All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 209 209 59
Full Text Views 25 25 7
PDF Downloads 38 38 13

Developing Impacts-Based Drought Thresholds for Ohio

Ning ZhangaDepartment of Geography, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
bUniversity of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, Davis, California

Search for other papers by Ning Zhang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Zhiying LiaDepartment of Geography, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
cDepartment of Geography, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire

Search for other papers by Zhiying Li in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Steven M. QuiringaDepartment of Geography, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

Search for other papers by Steven M. Quiring in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Drought monitoring is critical for managing agriculture and water resources and for triggering state emergency response plans and hazard mitigation activities. Fixed thresholds serve as guidelines for the United States Drought Monitor (USDM). However, fixed drought thresholds (i.e., using the same threshold in all seasons and climate regions) may not properly reflect local conditions and impacts. Therefore, this study develops impacts-based drought thresholds that are appropriate for drought monitoring in Ohio. We examined four drought indices that are currently used by the State of Ohio: Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), Standardized Precipitation-Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI), Palmer’s Z-Index and Palmer Hydrological Drought Index (PHDI). Streamflow and corn yield are used as indicators of hydrological and agricultural drought impacts, respectively. Our results show that fixed thresholds tend to indicate milder drought conditions in Ohio, while the proposed impacts-based drought thresholds are more sensitive to exceptional drought (D4) conditions. The area percentage of D4 based on impacts-based drought thresholds is more strongly correlated with corn yield and streamflow. This study provides a methodology for developing local impacts-based drought thresholds that can be applied to other regions where long-term drought impact records exist to provide regionally representative depictions of conditions and improve drought monitoring.

Ning Zhang and Zhiying Li contributed to the work equally and should be regarded as co-first authors.

Corresponding author: Zhiying Li, li.8254@osu.edu

Abstract

Drought monitoring is critical for managing agriculture and water resources and for triggering state emergency response plans and hazard mitigation activities. Fixed thresholds serve as guidelines for the United States Drought Monitor (USDM). However, fixed drought thresholds (i.e., using the same threshold in all seasons and climate regions) may not properly reflect local conditions and impacts. Therefore, this study develops impacts-based drought thresholds that are appropriate for drought monitoring in Ohio. We examined four drought indices that are currently used by the State of Ohio: Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), Standardized Precipitation-Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI), Palmer’s Z-Index and Palmer Hydrological Drought Index (PHDI). Streamflow and corn yield are used as indicators of hydrological and agricultural drought impacts, respectively. Our results show that fixed thresholds tend to indicate milder drought conditions in Ohio, while the proposed impacts-based drought thresholds are more sensitive to exceptional drought (D4) conditions. The area percentage of D4 based on impacts-based drought thresholds is more strongly correlated with corn yield and streamflow. This study provides a methodology for developing local impacts-based drought thresholds that can be applied to other regions where long-term drought impact records exist to provide regionally representative depictions of conditions and improve drought monitoring.

Ning Zhang and Zhiying Li contributed to the work equally and should be regarded as co-first authors.

Corresponding author: Zhiying Li, li.8254@osu.edu
Save