Intercomparison of Soil Moisture Memory in Two Land Surface Models

Sarith P. P. Mahanama Goddard Earth Sciences and Technology Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Baltimore, and Hydrological Sciences Branch, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland

Search for other papers by Sarith P. P. Mahanama in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Randal D. Koster Hydrological Sciences Branch, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland

Search for other papers by Randal D. Koster in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

A heavy rain or a dry period can produce an anomaly in soil moisture, and the dissipation of this anomaly may take weeks to months. It is important to understand how land surface models (LSMs) used with atmospheric general circulation models simulate this soil moisture “memory,” because this memory may have profound implications for long-term weather prediction through land–atmosphere feedback.

In order to understand better the effect of precipitation and net radiation on soil moisture memory, the NASA Seasonal-to-Interannual Prediction Project (NSIPP) Catchment LSM and the Mosaic LSM were both forced with a wide variety of idealized climates. The imposed climates had average monthly precipitation ranging from 15 to 500 mm and monthly net radiations (in terms of water equivalent) ranging from 20 to 400 mm, with consequent changes in near-surface temperature and humidity. For an equivalent water holding capacity, the two models maximize memory in distinctly different climate regimes. Memory in the NSIPP Catchment LSM exceeds that in the Mosaic LSM when precipitation and net radiation are of the same order; otherwise, memory in the Mosaic LSM is larger.

The NSIPP Catchment and the Mosaic LSMs were also driven offline, globally, for a period of 15 yr (1979–93) with realistic atmospheric forcing. Global distributions of 1-month-lagged autocorrelation of soil moisture for boreal summer were computed. An additional global run with the NSIPP Catchment LSM employing the Mosaic LSM's water holding capacities was also performed. These three global runs show that while some of the intermodel difference in memory can be explained (following traditional interpretations) in terms of differences in water holding capacity and potential evaporation, much of the intermodal difference stems from differences in the parameterizations of evaporation and runoff.

Corresponding author address: Sarith Mahanama, Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 900.3, Greenbelt, MD 20771. Email: sarith@janus.gsfc.nasa.gov

Abstract

A heavy rain or a dry period can produce an anomaly in soil moisture, and the dissipation of this anomaly may take weeks to months. It is important to understand how land surface models (LSMs) used with atmospheric general circulation models simulate this soil moisture “memory,” because this memory may have profound implications for long-term weather prediction through land–atmosphere feedback.

In order to understand better the effect of precipitation and net radiation on soil moisture memory, the NASA Seasonal-to-Interannual Prediction Project (NSIPP) Catchment LSM and the Mosaic LSM were both forced with a wide variety of idealized climates. The imposed climates had average monthly precipitation ranging from 15 to 500 mm and monthly net radiations (in terms of water equivalent) ranging from 20 to 400 mm, with consequent changes in near-surface temperature and humidity. For an equivalent water holding capacity, the two models maximize memory in distinctly different climate regimes. Memory in the NSIPP Catchment LSM exceeds that in the Mosaic LSM when precipitation and net radiation are of the same order; otherwise, memory in the Mosaic LSM is larger.

The NSIPP Catchment and the Mosaic LSMs were also driven offline, globally, for a period of 15 yr (1979–93) with realistic atmospheric forcing. Global distributions of 1-month-lagged autocorrelation of soil moisture for boreal summer were computed. An additional global run with the NSIPP Catchment LSM employing the Mosaic LSM's water holding capacities was also performed. These three global runs show that while some of the intermodel difference in memory can be explained (following traditional interpretations) in terms of differences in water holding capacity and potential evaporation, much of the intermodal difference stems from differences in the parameterizations of evaporation and runoff.

Corresponding author address: Sarith Mahanama, Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 900.3, Greenbelt, MD 20771. Email: sarith@janus.gsfc.nasa.gov

Save
  • Berg, A. A., 2001: The sensitivity of land surface model simulations to bias correction of the European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts reanalysis. M.S. thesis, Dept. of Geological Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, 115 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Delworth, T. L., and Manabe S. , 1988: The influence of potential evaporation on the variabilities of simulated soil wetness and climate. J. Climate, 1 , 523547.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dirmeyer, P. A., 2000: Using a global soil witness dataset to improve seasonal climate simulation. J. Climate, 13 , 29002922.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ducharne, A., Koster R. D. , Suarez M. J. , Stieglitz M. , and Kumar P. , 2000: A catchment-based approach to modeling land surface processes in a general circulation model. Part 2: Parameter estimation and model demonstration. J. Geophys. Res., 105 (D20) 2482324838.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Entin, J. K., Robock A. , Vinnikov K. Y. , Hollinger S. E. , Liu S. , and Namkhai A. , 2000: Temporal and spatial scales of observed soil moisture variations in the extratropics. J. Geophys. Res., 105 (D9) 1186511877.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Guillevic, P., Koster R. D. , Suarez M. J. , Bounoua L. , Collatz G. J. , Los S. O. , and Mahanama S. P. P. , 2002: Influence of the interannual variability of vegetation on the surface energy balance—A global sensitivity study. J. Hydrometeor., 3 , 617629.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koster, R. D., and Suarez M. J. , 1992: Modeling the land surface boundary in climate models as a composite of independent vegetation stands. J. Geophys. Res., 97 , 26972716.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koster, R. D., and Suarez M. J. , 1995: The relative contributions of land and ocean process to precipitation variability. J. Geophys. Res., 100 , 1377513790.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koster, R. D., and Suarez M. J. , 1996a: Energy and water balance calculations in the MOSAIC LSM. NASA Tech. Memo. 104606, Vol. 9, 60 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koster, R. D., and Suarez M. J. , 1996b: The influence of land surface moisture retention on precipitation statistics. J. Climate, 9 , 25512567.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koster, R. D., and Milly P. C. D. , 1997: The interplay between transpiration and runoff formulations in land surface schemes used with atmospheric models. J. Climate, 10 , 15781591.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koster, R. D., and Suarez M. J. , 2001: Soil moisture memory in climate models. J. Hydrometeor., 2 , 558570.

  • Koster, R. D., and Suarez M. J. , 2003: Impact of land surface initialization on seasonal precipitation and temperature prediction. J. Hydrometeor., 4 , 408423.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koster, R. D., Suarez M. J. , Ducharne A. , Stieglitz M. , and Kumar P. , 2000a: A catchment-based approach to modeling land surface processes in a general circulation model. Part 1: Model structure. J. Geophys. Res., 105 (D20) 2480924822.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koster, R. D., Suarez M. J. , and Heiser M. , 2000b: Variance and predictability of precipitation at seasonal-to-interannual timescales. J. Hydrometeor., 1 , 2646.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, Y., and Avissar R. , 1999a: A study of persistence in the land–atmosphere system using a fourth-order analytical model. J. Climate, 12 , 21542168.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, Y., and Avissar R. , 1999b: A study of persistence in the land–atmosphere system using a general circulation model and observations. J. Climate, 12 , 21392153.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Oglesby, R. J., and Erickson D. J. III, 1989: Soil moisture and the persistence of North American drought. J. Climate, 2 , 13621380.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Robock, A., Vinnikov K. Y. , Sirinivasan G. , Entin J. K. , Hollinger S. E. , Speranskaya N. A. , Liu S. , and Namkhai A. , 2000: The global soil moisture data bank. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 81 , 12811299.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sellers, P. J., Mintz Y. , Sud Y. C. , and Dalcher A. , 1986: A simple biosphere model (SiB) for use within general circulation models. J. Atmos. Sci., 43 , 505531.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sellers, P. J., and Coauthors, 1996: The ISLSCP Initiative I global datasets: Surface boundary conditions and atmospheric forcings for land–atmosphere studies. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77 , 19872005.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shukla, J., and Mintz Y. , 1982: Influence of land-surface evapotranspiration on the earth's climate. Science, 215 , 14981501.

  • Verdin, K. L., and Verdin J. P. , 1999: A topological system for delineation and codification of the Earth's river basins. J. Hydrol., 218 , 112.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vinnikov, K. Ya, and Yeserkepova I. B. , 1991: Soil moisture: Empirical data and model results,. J. Climate, 4 , 6679.

  • Vinnikov, K. Ya, Robock A. , Speranskaya N. A. , and Schlosser A. , 1996: Scales of temporal and spatial variability of midlatitude soil moisture. J. Geophys. Res., 101 (D3) 71637174.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wood, E. F., and Coauthors, 1998: The Project for Intercomparison of Land-Surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS) Phase 2(c) Red-Arkansas River Basin experiment: 1. Experiment description and summary intercomparisons. Global Planet. Change, 19 , 115135.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 673 224 37
PDF Downloads 252 85 11