Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Satellite-Derived Latent Heating Distribution and Environmental Influences in Hurricane Opal (1995)

Edward B. Rodgers Laboratory of Atmospheres, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland

Search for other papers by Edward B. Rodgers in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
William S. Olson Caelum Research Corporation, Silver Spring, Maryland

Search for other papers by William S. Olson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
V. Mohan Karyampudi Science Systems and Applications Inc., Lanham, Maryland

Search for other papers by V. Mohan Karyampudi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Harold F. Pierce Science Systems and Applications Inc., Lanham, Maryland

Search for other papers by Harold F. Pierce in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 May 1998
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<1229:SDLHDA>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
1229–1247
Restricted access

Abstract

The total (i.e., convective and stratiform) latent heat release (LHR) cycle in the eyewall region of Hurricane Opal (October 1995) has been estimated using observations from the F-10, F-11, and F-13 Defense Meteorological Satellite Program Special Sensor Microwave/Imagers (SSM/Is). This LHR cycle occurred during the hurricane’s rapid intensification and decay stages (3–5 October 1995). The satellite observations revealed that there were at least two major episodes in which a period of elevated total LHR (i.e., convective burst) occurred in the eyewall region. During these convective bursts, Opal’s minimum pressure decreased by 50 mb and the LHR generated by convective processes increased, as greater amounts of latent heating occurred at middle and upper levels. It is hypothesized that the abundant release of latent heat in Opal’s middle- and upper-tropospheric region during these convective burst episodes allowed Opal’s eyewall to become more buoyant, enhanced the generation of kinetic energy and, thereby, rapidly intensified the system. The observations also suggest that Opal’s intensity became more responsive to the convective burst episodes (i.e., shorter time lag between LHR and intensity and greater maximum wind increase) as Opal became more intense.

Analyses of SSM/I-retrieved parameters, sea surface temperature observations, and the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) data reveal that the convective rainband (CRB) cycles and sea surface and tropopause temperatures, in addition to large-scale environmental forcing, had a profound influence on Opal’s episodes of convective burst and its subsequent intensity. High sea surface (29.7°C) and low tropopause (192 K) temperatures apparently created a greater potential for Opal’s maximum intensity. Strong horizontal moisture flux convergence within Opal’s outer-core regions (i.e., outside 333-km radius from the center) appeared to help initiate and maintain Opal’s CRBs. These CRBs, in turn, propagated inward to help generate and dissipate the eyewall convective bursts. The first CRB that propagated into Opal’s eyewall region appeared to initiate the first eyewall convective burst. The second CRB propagated to within 111 km of Opal’s center and appeared to dissipate the first CRB, subjecting it to subsidence and the loss of water vapor flux. The ECMWF upper-tropospheric height and wind analyses suggest that Opal interacted with a diffluent trough that initated an outflow channel, and generated high values of upper-tropospheric eddy relative angular momentum flux convergence. The gradient wind adjustment processes associated with Opal’s outflow channel, in turn, may have helped to initiate and maintain the eyewall convective bursts. The ECMWF analyses also suggest that a dry air intrusion within the southwestern quadrant of Opal’s outer-core region, together with strong vertical wind shear, subsequently terminated Opal’s CRB cycle and caused Opal to weaken prior to landfall.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Edward B. Rodgers, Mesoscale Atmospheric Processes Branch (Code 912), Laboratory for Atmospheres, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771.

Abstract

The total (i.e., convective and stratiform) latent heat release (LHR) cycle in the eyewall region of Hurricane Opal (October 1995) has been estimated using observations from the F-10, F-11, and F-13 Defense Meteorological Satellite Program Special Sensor Microwave/Imagers (SSM/Is). This LHR cycle occurred during the hurricane’s rapid intensification and decay stages (3–5 October 1995). The satellite observations revealed that there were at least two major episodes in which a period of elevated total LHR (i.e., convective burst) occurred in the eyewall region. During these convective bursts, Opal’s minimum pressure decreased by 50 mb and the LHR generated by convective processes increased, as greater amounts of latent heating occurred at middle and upper levels. It is hypothesized that the abundant release of latent heat in Opal’s middle- and upper-tropospheric region during these convective burst episodes allowed Opal’s eyewall to become more buoyant, enhanced the generation of kinetic energy and, thereby, rapidly intensified the system. The observations also suggest that Opal’s intensity became more responsive to the convective burst episodes (i.e., shorter time lag between LHR and intensity and greater maximum wind increase) as Opal became more intense.

Analyses of SSM/I-retrieved parameters, sea surface temperature observations, and the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) data reveal that the convective rainband (CRB) cycles and sea surface and tropopause temperatures, in addition to large-scale environmental forcing, had a profound influence on Opal’s episodes of convective burst and its subsequent intensity. High sea surface (29.7°C) and low tropopause (192 K) temperatures apparently created a greater potential for Opal’s maximum intensity. Strong horizontal moisture flux convergence within Opal’s outer-core regions (i.e., outside 333-km radius from the center) appeared to help initiate and maintain Opal’s CRBs. These CRBs, in turn, propagated inward to help generate and dissipate the eyewall convective bursts. The first CRB that propagated into Opal’s eyewall region appeared to initiate the first eyewall convective burst. The second CRB propagated to within 111 km of Opal’s center and appeared to dissipate the first CRB, subjecting it to subsidence and the loss of water vapor flux. The ECMWF upper-tropospheric height and wind analyses suggest that Opal interacted with a diffluent trough that initated an outflow channel, and generated high values of upper-tropospheric eddy relative angular momentum flux convergence. The gradient wind adjustment processes associated with Opal’s outflow channel, in turn, may have helped to initiate and maintain the eyewall convective bursts. The ECMWF analyses also suggest that a dry air intrusion within the southwestern quadrant of Opal’s outer-core region, together with strong vertical wind shear, subsequently terminated Opal’s CRB cycle and caused Opal to weaken prior to landfall.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Edward B. Rodgers, Mesoscale Atmospheric Processes Branch (Code 912), Laboratory for Atmospheres, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771.

Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Adler, R. F., H.-Y. M. Yeh, N. Prasad, W.-K. Tao, and J. Simpson, 1991: Microwave simulations of a tropical rainfall system with a three-dimensional cloud model. J. Appl. Meteor.,30, 924–953.

  • Baik, J.-J., S.-M. Lee, and C. H. Cho, 1993: Examination of convective process representation and inertial stability in a tropical cyclone model. J. Korean Meteor. Inc.,29, 308–323.

  • Challa, M., and R. Pfeffer, 1980: Effects of eddy flux of angular momentum on model hurricane development. J. Atmos. Sci.,37, 1603–1618.

  • Charney, J. G., and A. Eliassen, 1964: On the growth of the hurricane depression. J. Atmos. Sci.,21, 68–75.

  • Chen, L., and W. M. Gray, 1985: Global view of the upper level outflow patterns associated with tropical cyclone intensity changes during FGGE. Colorado State University Atmospheric Science Paper 392, Fort Collins, CO, 1216 pp.

  • Churchill, D. D., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1984: Development and structure of winter monsoon cloud clusters on 10 December 1978. J. Atmos. Sci.,41, 933–960.

  • DeMaria, M., and J. Kaplan, 1994: A statistical hurricane intensity prediction scheme (SHIPS) for the Atlantic Basin. Wea. Forecasting,9, 209–220.

  • ——, J.-J. Baik, and J. Kaplan, 1993: Upper level eddy angular momentum fluxes and tropical cyclone intensity change. J. Atmos Sci.,50, 1183–1147.

  • des Jardins, M., K. Brill, and S. Schots, 1991: Use of GEMPAK on Unix Workstations. Preprints, Seventh Int. Conf. on Interactive Information and Processing Systems for Meteorology, Oceanography, and Hydrology, New Orleans, LA, Amer. Meteor. Soc. 449–451.

  • Emanuel, K. A., 1991: The theory of hurricanes. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.,23, 179–196.

  • Fitzpatrick, P. J., 1996: Understanding and forecasting tropical cyclone intensity change. Colorado State University Atmospheric Science Paper 598, Fort Collins, CO, 346 pp.

  • Flatau, P., G. J. Tripoli, J. Berlinder, and W. Cotton, 1989: The CSU-RAMS cloud microphysics model: General theory and code documentation. Colorado State University Atmospheric Sciences Atmospheric Research Paper 451, Fort Collins, CO, 88 pp.

  • Frank, W. M., 1977: The structure and energetics of the tropical cyclone. Part 1: Storm structure. Mon. Wea. Rev.,105, 1119–1135.

  • Gray, W. M., 1979: Hurricanes: Their formation, structure, and likely role in the tropical circulation. Meteorology over the Tropical Oceans, D. B. Shaw, Ed., Roy. Meteor. Soc., 155–218.

  • Hack, J. J., and W. H. Schubert, 1986: On nonlinear response of atmospheric vorticities to heating by organized cumulus convection. J. Atmos. Sci.,43, 1559–1573.

  • Holliday, C. R., and A. H. Thompson, 1979: Climatology characteristics of rapidly intensifying storms. Mon. Wea. Rev.,107, 1022–1034.

  • Hollinger, J. O., 1991: DMSP Special Sensor Microwave/Imager calibration/validation. Final Report Vol. 11, 1225 pp. [Available from J. O. Hollinger, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, 20375.].

  • Karyampudi, V. M., G. Lai, J. Monobianco, and S. Koch, 1995: Sensitivity of Hurricane Florence (1988) development to initial conditions, assimilation of satellite-derived rainfall rates and convective parameterization schemes. Preprints, 21st Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, Miami, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 386–388.

  • Krishnamurti, T. N., H. S. Bedi, and K. Ingles, 1993: Physical initialization using SSM/I rain rates. Tellus,45A, 247–269.

  • Kummerow, C., W. S. Olson, and L. Giglo, 1996: A simplified scheme for obtaining precipitation and vertical hydrometeor profiles from passive microwave sensors. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.,34, 1213–1232.

  • Lee, C. S., 1986: An observational study of tropical cloud cluster evolution and cyclogenesis in the western North Pacific. Colorado State University Atmospheric Science Paper 403, Fort Collins, CO, 250 pp.

  • Lord, S. J., H. E. Willoughby, and J. M. Piotrowicz, 1984: Role of a parameterized ice-phase microphysics in an axisymmetric nonhydrostatic tropical cyclone model. J. Atmos. Sci.,41, 2836–2848.

  • Mapes, B., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1995: Diabatic divergence profiles in western Pacific mesoscale convective systems. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 1807–1828.

  • Marks, F. D., 1985: Evolution of the structure of precipitation in Hurricane Allen (1980). Mon. Wea. Rev.,113, 909–930.

  • ——, and R. A. Houze Jr., 1987: Inner-core structure of Hurricane Alicia from airborne doppler radar observations. J. Atmos Sci.,44, 1296–1317.

  • Merrill, R. T., 1988: Environmental influence on hurricane intensification. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 1678–1687.

  • Molinari, J., and S. Skubis, 1985: Evolution of the surface wind field in an intensifying tropical cyclone. J Atmos. Sci.,42, 2865–2879.

  • ——, and D. Vollaro, 1989: External influences on hurricane intensity. Part 1: Outflow layer eddy momentum fluxes. J. Atmos. Sci.,46, 1093–1105.

  • Mundell, D. B, 1991: Tropical cyclone intensification. Preprints, 19th Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, Miami, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 511–515.

  • Olson, W. S., C. D. Kummerow, G. M. Heymsfield, and L. Giglio, 1996: A method for combined passive–active microwave retrievals of cloud and precipitation profiles. J. Appl. Meteor.,35, 1763–1789.

  • Ooyama, K. V., 1964: A dynamical model for the study of tropical cyclone development. Geifus Int.,4, 187–198.

  • Panegrossi, G., S. Dietrich, F. S. Marzano, A. Mugnai, E. A. Smith, X. Xiang, G. J. Tripoli, P. K. Wang, and J. P. V. Poiares Baptista, 1998: Use of cloud model microphysics for passive microwave-based precipitation retrieval: Significance of consistency between model and measurement manifolds. J. Atmos. Sci.,55, 1644–1673.

  • Petty, G. W., and K. B. Katsaros, 1990: New geophysical algorithms for the Special Sensor Microwave Imager. Preprints. Fitfh Int. Conf. on Satellite Meteorology and Oceanography, London, United Kingdom, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 247–251.

  • Reed, R. J., A. Hollingsworth, W. A. Heckle, and F. Dell, 1988: An evaluation of the performance of the ECMWF operational system in analyzing and forecasting easterly wave disturbances over Africa and the tropical Atlantic. Mon. Wea. Rev.,116, 824–865.

  • Reuter, G. W., and M. K. Yau, 1986: Numerical modeling of cloud development in a shear environment. Beitr. Phys. Atmos.,66, 65–80.

  • Rodgers, E. B., and H. F. Pierce, 1995: Environmental influence on Typhoon Bobbie’s precipitation distribution. J. Appl. Meteor.,34, 2515–2532.

  • ——, S. W. Chang, J. Stout, J. Steranka, and J.-J. Shi, 1991: Satellite observations of variations in tropical cyclone convection caused by upper-tropospheric troughs. J. Appl. Meteor.,30, 1163–1184.

  • ——, ——, and J.-J. Baik, 1993: A satellite observational and numerical study of inner-core diabatic heating and subsequent intensity change in tropical cyclones. Preprints, 20th Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, San Antonio, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 189–192.

  • ——, ——, and H. F. Pierce, 1994a: A satellite observational and numerical study of the precipitation characteristics in western North Atlantic tropical cyclones. J. Appl. Meteor.33, 129–139.

  • ——, J.-J. Baik, and H. F. Pierce, 1994b: The environmental influence on tropical cyclone precipitation. J. Appl. Meteor.,33, 573–593.

  • Rutledge, S. A., and P. V. Hobbs, 1983: The mesoscale and microscale structure and organization of clouds and precipitation in midlatitude cyclones. Part VIII: A model for the “seeder-feeder” process in warm-frontal rainbands. J. Atmos. Sci.,40, 1185–1206.

  • Sadler, J. C., 1976: Tropical cyclone initiation by the tropical upper-tropospheric trough. Mon. Wea. Rev.,104, 1266–1278.

  • ——, 1978: Midseason typhoon development and intensity changes and the tropical upper-tropospheric trough. Mon. Wea. Rev.,106, 1137–1152.

  • Schubert, W. H., and J. J. Hack, 1982: Inertial stability and tropical cyclone development. J. Atmos. Sci.,39, 1687–1697.

  • Shapiro, W. H., and H. E. Willoughby, 1982: The response of balanced hurricanes to local sources of heat and momentum. J. Atmos. Sci.,39, 378–394.

  • Shaw, D. B., P. Lonnberg, A. Hollingsworth, and P. Unden, 1987: Data assimilation: The 1984/1985 revisions of the ECMWF mass and wind analysis. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,113, 533–566.

  • Shi, J.-J., S. W. Chang, and S. Raman, 1990: A numerical study of the outflow layer of tropical cyclones. Mon. Wea. Rev.,118, 2042–2055.

  • ——, ——, and ——, 1996: Impact of assimilation of dropwindsonde data and SSM/I rain rate on numerical prodiction of Hurricane Florence (1988). Mon. Wea. Rev.,124, 1435–1448.

  • Simpson, R. H., 1976: The hurricane disaster potential scale. Weatherwise,27, 169–186.

  • Tao, W.-K., S. Lang, J. Simpson, and R. Adler, 1993a: Retrieval algorithms for estimating the vertical profiles of latent heat release. Their applications for TRMM. J. Meteor Soc. Japan,71, 685–700.

  • ——, J. Simpson, C.-H. Sui, B. Ferrier, S. Lang, J. Scala, M.-D. Chou, and K. Pickering, 1993b: Heating, moisture, and water budgets of tropical and midlatitude squall lines: Comparisons and sensitivity to longwave radiation. J. Atmos. Sci.,50, 673–690.

  • ——, S. Lang, J. Simpson, C.-H. Sui, and B. Ferrier, 1996: Mechanisms of cloud-radiation interaction in the Tropics and midlatitudes. J. Atmos. Sci.,53, 2624–2651.

  • Trier, S. B., W. C. Skamarock, M. A. LeMone, and D. B. Parson, 1996: Structure and evolution of the 22 February 1993 TOGA COARE squall line: Numerical simulations. J. Atmos. Sci.,53, 2861–2886.

  • Tripoli, G. J., 1992a: A nonhydrostatic model designed to simulate scale interaction. Mon. Wea. Rev.,120, 1342–1359.

  • ——, 1992b: An explicit three-dimensional nonhydrostatic numerical simulation of a tropical cyclone. Meteor. Atmos. Phys.,49, 229–254.

  • van Delden, A., 1989: On the deepening and filling of balanced cyclones by diabatic heating. Meteor. Atmos. Phys.,41, 127–145.

  • Weatherford, C., 1987: Typhoon structural evolution. Preprints, 17th Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, Miami, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 337–340.

  • Willoughby, H. E., 1988: The dynamics of the tropical cyclone core. Aust. Meteor. Mag.,36, 183–191.

  • ——, 1990: Temporal changes of the primary circulation in tropical cyclones. J. Atmos. Sci.,47, 242–264.

  • ——, J. A. Clos, and M. G. Shoreibah, 1982: Concentric eye-walls, secondary wind maxima, and the evolution of the hurricane vortex. J. Atmos. Sci.,39, 395–411.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1273 959 56
PDF Downloads 171 51 4