The Sensitivity of Precipitation to Circulation Details. Part I: An Analysis of Regional Analogs

Paul J. Roebber Department of Geosciences, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Search for other papers by Paul J. Roebber in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric Science, State University of New York at Albany, Albany, New York

Search for other papers by Lance F. Bosart in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

In this paper, the sensitivity of precipitation associated with ordinary baroclinic continental winter storms to small variations in the synoptic-scale circulation is explored using ensembles of observed regional analogs. When seeking time-coherent analogs for periods of 1–2 days in length on the basis of anomaly correlation scores at both the surface and 500 hPa, the observed precipitation structures are strongly dependent on circulation details, reflecting subtle differences at both the synoptic scale and mesoscale. It has also been found that when seeking time-coherent regional analogs on the basis of the observed precipitation distributions, such analogs cannot be identified. However, coherent precipitation structures that are identified for shorter periods (order 1 day) are found to occur in association with highly dissimilar circulations. Thus, the sensible weather that results from a particular circulation is crucially dependent on the details of the flow. The authors believe that these findings provide some explanation for the relatively slow advance of precipitation forecast skill in the face of continuously improving forecasts of the large-scale circulation.

The study of the evolution of the base case and its closest circulation analog is split into two successive 24-h periods. During the first 24 h, the substantial differences in the observed precipitation are linked to the complex interplay between precipitation events prior to the period of interest (which led to the generation of upwind sources of moisture) and synoptic-scale dynamics (primarily differences in the structure and intensity of the subtropical jet, which led to slight deviations in the low-level flow between the two cases and subsequent differences in moisture advection from the Gulf of Mexico and moisture convergence). During the second 24 h, differences in the observed precipitation are tied to differences in the convective response despite similarly potentially unstable environments, reflecting differences in synoptic and mesoscale triggering mechanisms. To more fully resolve the relative importance of these mechanisms, experiments with a mesoscale numerical model will be reported in a subsequent paper.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Paul J. Roebber, Department of Geosciences, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Lapham Hall 352, P.O. Box 413, Milwaukee, WI 53201.

Abstract

In this paper, the sensitivity of precipitation associated with ordinary baroclinic continental winter storms to small variations in the synoptic-scale circulation is explored using ensembles of observed regional analogs. When seeking time-coherent analogs for periods of 1–2 days in length on the basis of anomaly correlation scores at both the surface and 500 hPa, the observed precipitation structures are strongly dependent on circulation details, reflecting subtle differences at both the synoptic scale and mesoscale. It has also been found that when seeking time-coherent regional analogs on the basis of the observed precipitation distributions, such analogs cannot be identified. However, coherent precipitation structures that are identified for shorter periods (order 1 day) are found to occur in association with highly dissimilar circulations. Thus, the sensible weather that results from a particular circulation is crucially dependent on the details of the flow. The authors believe that these findings provide some explanation for the relatively slow advance of precipitation forecast skill in the face of continuously improving forecasts of the large-scale circulation.

The study of the evolution of the base case and its closest circulation analog is split into two successive 24-h periods. During the first 24 h, the substantial differences in the observed precipitation are linked to the complex interplay between precipitation events prior to the period of interest (which led to the generation of upwind sources of moisture) and synoptic-scale dynamics (primarily differences in the structure and intensity of the subtropical jet, which led to slight deviations in the low-level flow between the two cases and subsequent differences in moisture advection from the Gulf of Mexico and moisture convergence). During the second 24 h, differences in the observed precipitation are tied to differences in the convective response despite similarly potentially unstable environments, reflecting differences in synoptic and mesoscale triggering mechanisms. To more fully resolve the relative importance of these mechanisms, experiments with a mesoscale numerical model will be reported in a subsequent paper.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Paul J. Roebber, Department of Geosciences, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Lapham Hall 352, P.O. Box 413, Milwaukee, WI 53201.

Save
  • Anthes, R. A., 1983: Regional models of the atmosphere in middle latitudes. Mon. Wea. Rev.,111, 1306–1335.

  • Black, T. L., 1994: The new NMC mesoscale Eta Model: Description and forecast examples. Wea. Forecasting,9, 265–278.

  • Blanchard, B., M. T. McFarland, T. J. Schmugge, and E. Rhodes, 1981: Estimation of soil moisture with API algorithm and microwave emission. Water Resour. Bull.,17, 769–774.

  • Bosart, L. F., 1983: An update on trends in skill of daily forecasts of temperature and precipitation at the State University of New York at Albany. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,64, 346–354.

  • ——, and F. Sanders, 1981: The Johnstown flood of July 1977: A long-lived convective system. J. Atmos. Sci.,38, 1616–1642.

  • Carter, G. M., and P. D. Polger, 1986: A 20 year summary of National Weather Service verification results for temperature and precipitation. NOAA Tech. Memo. NWS FCST-31, National Weather Service, NOAA/U.S. Department of Commerce, 50 pp.

  • Farrell, R. J., and T. N. Carlson, 1989: Evidence for the role of the lid and underrunning in an outbreak of tornadic thunderstorms. Mon. Wea. Rev.,117, 857–871.

  • Funk, T. W., 1991: Forecasting techniques utilized by the forecast branch of the National Meteorological Center during a major convective rainfall event. Wea. Forecasting,6, 548–564.

  • Glahn, H. R., 1985: Yes, precipitation forecasts have improved. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,66, 820–830.

  • Gutzler, D. S., and J. Shukla, 1984: Analogs in the wintertime 500-mb height field. J. Atmos. Sci.,41, 177–189.

  • Hao, W., and L. F. Bosart, 1987: A moisture budget analysis of the protracted heat wave in the southern plains during the summer of 1980. Wea. Forecasting,4, 269–288.

  • Hoke, J. E., N. A. Phillips, G. J. Dimego, J. J. Tucillo, and J. G. Sela, 1989: The regional analysis and forecast system of the National Meteorological Center. Wea. Forecasting,4, 323–334.

  • Hollingsworth, A., K. Arpe, M. Tiedtke, M. Capaldo, and H. Savijari, 1980: The performance of a medium range forecast model in winter—Impact of physical parameterizations. Mon. Wea. Rev.,108, 1736–1773.

  • Junker, N. W., J. E. Hoke, and R. H. Grumm, 1989: Performance of NMC’s regional models. Wea. Forecasting,4, 368–390.

  • Kalnay, E., M. Kanamitsu, and W. E. Baker, 1990: Global numerical weather prediction at the National Meteorological Center. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,71, 1410–1428.

  • Keyser, D., and M. A. Shapiro, 1986: A review of the structure and dynamics of upper-level frontal zones. Mon. Wea. Rev.,114, 452–499.

  • Lorenz, E. N., 1969: Atmospheric predictability as revealed by naturally occurring analogs. J. Atmos. Sci.,26, 636–646.

  • Loughe, A. F., C.-C. Lai, and D. Keyser, 1995: A technique for diagnosing three-dimensional ageostrophic circulations in baroclinic disturbances on limited-area domains. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 1476–1504.

  • Mass, C. F., H. J. Edmon, H. J. Friedman, N. R. Cheney, and E. E. Recker, 1987: The use of compact discs for storage of large meteorological and oceanographic data sets. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,68, 1556–1558.

  • Mesinger, F., 1996: Improvements in quantitative precipitation forecasts with the Eta regional model at the National Centers for Environmental Prediction: The 48-km upgrade. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,77, 2637–2649.

  • Moore, J. T., and P. D. Blakley, 1988: The role of frontogenetical forcing and conditional symmetric instability in the Midwest snowstorm of 30–31 January 1982. Mon. Wea. Rev.,116, 2155–2171.

  • O’Brien, J. J., 1970: Alternative solution to the classical vertical velocity problem. J. Appl. Meteor.,9, 197–203.

  • Olson, D. A., N. W. Junker, and B. Korty, 1995: Evaluation of 33 years of quantitative precipitation forecasting at NMC. Wea. Forecasting,10, 498–511.

  • Oravec, R. J., and R. H. Grumm, 1993: The prediction of rapidly deepening cyclones by NMC’s Nested Grid Model: Winter 1989–autumn 1991. Wea. Forecasting,8, 248–270.

  • Palmén, E., and C. W. Newton, 1969: Atmospheric Circulation Systems: Their Structure and Physical Interpretation. Academic Press, 603 pp.

  • Ramamurthy, M. K., R. M. Rauber, B. P. Collins, and N. K. Malhotra, 1993: A comparative study of large-amplitude gravity-wave events. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 2951–2974.

  • Roebber, P. J., J. R. Gyakum, and D. N. Trat, 1994: Coastal frontogenesis and precipitation during ERICA IOP #2. Wea. Forecasting,9, 21–44.

  • Sanders, F., 1986a: Explosive cyclogenesis over the west-central North Atlantic Ocean, 1981–84. Part II: Evaluation of the LFM model performance. Mon. Wea. Rev.,114, 2207–2218.

  • ——, 1986b: Trends in skill of Boston forecasts made at MIT, 1966–84. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,67, 170–176.

  • ——, 1987: Skill of NMC operational models in prediction of explosive cyclogenesis. Wea. Forecasting,2, 322–336.

  • Shields, M. T., R. M. Rauber, and M. K. Ramamurthy, 1991: Dynamical forcing and mesoscale organization of precipitation bands in a Midwest winter cyclonic storm. Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 936–964.

  • Shuman, F. G., 1989: History of numerical weather prediction at the National Meteorological Center. Wea. Forecasting,4, 286–296.

  • ——, and J. B. Hovermale, 1968: An operational six-layer primitive equation model. J. Appl. Meteor.,7, 525–547.

  • Sutcliffe, R. C., 1947: A contribution to the problem of development. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,73, 370–383.

  • Trenberth, K. E., 1978: On the interpretation of the diagnostic quasi-geostrophic omega equation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,106, 131–137.

  • Whittaker, L. M., and L. H. Horn, 1982: Atlas of Northern Hemisphere Extratropical Cyclone Activity, 1958–77. Department of Meteorology, University of Wisconsin—Madison, 65 pp.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 880 720 43
PDF Downloads 86 30 3