Article Type:
Research Article

Case Study of Erin Using the FSU Nested Regional Spectral Model

S. Cocke Department of Meteorology, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida

Search for other papers by S. Cocke in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 May 1998
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<1337:CSOEUT>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
1337–1346
Restricted access

Abstract

A case study of Hurricane Erin of the 1995 storm season is presented using the recently developed Florida State University (FSU) Nested Regional Spectral Model. The nested regional spectral model uses a perturbation technique similar to that used in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction and European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts regional spectral models, but with a number of differences such as the use of a Mercator projection. The perturbations are deviations from the FSU Global Spectral Model (FSUGSM) results and are spectrally represented with π-periodic trigonometric basis functions. The perturbations are relaxed at the boundary to approach the global model results. The perturbation time tendencies are solved using a semi-implicit time integration scheme similar to that used in the FSUGSM. The regional model has the same sigma-coordinate vertical structure and physics as the FSUGSM. Implicit horizontal diffusion and time filtering of the perturbations is included.

Erin made landfall on both the Atlantic coast and gulf coast of Florida, each time with hurricane strength. A 4-day prediction is performed using a 0.5° transform grid, which yields an equivalent resolution to a T240 global model. T106 and T126 global models were used to provide base fields for the regional model as well as control experiments. The intensity forecast of the regional model was superior to that of the global model and reasonably close to the observed intensity. With physical initialization, the forecast track of the storm is improved in both the global and regional models. However, the regional model predicted the best track, showing both landfalls within 100 km of the observed landfalls.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Steven Cocke, FSU Dept. of Meteorology, 414 Love Bldg., Tallahassee, FL 32306.

Abstract

A case study of Hurricane Erin of the 1995 storm season is presented using the recently developed Florida State University (FSU) Nested Regional Spectral Model. The nested regional spectral model uses a perturbation technique similar to that used in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction and European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts regional spectral models, but with a number of differences such as the use of a Mercator projection. The perturbations are deviations from the FSU Global Spectral Model (FSUGSM) results and are spectrally represented with π-periodic trigonometric basis functions. The perturbations are relaxed at the boundary to approach the global model results. The perturbation time tendencies are solved using a semi-implicit time integration scheme similar to that used in the FSUGSM. The regional model has the same sigma-coordinate vertical structure and physics as the FSUGSM. Implicit horizontal diffusion and time filtering of the perturbations is included.

Erin made landfall on both the Atlantic coast and gulf coast of Florida, each time with hurricane strength. A 4-day prediction is performed using a 0.5° transform grid, which yields an equivalent resolution to a T240 global model. T106 and T126 global models were used to provide base fields for the regional model as well as control experiments. The intensity forecast of the regional model was superior to that of the global model and reasonably close to the observed intensity. With physical initialization, the forecast track of the storm is improved in both the global and regional models. However, the regional model predicted the best track, showing both landfalls within 100 km of the observed landfalls.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Steven Cocke, FSU Dept. of Meteorology, 414 Love Bldg., Tallahassee, FL 32306.

Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Asselin, R. A., 1972: Frequency filter for time integration. Mon. Wea. Rev.,100, 487–490.

  • Businger, J. A., J. C. Wyngard, Y. Izumi, and E. F. Bradley, 1971: Flux profile relationship in the atmospheric surface layer. J. Atmos. Sci.,28, 181–189.

  • Girard, C., and M. Jarraud, 1982: Short and medium range forecast differences between a spectral and grid point model. An extensive quasi-operational comparison. ECMWF Tech. Rep. 32, 178 pp. [Available from ECMWF, Shinfield Park, Reading RG2 9AX, United Kingdom.].

  • Harshvardan, and T. G. Corsetti, 1984: Long-wave parameterization for the UCLA/GLAS GCM. NASA Tech. Memo. 86072, 52 pp. [Available from Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771.].

  • Hoyer, J. M., 1987: The ECMWF spectral limited-area model. Proc. ECMWF Workshop on Techniques for Horizontal Discretization in Numerical Weather Prediction Models, Shinfield Park, Reading, United Kingdom, ECMWF, 343–359.

  • Jarraud, M., C. Girard, and U. Cubasch, 1981: Comparison of medium range forecasts made with models using spectral or finite difference techniques in the horizontal. ECMWF Tech. Rep. 23, 96 pp. [Available from ECMWF, Shinfield Park, Reading RG2 9AX, United Kingdom.].

  • Juang, H.-M. H., and M. Kanamitsu, 1994: The NMC Nested Regional Spectral Model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,122, 3–26.

  • Kanamitsu, M., 1975: On numerical prediction over a global tropical belt. Rep. 75-1, Dept. of Meteorology, Florida State University, 282 pp. [Available from Dept. of Meteorology, FSU, Tallahassee, FL 32306.].

  • ——, K. Tada, K. Kudo, N. Sato, and S. Isa, 1983: Description of the JMA operational spectral model. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan,61, 812–828.

  • Kitade, T., 1983: Nonlinear normal mode initialization with physics. Mon. Wea. Rev.,111, 2194–2213.

  • Krishnamurti, T. N., S. Low-Nam, and R. Pasch, 1983: Cumulus parameterization and rainfall rates II. Mon. Wea. Rev.,111, 816–828.

  • ——, K. Ingles, S. Cocke, R. Pasch, and T. Kitade, 1984: Details of low latitude medium range numerical weather prediction using a global spectral model (II). Effect of orography and physical initialization. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan,62, 613–649.

  • ——, J. Xue, H. S. Bedi, K. Ingles, and D. Oosterhof, 1991: Physical initialization for numerical weather prediction over the Tropics. Tellus,43AB, 53–81.

  • ——, S. K. Roy Bhowmik, D. Oosterhof, G. Rohaly, and N. Surgi, 1995: Mesoscale signatures within the Tropics generated by physical initialization. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 2771–2790.

  • Lacis, A. A., and J. E. Hansen, 1974: A parameterization of the absorption of solar radiation in the earth’s atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sci.,31, 118–133.

  • Louis, J. F., 1979: A parametric model of vertical eddy fluxes in the atmosphere. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,17, 187–202.

  • Tatsumi, Y., 1986: A spectral limited-area model with time dependent lateral boundary conditions and its application to a multi-level primitive equation model. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan,64, 637–663.

  • Tiedke, M., 1984: The sensitivity of the time-mean large-scale flow to cumulus convection in the ECMWF model. Workshop on Convection in large-scale numerical models, Shinfield Park, Reading, United Kingdom, ECMWF, 297–316.

  • Wallace, J. M., S. Tibaldi, and A. J. Simmons, 1983: Reduction of systematic forecast errors in the ECMWF model through the introduction of envelope orography. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,109, 683–718.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 475 319 39
PDF Downloads 50 21 2