Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Are General Circulation Models Ready for Operational Streamflow Forecasting for Water Management in the Ganges and Brahmaputra River Basins?

Safat Sikder Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for other papers by Safat Sikder in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Xiaodong Chen Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for other papers by Xiaodong Chen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Faisal Hossain Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for other papers by Faisal Hossain in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Jason B. Roberts National Space Science Technology Center, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama

Search for other papers by Jason B. Roberts in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Franklin Robertson National Space Science Technology Center, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama

Search for other papers by Franklin Robertson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
C. K. Shum Division of Geodetic Science, School of Earth Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, and Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China

Search for other papers by C. K. Shum in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Francis J. Turk Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California

Search for other papers by Francis J. Turk in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Feb 2016
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-14-0099.1
Page(s):
195–210
Restricted access

Abstract

This study asks the question of whether GCMs are ready to be operationalized for streamflow forecasting in South Asian river basins, and if so, at what temporal scales and for which water management decisions are they likely to be relevant? The authors focused on the Ganges, Brahmaputra, and Meghna basins for which there is a gridded hydrologic model calibrated for the 2002–10 period. The North American Multimodel Ensemble (NMME) suite of eight GCM hindcasts was applied to generate precipitation forecasts for each month of the 1982–2012 (30 year) period at up to 6 months of lead time, which were then downscaled according to the bias-corrected statistical downscaling (BCSD) procedure to daily time steps. A global retrospective forcing dataset was used for this downscaling procedure. The study clearly revealed that a regionally consistent forcing for BCSD, which is currently unavailable for the region, is one of the primary conditions to realize reasonable skill in streamflow forecasting. In terms of relative RMSE (normalized by reference flow obtained from the global retrospective forcings used in downscaling), streamflow forecast uncertainty (RMSE) was found to be 38%–50% at monthly scale and 22%–35% at seasonal (3 monthly) scale. The Ganges River (regulated) experienced higher uncertainty than the Brahmaputra River (unregulated). In terms of anomaly correlation coefficient (ACC), the streamflow forecasting at seasonal (3 monthly) scale was found to have less uncertainty (>0.3) than at monthly scale (<0.25). The forecast skill in the Brahmaputra basin showed more improvement when the time horizon was aggregated from monthly to seasonal than the Ganges basin. Finally, the skill assessment for the individual seasons revealed that the flow forecasting using NMME data had less uncertainty during monsoon season (July–September) in the Brahmaputra basin and in postmonsoon season (October–December) in the Ganges basin. Overall, the study indicated that GCMs can have value for management decisions only at seasonal or annual water balance applications at best if appropriate historical forcings are used in downscaling. The take-home message of this study is that GCMs are not yet ready for prime-time operationalization for a wide variety of multiscale water management decisions for the Ganges and Brahmaputra River basins.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Faisal Hossain, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, 201 More Hall, Box 352700, Seattle, WA 98195. E-mail: fhossain@uw.edu

Abstract

This study asks the question of whether GCMs are ready to be operationalized for streamflow forecasting in South Asian river basins, and if so, at what temporal scales and for which water management decisions are they likely to be relevant? The authors focused on the Ganges, Brahmaputra, and Meghna basins for which there is a gridded hydrologic model calibrated for the 2002–10 period. The North American Multimodel Ensemble (NMME) suite of eight GCM hindcasts was applied to generate precipitation forecasts for each month of the 1982–2012 (30 year) period at up to 6 months of lead time, which were then downscaled according to the bias-corrected statistical downscaling (BCSD) procedure to daily time steps. A global retrospective forcing dataset was used for this downscaling procedure. The study clearly revealed that a regionally consistent forcing for BCSD, which is currently unavailable for the region, is one of the primary conditions to realize reasonable skill in streamflow forecasting. In terms of relative RMSE (normalized by reference flow obtained from the global retrospective forcings used in downscaling), streamflow forecast uncertainty (RMSE) was found to be 38%–50% at monthly scale and 22%–35% at seasonal (3 monthly) scale. The Ganges River (regulated) experienced higher uncertainty than the Brahmaputra River (unregulated). In terms of anomaly correlation coefficient (ACC), the streamflow forecasting at seasonal (3 monthly) scale was found to have less uncertainty (>0.3) than at monthly scale (<0.25). The forecast skill in the Brahmaputra basin showed more improvement when the time horizon was aggregated from monthly to seasonal than the Ganges basin. Finally, the skill assessment for the individual seasons revealed that the flow forecasting using NMME data had less uncertainty during monsoon season (July–September) in the Brahmaputra basin and in postmonsoon season (October–December) in the Ganges basin. Overall, the study indicated that GCMs can have value for management decisions only at seasonal or annual water balance applications at best if appropriate historical forcings are used in downscaling. The take-home message of this study is that GCMs are not yet ready for prime-time operationalization for a wide variety of multiscale water management decisions for the Ganges and Brahmaputra River basins.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Faisal Hossain, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, 201 More Hall, Box 352700, Seattle, WA 98195. E-mail: fhossain@uw.edu
Save
Cover Journal of Hydrometeorology
Journal of Hydrometeorology

  • Adler, R. F., and Coauthors, 2003: The version 2 Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) monthly precipitation analysis (1979–present). J. Hydrometeor., 4, 1147–1167, doi:10.1175/1525-7541(2003)004<1147:TVGPCP>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Alexander, M. A., Bladé I. , Newman M. , Lanzante J. R. , Lau N. C. , and Scott J. D. , 2002: The atmospheric bridge: The influence of ENSO teleconnections on air–sea interaction over the global oceans. J. Climate, 15, 2205–2231, doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<2205:TABTIO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Becker, E. J., van den Dool H. , and Peña M. , 2013: Short-term climate extremes: Prediction skill and predictability. J. Climate, 26, 512–531, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00177.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Byerlee, D., 1992: Technical change, productivity, and sustainability in irrigated cropping systems of South Asia: Emerging issues in the post-green revolution era. J. Int. Dev., 4, 477–496, doi:10.1002/jid.3380040502.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • CEGIS, 2007: Sustainable end-to-end climate/flood forecast application through pilot projects showing measurable improvements. CEGIS Rep., 78 pp. [Available online at http://ral.ucar.edu/~hopson/NSF_SEES/UNL/Draft%20Final%20report_Training%20Module_Flood%20Risk%20Mangt.pdf.]

  • Chowdhury, M. R., and Ward N. , 2004: Hydro-meteorological variability in the greater Ganges–Brahmaputra–Meghna basins. Int. J. Climatol., 24, 1495–1508, doi:10.1002/joc.1076.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Costa-Cabral, M. C., Richey J. E. , Goteti G. , Lettenmaier D. P. , and Feldkötter C. , 2008: Landscape structure and use, climate, and water movement in the Mekong River basin. Hydrol. Processes, 22, 1731–1746, doi:10.1002/hyp.6740.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dyurgerov, M. B., and Meier M. F. , 2005: Glaciers and the changing earth system: A 2004 snapshot. Occasional Paper No. 58, INSTAAR, University of Colorado, 116 pp. [Available online at http://instaar.colorado.edu/uploads/occasional-papers/OP58_dyurgerov_meier.pdf.]

  • Funk, C., Hoell A. , Shukla S. , Bladé I. , Liebmann B. , Roberts J. B. , Robertson F. R. , and Husak G. , 2014: Predicting East African spring droughts using Pacific and Indian Ocean sea surface temperature indices. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 4965–4978, doi:10.5194/hess-18-4965-2014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hagedorn, R., Doblas-Reyes F. , and Palmer T. , 2005: The rationale behind the success of multi-model ensembles in seasonal forecasting—I. Basic concept. Tellus, 57A, 219–233, doi:10.1111/j.1600-0870.2005.00103.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hamlet, A. F., and Lettenmaier D. P. , 1999a: Effects of climate change on hydrology and water resources in the Columbia River basin. J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc., 35, 1597–1623, doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1999.tb04240.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hamlet, A. F., and Lettenmaier D. P. , 1999b: Columbia River streamflow forecasting based on ENSO and PDO climate signals. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 125, 333–341, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1999)125:6(333).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hopson, T. M., and Webster P. J. , 2010: A 1–10 day ensemble forecasting scheme for the major river basins of Bangladesh: Forecasting severe floods of 2003–07. J. Hydrometeor., 11, 618–641, doi:10.1175/2009JHM1006.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hossain, F., 2014: Paradox of peak flows in a changing climate. J. Hydrol. Eng., 19, 02514001, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001059.

  • Hossain, F., and Katiyar N. , 2006: Improving flood forecasting in international river basins. Eos, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, 87 (5), 49–50, doi:10.1029/2006EO050001.

  • Hossain, F., Siddique-E-Akbor A. H. , Mazumder L. C. , ShahNewaz S. M. , Biancamaria S. , Lee H. , and Shum C. K. , 2013: Proof of concept of an altimeter-based river forecasting system for transboundary flow inside Bangladesh. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Remote Sens., 7, 587–601, doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2013.2283402.

  • Hossain, F., and Coauthors, 2014: Crossing the “Valley of Death”: Lessons learned from implementing an operational satellite-based flood forecasting system. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 95, 1201–1207, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00176.1.

  • IPCC, 2013: What is a GCM? Data Distribution Centre, IPCC, accessed 13 March 2014. [Available online at http://www.ipcc-data.org/guidelines/pages/gcm_guide.html.]

  • Jian, J., Webster P. J. , and Hoyos C. D. , 2009: Large-scale controls on Ganges and Brahmaputra river discharge on intraseasonal and seasonal time-scales. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 135, 353–370, doi:10.1002/qj.384.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kirtman, B. P., and Coauthors, 2014: The North American Multimodel Ensemble: Phase-1 seasonal-to-interannual prediction; Phase-2 toward developing intraseasonal prediction. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 95, 585–601, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00050.1.

  • Klein, S. A., Soden B. J. , and Lau N.-C. , 1999: Remote sea surface temperature variations during ENSO: Evidence for a tropical atmospheric bridge. J. Climate, 12, 917–932, doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<0917:RSSTVD>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kundzewicz, Z. W., and Stakhiv E. Z. , 2010: Are climate models “ready for prime time” in water resources management applications, or is more research needed? Hydrol. Sci. J., 55, 1085–1089, doi:10.1080/02626667.2010.513211.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Liang, X., Lettenmaier D. P. , Wood E. F. , and Burges S. J. . 1994: A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models. J. Geophys. Res., 99, 14 415–14 428, doi:10.1029/94JD00483.

  • Lohmann, D., Raschke E. , Nijssen B. , and Lettenmaier D. P. , 1998: Regional scale hydrology: I. Formulation of the VIC-2L model coupled to a routing model. Hydrol. Sci. J., 43, 131–141, doi:10.1080/02626669809492107.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mirza, M. Q. M., 1998: Diversion of the Ganges water at Farakka and its effects on salinity in Bangladesh. Environ. Manage., 22, 711–722, doi:10.1007/s002679900141.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Misra, A. K., Saxena A. , Yaduvanshi M. , Mishra A. , Bhauduriya Y. , and Takur A. , 2007: Proposed river linking project of India: Boon or bane to nature? Environ. Geol., 51, 1361–1376, doi:10.1007/s00254-006-0434-7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Miyakoda, K., Hembree G. D. , Strickler R. F. , and Shulman I. , 1972: Cumulative results of extended forecast experiments: I. Model performance for winter cases. Mon. Wea. Rev., 100, 836–855, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1972)100<0836:CROEFE>2.3.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Müller, W. A., Appenzeller C. , Doblas-Reyes F. J. , and Liniger M. A. , 2005: A debiased ranked probability skill score to evaluate probabilistic ensemble forecasts with small ensemble sizes. J. Climate, 18, 1513–1523, doi:10.1175/JCLI3361.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Murphy, A. H., and Epstein E. S. , 1989: Skill scores and correlation coefficients in model verification. Mon. Wea. Rev., 117, 572–582, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<0572:SSACCI>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Negri, A. J., and Coauthors, 2005: The hurricane–flood–landslide continuum. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 86, 1241–1247, doi:10.1175/BAMS-86-9-1241.

  • Nishat, A., and Faisal I. M. , 2000: An assessment of the institutional mechanisms for water negotiations in the Ganges–Brahmaputra–Meghna system. Int. Negot., 5, 289–310, doi:10.1163/15718060020848776.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Nishat, B., and Rahman M. , 2009: Water resources modeling of the Ganges–Brahmaputra–Meghna River basins using satellite remote sensing data. J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc., 45, 1313–1327, doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00374.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • NRC, 2010: Assessment of Intraseasonal to Interannual Climate Prediction and Predictability. National Academies Press, 192 pp.

  • Pielke, R. A., Sr., 1998: Climate prediction as an initial value problem. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 79 (12), 2743–2745.

  • Reynolds, R. W., Smith T. M. , Liu C. , Chelton D. B. , Casey K. S. , and Schlax M. G. , 2007: Daily high-resolution-blended analyses for sea surface temperature. J. Climate, 20, 5473–5496, doi:10.1175/2007JCLI1824.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Salas, J. D., Rajagopalan B. , Saito L. , and Brown C. , 2012: Special section on climate change and water resources: Climate nonstationarity and water resources management. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 138, 385–388, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000279.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Shah, R. B., 2001: Ganges–Brahmaputra: The outlook for the twenty-first century. Sustainable Development of the Ganges–Brahmaputra–Meghna Basins, A. K. Biswas and J. I. Uitto, eds., Oxford University Press, 17–45.

  • Sheffield, J., Goteti G. , and Wood E. F. , 2006: Development of a 50-year high-resolution global dataset of meteorological forcings for land surface modeling. J. Climate, 19, 3088–3111, doi:10.1175/JCLI3790.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sheffield, J., Livneh B. , and Wood E. F. , 2012: Representation of terrestrial hydrology and large-scale drought of the continental United States from the North American Regional Reanalysis. J. Hydrometeor., 13, 856–876, doi:10.1175/JHM-D-11-065.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Shrestha, K. Y., Webster P. J. , and Toma V. E. , 2014: An atmospheric–hydrologic forecasting scheme for the Indus River basin. J. Hydrometeor., 15, 861–890, doi:10.1175/JHM-D-13-051.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Siddique-E-Akbor, A. H. M., Hossain F. , Sikder S. , Shum C. K. , Tseng S. , Yi Y. , Turk F. J. , and Limaye A. , 2014: Satellite precipitation data–driven hydrological modeling for water resources management in the Ganges, Brahmaputra, and Meghna basins. Earth Interact., 18, doi:10.1175/EI-D-14-0017.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sikder, S., and Hossain F. , 2014: Understanding the geophysical sources of uncertainty for Satellite Interferometric (SRTM)-based discharge estimation in river deltas: The case for Bangladesh. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens., 8, 523–538, doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2326893.

  • Sinha, I. N., 1995: Opportunity, delay and policy planning vision in the synergic development of eastern Himalayan rivers: A conspectus. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev., 11, 303–314, doi:10.1080/07900629550042254.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Vogel, R. M., 2011: Hydromorphology. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 137, 147–149, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000122.

  • Webster, P. J., 2013: Improve weather forecasts for the developing world. Nature, 493, 17–19, doi:10.1038/493017a.

  • Wilby, R. L., Wigley T. M. L. , Conway D. , Jones P. D. , Hewitson B. C. , Main J. , and Wilks D. S. , 1998: Statistical downscaling of general circulation model output: A comparison of methods. Water Resour. Res., 34, 2995–3008, doi:10.1029/98WR02577.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wilks, D. S., 2011: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences. 3rd ed., International Geophysics Series, Vol. 100, Academic Press, 704 pp.

  • Wood, A. W., Maurer E. P. , Kumar A. , and Lettenmaier D. P. , 2002: Long-range experimental hydrologic forecasting for the eastern United States. J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4429, doi:10.1029/2001JD000659.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wu, H., Adler R. F. , Hong Y. , Tian Y. , and Policelli F. , 2012: Evaluation of global flood detection using satellite-based rainfall and a hydrologic model. J. Hydrometeor., 13, 1268–1284, doi:10.1175/JHM-D-11-087.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Yatagai, A., Kamiguchi K. , Arakawa O. , Hamada A. , Yasutomi N. , and Kitoh A. , 2012: APHRODITE: Constructing a long-term daily gridded precipitation dataset for Asia based on a dense network of rain gauges. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 93, 1401–1415, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00122.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Yuan, X., Wood E. F. , and Ma Z. . 2015: A review on climate-model-based seasonal hydrologic forecasting: physical understanding and system development. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Water, 2, 523–536, doi:10.1002/wat2.1088.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 427 145 20
PDF Downloads 272 81 6