Precipitation Vertical Structure Characterization: A Feature-Based Approach

Malarvizhi Arulraj aCooperative Institute for Satellite Earth System Studies, Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, Maryland

Search for other papers by Malarvizhi Arulraj in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Veljko Petkovic aCooperative Institute for Satellite Earth System Studies, Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, Maryland

Search for other papers by Veljko Petkovic in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ralph R. Ferraro aCooperative Institute for Satellite Earth System Studies, Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, Maryland

Search for other papers by Ralph R. Ferraro in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Huan Meng bCenter for Satellite Applications and Research, NOAA/NESDIS, College Park, Maryland

Search for other papers by Huan Meng in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The three-dimensional (3D) structure of precipitation systems is highly dependent on hydrometeor formation processes and microphysics. This study aims to characterize distinct vertical profiles of precipitation regimes by relying on the availability of a high-quality, spatially dense radar network and its capability to observe the 3D structure of the storms. A deep-learning-based framework, coupled with unsupervised clustering methods, is developed to identify types of precipitation structures irrespective of their physical properties. A 6-month period of 3D reflectivity profiles from the Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor (MRMS) network is used to identify different regimes and investigate their properties with respect to the underlying environmental conditions. Dominant features retrieved from radar reflectivity profiles using convolutional neural-network-based autoencoders are employed to identify similar-looking vertical structures using coupled k-means and agglomerative clustering algorithms. The k-means method identifies distinct groups, while the agglomerative clustering visualizes intercluster relationships. The framework identifies 18 clusters that can be broadly combined into five groups of varied echo-top heights. The 18 clusters demonstrate variability with respect to structural features and precipitation rate/type, implying that profiles in each group belong to a physically different precipitation regime. An independent analysis of the regime properties is conducted by matching the MRMS reflectivity profiles with environmental parameters derived from the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh model forecasts. The distribution of the environmental variables confirms cluster-specific feature properties, confirming the physics-based regime separation across the clusters and their dependence on the vertical structure. The identified precipitation regimes can assist in developing physics-guided retrievals and studying precipitation regimes.

Significance Statement

This study proposes a systematic model to identify precipitation profiles of distinct vertical structures and evaluate their dependence on environmental conditions. The model was developed using ground-based radar observations; however, there is potential to extend this model to reflectivity profiles from both ground- and satellite-based sensors. In addition, the identified precipitation regime clusters could be a proxy for the vertical structure of precipitation systems and assist in determining the structural variability within traditional precipitation type classification (e.g., convective versus stratiform). Moreover, identifying the precipitation regimes could also be used to improve satellite-based precipitation retrievals. Finally, a better understanding of precipitation structure would also help improve the initialization of climate models.

© 2023 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Malarvizhi Arulraj, marulraj@umd.edu

Abstract

The three-dimensional (3D) structure of precipitation systems is highly dependent on hydrometeor formation processes and microphysics. This study aims to characterize distinct vertical profiles of precipitation regimes by relying on the availability of a high-quality, spatially dense radar network and its capability to observe the 3D structure of the storms. A deep-learning-based framework, coupled with unsupervised clustering methods, is developed to identify types of precipitation structures irrespective of their physical properties. A 6-month period of 3D reflectivity profiles from the Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor (MRMS) network is used to identify different regimes and investigate their properties with respect to the underlying environmental conditions. Dominant features retrieved from radar reflectivity profiles using convolutional neural-network-based autoencoders are employed to identify similar-looking vertical structures using coupled k-means and agglomerative clustering algorithms. The k-means method identifies distinct groups, while the agglomerative clustering visualizes intercluster relationships. The framework identifies 18 clusters that can be broadly combined into five groups of varied echo-top heights. The 18 clusters demonstrate variability with respect to structural features and precipitation rate/type, implying that profiles in each group belong to a physically different precipitation regime. An independent analysis of the regime properties is conducted by matching the MRMS reflectivity profiles with environmental parameters derived from the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh model forecasts. The distribution of the environmental variables confirms cluster-specific feature properties, confirming the physics-based regime separation across the clusters and their dependence on the vertical structure. The identified precipitation regimes can assist in developing physics-guided retrievals and studying precipitation regimes.

Significance Statement

This study proposes a systematic model to identify precipitation profiles of distinct vertical structures and evaluate their dependence on environmental conditions. The model was developed using ground-based radar observations; however, there is potential to extend this model to reflectivity profiles from both ground- and satellite-based sensors. In addition, the identified precipitation regime clusters could be a proxy for the vertical structure of precipitation systems and assist in determining the structural variability within traditional precipitation type classification (e.g., convective versus stratiform). Moreover, identifying the precipitation regimes could also be used to improve satellite-based precipitation retrievals. Finally, a better understanding of precipitation structure would also help improve the initialization of climate models.

© 2023 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Malarvizhi Arulraj, marulraj@umd.edu

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Materials (PDF 0.3662 MB)
Save
  • Anderberg, M. R., 1973: Cluster Analysis for Applications. Academic Press, 359 pp., https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-06161-0.

  • Arulraj, M., and A. P. Barros, 2021: Automatic detection and classification of low-level orographic precipitation processes from space-borne radars using machine learning. Remote Sens. Environ., 257, 112355, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112355.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, T.-S., T.-H. Tsai, Y.-T. Chen, C.-C. Lin, R.-C. Chen, S.-Y. Li, and H.-Y. Chen, 2005: A combined K-means and hierarchical clustering method for improving the clustering efficiency of microarray. 2005 Int. Symp. on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communication Systems, Hong Kong, China, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 405–408, https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPACS.2005.1595432.

  • Davies, D. L., and D. W. Bouldin, 1979: A cluster separation measure. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 1, 224227, https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1979.4766909.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dolan, B., B. Fuchs, S. A. Rutledge, E. A. Barnes, and E. J. Thompson, 2018: Primary modes of global drop size distributions. J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 14531476, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0242.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dowell, D. C., and Coauthors, 2022: The High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR): An hourly updating convection-allowing forecast model. Part I: Motivation and system description. Wea. Forecasting, 37, 13711395, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-21-0151.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dunn, J. C., 1974: Well-separated clusters and optimal fuzzy partitions. J. Cybern., 4, 95104, https://doi.org/10.1080/01969727408546059.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Elsaesser, G. S., C. D. Kummerow, T. S. L’Ecuyer, Y. N. Takayabu, and S. Shige, 2010: Observed self-similarity of precipitation regimes over the tropical oceans. J. Climate, 23, 26862698, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3330.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fred, A. L. N., and A. K. Jain, 2005: Combining multiple clusterings using evidence accumulation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 27, 835850, https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2005.113.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gustafsson, N., and Coauthors, 2018: Survey of data assimilation methods for convective-scale numerical weather prediction at operational centres. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144, 12181256, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3179.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hence, D. A., and R. A. Houze Jr., 2011: Vertical structure of hurricane eyewalls as seen by the TRMM Precipitation Radar. J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 16371652, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JAS3578.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hong, Y., and J. J. Gourley, 2018: Radar Hydrology: Principles, Models, and Applications. CRC Press, 176 pp.

  • Hong, Y., and Coauthors, 2019: Remote sensing precipitation: Sensors, retrievals, validations, and applications. Observation and Measurement of Ecohydrological Processes, X. Li and H. Vereecken, Eds., Ecohydrology, Vol. 2., Springer, 107–128, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48297-1_4.

  • Hou, A. Y., and Coauthors, 2014: The Global Precipitation Measurement Mission. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 95, 701722, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00164.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Houze, R. A., Jr., 1981: Structures of atmospheric precipitation systems: A global survey. Radio Sci., 16, 671689, https://doi.org/10.1029/RS016i005p00671.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Houze, R. A., Jr., 2014: Cloud Dynamics. International Geophysics Series, Vol. 104, Academic Press, 496 pp.

  • Hu, J., and A. Ryzhkov, 2022: Climatology of the vertical profiles of polarimetric radar variables and retrieved microphysical parameters in continental/tropical MCSs and landfalling hurricanes. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 127, e2021JD035498, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035498.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Iguchi, T., and Coauthors, 2010: GPM/DPR level-2. Algorithm Theoretical Basis Doc. Tech. Rep., 127 pp., https://gpm.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/document_files/ATBD_DPR_201811_with_Appendix3b_0.pdf.

  • Johnstone, I. M., and D. M. Titterington, 2009: Statistical challenges of high-dimensional data. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc., A367, 42374253, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2009.0159.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kirstetter, P.-E., J. J. Gourley, Y. Hong, J. Zhang, S. Moazamigoodarzi, C. Langston, and A. Arthur, 2015: Probabilistic precipitation rate estimates with ground-based radar networks. Water Resour. Res., 51, 14221442, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015672.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kummerow, C. D., D. L. Randel, M. Kulie, N.-Y. Wang, R. Ferraro, S. Joseph Munchak, and V. Petkovic, 2015: The evolution of the Goddard profiling algorithm to a fully parametric scheme. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 32, 22652280, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-15-0039.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Levizzani, V., and E. Cattani, 2019: Satellite remote sensing of precipitation and the terrestrial water cycle in a changing climate. Remote Sens., 11, 2301, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11192301.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Li, Y., and H. Wu, 2012: A clustering method based on K-means algorithm. Phys. Procedia, 25, 11041109, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2012.03.206.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liao, L., and R. Meneghini, 2022: GPM DPR retrievals: Algorithm, evaluation, and validation. Remote Sens., 14, 843, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14040843.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, C., D. J. Cecil, E. J. Zipser, K. Kronfeld, and R. Robertson, 2012: Relationships between lightning flash rates and radar reflectivity vertical structures in thunderstorms over the tropics and subtropics. J. Geophys. Res., 117, D06212, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017123.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Luo, Z. J., R. C. Anderson, W. B. Rossow, and H. Takahashi, 2017: Tropical cloud and precipitation regimes as seen from near-simultaneous TRMM, CloudSat, and CALIPSO observations and comparison with ISCCP. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 122, 59886003, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026569.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mace, G. G., C. Jakob, and K. P. Moran, 1998: Validation of hydrometeor occurrence predicted by the ECMWF model using millimeter wave radar data. Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 16451648, https://doi.org/10.1029/98GL00845.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Peterson, A. D., A. P. Ghosh, and R. Maitra, 2018: Merging K-means with hierarchical clustering for identifying general-shaped groups. Stat, 7, e172, https://doi.org/10.1002/sta4.172.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Porcacchia, L., P.-E. Kirstetter, V. Maggioni, and S. Tanelli, 2019: Investigating the GPM dual-frequency precipitation radar signatures of low-level precipitation enhancement. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 145, 31613174, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3611.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Prat, O. P., and A. P. Barros, 2010: Ground observations to characterize the spatial gradients and vertical structure of orographic precipitation – Experiments in the inner region of the Great Smoky Mountains. J. Hydrol., 391, 141156, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.013.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Qi, Y., and J. Zhang, 2017: A physically based two-dimensional seamless reflectivity mosaic for radar QPE in the MRMS system. J. Hydrometeor., 18, 13271340, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0197.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schumacher, C., R. A. Houze Jr., and I. Kraucunas, 2004: The tropical dynamical response to latent heating estimates derived from the TRMM Precipitation Radar. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 13411358, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<1341:TTDRTL>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shi, L., Y. Qiu, J. Shi, and S. Zhao, 2015: Atmospheric influences analysis in passive microwave remote sensing. 2015 IEEE Int. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symp. (IGARSS), Milan, Italy, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2334–2337, https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2015.7326276.

  • Shupe, M. D., T. Uttal, S. Y. Matrosov, and A. S. Frisch, 2001: Cloud water contents and hydrometeor sizes during the FIRE Arctic Clouds Experiment. J. Geophys. Res., 106, 15 01515 028, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900476.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Singh, N., N. Garg, and J. Pant, 2014: A comprehensive study of challenges and approaches for clustering high dimensional data. Int. J. Comput. Appl., 92, 710, https://doi.org/10.5120/15995-4844.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smedsmo, J. L., E. Foufoula-Georgiou, V. Vuruputur, F. Kong, and K. Droegemeier, 2005: On the vertical structure of modeled and observed deep convective storms: Insights for precipitation retrieval and microphysical parameterization. J. Appl. Meteor., 44, 18661884, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2306.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tang, L., J. Zhang, M. Simpson, A. Arthur, H. Grams, Y. Wang, and C. Langston, 2020: Updates on the radar data quality control in the MRMS quantitative precipitation estimation system. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 37, 15211537, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-19-0165.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Verlinde, J., M. P. Rambukkange, E. E. Clothiaux, G. M. McFarquhar, and E. W. Eloranta, 2013: Arctic multilayered, mixed-phase cloud processes revealed in millimeter-wave cloud radar Doppler spectra. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 118, 13 19913 213, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020183.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wen, Y., P. Kirstetter, J. J. Gourley, Y. Hong, A. Behrangi, and Z. Flamig, 2017: Evaluation of MRMS snowfall products over the western United States. J. Hydrometeor., 18, 17071713, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0266.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Williams, C. R., A. B. White, K. S. Gage, and F. M. Ralph, 2007: Vertical structure of precipitation and related microphysics observed by NOAA profilers and TRMM during NAME 2004. J. Climate, 20, 16931712, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4102.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilson, A. M., and A. P. Barros, 2014: An investigation of warm rainfall microphysics in the southern Appalachians: Orographic enhancement via low-level seeder–feeder interactions. J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 17831805, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0228.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • You, Y., N. Wang, and R. Ferraro, 2015: A prototype precipitation retrieval algorithm over land using passive microwave observations stratified by surface condition and precipitation vertical structure. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 120, 52955315, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022534.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, J., and Coauthors, 2016: Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor (MRMS) quantitative precipitation estimation: Initial operating capabilities. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 97, 621638, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00174.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, Y., S. Klein, G. G. Mace, and J. Boyle, 2007: Cluster analysis of tropical clouds using CloudSat data. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L12813, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029336.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 219 219 92
Full Text Views 145 145 84
PDF Downloads 124 124 61