Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Analysis of a Small, Vigorous Mesoscale Convective System in a Low-Shear Environment. Part I: Formation, Radar Echo Structure, and Lightning Behavior

Kevin R. Knupp Earth System Science Laboratory, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama

Search for other papers by Kevin R. Knupp in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Bart Geerts Earth System Science Laboratory, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama

Search for other papers by Bart Geerts in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Steven J. Goodman NASA/Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama

Search for other papers by Steven J. Goodman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Jul 1998
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<1812:AOASVM>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
1812–1836
Restricted access

Abstract

The evolution of a small, vigorous mesoscale convective system (MCS) over northern Alabama is described using Doppler radar, GOES satellite, surface mesonet, lightning, and sounding data. The MCS formed near noon in a relatively unstable environment having weak synoptic forcing and weak shear. The initiation of separate lines and clusters of deep convection occurred in regions exhibiting cumulus cloud streets, horizontal variations in stratocumulus cloud cover, and variations in inferred soil moisture. MCS growth via merger of storms within clusters and lines, and among the clusters, was accomplished largely through intersection of storm-scale and mesoscale outflow boundaries. The MCS maximum anvil area (∼60000 km2 at 220 K) and lifetime (8 h) were about 50% that of the typical Great Plains mesoscale convective complex (MCC).

Despite its smaller size, this MCS displayed many aspects that typify the mostly nocturnal Great Plains MCS. The precipitation output was highly variable due to the transient nature of the intense convective elements, many of which produced microbursts. The radar measurements documented the formation of a stratiform region along the trailing side of an intense convective line. This stratiform region formed as decaying convective cores coalesced, rather than through advection of precipitation particles directly from the convective region. Combined GOES IR imagery and radar reflectivity analyses within the stratiform region show a sinking anvil cloud top in the presence of increases in the vertical radar reflectivity gradient within the cloud during the maturation of the stratiform region.

During its intense developing stages, the MCS generated a peak cloud-to-ground (CG) flash rate of 2400 h−1, comparable to rates produced by larger MCCs. Early on, positive CG flashes were most prevalent around intense convective core regions exhibiting strong divergence at anvil level. During the latter stages, the emergence of positive CG was coincident with the formation of a prominent radar bright band within the stratiform region. Thus, a bipole was established, but its length was quite short at approximately 50 km, 25%–50% of the distance documented in other MCSs.

* Current affiliation: Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott, Arizona.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Kevin R. Knupp, Earth System Science Laboratory, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Hunstville, AL 35899.

Abstract

The evolution of a small, vigorous mesoscale convective system (MCS) over northern Alabama is described using Doppler radar, GOES satellite, surface mesonet, lightning, and sounding data. The MCS formed near noon in a relatively unstable environment having weak synoptic forcing and weak shear. The initiation of separate lines and clusters of deep convection occurred in regions exhibiting cumulus cloud streets, horizontal variations in stratocumulus cloud cover, and variations in inferred soil moisture. MCS growth via merger of storms within clusters and lines, and among the clusters, was accomplished largely through intersection of storm-scale and mesoscale outflow boundaries. The MCS maximum anvil area (∼60000 km2 at 220 K) and lifetime (8 h) were about 50% that of the typical Great Plains mesoscale convective complex (MCC).

Despite its smaller size, this MCS displayed many aspects that typify the mostly nocturnal Great Plains MCS. The precipitation output was highly variable due to the transient nature of the intense convective elements, many of which produced microbursts. The radar measurements documented the formation of a stratiform region along the trailing side of an intense convective line. This stratiform region formed as decaying convective cores coalesced, rather than through advection of precipitation particles directly from the convective region. Combined GOES IR imagery and radar reflectivity analyses within the stratiform region show a sinking anvil cloud top in the presence of increases in the vertical radar reflectivity gradient within the cloud during the maturation of the stratiform region.

During its intense developing stages, the MCS generated a peak cloud-to-ground (CG) flash rate of 2400 h−1, comparable to rates produced by larger MCCs. Early on, positive CG flashes were most prevalent around intense convective core regions exhibiting strong divergence at anvil level. During the latter stages, the emergence of positive CG was coincident with the formation of a prominent radar bright band within the stratiform region. Thus, a bipole was established, but its length was quite short at approximately 50 km, 25%–50% of the distance documented in other MCSs.

* Current affiliation: Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott, Arizona.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Kevin R. Knupp, Earth System Science Laboratory, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Hunstville, AL 35899.

Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Alexander, G. D., and G. S. Young, 1992: The relationship between EMEX precipitation feature properties and their environmental characteristics. Mon. Wea. Rev.,120, 554–564.

  • Atkins, N., and R. M. Wakimoto, 1991: Wet microburst activity over the southeastern United States: Implications for forecasting. Wea. Forecasting,6, 470–482.

  • Augustine, J. A., and K. W. Howard, 1988: Mesoscale convective complexes over the United States during 1985. Mon. Wea. Rev.,116, 685–701.

  • ——, and ——, 1991: Mesoscale convective complexes over the United States during 1986 and 1987. Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 1575–1589.

  • Barnes, G. M., and K. Siekman, 1984: The environment of fast- and slow-moving tropical mesoscale convective lines. Mon. Wea. Rev.,112, 1782–1794.

  • Biggerstaff, M. I., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1991: Kinematic and precipitation structure of the 10–11 June 1985 squall line. Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 3035–3065.

  • Brandes, E. A., 1990: Evolution and structure of the 6–7 May 1985 mesoscale convective system and associated vortex. Mon. Wea. Rev.,118, 109–127.

  • Brooks, H. E., C. A. Doswell III, and J. Cooper, 1994: On the environments of tornadic and nontornadic mesocyclones. Wea. Forecasting,9, 606–618.

  • Brown, R. A., 1980: Longitudinal instabilities and secondary flows in the planetary boundary layer: A review. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys.,18, 683–697.

  • Browning, K. A., and F. F. Hill, 1984: Structure and evolution of mesoscale convective system near the British Isles. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,110, 897–913.

  • Buechler, D. B., S. J. Goodman, E. W. McCaul, and K. R. Knupp, 1996: Cloud-to-ground lightning activity within tornadic supercells in the Tennessee Valley. Preprints, 18th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, San Francisco, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 499–503.

  • Chong, M., P. Amayenc, G. Scialom, and J. Testud, 1987: A tropical squall line observed during the COPT 81 experiment in West Africa. Part I: Kinematic structure inferred from dual-Doppler radar data. Mon. Wea. Rev.,115, 670–694.

  • Churchill, D. D., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1984: Development and structure of winter monsoon cloud clusters on 10 December 1978. J. Atmos. Sci.,41, 933–960.

  • ——, and ——, 1991: Effects of radiation and turbulence on the diabatic heating and water budget of the stratiform region of a tropical cloud cluster. J. Atmos. Sci.,48, 903–922.

  • Cotton, W. R., M.-S. Lin, R. L. McAnelly, and C. J. Tremback, 1989:A composite model of mesoscale convective complexes. Mon. Wea. Rev.,117, 765–783.

  • Engholm, C. D., E. R. Williams, and R. M. Dole, 1990: Meteorological and electrical conditions associated with positive cloud-to-ground lightning. Mon. Wea. Rev.,118, 470–487.

  • Fankhauser, J. C., N. A. Crook, J. Tuttle, L. J. Miller, and C. G. Wade, 1995: Initiation of deep convection along boundary layer convergence lines in a semitropical environment. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 291–313.

  • Fovell, R. G., and Y. Ogura, 1988: Numerical simulation of a midlatitude squall line in two dimensions. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 3846–3879.

  • ——, D. Durran, and J. R. Holton, 1992: Numerical simulations of convectively generated stratospheric gravity waves. J. Atmos. Sci.,49, 1427–1442.

  • Geerts, B., 1998: Mesoscale convective systems in the southeast United States during 1994–95: A survey. Wea. Forecasting, in press.

  • Goodman, S. J., and D. R. MacGorman, 1986: Cloud-to-ground lightning activity in mesoscale convective complexes. Mon. Wea. Rev.,114, 2320–2328.

  • Hauser, D., F. Roux, and P. Amayenc, 1988: Comparison of two methods for the retrieval of thermodynamic and microphysical variables from Doppler radar measurements: Application to the case of a tropical squall line. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 1285–1303.

  • Hildebrand, P. H., 1978: Iterative correction for attenuation of 5 cm radar in rain. J. Appl. Meteor.,17, 508–514.

  • Holle, R. L., A. I. Watson, R. E. Lopez, D. R. MacGorman, and R. Ortiz, 1994: The life cycle of lightning and severe weather in a 3–4 June 1985 PRE-STORM mesoscale convective system. Mon. Wea. Rev.,122, 1798–1808.

  • Houze, R. A., 1993: Cloud Dynamics. International Geophysics Series, Vol. 53, Academic Press, 570 pp.

  • ——, S. A. Rutledge, M. I. Biggerstaff, and B. F. Smull, 1989: Interpretation of Doppler weather radar displays in midlatitude mesoscale convective systems. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,70, 608–619.

  • ——, B. F. Smull, and P. Dodge, 1990: Mesoscale organization of springtime rainstorms in Oklahoma. Mon. Wea. Rev.,118, 613–654.

  • Hunter, S. M., T. J. Schuur, T. C. Marshall, and D. W. Rust, 1992: Electric and kinematic structure of the Oklahoma mesoscale convective system of 7 June 1989. Mon. Wea. Rev.,120, 2226–2239.

  • Johnson, R. H., and P. J. Hamilton, 1988: The relationship of surface pressure features to the precipitation and airflow structure of an intense midlatitude squall line. Mon. Wea. Rev.,116, 1444–1472.

  • Keighton, S. J., H. B. Bluestein, and D. R. MacGorman, 1991: The evolution of a severe mesoscale convective system: Cloud-to-ground lightning location and storm structure. Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 1533–1556.

  • Klimowski, B. A., 1994: Initiation and development of rear inflow within the 28–29 June 1989 North Dakota mesoconvective system. Mon. Wea. Rev.,122, 765–779.

  • Knupp, K. R., and W. R. Cotton, 1987: Internal structure of a small mesoscale convective system. Mon. Wea. Rev.,115, 629–645.

  • ——, and V. Chandrasekar, 1993: Estimation of C-band attenuation in heavy rain environments. Preprints, 26th Int. Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Norman, OK, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 543–545.

  • ——, B. Geerts, and J. D. Tuttle, 1998: Analysis of a small, vigorous mesoscale convective system in a low-shear environment. Part II: Evolution of the stratiform precipitation and mesoscale flows. Mon. Wea. Rev.,126, 1837–1858.

  • Leary, C. A., and R. A. Houze, 1979: Melting and evaporation of hydrometeors in precipitation from the anvil clouds of deep tropical convection. J. Atmos. Sci.,36, 669–679.

  • MacGorman, D. R., and D. W. Burgess, 1994: Positive cloud-to-ground lightning in tornadic storms and hailstorms. Mon. Wea. Rev.,122, 1671–1697.

  • Maddox, R. A., 1980: Mesoscale convective complexes. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,61, 1374–1387.

  • ——, 1983: Large-scale conditions associated with midlatitude, mesoscale convective complexes. Mon. Wea. Rev.,111, 1475–1493.

  • ——, D. M. Rodgers, and K. M. Howard, 1982: Mesoscale convective complexes over the United States in 1981: Annual summary. Mon. Wea. Rev.,110, 1501–1514.

  • Mapes, B. E., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1993: Cloud clusters and superclusters over the oceanic warm pool. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 1398–1415.

  • Martin, D. W., and A. J. Schreiner, 1981: Characteristics of West African and east Atlantic cloud clusters: A survey from GATE. Mon. Wea. Rev.,109, 1671–1688.

  • McCann, D. W., 1994: WINDEX—A new index for forecasting microburst potential. Wea. Forecasting,9, 532–541.

  • McNider, R. T., A. J. Song, D. M. Casey, P. J. Wetzel, W. L. Crosson, and R. M. Rabin, 1994: Toward a dynamic–thermodynamic assimilation of satellite surface temperature in numerical atmospheric models. Mon. Wea. Rev.,122, 2784–2803.

  • Miller, D., and J. M. Fritsch, 1992: Mesoscale convective complexes in the western Pacific region. Mon. Wea. Rev.,120, 2978–2992.

  • Mohr, C. G., and L. J. Miller, 1983: CEDRIC—A software package for Cartesian space editing, synthesis and display of radar fields using interactive control. Preprints, 21st Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Edmonton, AB, Canada, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 569–574.

  • Nelson, S. P., 1983: The influence of storm flow structure on hail growth. J. Atmos. Sci.,40, 1965–1983.

  • Nielsen, K. E., R. A. Maddox, and S. V. Vasiloff, 1994: The evolution of cloud-to-ground lightning within a portion of the 10–11 June 1985 squall line. Mon. Wea. Rev.,122, 1809–1817.

  • Purdom, J. F. W., 1982: Subjective interpretation of geostationary satellite data for nowcasting. Nowcasting, K. A. Browning, Ed., Academic Press, 149–166.

  • Reap, R. M., and D. R. MacGorman, 1989: Cloud-to-ground lightning: Climatological characteristics and relationships to model fields, radar observations and severe local storms. Mon. Wea. Rev.,117, 518–535.

  • Rodgers, D. M., and K. W. Howard, 1983: Mesoscale convective complexes over the United States during 1982. Mon. Wea. Rev.,111, 2363–2369.

  • ——, M. J. Magnano, and J. H. Arns, 1985: Mesoscale convective complexes over the United States during 1983. Mon. Wea. Rev.,113, 888–901.

  • Rotunno, R., J. B. Klemp, and M. L. Weisman, 1988: A theory for strong, long-lived squall lines. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 463–485.

  • Rutledge, S. A., and D. R. MacGorman, 1988: Cloud-to-ground lightning activity in the 10–11 June 1985 mesoscale convective system observed during Oklahoma–Kansas PRE-STORM project. Mon. Wea. Rev.,116, 1393–1408.

  • ——, and W. A. Petersen, 1994: Vertical radar reflectivity structure and cloud-to-ground lightning in the stratiform region of MCSs:Further evidence for in situ charging in the stratiform region. Mon. Wea. Rev.,122, 1760–1776.

  • ——, C. Lu, and D. R. MacGorman, 1990: Positive cloud-to-ground lightning in mesoscale convective systems. J. Atmos. Sci.,47, 2085–2100.

  • Schuur, T. J., B. F. Smull, W. D. Rust, and T. C. Marshall, 1991: Electrical and kinematic structure of the stratiform precipitation region trailing an Oklahoma squall line. J. Atmos. Sci.,48, 825–842.

  • Segal, M., R. W. Arritt, C. Clark, R. Rabin, and J. Brown, 1995: Scaling evaluation of the effect of surface characteristics on potential for deep convection over uniform terrain. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 383–400.

  • Simpson, J., 1980: Downdrafts as linkages in dynamic cumulus seeding effects. J. Appl. Meteor.,19, 477–487.

  • Smull, B. F., and J. A. Augustine, 1993: Multiscale analysis of a mature mesoscale convective complex. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 103–132.

  • Stensrud, D. J., and J. M. Fritsch, 1994: Mesoscale convective systems in weakly forced large-scale environments. Part II: Generation of a mesoscale initial condition. Mon. Wea. Rev.,122, 2068–2083.

  • Stolzenburg, M., 1994: Observations of high ground flash densities of positive lightning in summertime thunderstorms. Mon. Wea. Rev.,122, 1740–1750.

  • Storm Data, 1986: Vol. 28, No. 2. [Available from National Climatic Data Center, Federal Building, Asheville, NC 28801.].

  • Tao, W. K., and J. Simpson, 1989: Modelling study of a tropical squall-type convective line. J. Atmos. Sci.,46, 177–202.

  • Velasco, I., and J. M. Fritsch, 1987: Mesoscale convective complexes in the Americas. J. Geophys. Res.,92 (D8), 9591–9613.

  • Wallace, J. M., 1975: Diurnal variations in precipitation and thunderstorm frequency over the conterminous United States. Mon. Wea. Rev.,103, 406–419.

  • Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin, 1986: Vol. 73, No. 28. [Available from NOAA/NWS/NCEP, 4700 Silver Hill Rd., Stop 9910, Washington, DC 20233-9910.].

  • Weisman, M. L., J. B. Klemp, and R. Rotunno, 1988: Structure and evolution of numerically simulated squall lines. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 1990–2013.

  • Westcott, N. E., 1994: Merging of convective clouds: Cloud initiation, bridging, and subsequent growth. Mon. Wea. Rev.,122, 780–790.

  • Wilson, J. W., R. D. Roberts, C. Kessinger, and J. McCarthy, 1984:Microburst wind structure and evaluation of Doppler radar for airport wind shear detection. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,23, 898–915.

  • Wilson, K. J., and B. F. Ryan, 1986: The subsynoptic scale environment of mesoscale convective weather systems at genesis over southeastern Australia. Beitr. Phys. Atmos.,60, 210–228.

  • Yuter, S. E., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1995a: Three-dimensional kinematic and microphysical evolution of Florida cumulonimbus. Part I: Spatial distribution of updrafts, downdrafts, and precipitation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 1921–1940.

  • ——, and ——, 1995b: Three-dimensional kinematic and microphysical evolution of Florida cumulonimbus. Part II: Frequency distributions of vertical velocity, reflectivity, and differential reflectivity. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 1941–1963.

  • ——, and ——, 1995c: Three-dimensional kinematic and microphysical evolution of Florida cumulonimbus. Part III: Vertical mass transport, mass divergence, and synthesis. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 1964–1983.

  • Zipser, E. J., 1982: Use of a conceptual model of the life cycle of mesoscale convective systems to improve very-short-range forecasts. Nowcasting, K. A. Browning, Ed., Academic Press, 191–204.

  • ——, R. J. Meitin, and M. A. Lemone, 1981: Mesoscale motion fields associated with a slowly-moving GATE convective band. J. Atmos. Sci.,38, 1725–1750.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 248 82 5
PDF Downloads 119 50 4