Abstract
Standard atmospheric energy budget computations are made for three distinct sets of Northern Hemisphere synoptic analyses prepared from data gathered during the August 1975 Data Systems Test. The first analysis set (System 1) included all data, the second (System 2) all but the satellite temperature retrievals (excepting some retained in the Southern Hemisphere for analysis model stability), and the third (System 3) all but the rawinsondes. Our results indicate that significant differences occur in the energetics of the analyses. In particular, there is a significant loss of longitudinal variance in an analysis based mainly on satellite retrievals as compared to that based mainly on rawinsonde data. In addition, forecasts by the NMC 6-layer numerical model initiated from System 1 and 2 analyses were evaluated for forecast periods from 00 to 72 h. It appears that this forecast model is sensitive to variations supplied by the initial data sets, but only to 12 h. Thereafter the forecast energetics are controlled by the model physics, and energy differences evolving from the different data sets remain constant in time.
