construction, calibration and validation of hydrological models. Distributed Hydrological Modelling, M. Abbott and J. Refsgaard, Eds., Springer, 41–54.

  • Salinger, M. J., 2005: Climate variability and change: Past, present and future—An overview. Climatic Change, 70, 9–29, doi:10.1007/s10584-005-5936-x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Saunders, M. A., Chandler R. E. , Merchant C. J. , and Roberts F. P. , 2000: Atlantic hurricanes and NW Pacific typhoons: ENSO spatial impacts on occurrence and landfall. Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 1147–1150, doi:10.1029/1999GL010948.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SCONC, cited 2014a: Tropical cyclones that have affected the southeastern US. State Climate Office of North Carolina. [Available online at www.nc-climate.ncsu.edu/climate/hurricanes/affecting.php?state=NC&buffer=150.]

  • SCONC, cited 2014b: NC CRONOS Database: North Durham Water Reclamation Facility (DURH). State Climate Office of North Carolina. [Available online at http://hatteras.meas.ncsu.edu/cronos/?station=DURH&temporal=daily.]

  • Soil Survey Staff, cited 2013: Web soil survey. Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. [Available online at http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/.]

  • Stoy, P. C., and Coauthors, 2006: Separating the effects of climate and vegetation on evapotranspiration along a successional chronosequence in the southeastern US. Global Change Biol., 12, 2115–2135, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01244.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sturdevant-Rees, P., Smith J. A. , Morrison J. , and Baeck M. L. , 2001: Tropical storms and the flood hydrology of the central Appalachians. Water Resour. Res., 37, 2143–2168, doi:10.1029/2000WR900310.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tramblay, Y., Bouvier C. , Martin C. , Didon-Lescot J.-F. , Todorovik D. , and Domergue J.-M. , 2010: Assessment of initial soil moisture conditions for event-based rainfall–runoff modelling. J. Hydrol., 387, 176–187, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.04.006.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Weaver, J. C., 1994: Sediment characteristic and sedimentation rates in Lake Michie, Durham County, North Carolina, 1990–92. USGS Water-Resources Investigations Rep. 94-4123, 38 pp.

  • Webster, P. J., Holland G. J. , Curry J. A. , and Chang H.-R. , 2005: Changes in tropical cyclone number, duration, and intensity in a warming environment. Science, 309, 1844–1846, doi:10.1126/science.1116448.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wood, E. F., 1976: An analysis of the effects of parameter uncertainty in deterministic hydrologic models. Water Resour. Res., 12, 925–932, doi:10.1029/WR012i005p00925.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xia, Y., and Coauthors, 2012: Continental-scale water and energy flux analysis and validation for the North American Land Data Assimilation System project phase 2 (NLDAS-2): 1. Intercomparison and application of model products. J. Geophys. Res., 117, D03109, doi:10.1029/2011JD016048.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 516 147 12
PDF Downloads 327 109 2