Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Development of the Soil Moisture Index to Quantify Agricultural Drought and Its “User Friendliness” in Severity-Area-Duration Assessment

Venkataramana Sridhar Department of Civil Engineering, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho

Search for other papers by Venkataramana Sridhar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Kenneth G. Hubbard University of Nebraska at Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska

Search for other papers by Kenneth G. Hubbard in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Jinsheng You University of Nebraska at Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska

Search for other papers by Jinsheng You in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Eric D. Hunt University of Nebraska at Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska

Search for other papers by Eric D. Hunt in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Aug 2008
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JHM892.1
Page(s):
660–676
Restricted access

Abstract

This paper examines the role of soil moisture in quantifying drought through the development of a drought index using observed and modeled soil moisture. In Nebraska, rainfall is received primarily during the crop-growing season and the supply of moisture from the Gulf of Mexico determines if the impending crop year is either normal or anomalous and any deficit of rain leads to a lack of soil moisture storage. Using observed soil moisture from the Automated Weather Data Network (AWDN), the actual available water content for plants is calculated as the difference between observed or modeled soil moisture and wilting point, which is subsequently normalized with the site-specific, soil property–based, idealistic available water for plants that is calculated as the difference between field capacity and wilting point to derive the soil moisture index (SMI). This index is categorized into five classes from no drought to extreme drought to quantitatively assess drought in both space and time. Additionally, with the aid of an in-house hydrology model, soil moisture was simulated in order to compute model-based SMI and to compare the drought duration and severity for various sites. The results suggest that the soil moisture influence, a positive feedback process reported in many earlier studies, is unquestionably a quantitative indicator of drought. Also, the severity and duration of drought across Nebraska has a clear gradient from west to east, with the Panhandle region experiencing severe to extreme drought in the deeper soil layers for longer periods (>200 days), than the central and southwestern regions (125–150 days) or the eastern regions about 100 days or less. The anomalous rainfall years can eliminate the distinction among these regions with regard to their drought extent, severity, and persistence, thus making drought a more ubiquitous phenomenon, but the recovery from drought can be subject to similar gradations. The spatial SMI maps presented in this paper can be used with the Drought Monitor maps to assess the local drought conditions more effectively.

Corresponding author address: Venkataramana Sridhar, Department of Civil Engineering, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725-2075. Email: vsridhar@boisestate.edu

Abstract

This paper examines the role of soil moisture in quantifying drought through the development of a drought index using observed and modeled soil moisture. In Nebraska, rainfall is received primarily during the crop-growing season and the supply of moisture from the Gulf of Mexico determines if the impending crop year is either normal or anomalous and any deficit of rain leads to a lack of soil moisture storage. Using observed soil moisture from the Automated Weather Data Network (AWDN), the actual available water content for plants is calculated as the difference between observed or modeled soil moisture and wilting point, which is subsequently normalized with the site-specific, soil property–based, idealistic available water for plants that is calculated as the difference between field capacity and wilting point to derive the soil moisture index (SMI). This index is categorized into five classes from no drought to extreme drought to quantitatively assess drought in both space and time. Additionally, with the aid of an in-house hydrology model, soil moisture was simulated in order to compute model-based SMI and to compare the drought duration and severity for various sites. The results suggest that the soil moisture influence, a positive feedback process reported in many earlier studies, is unquestionably a quantitative indicator of drought. Also, the severity and duration of drought across Nebraska has a clear gradient from west to east, with the Panhandle region experiencing severe to extreme drought in the deeper soil layers for longer periods (>200 days), than the central and southwestern regions (125–150 days) or the eastern regions about 100 days or less. The anomalous rainfall years can eliminate the distinction among these regions with regard to their drought extent, severity, and persistence, thus making drought a more ubiquitous phenomenon, but the recovery from drought can be subject to similar gradations. The spatial SMI maps presented in this paper can be used with the Drought Monitor maps to assess the local drought conditions more effectively.

Corresponding author address: Venkataramana Sridhar, Department of Civil Engineering, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725-2075. Email: vsridhar@boisestate.edu

Save
Cover Journal of Hydrometeorology
Journal of Hydrometeorology

  • Alley, W. M., 1985: The Palmer Drought Severity Index as a measure of hydrologic drought. Water Resour. Bull., 21 , 105–114.

  • Campbell, G. S., 1985: Soil Physics with Basic. Elsevier, 150 pp.

  • Dirmeyer, P. A., 1994: Vegetation stress as a feedback mechanism in midlatitude drought. J. Climate, 7 , 1463–1483.

  • Entekhabi, D., Rodriguez-Iturbe I. , and Bras R. L. , 1992: Variability in large-scale water balance with land surface–atmosphere interaction. J. Climate, 5 , 798–813.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Guttman, N. B., Wallis J. R. , and Hosking J. R. M. , 1992: Spatial comparability of the Palmer Drought Severity Index. Water Resour. Bull., 28 , 6. 1111–1119.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hong, S-Y., and Kalnay E. , 2000: Role of sea surface temperature and soil-moisture feedback in the 1998 Oklahoma-Texas drought. Nature, 408 , 842–844.

  • Hubbard, K. G., and Wu H. , 2005: Modification of a crop-specific drought index for simulating corn yield in wet years. Agron. J., 97 , 1478–1484.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hubbard, K. G., Rosenberg N. J. , and Nielsen D. C. , 1983: An automated weather data network in support of agricultural operations. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 109 , 213–222.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jensen, M. E., Burman R. D. , and Allen R. G. , Eds. 1990: Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements. ASCE Manual and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 70, Irrigation and Drainage Division of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 332 pp.

  • Keyantash, J., and Dracup J. A. , 2002: The quantification of drought: An evaluation of drought indices. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 83 , 1167–1180.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kincaid, D. C., and Heerman D. F. , 1974: Scheduling irrigations using as programmable calculator. USDA-ARS-NC-12, 55 pp.

  • Koster, R. D., and Coauthors, 2004: Regions of strong coupling between soil moisture and precipitation. Science, 305 , 1138–1140. doi:10.1126/science.1100217.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mahmood, R., and Hubbard K. G. , 2003: Simulating sensitivity of soil moisture and evapotranspiration under heterogeneous soils and land uses. J. Hydrol., 280 , 72–90.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • NDMC, cited. 2007: U.S. drought monitor. National Drought Mitigation Center, University of Nebraska–Lincoln. [Available online at http://www.drought.unl.edu/dm/.].

  • Nicholson, S., 2000: Land surface processes and sahel climate. Rev. Geophys., 38 , 117–139.

  • Oglesby, R. J., 1991: Springtime soil moisture, nature climate variability, and North American drought as simulated by the NCAR Community Climate Model I. J. Climate, 4 , 890–897.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Oglesby, R. J., and Erickson D. J. III, 1989: Soil moisture and persistence of North American drought. J. Climate, 2 , 1362–1380.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Pal, J. S., and Eltahir E. A. B. , 2001: Pathways relating soil moisture conditions to future summer rainfall within a model of the land-atmosphere system. J. Climate, 14 , 1227–1242.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Penman, H. L., 1948: Natural evapotranspiration from open water, bare soil and grass. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, 193A , 120–145.

  • Piechota, T. C., and Dracup J. A. , 1996: Drought and regional hydrologic variation in the United States: Associations with the El Niño-Southern Oscillation. Water Resour. Res., 32 , 5. 1359–1373.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Robinson, J. M., and Hubbard K. G. , 1990: Soil water assessment model for several crops in the high plains. Agron. J., 82 , 1141–1148.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sandvig, R. M., and Phillips F. M. , 2006: Ecohydrological controls on soil moisture fluxes in arid to semiarid vadose zones. Water Resour. Res., 42 .W08422, doi:10.1029/2005WR004644.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sheffield, J., Goteti G. , Wen F. , and Wood E. F. , 2004: A simulated soil moisture based drought analysis for the United States. J. Geophys. Res., 109 .D24108, doi:10.1029/2004JD005182.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sridhar, V., Loope D. B. , Mason J. A. , Swinehart J. B. , Oglesby R. J. , and Rowe C. M. , 2006a: Large wind shift on the Great Plains during the Medieval warm period. Science, 313 , 5785. 345–347. doi:10.1126/science.1128941.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sridhar, V., Hubbard K. G. , and Wedin D. A. , 2006b: Assessment of soil moisture dynamics of the Nebraska Sandhills using long-term measurements and a hydrology model. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 132 , 5. 463–473. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2006)132:5(463).

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Timilsena, J., Piechota T. C. , Hidalgo H. , and Tootle G. , 2007: Five hundred years of hydrological drought in the upper Colorado river basin. J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc., 43 , 3. 798–812. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00064.x.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Tsakiris, G., and Vangelis H. , 2004: Towards a drought watch system based on spatial SPI. Water Resour. Manage., 18 , 1–12.

  • You, J., and Hubbard K. G. , 2006: Quality assurance of soil moisture data in ACIS–A case study in Nebraska. High Plains Regional Climate Center Rep., 31 pp.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 2114 580 35
PDF Downloads 1569 423 30