Downscaling Precipitation and Temperature with Temporal Neural Networks

Paulin Coulibaly Department of Civil Engineering, and School of Geography and Geology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Search for other papers by Paulin Coulibaly in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Yonas B. Dibike Department of Civil Engineering, and School of Geography and Geology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Search for other papers by Yonas B. Dibike in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
François Anctil Department of Civil Engineering, Université Laval, Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada

Search for other papers by François Anctil in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

The issues of downscaling the outputs of a global climate model (GCM) to a scale that is appropriate to hydrological impact studies are investigated using a temporal neural network approach. The time-lagged feed-forward neural network (TLFN) is proposed for downscaling daily total precipitation and daily maximum and minimum temperature series for the Serpent River watershed in northern Quebec (Canada). The downscaling models are developed and validated using large-scale predictor variables derived from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction–National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP–NCAR) reanalysis dataset. Atmospheric predictors such as specific humidity, wind velocity, and geopotential height are identified as the most relevant inputs to the downscaling models. The performance of the TLFN downscaling model is also compared to a statistical downscaling model (SDSM). The downscaling results suggest that the TLFN is an efficient method for downscaling both daily precipitation and temperature series. The best downscaling models were then applied to the outputs of the Canadian Global Climate Model (CGCM1), forced with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) IS92a scenario. Changes in average precipitation between the current and the future scenarios predicted by the TLFN are generally found to be smaller than those predicted by the SDSM model. Furthermore, application of the downscaled data for hydrologic impact analysis in the Serpent River resulted in an overall increasing trend in mean annual flow as well as earlier spring peak flow. The results also demonstrate the emphasis that should be given in identifying the appropriate downscaling tools for impact studies by showing how a future climate scenario downscaled with different downscaling methods could result in significantly different hydrologic impact simulation results for the same watershed.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Paulin Coulibaly, Department of Civil Engineering, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L7, Canada. Email: couliba@mcmaster.ca

Abstract

The issues of downscaling the outputs of a global climate model (GCM) to a scale that is appropriate to hydrological impact studies are investigated using a temporal neural network approach. The time-lagged feed-forward neural network (TLFN) is proposed for downscaling daily total precipitation and daily maximum and minimum temperature series for the Serpent River watershed in northern Quebec (Canada). The downscaling models are developed and validated using large-scale predictor variables derived from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction–National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP–NCAR) reanalysis dataset. Atmospheric predictors such as specific humidity, wind velocity, and geopotential height are identified as the most relevant inputs to the downscaling models. The performance of the TLFN downscaling model is also compared to a statistical downscaling model (SDSM). The downscaling results suggest that the TLFN is an efficient method for downscaling both daily precipitation and temperature series. The best downscaling models were then applied to the outputs of the Canadian Global Climate Model (CGCM1), forced with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) IS92a scenario. Changes in average precipitation between the current and the future scenarios predicted by the TLFN are generally found to be smaller than those predicted by the SDSM model. Furthermore, application of the downscaled data for hydrologic impact analysis in the Serpent River resulted in an overall increasing trend in mean annual flow as well as earlier spring peak flow. The results also demonstrate the emphasis that should be given in identifying the appropriate downscaling tools for impact studies by showing how a future climate scenario downscaled with different downscaling methods could result in significantly different hydrologic impact simulation results for the same watershed.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Paulin Coulibaly, Department of Civil Engineering, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L7, Canada. Email: couliba@mcmaster.ca

Save
  • Anctil, F., Perrin C. , and Andréassian V. , 2003: ANN output updating of lumped conceptual rainfall/runoff forecasting models. J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc., 39 , 12691279.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology, 2000: Artificial neural networks in hydrology I: Preliminary concepts. ASCE J. Hydrol. Eng., 5 , 115123.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brandt, M., 1990: Simulation of runoff and nitrate transport from mixed basins in Sweden. Nord. Hydrol., 21 , 1334.

  • Cannon, A. J., and Whitfield P. H. , 2002: Downscaling recent streamflow conditions in British Columbia, Canada using ensemble neural network models. J. Hydrol., 259 , 136151.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carter, T. R., Parry M. L. , Harasawa H. , and Nishioka S. , 1994: IPCC technical guidelines for assessing climate change impacts and adaptations. University College and Centre for Global Environmental Research Rep. CGER-1015-94, 59 pp.

  • Conway, D., Wilby R. L. , and Jones P. D. , 1996: Precipitation and air flow indices over the British Isles. Climate Res., 7 , 169183.

  • Coulibaly, P., Anctil F. , Aravena R. , and Bobée B. , 2001a: ANN modeling of water table depth fluctuations. Water Resour. Res., 37 , 885896.

  • Coulibaly, P., Anctil F. , and Bobée B. , 2001b: Multivariate reservoir inflow forecasting using temporal neural networks. J. Hydrol. Eng. ASCE, 6 , 367376.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dibike, Y. B., Solomatine D. , and Abbott M. B. , 1999: On the encapsulation of numerical-hydraulic models in artificial neural network. J. Hydraul. Res., 37 , 147161.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gautam, D. K., and Holz K-P. , 2000: Neural network based system identification approach for the modelling of water resources and environmental systems. Artificial Intelligence Methods in Civil Engineering Applications, Proceedings of the Second Joint Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Methods in Civil Engineering Applications, O. Schleider and A. Zijderveld, Eds., 87–100.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harlin, J., and Kung C-S. , 1992: Parameter uncertainty and simulation of design floods in Sweden. J. Hydrol., 137 , 209230.

  • Hengeveld, H. G., 2000: Projections for Canada’s climate future: A discussion of recent simulations with the Canadian global climate model. Climate Change Digest, Vol. CCD00-01, Special Edition, Meteorological Service of Canada, Environment Canada, 32 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kistler, R., and Coauthors, 2001: The NCEP/NCAR 50-Year Reanalysis. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 82 , 247267.

  • Liden, R., and Harlin J. , 2000: Analysis of conceptual rainfall-runoff modelling performance in different climates. J. Hydrol., 238 , 231247.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe J. V. , 1970: River flow forecasting through conceptual models—Part I: A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol., 10 , 282290.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Principe, J. C., Euliano N. R. , and Lefebvre W. C. , 2000: Neural and Adaptive Systems: Fundamentals through Simulations. John Wiley, 672 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Salathe, E. P., 2003: Comparison of various precipitation downscaling methods for the simulation of streamflow in a rainshadow river basin. Int. J. Climatol., 23 , 887901.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schoof, J. T., and Pryor S. C. , 2001: Downscaling temperature and precipitation: A comparison of regression-based methods and artificial neural networks. Int. J. Climatol., 21 , 773790.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schubert, S., 1998: Downscaling local extreme temperature changes in south-eastern Australian from the CSIRO Mark2 GCM. Int. J. Climatol., 18 , 14191438.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schubert, S., and Henderson-Sellers A. , 1997: A statistical model to downscale local daily temperature extremes from synoptic-scale atmospheric circulation patterns in the Australian region. Climate Dyn., 13 , 223234.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Semenov, M. A., and Barrow E. M. , 1997: Use of stochastic weather generator in the development of climate change scenarios. Climate Change, 35 , 397414.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tatli, H., Dalfes H. , and Mente S. , 2004: A statistical downscaling method for monthly total precipitation over Turkey. Int. J. Climatol., 24 , 161180.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • von Storch, H., Hewitson B. , and Mearns L. , 2000: Review of empirical downscaling techniques. Regional Climate Development under Global Warming General Tech. Rep. 4, Torbjørnrud, Norway, 29–46.

  • Weichert, A., and Burger G. , 1998: Linear versus nonlinear techniques in downscaling. Climate Res., 10 , 8393.

  • Widmann, M., and Bretherton C. S. , 2000: Validation of mesoscale precipitation in the NCEP reanalysis using a new grid-cell dataset for the northwestern United States. J. Climate, 13 , 19361950.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wigley, T. M. L., Jones P. D. , Briffa K. R. , and Smith G. , 1990: Obtaining subgrid scale information from coarse-resolution general circulation model output. J. Geophys. Res., 95 , 19431953.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilby, R. L., Dawson C. W. , and Barrow E. M. , 2002: SDSM—A decision support tool for the assessment of regional climate change impacts. Environ. Modell. Software, 17 , 147159.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xu, C. Y., 1999: From GCM to River flow: A review of downscaling methods and hydrologic modeling approaches. Prog. Phys. Geogr., 23 , 229249.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 2421 675 169
PDF Downloads 1597 296 39