Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Implementation and Validation of a Condensation Scheme in a Nonhydrostatic Mesoscale Model

Anne Dagrun Sandvik Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

Search for other papers by Anne Dagrun Sandvik in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Jul 1998
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<1882:IAVOAC>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
1882–1905
Restricted access

Abstract

In this paper a condensation scheme is implemented in a nonhydrostatic mesoscale model (MEMO). An overview of the model and the modified Sundqvist condensation scheme are given. The model, including condensation (MEMOIC), is tested on two well-known phenomena that are likely to produce clouds in humid atmospheres: sea breeze and flow over a mesoscale mountain. First the sea-breeze simulations are used to show the effect increased horizontal resolution has on the results (wind velocities, cloud water, and precipitation pattern). It is concluded that the circulation generally increases due to increased resolution and that the Sundqvist condensation scheme performs well with horizontal model resolution as high as 2.5 km. Second, a number of simulations of flow over mountain are discussed. Upstream flow parameters and the shape of the mountain are changed to test the usability of MEMOIC. Also, for this flow pattern, MEMOIC performs well. It is shown that it is able to handle released instabilities and that it gives reasonable results for horizontal grid resolution as high as 500 m. For the discussed flow patterns it is hard to give a lower horizontal-resolution limit for MEMOIC.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Anne Dagrun Sandvik, Norwegian Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 43, Blindern, N-0313 Oslo, Norway.

Abstract

In this paper a condensation scheme is implemented in a nonhydrostatic mesoscale model (MEMO). An overview of the model and the modified Sundqvist condensation scheme are given. The model, including condensation (MEMOIC), is tested on two well-known phenomena that are likely to produce clouds in humid atmospheres: sea breeze and flow over a mesoscale mountain. First the sea-breeze simulations are used to show the effect increased horizontal resolution has on the results (wind velocities, cloud water, and precipitation pattern). It is concluded that the circulation generally increases due to increased resolution and that the Sundqvist condensation scheme performs well with horizontal model resolution as high as 2.5 km. Second, a number of simulations of flow over mountain are discussed. Upstream flow parameters and the shape of the mountain are changed to test the usability of MEMOIC. Also, for this flow pattern, MEMOIC performs well. It is shown that it is able to handle released instabilities and that it gives reasonable results for horizontal grid resolution as high as 500 m. For the discussed flow patterns it is hard to give a lower horizontal-resolution limit for MEMOIC.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Anne Dagrun Sandvik, Norwegian Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 43, Blindern, N-0313 Oslo, Norway.

Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Andersen, P., 1972: The distribution of monthly precipitation in southern Norway in relation to prevailing H. Johansen weather types. Acta Universitatis Bergensis, Series Mathematica rerumque naturalium, Vol. 11, 1–20.

  • Atkinson, B. W., 1981: Mesoscale Atmospheric Circulations. Academic Press, 495 pp.

  • Banta, R. M., 1990: The role of mountain flows in making clouds. Atmospheric Processes over Complex Terrain, Meteor. Monogr., No. 45, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 229–282.

  • Bergeron, T., 1935: On the physics of cloud and precipitation. Proc. 5th Assem. Int. Geodesy Geophys., Lisbon, Portugal, 156–178.

  • Berry, E. X., and R. L. Reinhardt, 1974: An analysis of cloud drop growth by collection: Part I. Double distributions. J. Atmos. Sci.,31, 1814–1824.

  • Bougeault, P., and J. F. Geleyn, 1989: Some problems of closure assumption and scale dependency in the parameterization of moist deep convection for numerical weather prediction. Meteor. Atmos. Phys.,40, 123–135.

  • Browning, K. A., 1980: Orographic effects in planetary flows. GARP Publications Series, No. 23, 114 pp.

  • Carpenter, K. M., 1982: Note on the paper “Radiation Condition for the Lateral Boundaries of Limited Area Numerical Models,” by Miller, M. J., and A. J. Thorpe. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,108, 717–719.

  • Copson, E. T., 1975: Partial Differential Equations. Cambridge University Press, 280 pp.

  • Cotton, W. R., and R. A. Anthes, 1989: Storm and Cloud Dynamics. Academic Press, 883 pp.

  • Cunningham, R. M., 1951: Some observations of natural precipitation processes. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,32, 334–343.

  • Cushman-Roisin, B., 1994: Introduction to Geophysical Fluid Dynamics. Prentice-Hall, 320 pp.

  • Deardorff, J. W., 1978: Efficient prediction of ground surface temperature and moisture with inclusion of a layer of vegetation. J. Geophys. Res.,83, 1889–1903.

  • Dudhia, J., 1993: A nonhydrostatic version of the Penn State–NCAR mesoscale model: Validation tests and simulation of an Atlantic cyclone and cold front. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 1493–1513.

  • Durran, D. R., 1990: Mountain waves and downslope winds. Atmospheric Processes over Complex Terrain, Meteor. Monogr., No. 45, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 59–82.

  • Findeisen, W., 1938: Die Kolloidmeteorologischen Vorgange der Niedershlagsbildung. Meteor. Z.,55, 121–133.

  • Flassak, T., 1990: Ein nicht-hydrostatisches mesoskaliges Modell zur Beschreibung der Dynamik der planetaren Grenzschicht. Ph.D. thesis, Fortschr.-Ber. 203 pp. [Available from VDI Reihe 15, VDI - Verlag, Düsseldorf, Germany.].

  • ——, and N. Moussiopoulos, 1987: An application of an efficient non-hydrostatic mesoscale model. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,41, 135–147.

  • Gal-Chen, T., and R. Sommerville, 1975: On the use of coordinate transformation for the solution of the Navier–Stokes equations. J. Comput. Phys.,17, 209–228.

  • Geleyn, J.-F., 1981: Some diagnostics of the cloud-radiation interaction in the ECMWF forecast model. Workshop on Radiation and Cloud-Radiation Interaction in Numerical Modelling, Reading, United Kingdom, ECMWF, 135–162.

  • Golding, B. W., 1990: The Meteorological Office mesoscale model. Meteor. Mag.,119, 81–96.

  • ——, 1992: An efficient non-hydrostatic forecast model. Meteor. Atmos. Phys.,50, 89–103.

  • Grønås, S., 1995: The seclusion intensification of the New Year’s Day storm 1992. Tellus,47A, 733–741.

  • ——, and O. E. Hellevik, 1982: A limited area prediction model at the Norwegian Meteorological Institute. Tech. Rep. 61, 75 pp. [Available from Norwegian Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 43, Blindern, N-0313 Oslo, Norway.].

  • ——, and N. G. Kvamstø, 1995: Numerical simulations of synoptic conditions and development of Arctic front polar lows. Tellus,47A, 797–814.

  • ——, and A. D. Sandvik, 1996: An analysis of sea and land breezes at high latitudes based on numerical simulations. Condensation processes in a non-hydrostatic mesoscale model. Ph.D. thesis, University of Bergen, 181 pp. [Available from Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen, Allegt. 70, N-5007 Bergen, Norway.].

  • ——, A. Foss, and M. Lystad, 1987: Numerical simulations of polar lows in the Norwegian Sea. Tellus,39A, 334–353.

  • ——, N. G. Kvamstø, and E. Raustein, 1994: Numerical simulation of the northern Germany storm of 27–28 August 1989. Tellus,46A, 635–650.

  • Gustafsson, N., 1993: HIRLAM 2 Final Rep. Tech. Rep. 9, 126 pp. [Available from Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, S-60176 Norkopping, Sweden.].

  • Haltiner, G. J., and R. T. Williams, 1980: Numerical Prediction and Dynamic Meteorology. 2d ed. John Wiley and Sons, 477 pp.

  • Harten, A., 1984: On a class of high resolution total-variation-stable finite-difference schemes. SIAM J. Number. Anal.,21, 1–23.

  • ——, 1986: On a large time-step high resolution scheme. Math. Comput.,46, 379–399.

  • Hense, A., and E. Heise, 1984: A sensitivity study of cloud parameterization in general circulation models. Beitr. Phys. Atmos.,57, 240–258.

  • Holton, J. R., 1992: An Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology. 3d ed. Academic Press, 511 pp.

  • Huschke, R. E., Ed., 1959: Glossary of Meteorology. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 638 pp.

  • Johansen, E. D., 1995: Simulering av orografisk nedbør over Nordland (Simulation of orographic precipitation in Norland). M.S. thesis, Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen, 106 pp. [Available from Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen, Allegt. 70, N-5007 Bergen, Norway.].

  • Klemp, J. B., and D. R. Durran, 1983: An upper boundary condition permitting internal gravity wave radiation in numerical mesoscale models. Mon. Wea. Rev.,111, 430–444.

  • Kunz, R., 1994: A high resolution wind flow simulation in the Graz basin. EUROTRAC Report; The Eumac Zooming Model, N. Moussiopoulos, Ed., EUROTRAC International Secretariat, 143–152.

  • ——, and N. Moussiopoulos, 1995: Simulation of the wind field in Athens using refined boundary conditions. Atmos. Environ.,29 (24), 3575–3591.

  • Le Treut, H., and Z. X. Li, 1988: Using Meteosat data to validate a prognostic cloud water scheme. Atmos. Res.,21, 273–292.

  • Lilly, D. K., and J. B. Klemp, 1979: The effect of terrain shape on nonlinear hydrostatic mountain waves. J. Fluid Mech.,95, 241–261.

  • Liou, K. N., 1992: Radiation and Cloud Processes in the Atmosphere. Oxford University Press, 487 pp.

  • Manabe, S., and J. L. Holloway Jr., 1971: Simulation of climate by a global general circulation model. 1: Hydrological cycle and heat balance. Mon. Wea. Rev.,99, 335–369.

  • Moussiopoulos, N., 1987: An efficient scheme to calculate radiative transfer in mesoscale models. Environ. Software,2, 172–191.

  • ——, 1989: Mathematiche Modellierung mesoskaliger Ausbreitung in der Atmosphäre. VDI-Verlag, 307 pp.

  • ——, 1994: EUROTRAC Report; The EUMAC Zooming Model, Model Structure and Application. EUROTRAC International Secretariat, 266 pp.

  • Nordeng, T. E., 1986: Parameterization of physical processes in a three-dimensional numerical weather prediction model. Tech. Rep. 654, 48 pp. [Available from The Norwegian Meteorological Institute, P.b.43, 0313 Oslo, Norway.].

  • Nordø, J., and K. Hjortnæs, 1966: Statistical studies of precipitation on local, national, and continental scales. Geofys. Publ. 26, 46 pp.

  • Orlanski, I., 1975: A rational subdivision of scales for atmospheric processes. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,56, 527–530.

  • ——, 1976: A simple boundary condition for unbounded hyperbolic flows. J. Comput. Phys.,21, 251–269.

  • Pielke, R. A., and Coauthors, 1992: A comprehensive meteorological modelling system—RAMS. Meteor. Atmos. Phys.,49, 69–91.

  • Pruppacher, H., and J. D. Klett, 1978: Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation. D. Reidel, 714 pp.

  • Roeckner, E., and U. Schlese, 1985: January simulation of clouds with a prognostic cloud cover scheme. Workshop on Cloud Cover Parameterization in Numerical Models, Reading, United Kingdom, ECMWF, 87–108.

  • Rogers, R. R., and M. K. Yau, 1989: A Short Course in Cloud Physics. 3d ed. Pergamon Press, 293 pp.

  • Rutledge, S. A., and P. V. Hobbs, 1983: The mesoscale and microscale structure and organization of clouds and precipitation in midlatitude cyclones. VIII: A model for the “seeder-feeder” process in warm-frontal rainbands. J. Atmos. Sci.,40, 1185–1206.

  • Sandvik, A. D., 1994: Simulation of the sea/land breeze circulation in southern Norway. EUROTRAC Report; The Eumac Zooming Model, Model Structure and Application, N. Moussiopoulos, Ed., EUROTRAC International Secretariat, 237–242.

  • ——, 1996: Condensation processes in a non-hydrostatic mesoscale model. Ph.D. thesis, Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen, 181 pp. [Available from Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen, N-5007 Bergen, Norway.].

  • Sasamori, T., 1975: A statistical model for stationary atmospheric cloudiness, liquid water content, and rate of precipitation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,103, 1037–1047.

  • Segal, M., J. F. W. Purdom, J. L. Song, R. A. Pielke, and Y. Mahrer, 1986: Evaluation of cloud shading effects on the generation and modification of mesoscale circulations. Mon. Wea. Rev.,114, 1201–1212.

  • Simpson, J. E., 1994: Sea Breeze and Local Winds. Cambridge University Press, 234 pp.

  • Slingo, J. M., 1980: A cloud parameterization scheme derived from GATE data for use with a numerical model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,106, 747–770.

  • ——, 1984a: Studies of cloud-radiation interaction in the ECMWF medium range forecast model. Proc. IAMAP Int. Radiation Symp..

  • ——, 1984b: Cloud cover experimentation with the ECMWF model. Proc. on Cloud Cover Parameterization in Numerical Models, Reading, United Kingdom, ECMWF, 163–212.

  • ——, 1987: The development and verification of a cloud prediction scheme for the ECMWF model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,113, 899–927.

  • Smagorinsky, J., 1960: On the Numerical Prediction of Large Scale Condensation by Numerical Models. Geophys. Monogr., No. 5, Amer. Geophys. Union, 71–78.

  • Smith, R. B., 1979: The influence of mountains on the atmosphere. Advances in Geophysics, Vol. 21, Academic Press, 87–230.

  • ——, 1989: Mechanisms of orographic precipitation. Meteor. Mag.,118, 85–88.

  • ——, 1990: A scheme for predicting layer clouds and their water content in a general circulation model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,116, 435–460.

  • Smolarkiewicz, P. K., and P. Rotunno, 1990: Low Froude number flow past three-dimensional obstacles. Part II: Upwind flow reversal zone. J. Atmos. Sci.,47, 1498–1511.

  • Stephens, G. L., 1984: The parameterization of radiation for numerical weather prediction in climate models. Mon. Wea. Rev.,112, 826–867.

  • Stull, R. B., 1988: An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology. Kluwer Academic, 666 pp.

  • Sundqvist, H., 1978: A parameterization scheme for non-convective condensation including prediction of cloud water content. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,104, 677–690.

  • ——, 1988: Parameterization of condensation and associated clouds in models for weather prediction and general circulation simulation. Physically-Based Modelling and Simulation of Climate and Climatic Change, M. E. Schlesinger, Ed., Reidel, 433–461.

  • ——, 1993: Inclusion of ice phase of hydrometeors in cloud parameterization for mesoscale and largescale models. Beitr. Phys. Atmos.,66, 137–147.

  • ——, E. Berge, and J. E. Kristjansson, 1989: Condensation and cloud parameterization studies with a mesoscale NWP model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,117, 1641–1657.

  • Tremback, C. J., G. J. Tripoli, and W. R. Cotton, 1985: A regional scale atmospheric numerical model including explicit moist physics and a hydrostatic time-split scheme. Preprints, Seventh Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Montreal, PQ, Canada, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 433–434.

  • Tripoli, G. J., and W. R. Cotton, 1982: The Colorado State University three-dimensional cloud/mesoscale model—1982. Part 1: General theoretical framework and sensitivity experiments. J. Rech. Atmos.,16, 185–220.

  • Utaaker, K., 1963: The Local Climate of Nes, Hedemark. Norwegian University Press, 143 pp.

  • Wagner, P., 1994: Simulation of the mountain winds in the Kinzig Valley with the mesoscale model MEMO. EUROTRAC Report; The Eumac Zooming Model, Model Structure and Application, N. Moussiopoulos, Ed., EUROTRAC International Secretariat, 207–220.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 167 54 0
PDF Downloads 90 17 3