Pressure Transients within MCS Mesohighs and Wake Lows

Jason C. Knievel Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

Search for other papers by Jason C. Knievel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Richard H. Johnson Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

Search for other papers by Richard H. Johnson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

By animating enhanced coarse surface pressure observations of 12 1985 Preliminary Regional Experiment for Storm-Scale Operational Research Meteorology (PRE-STORM) mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) the authors exposed 92 transitory highs and lows living within virtually all of the systems’ mesohighs and wake lows. A quasi-Lagrangian (feature following, not material following) analysis of the pressure fields produced five primary results.

First, these transients, with magnitudes of a few millibars, horizontal dimensions of order 100 km, and average lifetimes of about 2 h, collectively composed spatial and temporal envelopes that contributed at least part of the total pressure field within mesohighs and wake lows. Transients did not apparently favor formation or dissipation in any location of the envelopes. Second, as the MCSs matured, the difference between each complex’s transitory highs’ mean pressure and transitory lows’ mean pressure increased in 78% of the conclusive cases. Apparently, one frequent role of MCSs is locally to magnify storm-scale pressure gradients. Third, transient paths reflect the frequent symmetric-to-asymmetric metamorphoses of the MCSs. Fourth, the temporal fluctuations of the numbers and apparent sizes of transients within a composite MCS partially support theories of MCS upscale evolution. Finally, the composite’s transient numbers and apparent sizes varied almost identically with time in a pattern that closely resembles the fluctuation of stratiform and convective volumetric rain rates of MCSs.

Corresponding author address: Jason C. Knievel, Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1371.

Abstract

By animating enhanced coarse surface pressure observations of 12 1985 Preliminary Regional Experiment for Storm-Scale Operational Research Meteorology (PRE-STORM) mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) the authors exposed 92 transitory highs and lows living within virtually all of the systems’ mesohighs and wake lows. A quasi-Lagrangian (feature following, not material following) analysis of the pressure fields produced five primary results.

First, these transients, with magnitudes of a few millibars, horizontal dimensions of order 100 km, and average lifetimes of about 2 h, collectively composed spatial and temporal envelopes that contributed at least part of the total pressure field within mesohighs and wake lows. Transients did not apparently favor formation or dissipation in any location of the envelopes. Second, as the MCSs matured, the difference between each complex’s transitory highs’ mean pressure and transitory lows’ mean pressure increased in 78% of the conclusive cases. Apparently, one frequent role of MCSs is locally to magnify storm-scale pressure gradients. Third, transient paths reflect the frequent symmetric-to-asymmetric metamorphoses of the MCSs. Fourth, the temporal fluctuations of the numbers and apparent sizes of transients within a composite MCS partially support theories of MCS upscale evolution. Finally, the composite’s transient numbers and apparent sizes varied almost identically with time in a pattern that closely resembles the fluctuation of stratiform and convective volumetric rain rates of MCSs.

Corresponding author address: Jason C. Knievel, Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1371.

Save
  • Atlas, D., R. Tatehira, R. C. Srivastava, W. Marker, and R. E. Carbone, 1969: Precipitation-induced mesoscale wind perturbations in the melting layer. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,95, 544–560.

  • Barnes, S. L., 1964: A technique for maximizing details in numerical weather map analysis. J. Appl. Meteor.,3, 396–409.

  • Biggerstaff, M. I., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1991: Kinematic and precipitation structure of the 10–11 June 1985 squall line. Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 3034–3065.

  • Bleeker, W., and M. J. Andre, 1950: Convective phenomena in the atmosphere. J. Meteor.,7, 195–209.

  • Bluestein, H. B., 1992: Synoptic–Dynamic Meteorology in Midlatitudes. Vol. 1, Principles of Kinematics and Dynamics, Oxford University Press, 431 pp.

  • Bosart, L. F., and J. P. Cussen Jr., 1973: Gravity wave phenomena accompanying east coast cyclogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev.,101, 446–454.

  • Braham, R. R., 1952: The water and energy budgets of the thunderstorm and their relation to thunderstorm development. J. Meteor.,9, 227–242.

  • Braun, S. A., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1994: The transition zone and secondary maximum of radar reflectivity behind a midlatitude squall line: Results retrieved from Doppler radar data. J. Atmos. Sci.,51, 2733–2755.

  • ——, and ——, 1997: The evolution of the 10–11 June PRE-STORM squall line: Initiation, development of rear inflow, and dissipation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,125, 478–504.

  • Brown, H. A., 1963: On the low-level structure of a squall line. Mesometeorology Research Paper 21, Dept. of Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 19 pp. [Available from Dept. of Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, 5734 S. Ellis Ave., Chicago, IL 60637.].

  • Brunk, I. W., 1949: The pressure pulsation of 11 April 1944. J. Meteor.,6, 181–187.

  • ——, 1953: Squall lines. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,34, 1–9.

  • Byers, H. R., and R. R. Braham, 1949: The Thunderstorm. U.S. Weather Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, 287 pp.

  • Carbone, R. E., J. W. Conway, N. A. Crook, and M. W. Moncrieff, 1990: The generation and propagation of a nocturnal squall line. Part I: Observations and implications for mesoscale predictability. Mon. Wea. Rev.,118, 26–49.

  • Chapman, S., and R. S. Lindzen, 1970: Atmospheric Tides. Reidel, 200 pp.

  • Chong, M., P. Amayenc, G. Scialom, and J. Testud, 1987: A tropical squall line observed during the COPT 81 experiment in West Africa. Part I: Kinematic structure inferred from dual-Doppler radar data. Mon. Wea. Rev.,115, 670–694.

  • Cunning, J. B., 1986: The Oklahoma–Kansas Preliminary Regional Experiment for STORM-Central. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,67, 1478–1486.

  • Fovell, R. G., and Y. Ogura, 1988: Numerical simulation of a midlatitude squall line in two dimensions. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 3846–3879.

  • Fujita, T. T., 1955: Results of detailed synoptic studies of squall lines. Tellus,7, 405–436.

  • ——, 1959: Precipitation and cold air production in mesoscale thunderstorm systems. J. Meteor.,16, 454–466.

  • ——, 1963: Analytical mesometeorology: A review. Severe Local Storms, Meteor. Monogr., No. 27, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77–125.

  • ——, 1985: The downburst: Microburst and macroburst. SMRP Research Paper 210, Dept. of Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 122 pp. [NTIS PB-148880.].

  • Gallus, W. A., Jr., 1996: The influence of microphysics in the formation of intense wake lows: A numerical modeling study. Mon. Wea. Rev.,124, 2267–2281.

  • ——, and R. H. Johnson, 1995a: The dynamics of circulations within the trailing stratiform regions of squall lines. Part I: The 10–11 June PRE-STORM System. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 2161–2187.

  • ——, 1995b: The dynamics of circulations within the trailing stratiform regions of squall lines. Part II: Influence of the convective line and ambient environment. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 2188–2211.

  • Heymsfield, G. M., and S. Schotz, 1985: Structure and evolution of a severe squall line over Oklahoma. Mon. Wea. Rev.,113, 1563–1589.

  • Houze, R. A., Jr., 1993: Cloud Dynamics. Academic Press, 573 pp.

  • ——, and E. N. Rappaport, 1984: Air motions and precipitation structure of an early summer squall line over the eastern tropical Atlantic. J. Atmos. Sci.,41, 553–574.

  • ——, B. F. Smull, and P. Dodge, 1990: Mesoscale organization of springtime rainstorms in Oklahoma. Mon. Wea. Rev.,118, 613–654.

  • Humphreys, W. J., 1929: The Physics of the Air. McGraw-Hill, 654 pp.

  • Johnson, R. H., and J. J. Toth, 1986: Preliminary data quality analysis for May–June 1985 Oklahoma-Kansas PRE-STORM PAM-II mesonetwork. Atmospheric Science Paper 407, Dept. of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 41 pp. [Available from Dept. of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1371.].

  • ——, and P. J. Hamilton, 1988: The relationship of surface pressure features to the precipitation and airflow structure of an intense midlatitude squall line. Mon. Wea. Rev.,116, 1444–1472.

  • Kessinger, C. J., P. S. Ray, and C. E. Hane, 1987: The 19 May 1977 Oklahoma squall line. Part I: A multiple Doppler analysis of convective and stratiform structure. J. Atmos. Sci.,44, 2840–2864.

  • Klimowski, B. A., 1994: Initiation and development of rear inflow within the 28–29 June 1989 North Dakota mesoconvective system. Mon. Wea. Rev.,122, 765–779.

  • Koch, S. E., P. B. Dorian, and R. E. Golos, 1988: A mesoscale gravity wave event observed during CCOPE. Part I: Multiscale statistical analysis of wave characteristics. Mon. Wea. Rev.,116, 2527–2544.

  • Krumm, W. R., 1954: On the cause of downdrafts from dry thunderstorms over the plateau area of the United States. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,35, 122–125.

  • Leary, C. A., 1980: Temperature and humidity profiles in mesoscale unsaturated downdrafts. J. Atmos. Sci.,37, 1005–1012.

  • ——, and E. N. Rappaport, 1987: The life cycle and internal structure of a mesoscale convective complex. Mon. Wea. Rev.,115, 1503–1527.

  • Ligda, M. G. H., 1956: The radar observation of mature pre-frontal squall lines in the midwestern United States. Contrib. Oceanogr. Meteor.,3 (60–89), 153–155.

  • Loehrer, S. M., 1992: The surface pressure features and precipitation structure of PRE-STORM mesoscale convective systems. Atmospheric Science Paper 518, Dept. of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 296 pp. [Available from Dept. of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1371.].

  • ——, and R. H. Johnson, 1995: Surface pressure and precipitation life cycle characteristics of PRE-STORM mesoscale convective systems. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 600–621.

  • McAnelly, R. L., and W. R. Cotton, 1992: Early growth of mesoscale convective complexes: A meso-β-scale cycle of convective precipitation? Mon. Wea. Rev.,120, 1851–1877.

  • Nachamkin, J. E., 1992: The upscale evolution of a midlatitude mesoscale convective complex. Atmospheric Science Paper 498, Dept. of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 122 pp. [Available from Dept. of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1371.].

  • Newton, C. W., 1950: Structure and mechanism of the pre-frontal squall line. J. Meteor.,7, 210–222.

  • ——, 1966: Circulations in large sheared cumulonimbus [sic]. Tellus,18, 699–712.

  • ——, and J. C. Fankhauser, 1964: On the movements of convective storms, with emphasis on size distribution in relation to water-budget requirements. J. Appl. Meteor.,3, 651–668.

  • Nicholls, M. E., R. H. Johnson, and W. R. Cotton, 1988: The sensitivity of two-dimensional simulations of tropical squall lines to environmental profiles. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 3625–3649.

  • Ogura, Y., and M. T. Liou, 1980: The structure of the midlatitude squall line: A case study. J. Atmos. Sci.,37, 553–567.

  • Orlanski, I., 1975: A rational subdivision of scales for atmospheric processes. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,56, 527–530.

  • Pandya, R. E., and D. R. Durran, 1996: The influence of convectively generated thermal forcing on the mesoscale circulation around squall lines. J. Atmos. Sci.,53, 2924–2951.

  • Pedgley, D. E., 1962: A meso-synoptic analysis of the thunderstorms on 28 August 1958. U.K. Meteor. Office Geophys. Memo. 106, 74 pp. [Available from U.K. Meteorological Office, Room 709, London Road, Bracknell, Berkshire RG12 2SZ, United Kingdom.].

  • Redelsperger, J.-L., and J.-P. Lafore, 1988: A three-dimensional simulation of a tropical squall line: Convective organization and thermodynamic transport. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 1334–1356.

  • Riehl, H., 1968: Some aspects of cumulus-scale downdrafts. Atmospheric Science Paper 126, Part 1, Dept. of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 32 pp. [Available from Dept. of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1371.].

  • Rotunno, R., J. B. Klemp, and M. L. Weisman, 1988: A theory for strong, long-lived squall lines. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 463–485.

  • Roux, F., 1988: The West African squall line observed on 23 June 1981 during COPT 81: Kinematics and thermodynamics of the convective region. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 406–426.

  • Rutledge, S. A., R. A. Houze Jr., M. I. Biggerstaff, and T. Matejka, 1988: The Oklahoma-Kansas mesoscale convective system of 10–11 June 1985: Precipitation structure and single-Doppler radar analysis. Mon. Wea. Rev.,116, 1409–1430.

  • Sanders, F., and K. A. Emanuel, 1977: The momentum budget and temporal evolution of a mesoscale convective system. J. Atmos. Sci.,34, 322–330.

  • Sawyer, J. S., 1946: Cooling by rain as the cause of the pressure rise in convective squalls. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,72, 168.

  • Schmidt, J. M., and W. R. Cotton, 1989: A High Plains squall line associated with severe surface winds. J. Atmos. Sci.,46, 281–302.

  • Schubert, W. H., J. J. Hack, P. L. Silva Dias, and S. R. Fulton, 1980:Geostrophic adjustment in an axisymmetric vortex. J. Atmos. Sci.,37, 1464–1484.

  • Scott, J. D., and S. A. Rutledge, 1995: Doppler radar observations of an asymmetric MCS and associated vortex couplet. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 3437–3457.

  • Shaw, W. N., and W. H. Dines, 1905: The study of the minor fluctuations of atmospheric pressure. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,31, 39–52.

  • Skamarock, W. C., M. L. Weisman, and J. B. Klemp, 1994: Three-dimensional evolution of simulated long-lived squall lines. J. Atmos. Sci.,51, 2563–2584.

  • Smull, B. F., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1987a: Dual-Doppler radar analysis of a midlatitude squall line with a trailing region of stratiform rain. J. Atmos. Sci.,44, 2128–2148.

  • ——, and ——, 1987b: Rear inflow in squall lines with trailing stratiform precipitation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,115, 2869–2889.

  • Sommeria, G., and J. Testud, 1984: COPT 81: A field experiment designed for the study of dynamics and electrical activity of deep convection in continental tropical regions. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,65, 4–10.

  • Srivastava, R. C., 1985: A simple model of evaporatively driven downdraft: Application to microburst downdraft. J. Atmos. Sci.,42, 1004–1023.

  • ——, 1987: A model of intense downdrafts driven by the melting and evaporation of precipitation. J. Atmos. Sci.,44, 1752–1773.

  • ——, T. J. Matejka, and T. J. Lorello, 1986: Doppler radar study of the trailing anvil region associated with a squall line. J. Atmos. Sci.,43, 356–377.

  • Stensrud, D. J., R. A. Maddox, and C. L. Ziegler, 1991: A sublimation-initiated mesoscale downdraft and its relation to the wind field below a precipitating anvil cloud. Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 2124–2139.

  • Stumpf, G. J., 1988: Surface pressure features associated with a mesoscale convective system in O.-K. PRE-STORM. Atmospheric Science Paper 435, Dept. of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 148 pp. [Available from Dept. of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1371.].

  • ——, R. H. Johnson, and B. F. Smull, 1991: The wake low in a midlatitude mesoscale convective system having complex convective organization. Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 134–158.

  • Suckstorff, G. A., 1935: Die Strömungsvorgänge in Instabilitätsschauern. Z. Meteor.,25, 449–452.

  • ——, 1939: Die Ergebnisse der Untersuchungen an tropischen Gewittern und einigen anderen Erscheinungen. Gerlands Beitr. Geophysik,55, 138–185.

  • Vescio, M. D., and R. H. Johnson, 1992: The surface-wind response to transient mesoscale pressure fields associated with squall lines. Mon. Wea. Rev.,120, 1837–1850.

  • Wakimoto, R. M., 1982: The life cycle of thunderstorm gust fronts viewed with Doppler radar and rawinsonde data. Mon. Wea. Rev.,110, 1060–1082.

  • Wicker, L. J., and W. C. Skamarock, 1996: The dynamics governing surface pressure fields in mesoscale convective systems. Preprints, Seventh Conf. on Mesoscale Processes, Reading, United Kingdom, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 476–478.

  • Williams, D. T., 1948: A surface micro-study of squall-line thunderstorms. Mon. Wea. Rev.,76, 239–246.

  • ——, 1953: Pressure wave observations in the central Midwest, 1952. Mon. Wea. Rev.,81, 278–289.

  • ——, 1963: The thunderstorm wake of May 4, 1961. National Severe Storms Project Rep. 18, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, DC, 23 pp. [NTIS PB-168223.].

  • Yang, M.-J., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1995: Sensitivity of squall-line rear inflow to ice microphysics and environmental humidity. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 3175–3192.

  • ——, and ——, 1996: Momentum budget of a squall line with trailing stratiform precipitation: Calculations with a high-resolution numerical model. J. Atmos. Sci.,53, 3629–3652.

  • Yuter, S. E., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1997: Measurements of raindrop size distributions over the Pacific warm pool and implications for ZR relations. J. Appl. Meteor.,36, 847–867.

  • Zhang, D.-L., and K. Gao, 1989: Numerical simulation of an intense squall line during 10–11 June 1985 PRE-STORM. Part II: Rear inflow, surface pressure perturbations, and stratiform precipitation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,117, 2067–2094.

  • Zipser E. J., 1969: The role of organized unsaturated convective downdrafts in the structure and rapid decay of an equatorial disturbance. J. Appl. Meteor.,8, 799–814.

  • ——, 1977: Mesoscale and convective scale downdrafts as distinct components of squall-line structure. Mon. Wea. Rev.,105, 1568–1589.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 158 60 3
PDF Downloads 92 49 2