Abstract
It is desirable to filter the unpredictable components from a medium-range forecast. Such a filtered forecast can be obtained by averaging an ensemble of predictions that started from slightly different initial atmospheric states. Different strategies have been proposed to generate the initial perturbations for such an ensemble. “Optimal” perturbation give the largest error at a prespecified forecast time. “Bred” perturbations have grown during a period prior to the analysis. “OSSE-MC” perturbations are obtained using a Monte Carlo-like observation system simulation experiment (OSSE).
In the current pilot study, the properties of the different strategies are compared. A three-level quasigeostrophic model is used to describe the evolution of the errors. The tangent linear version of this model and its adjoint version are used to generate the optimal perturbations, while bred perturbations are generated using the full nonlinear model. In the OSSE-MC method, random perturbations of model states are used in the simulation of radiosonde and satellite observations. These observations are then assimilated using an optimal interpolation (OI) assimilation system. A large OSSE-MC ensemble is obtained using such input and the OI system, which then provides the ground truth for the other ensembles. Its observed statistical properties are also used in the construction of the optimal and the bred perturbations.
The quality of the different ensemble mean medium-range forecasts is compared for forecast lengths of up to 15 days and ensembles of 2, 8, and 32 members. Before 6 days the control performs almost as well as any ensemble mean. Bred and OSSE-MC ensembles of only two members are of marginal quality. For all three methods an ensemble size of 8 is sufficient to obtain the main part of the possible improvement over the control, and all perform well for 32-member ensembles. Still better results are obtained from a weighted mean of the climate and the ensemble mean.
