Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

One-Way Coupling of an Atmospheric and a Hydrologic Model in Colorado

L. E. Hay U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado

Search for other papers by L. E. Hay in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
M. P. Clark Center for Science and Technology Policy Research, CIRES, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by M. P. Clark in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
M. Pagowski Forecast Systems Laboratory, Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by M. Pagowski in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
G. H. Leavesley U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado

Search for other papers by G. H. Leavesley in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
W. J. Gutowski Jr. Department of Agronomy, Geological and Atmospheric Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa

Search for other papers by W. J. Gutowski Jr. in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Aug 2006
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM512.1
Page(s):
569–589
Restricted access

Abstract

This paper examines the accuracy of high-resolution nested mesoscale model simulations of surface climate. The nesting capabilities of the atmospheric fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University (PSU)–National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Mesoscale Model (MM5) were used to create high-resolution, 5-yr climate simulations (from 1 October 1994 through 30 September 1999), starting with a coarse nest of 20 km for the western United States. During this 5-yr period, two finer-resolution nests (5 and 1.7 km) were run over the Yampa River basin in northwestern Colorado. Raw and bias-corrected daily precipitation and maximum and minimum temperature time series from the three MM5 nests were used as input to the U.S. Geological Survey’s distributed hydrologic model [the Precipitation Runoff Modeling System (PRMS)] and were compared with PRMS results using measured climate station data.

The distributed capabilities of PRMS were provided by partitioning the Yampa River basin into hydrologic response units (HRUs). In addition to the classic polygon method of HRU definition, HRUs for PRMS were defined based on the three MM5 nests. This resulted in 16 datasets being tested using PRMS. The input datasets were derived using measured station data and raw and bias-corrected MM5 20-, 5-, and 1.7-km output distributed to 1) polygon HRUs and 2) 20-, 5-, and 1.7-km-gridded HRUs, respectively. Each dataset was calibrated independently, using a multiobjective, stepwise automated procedure. Final results showed a general increase in the accuracy of simulated runoff with an increase in HRU resolution. In all steps of the calibration procedure, the station-based simulations of runoff showed higher accuracy than the MM5-based simulations, although the accuracy of MM5 simulations was close to station data for the high-resolution nests. Further work is warranted in identifying the causes of the biases in MM5 local climate simulations and developing methods to remove them.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Lauren E. Hay, U.S. Geological Survey, Box 25046, MS 412, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225. Email: lhay@usgs.gov

Abstract

This paper examines the accuracy of high-resolution nested mesoscale model simulations of surface climate. The nesting capabilities of the atmospheric fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University (PSU)–National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Mesoscale Model (MM5) were used to create high-resolution, 5-yr climate simulations (from 1 October 1994 through 30 September 1999), starting with a coarse nest of 20 km for the western United States. During this 5-yr period, two finer-resolution nests (5 and 1.7 km) were run over the Yampa River basin in northwestern Colorado. Raw and bias-corrected daily precipitation and maximum and minimum temperature time series from the three MM5 nests were used as input to the U.S. Geological Survey’s distributed hydrologic model [the Precipitation Runoff Modeling System (PRMS)] and were compared with PRMS results using measured climate station data.

The distributed capabilities of PRMS were provided by partitioning the Yampa River basin into hydrologic response units (HRUs). In addition to the classic polygon method of HRU definition, HRUs for PRMS were defined based on the three MM5 nests. This resulted in 16 datasets being tested using PRMS. The input datasets were derived using measured station data and raw and bias-corrected MM5 20-, 5-, and 1.7-km output distributed to 1) polygon HRUs and 2) 20-, 5-, and 1.7-km-gridded HRUs, respectively. Each dataset was calibrated independently, using a multiobjective, stepwise automated procedure. Final results showed a general increase in the accuracy of simulated runoff with an increase in HRU resolution. In all steps of the calibration procedure, the station-based simulations of runoff showed higher accuracy than the MM5-based simulations, although the accuracy of MM5 simulations was close to station data for the high-resolution nests. Further work is warranted in identifying the causes of the biases in MM5 local climate simulations and developing methods to remove them.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Lauren E. Hay, U.S. Geological Survey, Box 25046, MS 412, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225. Email: lhay@usgs.gov

Save
Cover Journal of Hydrometeorology
Journal of Hydrometeorology

  • Anderson, J. R., Hardy E. E. , Roach J. T. , and Witmer R. E. , 1976: A land use land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 964, 28 pp.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation

  • Benjamin, S. G., and Coauthors, 2004: An hourly assimilation–forecast cycle. The RVC. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132 , 495–518.

  • Benoit, R., Pellerin P. , Kouwen N. , Ritchie H. , Donaldson N. , Joe P. , and Soulis E. D. , 2000: Toward the use of coupled atmospheric and hydrologic models at regional scale. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128 , 1681–1706.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Blackadar, A. K., 1976: Modeling the nocturnal boundary layer. Preprints, Third Symp. on Atmospheric Turbulence and Air Quality, Raleigh, NC, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 46–49.

  • Blackadar, A. K., 1979: High resolution models of the planetary boundary layer. Advances in Environmental Science and Engineering, Vol. 1, J. R. Pfafflin and E. N. Ziegler, Eds., Gordon and Briech Scientific Publishing, 50–85.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Burk, S. D., and Thompson W. T. , 1989: A vertically nested regional numerical weather prediction model with second-order closure physics. Mon. Wea. Rev., 117 , 2305–2324.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Duan, Q., Sorooshian S. , and Gupta V. K. , 1992: Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resour. Res., 28 , 1015–1031.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Duan, Q., Gupta V. K. , and Sorooshian S. , 1993: A shuffled complex evolution approach for effective and efficient global minimization. J. Opt. Theory Appl., 76 , 501–521.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Duan, Q., Sorooshian S. , and Gupta V. K. , 1994: Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models. J. Hydrol., 158 , 265–284.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dudhia, J., 1989: Numerical study of convection observed during the winter monsoon experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model. J. Atmos. Sci., 46 , 3077–3107.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Eischeid, J. K., Pasteris P. A. , Diaz H. F. , Plantico M. S. , and Lott N. J. , 2000: Creating a serially complete, national daily time series of temperature and precipitation for the western United States. J. Appl. Meteor., 39 , 1580–1591.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Farnsworth, R. K., Thompson E. S. , and Peck E. L. , 1982: Evaporation atlas for the contiguous 48 United States. NOAA Tech. Rep. NWS 33, 26 pp.

  • Grell, G. A., and Dévényi D. , 2002: A generalized approach to parameterizing convection combining ensemble and data assimilation techniques. Geophys. Res. Lett., 29 .1693, doi:10.1029/2002GL01531.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Grell, G. A., Dudhia J. , and Stauffer D. R. , 1995: A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR Tech. Rep. NCAR/TN-398+STR, 122 pp.

  • Grell, G. A., Schade L. , Knoche R. , Pfeiffer A. , and Egger J. , 2000: Nonhydrostatic climate simulations of precipitation over complex terrain. J. Geophys. Res., 105 , D24. 29595–29608.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hay, L. E., and Clark M. P. , 2003: Use of statistically and dynamically downscaled atmospheric model output for hydrologic simulations in three mountainous basins in the western United States. J. Hydrol., 282 , 56–75.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hay, L. E., Wilby R. L. , and Leavesley G. H. , 2000: A comparison of delta change and downscaled GCM scenarios for three mountainous basins in the United States. J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc., 36 , 387–397.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hay, L. E., Clark M. P. , Wilby R. L. , Gutowski W. J. , Leavesley G. H. , Pan Z. , Arritt R. W. , and Takle E. S. , 2002: Use of regional climate model output for hydrologic simulations. J. Hydrometeor., 3 , 571–590.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hay, L. E., Leavesley G. H. , Clark M. P. , Markstrom S. L. , Viger R. J. , and Umemoto M. , 2006: Step-wise, multiple-objective calibration of a hydrologic model for a snowmelt-dominated basin. J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc., in press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hogue, T. S., Sorooshian S. , Gupta H. V. , Holz A. , and Braatz D. , 2000: A multi-step automatic calibration scheme for river forecasting models. J. Hydrometeor., 1 , 524–542.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kalnay, E., and Coauthors, 1996: The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77 , 437–471.

  • Kuczera, G., 1997: Efficient subspace probabilistic parameter optimization for catchment models. Water Resour. Res., 33 , 177–185.

  • Leavesley, G. H., and Stannard L. G. , 1995: The precipitation-runoff modeling system-PRMS. Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, V. P Singh, Ed., Water Resources Publications, 281–310.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Leavesley, G. H., Lichty R. W. , Troutman B. M. , and Saindon L. G. , 1983: Precipitation-runoff modeling system: User’s manual. U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Rep. 83-4238, 207 pp.

  • Leung, L. R., and Qian Y. , 2003: The sensitivity of precipitation and snowpack simulations to model resolution via nesting in regions of complex terrain. J. Hydrometeor., 4 , 1025–1043.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lin, C. A., Wen L. , Beland M. , and Chaumont D. , 2002: A coupled atmospheric-hydrological modeling study of the 1996 Ha! Ha! River basin flash flood in Quebec, Canada. Geophys. Res. Lett., 29 .1026, doi:10.1029/2001GL013827.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Madsen, H., 2003: Parameter estimation in distributed hydrological catchment modelling using automatic calibration with multiple objectives. Adv. Water Resour., 26 , 205–216.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • McCarthy, J. J., Canziani O. F. , Leary N. A. , Dokken D. J. , and White K. S. , 2001: Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, Vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, 1032 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mlawer, E. J., Taubman S. J. , Brown P. D. , Iacono M. J. , and Clough S. A. , 1997: Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave. J. Geophys. Res., 102 , 16663–16682.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe J. V. , 1970: River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol., 10 , 282–290.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Panofsky, H. A., and Brier G. W. , 1968: Some Applications of Statistics to Meteorology. The Pennsylvania State University Press, 224 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Phillips, T. J., 1995: Documentation of the AMIP models on the World Wide Web. Lawrence Livermore Laboratory PCMDI Rep. 24, 14 pp.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation

  • Reek, T., Doty S. R. , and Owen T. W. , 1992: A deterministic approach to the validation of historical daily temperature and precipitation data from the cooperative network. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 73 , 753–762.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Reisner, J., Rasmussen R. J. , and Bruintjes R. T. , 1998: Explicit forecasting of supercooled liquid water in winter storms using the MM5 mesoscale model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 124 , 1071–1107.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Seuffert, G., Gross P. , Simmer C. , and Wood E. F. , 2002: The influence of hydrologic modelling on the predicted local weather: Two-way coupling of a mesoscale land surface model and a land surface hydrologic model. J. Hydrometeor., 3 , 505–523.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sloto, R. A., and Crouse M. Y. , 1996: HYSEP: A computer program for streamflow hydrograph separation and analysis. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Rep. 96-4040, 46 pp.

  • Smirnova, T. G., Brown J. M. , Benjamin S. G. , and Dongsoo K. , 2000: Parameterization of cold-season processes in the MAPS land-surface scheme. J. Geophys. Res., 105 , 4077–4086.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1994: State Soil Geographic (STATSGO) database—Data use information. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Miscellaneous Publication 1492, 107 pp.

  • Viger, R. J., Markstrom S. L. , and Leavesley G. H. , 1998: The GIS Weasel—An interface for the treatment of spatial information used in watershed modeling and water resource management. Proc. of the First Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modeling Conf., Vol II, Las Vegas, NV, Subcommittee on Hydrology of the Interagency Advisory Committee on Water Data, 73–80.

  • Vrugt, J. A., Bouten W. , Gupta H. V. , and Sorooshian S. , 2003: Toward improved identifiability of hydrologic model parameters: The information content of experimental data. Water Resour. Res., 38 .1312, doi:10.1029/2001WR001118.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Westrick, K. J., and Mass C. F. , 2001: An evaluation of a high-resolution hydrometeorological modeling system for prediction of a cold-season flood event in a coastal mountainous watershed. J. Hydrometeor., 2 , 161–180.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Westrick, K. J., Storck P. , and Mass C. F. , 2002: Description and evaluation of a hydrometeorological forecast system for mountainous watersheds. Wea. Forecasting, 17 , 250–262.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wilby, R. L., Hay L. E. , and Leavesley G. H. , 1999: A comparison of downscaled and raw GCM output: Implications for climate change scenarios in the San Juan River basin, Colorado. J. Hydrol., 225 , 67–91.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wilks, D. S., 1995: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences: An Introduction. Academic Press, 467 pp.

  • Wood, A. W., Maurer E. P. , Kumar A. , and Lettenmaier D. P. , 2002: Long-range experimental hydrological forecasting for the eastern United States. J. Geophys. Res., 107 .4429, doi:10.1029/2001JD000659.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Yapo, P. O., Gupta H. V. , and Sorooshian S. , 1996: Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: Sensitivity to calibration data. J. Hydrol., 181 , 23–48.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 602 366 36
PDF Downloads 173 29 5