Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

The Influence of Mesoscale Humidity and Evapotranspiration Fields on a Model Forecast of a Cold-Frontal Squall Line

Steven E. Koch Department of Marine, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University at Raleigh, Raleigh, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Steven E. Koch in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Ahmet Aksakal Science Systems and Applications, Incorporated, Landover, Maryland

Search for other papers by Ahmet Aksakal in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Jeffery T. McQueen S. T. Systems Corporation, Lanham, Maryland

Search for other papers by Jeffery T. McQueen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Mar 1997
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1997)125<0384:TIOMHA>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
384–409
Restricted access

Abstract

Satellite imagery and rain gauge data are combined to create mesoscale detail in the initial states of relative humidity (RH) and surface moisture availability (M) for a mesoscale model simulation. The most profound impact of inserting the mesoscale initial fields was the development of a strong vertical circulation transverse to an intensifying cold front that triggered an intense frontal rainband similar to a severe squall line that was observed to develop explosively. This paper explores the causative factors leading to the formation of this intense circulation and the sensitivity of the model to the mesoscale initial fields.

A substantial gradient in the initialized RH and M fields occurred across the cold front in the region where the observed frontal squall line formed. In contrast to the control run, the model simulations that incorporated the mesoscale initial analysis displayed considerable daytime warming just ahead of the front. This warming was due principally to a reduction in the RH (and, hence, low-level cloud cover) east of the front, although an increase in the cross-frontal M gradient did contribute about 25% of the warming. Increased sensible heat fluxes at the expense of decreased latent heat fluxes led to a much deeper and well-mixed prefrontal boundary layer, a more erect frontal surface, and an updraft jet just ahead of the front. A density current–like flow developed in the cold air immediately behind the front only in the presence of this cross-frontal gradient in sensible heating. Much improved forecasts of the location and timing of the frontal squall line and other precipitation systems resulted from the mesoscale initial analysis. The initial RH and M fields possessed sufficient resolution and consistency with the model dynamics to have a positive influence on the forecasts for a period of at least 12 h.

This study provides evidence that differential cloud cover and evapotranspiration fields can have important impacts on frontal behavior when strong synoptic dynamics are present. Future research should attempt to improve the modeling of evapotranspiration processes, develop more objective satellite-based humidity analysis techniques, and obtain in situ mesoscale data for verification of the retrieved atmospheric and soil moisture fields.

* Current affiliation: NOAA/Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, Maryland.

Corresponding author address: Steven E. Koch, Dept. of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University at Raleigh, Box 8208, Raleigh, North Carolina.

Abstract

Satellite imagery and rain gauge data are combined to create mesoscale detail in the initial states of relative humidity (RH) and surface moisture availability (M) for a mesoscale model simulation. The most profound impact of inserting the mesoscale initial fields was the development of a strong vertical circulation transverse to an intensifying cold front that triggered an intense frontal rainband similar to a severe squall line that was observed to develop explosively. This paper explores the causative factors leading to the formation of this intense circulation and the sensitivity of the model to the mesoscale initial fields.

A substantial gradient in the initialized RH and M fields occurred across the cold front in the region where the observed frontal squall line formed. In contrast to the control run, the model simulations that incorporated the mesoscale initial analysis displayed considerable daytime warming just ahead of the front. This warming was due principally to a reduction in the RH (and, hence, low-level cloud cover) east of the front, although an increase in the cross-frontal M gradient did contribute about 25% of the warming. Increased sensible heat fluxes at the expense of decreased latent heat fluxes led to a much deeper and well-mixed prefrontal boundary layer, a more erect frontal surface, and an updraft jet just ahead of the front. A density current–like flow developed in the cold air immediately behind the front only in the presence of this cross-frontal gradient in sensible heating. Much improved forecasts of the location and timing of the frontal squall line and other precipitation systems resulted from the mesoscale initial analysis. The initial RH and M fields possessed sufficient resolution and consistency with the model dynamics to have a positive influence on the forecasts for a period of at least 12 h.

This study provides evidence that differential cloud cover and evapotranspiration fields can have important impacts on frontal behavior when strong synoptic dynamics are present. Future research should attempt to improve the modeling of evapotranspiration processes, develop more objective satellite-based humidity analysis techniques, and obtain in situ mesoscale data for verification of the retrieved atmospheric and soil moisture fields.

* Current affiliation: NOAA/Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, Maryland.

Corresponding author address: Steven E. Koch, Dept. of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University at Raleigh, Box 8208, Raleigh, North Carolina.

Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Anthes, R. A., N. L. Seaman, and T. T. Warner, 1980: Comparisons of numerical simulations of the planetary boundary layer by a mixed-layer and multi-level model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,108, 365–376.

  • ——, D. Keyser, and J. W. Deardorff, 1982: Further considerations on modeling the sea breeze with a mixed-layer model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,110, 757–765.

  • Bell, R. S., and O. Hammon, 1989: The sensitivity of fine-mesh rainfall and cloud forecasts to the initial specification of humidity. Meteor. Mag.,118, 152–158.

  • Blackadar, A. K., 1976: Modeling the nocturnal boundary layer. Preprints, Third Symp. on Atmospheric Turbulence, Diffusion, and Air Quality, Raleigh, NC, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 46–49.

  • ——, 1978: Modeling pollutant transfer during daytime convection. Preprints, Fourth Symp. on Atmospheric Turbulence, Diffusion, and Air Quality, Reno, NV, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 443–447.

  • ——, 1979: High-resolution models of the planetary boundary layer. Advances in Environmental Science and Engineering, Vol. 1, J. R. Pfafflin and E. N. Ziegler, Eds., Gordon and Breach, 50–85.

  • Chang, J.-T., and P. J. Wetzel, 1991: Effects of spatial variations of soil moisture and vegetation on the evolution of a prestorm environment: A numerical case study. Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 1368–1390.

  • Chou, M.-D., J. Childs, and P. Dorian, 1986: Cloud cover estimation using bispectral satellite measurements. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,25, 1280–1292.

  • Coakley, J. A., Jr., and F. P. Bretherton, 1982: Cloud cover from high-resolution scanner data: Detecting and allowing for partially filled fields of view. J. Geophys. Res.,87, 4917–4932.

  • DesBois, M., G. Seze, and G. Szejwach, 1982: Automatic classification of clouds on METEOSTAT imagery: Application to high-level clouds. J. Appl. Meteor.,21, 401–412.

  • Dorian, P. B., S. E. Koch, and W. C. Skillman, 1988: The relationship between satellite-inferred frontogenesis and squall line formation. Wea. Forecasting,3, 319–342.

  • Fast, J. D., and M. D. McCorcle, 1991: The effect of heterogeneous soil moisture on a summer baroclinic circulation in the central United States. Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 2140–2167.

  • Fritsch, J. M., and C. F. Chappell, 1980: Numerical prediction of convectively driven mesoscale pressure systems. Part I: Convective parameterization. J. Atmos. Sci.,37, 1722–1733.

  • Garand, L., 1993: A pattern recognition technique for retrieving humidity profiles from Meteosat or GOES imagery. J. Appl. Meteor.,32, 1592–1607.

  • Hamill, T. M., R. P. d’Entremont, and J. T. Bunting, 1992: A description of the air force real-time nephanalysis model. Wea. Forecasting,7, 288–306.

  • Hasler, A. F., and M. L. desJardins, 1987: AOIPS/2: An interactive system to process, analyze, and display meteorological data sets for nowcasting. Adv. Space Res.,7, 375–388.

  • Kaplan, M. L., J. W. Zack, V. C. Wong, and J. J. Tuccillo, 1982: Initial results from a mesoscale atmospheric simulation system and comparisons with the AVE-SESAME I data set. Mon. Wea. Rev.,110, 1564–1590.

  • ——,——,——, and ——, 1984: The interactive role of subsynoptic scale jet streak and planetary boundary layer adjustments in organizing an isolated convective complex. Mon. Wea. Rev.,112, 2212–2238.

  • Koch, S. E., 1984: The role of an apparent mesoscale frontogenetical circulation in squall line initiation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,112, 2090–2111.

  • ——, 1985: Ability of a regional scale model to predict the genesis of intense mesoscale convective systems. Mon. Wea. Rev.,113, 1693–1713.

  • ——, W. C. Skillman, P. J. Kocin, P. J. Wetzel, K. F. Brill, D. A. Keyser, and M. C. McCumber, 1985: Synoptic scale forecast skill and systematic errors in the MASS 2.0 model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,113, 1714–1737.

  • ——, J. T. McQueen, and V. M. Karyampudi, 1995: A numerical study of the effects of differential cloud cover on cold frontal structure and dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 937–964.

  • Kocin, P. J., L. W. Uccellini, J. W. Zack, and M. L. Kaplan, 1985: A mesoscale numerical forecast of an intense convective snowburst along the East Coast. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,66, 1412–1424.

  • Kristjansson, J. E., 1991: Cloud parameterization at different horizontal resolutions. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,117, 1255–1280.

  • Lipton, A. E., 1993: Cloud shading retrieval and assimilation in a satellite–model coupled mesoscale analysis system. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 3062–3081.

  • Locatelli, J. D., J. E. Martin, and P. V. Hobbs, 1994: A wide cold-frontal rainband and its relationship to frontal topography. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,120, 259–275.

  • Mailhot, J., C. Chouinard, R. Benoit, M. Roch, G. Verner, J. Coté, and J. Pudykiewicz, 1989: Numerical forecasting of winter coastal storms during CASP: Evaluation of the regional finite-element model. Atmos.–Ocean,27, 24–58.

  • Manobianco, J., S. E. Koch, V. M. Karyampudi, and A. J. Negri, 1994: The impact of assimilating satellite-derived precipitation rates on numerical simulations of the ERICA IOP 4 cyclone. Mon. Wea. Rev.,122, 341–365.

  • McCumber, M. C., and R. A. Pielke, 1981: Simulation of the effects of surface fluxes of heat and moisture in a mesoscale numerical model. Part I: Soil layer. J. Geophys. Res.,86, 9929–9938.

  • Menzel, W. P., W. L. Smith, and T. R. Stewart, 1983: Improved cloud motion wind vector and altitude assignment using VAS. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,22, 377–384.

  • Mills, G. A., 1983: The sensitivity of a numerical prognosis to moisture detail in the initial state. Aust. Meteor. Mag.,31, 111–119.

  • ——, and N. E. Davidson, 1987: Tropospheric moisture profiles from digital IR satellite imagery: System description and analysis/forecast impact. Aust. Meteor. Mag.,35, 109–118.

  • Molinari, J., 1982: A method for calculating the effects of deep cumulus convection in numerical models. Mon. Wea. Rev.,110, 1527–1534.

  • Norquist, D. C., 1988: Alternative forms of humidity information in global data assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,116, 452–471.

  • Ookouchi, Y., M. Segal, R. C. Kessler, and R. A. Pielke, 1984: Evaluation of soil moisture effects on the generation and modification of mesoscale circulations. Mon. Wea. Rev.,112, 2281–2292.

  • Perkey, D. J., 1976: A description and preliminary results from a fine-mesh model for forecasting quantitative precipitation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,104, 1513–1526.

  • Physick, W. L., 1988: Mesoscale modeling of a cold front and its interaction with a diurnally heated land mass. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 3169–3187.

  • Pinkerton, J. E., 1978: Numerical experiments on boundary layer effects of frontal structure. Ph.D. dissertation, Drexel University, 213 pp. [Available from University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, MI 48106.].

  • Rabin, R. M., S. Stadler, P. J. Wetzel, D. J. Stensrud, and M. Gregory, 1990: Observed effects of landscape variability on convective clouds. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,71, 272–280.

  • Reeder, M. J., 1986: The interaction of a surface cold front with a prefrontal thermodynamically well-mixed boundary layer. Aust. Meteor. Mag.,34, 137–148.

  • Schreiner, A. J., D. A. Unger, W. P. Menzel, G. P. Ellrod, K. I. Strabak, and J. L. Peller, 1993: A comparison of ground and satellite observations of cloud cover. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,74, 1851–1861.

  • Segal, M., and R. W. Arritt, 1992: Nonclassical mesoscale circulations caused by surface sensible heat-flux gradients. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,73, 1593–1604.

  • ——, F. W. Purdom, J. L. Song, R. A. Pielke, and Y. Mahrer, 1986: Evaluation of cloud shading effects on the generation and modification of mesoscale circulations. Mon. Wea. Rev.,114, 1201–1212.

  • ——, R. Avissar, M. C. McCumber, and R. A. Pielke, 1988: Evaluation of vegetation effects on the generation and modification of mesoscale circulations. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 2268–2292.

  • ——, W. L. Physick, J. E. Heim, and R. W. Arritt, 1993: The enhancement of cold-front temperature contrast by differential cloud cover. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 867–873.

  • Simpson, J. E., 1987: Gravity Currents: In the Environment and the Laboratory. Wiley & Sons, 244 pp.

  • Slingo, J. M., 1987: The development and verification of a cloud prediction scheme for the ECMWF model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,113, 899–927.

  • Smagorinsky, J., 1960: On the dynamical prediction of large-scale condensation by numerical methods. Physics of Precipitation, H. Weickman, Ed., Amer. Geophys. Union, 71–78.

  • Smith, R. K., and M. J. Reeder, 1988: On the movement and low-level structure of cold fronts. Mon. Wea. Rev.,116, 1927–1944.

  • Stull, R. B., 1988: An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 666 pp.

  • Sun, W.-Y., and Y. Ogura, 1979: Boundary-layer forcing as a possible trigger to a squall-line formation. J. Atmos. Sci.,36, 235–254.

  • Tarbell, T. C., T. T. Warner, and R. A. Anthes, 1981: The initialization of the divergent component of horizontal wind in mesoscale numerical weather prediction models and its effect on initial precipitation rates. Mon. Wea. Rev.,109, 77–95.

  • Tarpley, J. P., S. R. Schneider, and R. L. Money, 1984: Global vegetation indices from NOAA-7 meteorological satellite. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,23, 491–494.

  • Uccellini, L. W., R. A. Petersen, K. F. Brill, P. J. Kocin, and J. J. Tuccillo, 1987: Synergistic interactions between an upper-level jet streak and diabatic processes that influence the development of a low-level jet and a secondary coastal cyclone. Mon. Wea. Rev.,115, 2227–2261.

  • Walcek, C. J., 1994: Cloud cover and its relationship to relative humidity during a springtime midlatitude cyclone. Mon. Wea. Rev.,122, 1021–1035.

  • Wetzel, P. J., 1990: A simple parcel method for prediction of cumulus onset and area-averaged cloud amount over heterogeneous land surfaces. J. Appl. Meteor.,29, 516–523.

  • ——, and J.-T. Chang, 1988: Evapotranspiration from nonuniform surfaces: A first approach for short-term numerical weather prediction. Mon. Wea. Rev.,116, 600–621.

  • Wolcott, S. W., and T. T. Warner, 1981: A moisture analysis procedure utilizing surface and satellite data. Mon. Wea. Rev.,109, 1989–1998.

  • Xu, K.-M., and S. K. Krueger, 1991: Evaluation of cloudiness parameterizations using a cumulus ensemble model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 342–367.

  • Zack, J. W., and M. L. Kaplan, 1987: Numerical simulations of the subsynoptic features associated with the AVE-SESAME I case. Part I: The preconvective environment. Mon. Wea. Rev.,115, 2367–2394.

  • Zhang, D.-L., and R. A. Anthes, 1982: A high-resolution model of the planetary boundary layer—Sensitivity tests and comparisons with SESAME-79 data. J. Appl. Meteor.,21, 1594–1609.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1258 1107 98
PDF Downloads 105 29 6