Abstract
Evaluating the accuracy of various precipitation datasets over ungauged or even sparse-gauge areas is a challenging task. Cross-validation methods can evaluate three or more datasets based on the error independence from input data, without relying on ground observations. Here, the triple collocation (TC) method is employed to evaluate multisource precipitation datasets: China Gauge-based Daily Precipitation Analysis (CGDPA), model-based ERA5, and satellite-derived IMERG-Early, IMERG-Late, GSMaP in near–real time (GSMaP-NRT), and GSMaP moving vector with Kalman filter (GSMaP-MVK) over the Tibetan Plateau (TP). TC-based results show that ERA5 has better performances than satellite-only precipitation products over mountainous regions with complex terrains. For purely satellite-derived products, IMERG products outperform GSMaP products. Considering the potential existence of error dependencies among input datasets, caution should be exercised. Thus, it is necessary to introduce an alternative cross-validation method (generalized three-cornered hat) and explore the applicability of cross validation from the perspective of error independence. We found that cross-validation methods have high applicability in most TP regions with sparse-gauge density (accounting for about 80.1% of the total area). Additionally, we conducted simulation experiments to discuss the applicability and robustness of TC. The simulation results substantiated that cross validation can serve as a robust evaluation method over sparse-gauge regions. Although it is generally known that the cross-validation methods can be served in sparse-gauge regions, the application condition of different evaluation methods for precipitation products is identified quantitatively in TP now.
Significance Statement
Cross validation is a powerful assessment method for multisource precipitation datasets. This method is widely used by hydrologists in sparse-gauge or ungauged regions, like the African continent and the Tibetan Plateau (TP). However, as an indirect assessment method, the inherent uncertainty in cross validation warrants emphasis. Here, two cross-validation methods (the triple collocation method and the generalized three-cornered hat method) are employed to evaluate multisource precipitation datasets: China Gauge-based Daily Precipitation Analysis (CGDPA), model-based ERA5, and satellite-derived IMERG-Early, IMERG-Late, GSMaP in near–real time (GSMaP-NRT), and GSMaP moving vector with Kalman filter (GSMaP-MVK) over the TP. In this study, we not only assessed the current mainstream six precipitation datasets but also analyzed their uncertainties by combining these two cross-validation methods.
© 2024 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).
