Evaluation of IMERG and MSG-CPP Precipitation Estimates over Europe Using EURADCLIM: A Gauge-Adjusted European Composite Radar Dataset

Emiel van der Plas aKNMI, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt, Netherlands

Search for other papers by Emiel van der Plas in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8216-9173
,
Aart Overeem aKNMI, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt, Netherlands

Search for other papers by Aart Overeem in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jan Fokke Meirink aKNMI, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt, Netherlands

Search for other papers by Jan Fokke Meirink in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Hidde Leijnse aKNMI, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt, Netherlands

Search for other papers by Hidde Leijnse in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Linda Bogerd bWUR, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands

Search for other papers by Linda Bogerd in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

A new pan-European climatological dataset was recently released that has a much higher spatiotemporal resolution than existing pan-European interpolated rain gauge datasets. This radar dataset of hourly precipitation accumulations, European Radar Climatology (EURADCLIM) (Overeem et al.), covers most of continental Europe with a resolution of 2 km × 2 km and is adjusted employing data from potentially thousands of government rain gauges. This study aims to use this dataset to evaluate two important satellite-derived precipitation products over the period 2013–19 at a much higher spatiotemporal resolution than was previously possible at the European scale: the IMERG late run and the Meteosat Second Generation (MSG) cloud physical property product from the SEVIRI instrument. The latter is only available during daytime, so the analyses are restricted to daytime conditions. A direct gridcell comparison of hourly precipitation reveals an apparently low coefficient of correlation. However, looking into slightly more detail at statistics pertaining to longer time scales or specific areas, the datasets show good correspondence. All datasets are shown to have their specific biases, which can be transient or more systematic, depending on the timing or location. The MSG precipitation seems to have an overall positive bias, and the IMERG dataset suffers from some transient overestimation of certain events.

© 2024 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Emiel van der Plas, emiel.van.der.plas@knmi.nl

Abstract

A new pan-European climatological dataset was recently released that has a much higher spatiotemporal resolution than existing pan-European interpolated rain gauge datasets. This radar dataset of hourly precipitation accumulations, European Radar Climatology (EURADCLIM) (Overeem et al.), covers most of continental Europe with a resolution of 2 km × 2 km and is adjusted employing data from potentially thousands of government rain gauges. This study aims to use this dataset to evaluate two important satellite-derived precipitation products over the period 2013–19 at a much higher spatiotemporal resolution than was previously possible at the European scale: the IMERG late run and the Meteosat Second Generation (MSG) cloud physical property product from the SEVIRI instrument. The latter is only available during daytime, so the analyses are restricted to daytime conditions. A direct gridcell comparison of hourly precipitation reveals an apparently low coefficient of correlation. However, looking into slightly more detail at statistics pertaining to longer time scales or specific areas, the datasets show good correspondence. All datasets are shown to have their specific biases, which can be transient or more systematic, depending on the timing or location. The MSG precipitation seems to have an overall positive bias, and the IMERG dataset suffers from some transient overestimation of certain events.

© 2024 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Emiel van der Plas, emiel.van.der.plas@knmi.nl
Save
  • Becker, A., P. Finger, A. Meyer-Christoffer, B. Rudolf, K. Schamm, U. Schneider, and M. Ziese, 2013: A description of the global land-surface precipitation data products of the global precipitation climatology centre with sample applications including centennial (trend) analysis from 1901–present. Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 5, 7199, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-5-71-2013.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Benas, N., S. Finkensieper, M. Stengel, G.-J. van Zadelhoff, T. Hanschmann, R. Hollmann, and J. F. Meirink, 2017: The MSG-SEVIRI-based cloud property data record CLAAS-2. Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 415434, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-415-2017.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bogerd, L., A. Overeem, H. Leijnse, and R. Uijlenhoet, 2020: Evaluation of the GPM IMERG-late precipitation product and its constituents over the Netherlands. 2020 Fall Meeting, Online, Amer. Geophys. Union, Abstract H217-06.

  • Cornes, R. C., G. van der Schrier, E. J. M. van den Besselaar, and P. D. Jones, 2018: An ensemble version of the E-OBS temperature and precipitation data sets. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 123, 93919409, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD028200.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ebert, E. E., and J. L. McBride, 2000: Verification of precipitation in weather systems: Determination of systematic errors. J. Hydrol., 239, 179202, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00343-7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fabry, F., 2015: Radar Meteorology: Principles and Practice. Cambridge University Press, 276 pp.

  • Gaona, M. F. R., A. Overeem, H. Leijnse, and R. Uijlenhoet, 2016: First-year evaluation of GPM rainfall over the Netherlands: IMERG day 1 final run (V03D). J. Hydrometeor., 17, 27992814, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0087.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Greenwald, T. J., 2009: A 2 year comparison of AMSR-E and MODIS cloud liquid water path observations. Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L20805, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040394.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hou, A. Y., and Coauthors, 2014: The Global Precipitation Measurement mission. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 95, 701722, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00164.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huffman, G. J., and Coauthors, 2007: The TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA): Quasi-global, multiyear, combined-sensor precipitation estimates at fine scales. J. Hydrometeor., 8, 3855, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM560.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Klein Tank, A. M. G., and Coauthors, 2002: Daily dataset of 20th-century surface air temperature and precipitation series for the European climate assessment. Int. J. Climatol., 22, 14411453, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.773.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Klok, E. J., and A. M. G. Klein Tank, 2009: Updated and extended European dataset of daily climate observations. Int. J. Climatol., 29, 11821191, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1779.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Met Office, 2010: Cartopy: A Cartographic Python Library with a Matplotlib interface. https://scitools.org.uk/cartopy.

  • Navarro, A., E. García-Ortega, A. Merino, J. L. Sánchez, C. Kummerow, and F. J. Tapiador, 2019: Assessment of IMERG precipitation estimates over Europe. Remote Sens., 11, 2470, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11212470.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • O, S., U. Foelsche, G. Kirchengast, J. Fuchsberger, J. Tan, and W. A. Petersen, 2017: Evaluation of GPM IMERG early, late, and final rainfall estimates using WegenerNet gauge data in southeastern Austria. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 65596572, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-6559-2017.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Overeem, A., E. van den Besselaar, G. van der Schrier, J. Meirink, E. van der Plas, and H. Leijnse, 2022: EURADCLIM: The European climatological gauge-adjusted radar precipitation dataset (1-h accumulations). KNMI DataPlatform, accessed 11 June 2022, https://doi.org/10.21944/7ypj-wn68.

  • Overeem, A., E. van den Besselaar, G. van der Schrier, J. Meirink, E. van der Plas, and H. Leijnse, 2023: EURADCLIM: The European climatological high-resolution gauge-adjusted radar precipitation dataset. Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 14411464, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1441-2023.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Park, S., M. Berenguer, and D. Sempere-Torres, 2019: Long-term analysis of gauge-adjusted radar rainfall accumulations at European scale. J. Hydrol., 573, 768777, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.093.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rauber, R. M., and S. W. Nesbitt, 2018: Radar Meteorology: A First Course. John Wiley and Sons, 496 pp., https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118432662.

  • Roberts, N. M., and H. W. Lean, 2008: Scale-selective verification of rainfall accumulations from high-resolution forecasts of convective events. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 7897, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007MWR2123.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roebeling, R. A., and I. Holleman, 2009: SEVIRI rainfall retrieval and validation using weather radar observations. J. Geophys. Res., 114, D21202, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012102.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roebeling, R. A., E. L. A. Wolters, J. F. Meirink, and H. Leijnse, 2012: Triple collocation of summer precipitation retrievals from SEVIRI over Europe with gridded rain gauge and weather radar data. J. Hydrometeor., 13, 15521566, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-089.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Saltikoff, E., and Coauthors, 2019: OPERA the radar project. Atmosphere, 10, 320, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10060320.

  • Skofronick-Jackson, G., D. Kirschbaum, W. Petersen, G. Huffman, C. Kidd, E. Stocker, and R. Kakar, 2018: The Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission’s scientific achievements and societal contributions: Reviewing four years of advanced rain and snow observations. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144, 2748, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3313.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 415 415 91
Full Text Views 77 77 48
PDF Downloads 101 101 63