An Observational Study of Fronts and Frontal Mergers over the Continental United States

Paul J. Neiman NOAA/ERL, Environmental Technology Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Paul J. Neiman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
F. Martin Ralph NOAA/ERL, Environmental Technology Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by F. Martin Ralph in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M. A. Shapiro NOAA/ERL, Environmental Technology Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by M. A. Shapiro in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
B. F. Smull NOAA/ERL, National Severe Storms Laboratory and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for other papers by B. F. Smull in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
D. Johnson NOAA/ERL, National Severe Storms Laboratory, Mesoscale Research and Applications Division, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by D. Johnson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The Stormscale Operational and Research Meteorology-Fronts Experiment Systems Tests (STORM-FEST) field program was carried out over the central United States to investigate the structure and dynamics of fronts and their attendant precipitation systems adjacent to complex topography and to evaluate new observing networks and analysis techniques for mesoscale research and weather forecasting. This study presents the analysis of data taken between 8 and 10 March 1992, which was the most active period of STORM-FEST. This three-day observing period was characterized by the passage of an extratropical cyclone and related fronts. The synoptic-scale conditions related to the cyclone and frontal evolutions are described. Multiple frontal zones (i.e., Pacific and arctic cold fronts, quasi-stationary polar front, dryline, maritime warm front) and associated regions of precipitation are documented, and their origins and interactions are explored. These features, both well defined and subtle, were observed with unique clarity on the mesoscale by the temporally and spatially enhanced experimental observing networks that included an unprecedented combination of aircraft, rawinsondes, and radar wind profilers.

The 8–10 March period was dominated by two synoptic-scale cyclonic waves of Pacific and arctic origin that phased over the STORM-FEST domain. As the Pacific wave moved northeastward over the central United States it became elongated, while beneath it the arctic air spread southward and eastward, yielding a set of three tropopause folds, including one associated with a subtropical jet. Each wave included a cold front (i.e., the Pacific and arctic) at its leading edge. Owing to the relatively large mean density of the cold arctic air mass, the arctic front was clearly seen at the surface as it undercut all other weather systems and its westward movement was blocked by the Rocky Mountains. The downward penetration of the Pacific cold front to the surface was interrupted east of the dryline by the shallow (<150 mb deep), potentially more dense Gulf of Mexico air mass. Sensible heating and adiabatic descent from the elevated Mexican Plateau likely contributed to this density contrast. In effect, the top of the gulf air mass acted as the proxy ground level for the Pacific front, creating a cold front aloft. Detailed observations of the relationship between a prefrontal squall line and the Pacific cold front are provided.

A preexisting quasi-stationary polar front situated over the central United States was involved in two frontal mergers, first with an overrunning maritime warm front whose warm-sector air mass was modified by the Gulf of Mexico, and then with the undercutting arctic front. The structural characteristics of these frontal zones became joined into a single “hybrid” or merged zone following the merger process. Unlike occlusions, for which the fronts slope in generally opposite directions, a frontal merger is characterized by fronts that slope in roughly the same direction. These observations and analyses illustrate the complexity of wintertime frontal systems and interactions that occur regularly over the central United States.

Corresponding author address: Paul J. Neiman, NOAA/ETL, Mail Code R/E/ET7, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80303-3328.

Abstract

The Stormscale Operational and Research Meteorology-Fronts Experiment Systems Tests (STORM-FEST) field program was carried out over the central United States to investigate the structure and dynamics of fronts and their attendant precipitation systems adjacent to complex topography and to evaluate new observing networks and analysis techniques for mesoscale research and weather forecasting. This study presents the analysis of data taken between 8 and 10 March 1992, which was the most active period of STORM-FEST. This three-day observing period was characterized by the passage of an extratropical cyclone and related fronts. The synoptic-scale conditions related to the cyclone and frontal evolutions are described. Multiple frontal zones (i.e., Pacific and arctic cold fronts, quasi-stationary polar front, dryline, maritime warm front) and associated regions of precipitation are documented, and their origins and interactions are explored. These features, both well defined and subtle, were observed with unique clarity on the mesoscale by the temporally and spatially enhanced experimental observing networks that included an unprecedented combination of aircraft, rawinsondes, and radar wind profilers.

The 8–10 March period was dominated by two synoptic-scale cyclonic waves of Pacific and arctic origin that phased over the STORM-FEST domain. As the Pacific wave moved northeastward over the central United States it became elongated, while beneath it the arctic air spread southward and eastward, yielding a set of three tropopause folds, including one associated with a subtropical jet. Each wave included a cold front (i.e., the Pacific and arctic) at its leading edge. Owing to the relatively large mean density of the cold arctic air mass, the arctic front was clearly seen at the surface as it undercut all other weather systems and its westward movement was blocked by the Rocky Mountains. The downward penetration of the Pacific cold front to the surface was interrupted east of the dryline by the shallow (<150 mb deep), potentially more dense Gulf of Mexico air mass. Sensible heating and adiabatic descent from the elevated Mexican Plateau likely contributed to this density contrast. In effect, the top of the gulf air mass acted as the proxy ground level for the Pacific front, creating a cold front aloft. Detailed observations of the relationship between a prefrontal squall line and the Pacific cold front are provided.

A preexisting quasi-stationary polar front situated over the central United States was involved in two frontal mergers, first with an overrunning maritime warm front whose warm-sector air mass was modified by the Gulf of Mexico, and then with the undercutting arctic front. The structural characteristics of these frontal zones became joined into a single “hybrid” or merged zone following the merger process. Unlike occlusions, for which the fronts slope in generally opposite directions, a frontal merger is characterized by fronts that slope in roughly the same direction. These observations and analyses illustrate the complexity of wintertime frontal systems and interactions that occur regularly over the central United States.

Corresponding author address: Paul J. Neiman, NOAA/ETL, Mail Code R/E/ET7, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80303-3328.

Save
  • Abercromby, R., 1887: Weather, A Popular Exposition of the Nature of Weather Changes from Day to Day. International Science Series, Vol. 59, K. Paul Trench, 472 pp.

  • Adams, M. E., S. Businger, and M. L. Kaplan, 1995: Terrain-induced midtropospheric frontogenesis and jet streak formation during STORM-FEST IOP-17, 8 and 9 March 1992. Preprints, Seventh Conf. on Mountain Meteorology, Breckenridge, CO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 96–100.

  • Angevine, W. M., A. B. White, and S. K. Avery, 1994: Boundary-layer depth and entrainment zone characterization with a boundary-layer profiler. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,68, 375–385.

  • Benjamin, S. G., K. A. Brewster, R. Brümmer, B. F. Jewett, T. W. Schlatter, T. L. Smith, and P. A. Stamus, 1991: An isentropic three-hourly data assimilation system using ACARS aircraft observations. Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 888–906.

  • Bergeron, T., 1951: A general survey in the field of cloud physics. Int. Union Geod. Geophys., Assoc. Meteor. Brussels, Ninth General Assembly, Brussels, Belgium, Int. Union Geod. Geophys., 120–134.

  • Bjerknes, J., 1919: On the structure of moving cyclones. Geofys. Publ.,1, 1–8.

  • ——, and H. Solberg, 1922: Life cycles of cyclones and the polar front theory of atmospheric circulations. Geofys. Publ.,3, 1–18.

  • Bjerknes, V., 1910: Synoptic representation of atmospheric motions. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,36, 267–286.

  • ——, 1921: On the dynamics of the circular vortex with applications to the atmosphere and atmospheric vortex and wave motions. Geofys. Publ.,2, 1–88.

  • Bonner, W. D., 1968: Climatology of the low-level jet. Mon. Wea. Rev.,96, 833–850.

  • Browning, K. A., and T. W. Harrold, 1970: Air motion and precipitation growth at a cold front. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,96, 369–389.

  • Carlson, T. N., 1980: Airflow through midlatitude cyclones and the comma cloud pattern. Mon. Wea. Rev.,108, 1498–1509.

  • ——, S. G. Benjamin, and G. S. Forbes, 1983: Elevated mixed layers in the regional severe storm environment: Conceptual model and case studies. Mon. Wea. Rev.,111, 1453–1473.

  • Castle, J. A., J. D. Locatelli, J. E. Martin, and P. V. Hobbs, 1996: Structure and evolution of winter cyclones in the central United States and their effects on the distribution of precipitation. Part IV: The evolution of a drytrough on 8–9 March 1992. Mon. Wea. Rev.,124, 1591–1595.

  • Charba, J., 1974: Application of a gravity current model to analysis of squall-line gust front. Mon. Wea. Rev.,102, 140–156.

  • Colle, B. A., and C. F. Mass, 1995: The structure and evolution of cold surges east of the Rocky Mountains. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 2577–2610.

  • Cunning, J. B., 1986: The Oklahoma–Kansas preliminary regional experiment for STORM-Central. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,67, 1478–1486.

  • ——, and S. F. Williams, 1993: Operations summary and data inventory. NOAA, 389 pp. [Available from United States Weather Research Program Office, NOAA, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80303.].

  • Dean, D. B., and L. F. Bosart, 1996: Northern Hemisphere 500-hPa trough merger and fracture: A climatology and case study. Mon. Wea. Rev.,124, 2644–2671.

  • Djurić, D., and M. S. Damiani Jr., 1980: On the formation of the low-level jet over Texas. Mon. Wea. Rev.,108, 1854–1865.

  • ——, and D. S. Ladwig, 1983: Southerly low-level jet in the winter cyclones of the southwestern Great Plains. Mon. Wea. Rev.,111, 2275–2281.

  • Dunn, L., 1987: Cold-air damming by the Front Range of the Colorado Rockies and its relationship to locally heavy snows. Wea. Forecasting,2, 177–189.

  • Ecklund, W. L., K. S. Gage, and C. R. Williams, 1995: Tropical precipitation studies using a 915 MHz wind profiler. Radio Sci.,30, 1055–1064.

  • Fujita, T., 1963: Analytical mesometeorology: A review. Severe Local Storms, Meteor. Monogr., No. 27, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77–125.

  • Gage, K. S., C. R. Williams, and W. L. Ecklund, 1994: UHF wind profilers: A new tool for diagnosing tropical convective cloud systems. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,75, 2289–2294.

  • Gaza, R. S., and L. F. Bosart, 1990: Trough-merger characteristics over North America. Wea. Forecasting,5, 314–331.

  • Goff, R. C., 1976: Vertical structure of thunderstorm outflows. Mon. Wea. Rev.,104, 1429–1440.

  • Hakim, G. J., L. F. Bosart, and D. Keyser, 1995: The Ohio Valley wave-merger cyclogenesis event of 25–26 January 1978. Part I:Multiscale case study. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 2663–2692.

  • ——, D. Keyser, and L. F. Bosart, 1996: The Ohio Valley wave-merger cyclogenesis event of 25–26 January 1978. Part II: Diagnosis using quasigeostrophic potential vorticity inversion. Mon. Wea. Rev.,124, 2176–2205.

  • Hane, C. E., C. L. Ziegler, and H. B. Bluestein, 1993: Investigation of the dryline and convective storms initiated along the dryline:Field experiments during COPS-91. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,74, 2133–2145.

  • Hermes, L. G., 1991: Comparisons of rawinsonde-deduced kinematic and thermodynamic quantities with those deduced from VHF profiler observations. Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 1693–1712.

  • Herzegh, P. H., and P. V. Hobbs, 1980: The mesoscale and microscale structure and organization of clouds and precipitation in midlatitude cyclones. Part II: Warm-frontal clouds. J. Atmos. Sci.,37, 597–611.

  • Hirschberg, P. A., R. J. Lind, S. J. Bolduc, and R. L. Elsberry, 1995:The West Coast Picket Fence Experiment during STORM-FEST. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,76, 1741–1757.

  • Hobbs, P. V., J. D. Locatelli, and J. E. Martin, 1996: A new conceptual model for cyclones generated in the lee of the Rocky Mountains. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,77, 1169–1178.

  • Hoskins, B. J., M. E. McIntyre, and A. W. Robertson, 1985: On the use and significance of isentropic potential vorticity maps. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,111, 877–946.

  • Houze, R. A., Jr., S. A. Rutledge, M. I. Biggerstaff, and B. F. Smull, 1989: Interpretation of Doppler weather radar displays of midlatitude mesoscale convective systems. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,70, 608–619.

  • Jewell, R., 1981: Tor Bergeron’s first year in the Bergen School: Towards an historical appreciation. Pure Appl. Geophys.,19, 474–490.

  • Jorgensen, D. P., and B. F. Smull, 1993: Mesovortex circulations seen by airborne Doppler radar within a bow–echo mesoscale convective system. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,74, 2146–2157.

  • ——, P. H. Hildebrand, and C. L. Frush, 1983: Feasibility test of an airborne pulse–Doppler meteorological radar. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,22, 744–757.

  • ——, T. Matejka, and J. D. DuGranrut, 1996: Multi-beam techniques for deriving wind fields from airborne Doppler radars. J. Meteor. Atmos. Phys.,59, 83–104.

  • Keyser, D., and M. A. Shapiro, 1986: A review of the structure and dynamics of upper-level frontal zones. Mon. Wea. Rev.,114, 452–499.

  • Koch, S. E., and J. McCarthy, 1982: The evolution of an Oklahoma dryline. Part II: Boundary-layer forcing of meso-convective systems. J. Atmos. Sci.,39, 237–257.

  • Kreitzberg, C. W., 1964: The structure of occlusions as determined from serial ascents and vertically-directed radar. Tech. Rep. AFCRL-64-26, 21 pp. [Available from Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratory, Bedford, MA 01730.].

  • ——, and H. A. Brown, 1970: Mesoscale weather systems within an occlusion. J. Appl. Meteor.,9, 417–432.

  • Lai, C.-C., and L. F. Bosart, 1988: A case study of trough merger in split westerly flow. Mon. Wea. Rev.,116, 1838–1856.

  • Lauritsen, D. K., 1991: A review of the CLASS sounding system and an overview of its successor: NEXUS. Preprints, Seventh Symp. on Meteorological Observations and Instrumentation, New Orleans, LA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 265–269.

  • Locatelli, J. D., J. E. Martin, J. A. Castle, and P. V. Hobbs, 1995: Structure and evolution of winter cyclones in the central United States and their effects on the distribution of precipitation. Part III: The development of a squall line associated with weak cold frontogenesis aloft. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 2641–2662.

  • Loehrer, S. M., and R. H. Johnson, 1995: Surface pressure and precipitation life cycle characteristics of PRE-STORM mesoscale convective systems. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 600–621.

  • Martin, J. E., J. D. Locatelli, P. V. Hobbs, P.-Y. Wang, and J. A. Castle, 1995: Structure and evolution of winter cyclones in the central United States and their effects on the distribution of precipitation. Part I: A synoptic-scale rainband associated with a dryline and lee trough. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 241–264.

  • Mass, C. F., 1991: Synoptic frontal analysis: Time for a reassessment? Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,72, 348–363.

  • Matthews, D. A., 1981: Observations of a cloud arc triggered by thunderstorm outflow. Mon. Wea. Rev.,109, 2140–2157.

  • Mattocks, C., and R. Bleck, 1986: Jet streak dynamics and geostrophic adjustment processes during the initial stages of lee cyclogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev.,114, 2033–2056.

  • Mecikalski, J. R., and J. S. Tilley, 1992: Cold surges along the front range of the Rocky Mountains: Development of a classification scheme. Meteor. Atmos. Phys.,48, 249–271.

  • Miller, L. J., M. A. LeMone, W. Blumen, R. L. Grossman, N. Gamage, and R. J. Zamora, 1996: The low-level structure and evolution of a dry arctic front over the central United States. Part I: Mesoscale observations. Mon. Wea. Rev.,124, 1648–1675.

  • Moore, J. T., and H. E. Fuelberg, 1981: A synoptic analysis of the first AVE-SESAME ’79 period. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,62, 1577–1590.

  • Neiman, P. J., and M. A. Shapiro, 1989: Retrieving horizontal temperature gradients and advections from single-station wind profiler observations. Wea. Forecasting,4, 222–233.

  • ——, and ——, 1993: The life cycle of an extratropical marine cyclone. Part I: Frontal-cyclone evolution and thermodynamic air–sea interaction. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 2153–2176.

  • ——, ——, E. G. Donall, and C. W. Kreitzberg, 1990: Diabatic modification of an extratropical cyclone warm sector by cold underlying water. Mon. Wea. Rev.,118, 1576–1590.

  • ——, P. T. May, and M. A. Shapiro, 1992: Radio acoustic sounding system (RASS) and wind profiler observations of lower- and middle-tropospheric weather systems. Mon. Wea. Rev.,120, 2298–2313.

  • ——, M. A. Shapiro, and L. S. Fedor, 1993: The life cycle of an extratropical marine cyclone. Part II: Mesoscale structure and diagnostics. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 2177–2199.

  • Newton, C. W., 1950: Structure and mechanism of the prefrontal squall line. J. Meteor.,7, 210–222.

  • ——, 1963: Dynamics of severe convective storms. Severe Local Storms, Meteor. Monogr., No. 27, Amer. Meteor. Soc. 33–58.

  • NOAA, 1992: Storm Data. Vol. 34. National Climatic Data Center, 105 pp.

  • Palmén, E., and C. W. Newton, 1951: On the three-dimensional motions in an outbreak of polar air. J. Meteor.,8, 25–39.

  • Panofsky, H. A., and J. A. Dutton, 1984: Atmospheric Turbulence—Models and Methods for Engineering Applications. Wiley-Interscience, 397 pp.

  • Parsons, D. B., M. A. Shapiro, R. M. Hardesty, R. J. Zamora, and J. M. Intrieri, 1991: The finescale structure of a West Texas dryline. Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 1242–1258.

  • Ralph, F. M., 1995: Using radar-measured radial vertical velocities in rain and snow to distinguish precipitation scattering from clear-air scattering. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,12, 257–267.

  • ——, P. J. Neiman, D. W. van de Kamp, and D. C. Law, 1995: Using spectral moment data from NOAA’s 404-MHz radar wind profilers to observe precipitation. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,76, 1717–1739.

  • ——, ——, and D. Ruffieux, 1996: Precipitation identification from radar wind profiler spectral moment data: Vertical velocity histograms, velocity variance, and signal power-vertical velocity correlations. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,13, 545–559.

  • Rasmussen, R., and Coauthors, 1992: Winter Icing and Storms Project (WISP). Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,73, 951–974.

  • Rogers, R. R., W. L. Ecklund, D. A. Carter, K. S. Gage, and S. A. Ethier, 1993: Research applications of a boundary-layer wind profiler. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,74, 567–580.

  • Rossby, C.-G., and R. H. Weightman, 1926: Application of the polar-front theory to a series of American weather maps. Mon. Wea. Rev.,54, 485–496.

  • Saarikivi, P., and T. Puhakka, 1990: The structure and evolution of a wintertime occluded front. Tellus,42A, 122–139.

  • Sanders, F., 1955: An investigation of the structure and dynamics of an intense surface frontal zone. J. Meteor.,12, 542–552.

  • ——, and C. A. Doswell III, 1995: A case for detailed surface analysis. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,76, 505–521.

  • Schaefer, J. T., 1986: The dryline. Mesoscale Meteorology and Forecasting, P. Ray, Ed., Amer. Meteor. Soc., 549–570.

  • Schultz, D. M., and C. F. Mass, 1993: The occlusion process in a midlatitude cyclone over land. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 918–940.

  • Shapiro, M. A., 1982: Mesoscale weather systems of the central United States. The national STORM program: Scientific and technological bases and major objectives. UCAR Rep., Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, 78 pp. [Available from the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307.].

  • ——, and D. Keyser, 1990: Fronts, jet streams, and the tropopause. Extratropical Cyclones: The Erik Palmén Memorial Volume, C. W. Newton and E. Holopainen, Eds., Amer. Meteor. Soc., 167–191.

  • ——, T. Hampel, D. Rotzoll, and F. Mosher, 1985: The frontal hydraulic head: A micro-α scale (∼1 km) triggering mechanism for mesoconvective weather systems. Mon. Wea. Rev.,113, 1166–1183.

  • Smull, B. F., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1987a: Dual-Doppler radar analysis of a midlatitude squall line with a trailing region of stratiform precipitation. J. Atmos. Sci.,44, 2128–2148.

  • ——, and ——, 1987b: Rear inflow in squall lines with trailing stratiform precipitation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,115, 2869–2889.

  • ——, and J. A. Augustine, 1993: Multiscale analysis of a mature mesoscale convective complex. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 103–132.

  • Snook, J. S., 1993: An investigation of Colorado Front Range winter storms using a nonhydrostatic mesoscale numerical model designed for operational usage. Ph.D. dissertation, Colorado State University, 373 pp.

  • Steiner, A., and H. Richner, 1994: Separation of clear-air echoes from precipitation echoes in UHF wind profiler measurements. Ann. Geophys.,12, 497–505.

  • Stumpf, G. J., R. H. Johnson, and B. F. Smull, 1991: The wake low in a midlatitude convective system having complex convective organization. Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 134–158.

  • Taylor, G. I., 1938: The spectrum of turbulence. Proc. Roy. Soc. London,A164, 476–490.

  • Tripoli, S., A. Buzzi, and A. Speranza, 1990: Orographic cyclogenesis. Extratropical Cyclones: The Erik Palmén Memorial Volume, C. W. Newton and E. Holopainen, Eds., Amer. Meteor. Soc., 107–127.

  • Uccellini, L. W., 1990: Processes contributing to the rapid development of extratropical cyclones. Extratropical Cyclones: The Erik Palmén Memorial Volume, C. W. Newton and E. Holopainen, Eds., Amer. Meteor. Soc., 81–105.

  • ——, S. F. Corfidi, N. W. Junker, P. J. Kocin, and D. A. Olson, 1992:Report on the surface analysis workshop held at the National Meteorological Center 25–28 March 1991. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,73, 459–472.

  • Wang, P.-Y., J. E. Martin, J. D. Locatelli, and P. V. Hobbs, 1995: Structure and evolution of winter cyclones in the central United States and their effects on the distribution of precipitation. Part II: Arctic fronts. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 1328–1344.

  • Weber, B. L., and D. B. Wuertz, 1991: Quality control algorithm for profiler measurements of winds and temperatures. NOAA Tech. Memo. ERL WPL-212, 32 pp. [NTIS PB92124080XSP.].

  • ——, ——, D. C. Welsh, and R. McPeek, 1993: Quality controls for profiler measurements of winds and RASS temperatures. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,10, 452–464.

  • Wesley, D. A., R. M. Rasmussen, and B. C. Bernstein, 1995: Snowfall associated with a terrain-generated convergence zone during the Winter Icing and Storms Project. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 2957–2977.

  • White, A. B., 1993: Mixing layer depth using 915-MHz radar reflectivity data. Preprints, Eighth Symp. on Meteorological Observations and Instrumentation, Anaheim, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 248–250.

  • ——, C. W. Fairall, and D. W. Thomson, 1991: Radar observations of humidity variability in and above the marine atmospheric boundary layer. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,8, 639–658.

  • Wilczak, J. M., and Coauthors, 1995: Contamination of wind profiler data by migrating birds: Characteristics of corrupted data and potential solutions. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,12, 449–467.

  • Williams, C. R., W. L. Ecklund, and K. S. Gage, 1995: Classification of precipitating clouds in the tropics using 915-MHz wind profilers. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,12, 996–1012.

  • Young, G. S., and R. H. Johnson, 1984: Meso- and microscale features of a Colorado cold front. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,23, 1315–1325.

  • Zamora, R. J., 1993: The measurement of frontal-scale vertical motion using NOAA demonstration and boundary layer wind profilers. Preprints, 13th Conf. on Weather Analysis and Forecasting including Symp. on Flash Floods, Vienna, VA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 540–543.

  • Zipser, E. J., 1977: Mesoscale and convective-scale downdrafts as distinct components of squall-line structure. Mon. Wea. Rev.,105, 1568–1589.

  • ——, 1988: The evolution of mesoscale convective systems: Evidence from radar and satellite observations. Proc. Int. Symp. on Tropical Precipitation Measurements, Tokyo, Japan, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 159–166.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 351 156 1
PDF Downloads 162 43 1