Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Airborne Doppler Radar Analysis of Supercells during COPS-91

David C. Dowell School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by David C. Dowell in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Howard B. Bluestein School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Howard B. Bluestein in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
David P. Jorgensen NOAA/NSSL, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by David P. Jorgensen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Mar 1997
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1997)125<0365:ADRAOS>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
365–383
Restricted access

Abstract

On 26 May 1991, NOAA P-3 airborne Doppler radar data were collected near two tornadic supercells in the southern Plains during the Cooperative Oklahoma Profiler Studies (COPS-91) field program. The 3-cm radar mounted in the tail of the aircraft was operated using the fore–aft scanning technique (FAST). Both storms were sampled just minutes after each had produced a tornado. The COPS-91 storms are the first tornadic supercells to be sampled extensively by airborne Doppler radar using the FAST methodology.

Pseudo-dual-Doppler analyses of a dissipating storm in southwest Kansas show no remaining low-level circulation, even though the storm had just produced a tornado. The analyses of a storm in northwest Oklahoma reveal better-defined features in the wind field near the surface. In contrast to what has been previously observed in post-tornadic supercells, the cyclonic vorticity in both storms was greater aloft than at low levels. The 26 May 1991 storms provide further evidence that supercells often contain multiple updrafts and mesocyclones. Cyclical mesocyclogenesis was occurring in the northwest Oklahoma storm while pseudo-dual-Doppler data were being collected.

Airborne Doppler radar provides the potential for obtaining datasets throughout the lifetime of a storm at close range, where the observational geometry can be controlled to minimize known errors. The lessons learned from COPS-91 were incorporated into the airborne Doppler strategies employed during the subsequent Verificafion of the Origins of Rotation in Tornadoes Experiment (1994–95).

Corresponding author address: David C. Dowell, School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, 100 East Boyd, Room 1310, Norman, OK 73019-0628.

Abstract

On 26 May 1991, NOAA P-3 airborne Doppler radar data were collected near two tornadic supercells in the southern Plains during the Cooperative Oklahoma Profiler Studies (COPS-91) field program. The 3-cm radar mounted in the tail of the aircraft was operated using the fore–aft scanning technique (FAST). Both storms were sampled just minutes after each had produced a tornado. The COPS-91 storms are the first tornadic supercells to be sampled extensively by airborne Doppler radar using the FAST methodology.

Pseudo-dual-Doppler analyses of a dissipating storm in southwest Kansas show no remaining low-level circulation, even though the storm had just produced a tornado. The analyses of a storm in northwest Oklahoma reveal better-defined features in the wind field near the surface. In contrast to what has been previously observed in post-tornadic supercells, the cyclonic vorticity in both storms was greater aloft than at low levels. The 26 May 1991 storms provide further evidence that supercells often contain multiple updrafts and mesocyclones. Cyclical mesocyclogenesis was occurring in the northwest Oklahoma storm while pseudo-dual-Doppler data were being collected.

Airborne Doppler radar provides the potential for obtaining datasets throughout the lifetime of a storm at close range, where the observational geometry can be controlled to minimize known errors. The lessons learned from COPS-91 were incorporated into the airborne Doppler strategies employed during the subsequent Verificafion of the Origins of Rotation in Tornadoes Experiment (1994–95).

Corresponding author address: David C. Dowell, School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, 100 East Boyd, Room 1310, Norman, OK 73019-0628.

Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Bluestein, H. B., and C. R. Parks, 1983: A synoptic and photographic climatology of low-precipitation severe thunderstorms in the southern Plains. Mon. Wea. Rev.,111, 2034–2046.

  • ——, and G. R. Woodall, 1990: Doppler-radar analysis of a low-precipitation severe storm. Mon. Wea. Rev.,118, 1640–1664.

  • ——, and S. S. Parker, 1993: Modes of isolated, severe convective storm formation along the dryline. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 1354–1372.

  • ——, J. G. LaDue, H. Stein, D. Speheger, and W. P. Unruh, 1993: Doppler radar wind spectra of supercell tornadoes. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 2200–2221.

  • Brandes, E. A., 1977: Gust front evolution and tornadogenesis as viewed by Doppler radar. J. Appl. Meteor.,16, 333–338.

  • ——, 1978: Mesocyclone evolution and tornadogenesis: Some observations. Mon. Wea. Rev.,106, 995–1011.

  • ——, 1981: Finestructure of the Del City–Edmond tornadic mesocirculation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,109, 635–647.

  • ——, 1984a: Relationships between radar-derived thermodynamic variables and tornadogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev.,112, 1033–1052.

  • ——, 1984b: Vertical vorticity generation and mesocyclone sustenance in tornadic thunderstorms: The observational evidence. Mon. Wea. Rev.,112, 2253–2269.

  • ——, R. P. Davies-Jones, and B. C. Johnson, 1988: Streamwise vorticity effects on supercell morphology and persistence. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 947–963.

  • Browning, K. A., 1964: Airflow and precipitation trajectories within severe local storms which travel to the right of the winds. J. Atmos. Sci.,21, 634–639.

  • ——, and R. J. Donaldson Jr., 1963: Airflow and structure of a tornadic storm. J. Atmos. Sci.,20, 533–545.

  • Burgess, D. W., V. T. Wood, and R. A. Brown, 1982: Mesocyclone evolution statistics. Preprints, 12th Conf. Severe Local Storms, San Antonio, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 422–424.

  • Cressman, G. P., 1959: An operational objective analysis system. Mon. Wea. Rev.,87, 367–374.

  • Davies-Jones, R. P., 1979: Dual-Doppler radar coverage area as a function of measurement accuracy and spatial resolution. J. Appl. Meteor.,18, 1229–1233.

  • ——, D. W. Burgess, and M. Foster, 1990: Test of helicity as a forecast parameter. Preprints, 16th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Kananaskis Park, AB, Canada, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 588–592.

  • Doviak, R. J., P. S. Ray, R. G. Strauch, and L. J. Miller, 1976: Error estimation in wind fields derived from dual-Doppler radar measurement. J. Appl. Meteor.,15, 868–878.

  • Dowell, D. C., 1994: A comparative study of two supercells: Airborne Doppler analyses. M.S. thesis, School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, 105 pp.

  • Hane, C. E., and P. S. Ray, 1985: Pressure and buoyancy fields derived from Doppler radar in a tornadic thunderstorm. J. Atmos. Sci.,42, 18–35.

  • ——, C. L. Ziegler, and H. B. Bluestein, 1993: Investigation of the dryline and convective storms initiated along the dryline: Field experiments during COPS-91. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,74, 2133–2145.

  • ——, T. M. Crawford, and H. B. Bluestein, 1994: A case study of along-dryline variability in relation to severe thunderstorm development. Preprints, Sixth Conf. Mesoscale Processes, Portland, OR, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 246–249.

  • Heymsfield, G. M., 1978: Kinematic and dynamic aspects of the Harrah tornadic storm analyzed from dual-Doppler data. Mon. Wea. Rev.,106, 233–254.

  • Hildebrand, P. H., 1989: Airborne Doppler radar accuracy. Preprints, 24th Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Tallahassee, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 585–588.

  • ——, and C. K. Mueller, 1985: Evaluation of meteorological airborne Doppler radar. Part I: Dual-Doppler analyses of air motions. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,2, 362–380.

  • ——, R. A. Oye, and R. E. Carbone, 1981: X-band vs C-band aircraft radar: The relative effects of beamwidth and attenuation in severe storm situations. J. Appl. Meteor.,20, 1353–1361.

  • Holle, R. L., 1988: Photogrammetry of thunderstorms. Instruments and Techniques for Thunderstorm Observation and Analysis, 2d ed., E. Kessler, Ed., University of Oklahoma Press, 51–63.

  • Johnson, K. W., P. S. Ray, B. C. Johnson, and R. P. Davies-Jones, 1987: Observations related to the rotational dynamics of the 20 May 1977 tornadic storms. Mon. Wea. Rev.,115, 2463–2478.

  • Jorgensen, D. P., 1984: Mesoscale and convective-scale characteristics of mature hurricanes. Part I: General observations by research aircraft. J. Atmos. Sci.,41, 1268–1285.

  • ——, and B. F. Smull, 1993: Mesovortex circulations seen by airborne Doppler radar within a bow-echo mesoscale convective system. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,74, 2146–2157.

  • ——, P. H. Hildebrand, and C. L. Frush, 1983: Feasibility test of an airborne pulse-Doppler meteorological radar. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,22, 744–757.

  • ——, M. A. LeMone, and B. Jou, 1991: Precipitation and kinematic structure of an oceanic mesoscale convective system. Part I: Convective line structure. Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 2608–2637.

  • ——, T. J. Matejka, and J. D. DuGranrut, 1995: Multi-beam techniques for deriving wind fields from airborne Doppler radars. J. Meteor. Atmos. Physics,58, 83–104.

  • Klemp, J. B., and R. Rotunno, 1983: A study of the tornadic region within a supercell thunderstorm. J. Atmos. Sci.,40, 359–377.

  • Lee, W.-C., P. Dodge, F. D. Marks, and P. H. Hildebrand, 1994: Mapping of airborne Doppler radar data. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,11, 572–578.

  • Leise, J. A., 1981: A multidimensional scale-telescoped filter and data extension package. NOAA Tech. Memo. ERL WPL-82, 18 pp. [NTIS PB82-164104.].

  • Lemon, L. R., and C. A. Doswell, 1979: Severe thunderstorm evolution and mesocyclone structure as related to tornadogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev.,107, 1184–1197.

  • LeMone, M. A., and D. P. Jorgensen, 1991: Precipitation and kinematic structure of an oceanic mesoscale convective system. Part II: Momentum transport and generation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 2638–2653.

  • Lilly, D. K., 1986: The structure, energetics, and propagation of rotating convective storms. Part II: Helicity and storm stabilization. J. Atmos. Sci.,43, 126–140.

  • O’Brien, J., 1970: Alternative solutions to the classical vertical velocity problem. J. Appl. Meteor.,9, 197–203.

  • Rasmussen, E. N., J. M. Straka, R. Davies-Jones, C. A. Doswell III, F. H. Carr, M. D. Eilts, and D. R. MacGorman, 1994: Verification of the Origins of Rotation in Tornadoes Experiment: VORTEX. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,75, 995–1006.

  • Ray, P. S., and D. P. Jorgensen, 1988: Uncertainties associated with combining airborne and ground-based Doppler radar data. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,5, 177–196.

  • ——, and M. Stephenson, 1990: Assessment of the geometric and temporal errors associated with airborne Doppler radar measurements of a convective storm. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,7, 206–217.

  • ——, C. L. Ziegler, W. Bumgarner, and R. J. Serafin, 1980: Single- and multiple-Doppler radar observations of tornadic storms. Mon. Wea. Rev.,108, 1607–1625.

  • ——, B. C. Johnson, K. W. Johnson, J. S. Bradberry, J. J. Stephens, K. K. Wagner, R. B. Wilhelmson, and J. B. Klemp, 1981: The morphology of several tornadic storms on 20 May 1977. J. Atmos. Sci.,38, 1643–1663.

  • ——, D. P. Jorgensen, and S. L. Wang, 1985: Airborne Doppler radar observations of a convective storm. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,24, 687–698.

  • Rotunno, R., 1981: On the evolution of thunderstorm rotation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,109, 577–586.

  • ——, and J. Klemp, 1985: On the rotation and propagation of simulated supercell thunderstorms. J. Atmos. Sci.,42, 271–292.

  • Rust, W. D., D. W. Burgess, R. A. Maddox, L. C. Showell, T. C. Marshall, and D. K. Lauritsen, 1990: Testing a mobile version of a cross-chain LORAN atmospheric (M-CLASS) sounding system. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,71, 173–180.

  • U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 1991: Storm Data. Vol. 33, No. 5, NOAA, NESDIS, and NCDC, 260 pp.

  • Wakimoto, R. M., and B. E. Martner, 1992: Observations of a Colorado tornado. Part II: Combined photogrammetric and Doppler radar analysis. Mon. Wea. Rev.,120, 522–543.

  • ——, W. C. Lee, H. B. Bluestein, C. H. Liu, and P. H. Hildebrand, 1996: ELDORA observations during VORTEX 95. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,77, 1465–1481.

  • Watson, A. I., D. O. Blanchard, D. P. Jorgensen, and D. W. Burgess, 1993: The kinematic structure of a supercell thunderstorm seen by airborne Doppler radar. Preprints, 26th Int. Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Norman, OK, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 209–211.

  • Weber, B. L., and Coauthors, 1990: Preliminary evaluation of the first NOAA demonstration network wind profiler. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,7, 909–918.

  • Weisman, M. L., and J. B. Klemp, 1982: The dependence of numerically simulated convective storms on vertical wind shear and buoyancy. Mon. Wea. Rev.,110, 504–520.

  • ——, and ——, 1984: The structure and classification of numerically simulated convective storms in directionally varying wind shears. Mon. Wea. Rev.,112, 2479–2498.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1215 1014 37
PDF Downloads 192 51 5