Numerical Prediction of Hurricane Opal

T. N. Krishnamurti Department of Meteorology, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida

Search for other papers by T. N. Krishnamurti in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Wei Han Department of Meteorology, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida

Search for other papers by Wei Han in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Bhaskar Jha Department of Meteorology, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida

Search for other papers by Bhaskar Jha in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
H. S. Bedi Department of Meteorology, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida

Search for other papers by H. S. Bedi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The main theme of this paper is on the intensity forecast of a hurricane (Opal) and interpretation of factors contributing toward it. The paper illustrates the results of assimilation and prediction for Hurricane Opal of 1995 from a very high-resolution global model. The assimilation makes use of a detailed physical initialization that vastly improves the nowcasting skill of rainfall and the model-based outgoing longwave radiation. Some of the interesting aspects of Hurricane Opal’s history occurred between 1200 UTC 1 October 1995 and 1200 UTC 5 October 1995. During this period the storm made landfall over the Florida panhandle. The storm reached maximum wind speed of over 130 kt on 4 October 1995. The intensity issue of Opal has drawn much attention. Issues such as the potential vorticity impact from a middle-latitude trough, the angular momentum of the lower-tropospheric inflow layer, the warm ocean temperature anomalies of the northern Gulf of Mexico, and the possible role of mesoconvective concentric eyewall are discussed in this paper.

The main finding of this study is that a reduction of the gradient of angular momentum occurs above the regions of maximum convective heating. This contributes toward stronger cyclonic spinup of parcels that enter the storm environment from the middle latitudes. Another major contributor is the import of angular momentum along the lower-tropospheric inflow channels of the storm. These channels were found to be open, that is, uncontaminated with a plethora of deep convection and heavy rain. This permitted the high angular momentum to advance toward the storm’s interior thus contributing to its intensification.

Corresponding author address: Dr. T. N. Krishnamurti, Dept. of Meteorology, B-161, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4520.

Abstract

The main theme of this paper is on the intensity forecast of a hurricane (Opal) and interpretation of factors contributing toward it. The paper illustrates the results of assimilation and prediction for Hurricane Opal of 1995 from a very high-resolution global model. The assimilation makes use of a detailed physical initialization that vastly improves the nowcasting skill of rainfall and the model-based outgoing longwave radiation. Some of the interesting aspects of Hurricane Opal’s history occurred between 1200 UTC 1 October 1995 and 1200 UTC 5 October 1995. During this period the storm made landfall over the Florida panhandle. The storm reached maximum wind speed of over 130 kt on 4 October 1995. The intensity issue of Opal has drawn much attention. Issues such as the potential vorticity impact from a middle-latitude trough, the angular momentum of the lower-tropospheric inflow layer, the warm ocean temperature anomalies of the northern Gulf of Mexico, and the possible role of mesoconvective concentric eyewall are discussed in this paper.

The main finding of this study is that a reduction of the gradient of angular momentum occurs above the regions of maximum convective heating. This contributes toward stronger cyclonic spinup of parcels that enter the storm environment from the middle latitudes. Another major contributor is the import of angular momentum along the lower-tropospheric inflow channels of the storm. These channels were found to be open, that is, uncontaminated with a plethora of deep convection and heavy rain. This permitted the high angular momentum to advance toward the storm’s interior thus contributing to its intensification.

Corresponding author address: Dr. T. N. Krishnamurti, Dept. of Meteorology, B-161, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4520.

Save
  • Businger, J. A., J. C. Wyngard, Y. Izumi, and E. F. Bradley, 1971: Flux profile relationship in the atmospheric surface layer. J. Atmos. Sci.,28, 181–189.

  • Gairola, R. K., and T. N. Krishnamurti, 1992: Rain rates based on SSM/I, OLR and raingauge data sets. J. Meteor. Atmos.,50, 165–174.

  • Harshvardan, and T. G. Corsetti, 1984: Long-wave parameterization for the UCLA/GLAS GCM. NASA Tech. Memo. 86072, 52 pp. [Available from NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771.].

  • Kanamitsu, M., 1975: On numerical prediction over a global tropical belt. Rep. 75-1, Dept. of Meteorology, The Florida State University, 1–282. [Available from Dept. of Meteorology, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306.].

  • ——, K. Tada, K. Kudo, N. Sato, and S. Isa, 1983: Description of the JMA operational spectral model. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan,61, 812–828.

  • Krishnamurti, T. N., S. Low-Nam, and R. Pasch, 1983: Cumulus parameterization and rainfall rates II. Mon. Wea. Rev.,111, 816–828.

  • ——, J. Xue, H. S. Bedi, K. Ingles, and D. Oosterhof, 1991: Physical initialization for numerical weather prediction over the tropics. Tellus,43AB, 53–81.

  • ——, H. S. Bedi, and K. Ingles, 1993: Physical Initialization using SSM/I rain rates. Tellus,45A, 247–269.

  • ——, G. D. Rohaly, and H. S. Bedi, 1994: On the improvement of precipitation forecast skill from physical initialization. Tellus,46A, 598–614.

  • ——, S. K. Bhowmik, D. Oosterhof, G. Rohaly, and N. Surgi, 1995:Mesoscale signatures within the Tropics generated by physical initialization. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 2771–2790.

  • ——, H. S. Bedi, G. D. Rohaly, D. K. Oosterhof, R. C. Torres, E. Williford, and N. Surgi, 1997: Physical initialization. Atmos.–Ocean.,35, 369–398.

  • Lacis, A. A., and J. E. Hansen, 1974: A parameterization of the absorption of solar radiation in the earth’s atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sci.,31, 118–133.

  • Lawrence, M., 1998: Atlantic hurricane season of 1995. Mon. Wea. Rev.,126, 1124–1151.

  • Louis, J. F., 1979: A parametric model of vertical eddy fluxes in the atmosphere. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,17, 187–202.

  • Tiedke, M., 1984: The sensitivity of the time-mean large-scale flow to cumulus convection in the ECMWF model. Workshop on Convection in Large-Scale Numerical Models. Reading, United Kingdom, ECMWF, 297–316.

  • Treadon, R. E., 1996: Physical initialization in the NMC Global Data Assimilation System. Meteor. Atmos. Phys.,60, 57–86.

  • Wallace, J. M., S. Tibaldi, and A. J. Simmons, 1983: Reduction of systematic forecast errors in the ECMWF model through the introduction of envelope orography. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,109, 683–718.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1262 1071 49
PDF Downloads 81 41 9