A Comparison of Two Objective Analysis Techniques for Profiler Time-Height Data

Frederick H. Carr School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Frederick H. Carr in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Phillip L. Spencer NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Phillip L. Spencer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Charles A. Doswell III NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Charles A. Doswell III in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Jeffrey D. Powell Vandenberg Air Force Base, Vandenberg, California

Search for other papers by Jeffrey D. Powell in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

Two methods for objective analysis of wind profiler data in time-height space are proposed and compared. One is a straightforward adaptation of a procedure developed by Doswell for introducing time continuity into a sequence of spatial analyses. The second technique, named the correlation method, introduces a new rationale for selection of the Barnes filter parameter that is based on knowledge of the statistical structure of wind profiler data. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed. It is noted that the correlation method, in principle, allows the deduction of consistent sampling intervals in time and space for the most dominant phenomena resolved by the data provided by a given atmospheric observing system. It is recommended that an objective analysis of wind profiler data be performed before single- or multiprofiler kinematic calculations are made.

In addition, it is shown that the positions of extrema in kinematic quantities computed from profiler triangles are relatively insensitive to the number of passes used in the analysis procedures. In fact, it is demonstrated that multipass Barnes-type schemes can overfit the original data, suggesting that a one-pass method may be preferable provided that the filter parameter is selected properly.

Abstract

Two methods for objective analysis of wind profiler data in time-height space are proposed and compared. One is a straightforward adaptation of a procedure developed by Doswell for introducing time continuity into a sequence of spatial analyses. The second technique, named the correlation method, introduces a new rationale for selection of the Barnes filter parameter that is based on knowledge of the statistical structure of wind profiler data. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed. It is noted that the correlation method, in principle, allows the deduction of consistent sampling intervals in time and space for the most dominant phenomena resolved by the data provided by a given atmospheric observing system. It is recommended that an objective analysis of wind profiler data be performed before single- or multiprofiler kinematic calculations are made.

In addition, it is shown that the positions of extrema in kinematic quantities computed from profiler triangles are relatively insensitive to the number of passes used in the analysis procedures. In fact, it is demonstrated that multipass Barnes-type schemes can overfit the original data, suggesting that a one-pass method may be preferable provided that the filter parameter is selected properly.

Save