Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Using Piecewise Potential Vorticity Inversion to Diagnose Frontogenesis. Part I: A Partitioning of the Q Vector Applied to Diagnosing Surface Frontogenesis and Vertical Motion

Michael C. Morgan Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisconsin

Search for other papers by Michael C. Morgan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Dec 1999
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1999)127<2796:UPPVIT>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
2796–2821
Restricted access

Abstract

The technique of piecewise potential vorticity (PV) inversion is used to identify the nondivergent wind fields attributed to upper-, middle-, and lower-tropospheric PV anomalies in addition to the irrotational wind with the goal of diagnosing the respective wind fields’ frontogenetic potentialities. Frontogenesis is diagnosed using a piecewise separation of the Q vector into parts associated with the partitioned wind field. Partitioned geostrophic Q vectors are used to diagnose the vertical motion attributed to the upper-, middle-, and lower-tropospheric PV anomalies.

Insight gained from this new diagnostic technique is demonstrated by examining a particular case of extratropical marine cyclogenesis resulting from the interaction of an upper-tropospheric short-wave trough with a surface thermal wave. In the early stages of development, the largest contributor to surface frontogenesis was associated with winds attributed to the lower-tropospheric thermal wave. As the cyclone matured, the contributions of the upper-tropospheric PV and near-surface potential temperature anomalies to surface frontogenesis increased. Winds attributed to the upper-tropospheric PV were frontogenetical north of the thermal ridge axis and frontolytical south of the thermal ridge in the warm sector. The upper-tropospheric PV acted to amplify the thermal ridge while simultaneously narrowing the warm sector. The patterns of geostrophic Q vectors associated with the upper-tropospheric PV suggest that ascent should be favored in the narrowing surface thermal ridge. The contribution to surface frontogenesis due to lower- and middle-tropospheric PV, whose increase is imputed to latent heat release, was variable during the evolution of the cyclone—suggesting that the location of diabatically generated PV anomalies relative to frontal zones can have a significant impact on frontogenesis and associated frontal precipitation distribution. Throughout the evolution of the cyclone, the irrotational wind was frontogenetical along the warm and cold fronts with the magnitude of the irrotational frontogenesis increasing as the surface cyclone amplified.

For the case considered, partitioned geostrophic Q vector “forcing” for vertical motion revealed approximately equal contributions from the upper-tropospheric PV anomalies and the near-surface thermal perturbations.

Characteristic patterns of Q vectors and Q-vector divergence are identified and presented for cases including an upper trough interacting with a surface baroclinic zone and a propagating surface edge wave.

Corresponding author address: Prof. Michael C. Morgan, University of Wisconsin—Madison, 1225 West Dayton St., Madison, WI 53706.

Email: morgan@meteor.wisc.edu

Abstract

The technique of piecewise potential vorticity (PV) inversion is used to identify the nondivergent wind fields attributed to upper-, middle-, and lower-tropospheric PV anomalies in addition to the irrotational wind with the goal of diagnosing the respective wind fields’ frontogenetic potentialities. Frontogenesis is diagnosed using a piecewise separation of the Q vector into parts associated with the partitioned wind field. Partitioned geostrophic Q vectors are used to diagnose the vertical motion attributed to the upper-, middle-, and lower-tropospheric PV anomalies.

Insight gained from this new diagnostic technique is demonstrated by examining a particular case of extratropical marine cyclogenesis resulting from the interaction of an upper-tropospheric short-wave trough with a surface thermal wave. In the early stages of development, the largest contributor to surface frontogenesis was associated with winds attributed to the lower-tropospheric thermal wave. As the cyclone matured, the contributions of the upper-tropospheric PV and near-surface potential temperature anomalies to surface frontogenesis increased. Winds attributed to the upper-tropospheric PV were frontogenetical north of the thermal ridge axis and frontolytical south of the thermal ridge in the warm sector. The upper-tropospheric PV acted to amplify the thermal ridge while simultaneously narrowing the warm sector. The patterns of geostrophic Q vectors associated with the upper-tropospheric PV suggest that ascent should be favored in the narrowing surface thermal ridge. The contribution to surface frontogenesis due to lower- and middle-tropospheric PV, whose increase is imputed to latent heat release, was variable during the evolution of the cyclone—suggesting that the location of diabatically generated PV anomalies relative to frontal zones can have a significant impact on frontogenesis and associated frontal precipitation distribution. Throughout the evolution of the cyclone, the irrotational wind was frontogenetical along the warm and cold fronts with the magnitude of the irrotational frontogenesis increasing as the surface cyclone amplified.

For the case considered, partitioned geostrophic Q vector “forcing” for vertical motion revealed approximately equal contributions from the upper-tropospheric PV anomalies and the near-surface thermal perturbations.

Characteristic patterns of Q vectors and Q-vector divergence are identified and presented for cases including an upper trough interacting with a surface baroclinic zone and a propagating surface edge wave.

Corresponding author address: Prof. Michael C. Morgan, University of Wisconsin—Madison, 1225 West Dayton St., Madison, WI 53706.

Email: morgan@meteor.wisc.edu

Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Black, R., and R. Dole, 1993: The dynamics of large scale cyclogenesis over the North Pacific Ocean. J. Atmos. Sci.,50, 421–442.

  • Bresky, W. C., and S. J. Colucci, 1996: A forecast and analyzed cyclogenesis event diagnosed with potential vorticity. Mon. Wea. Rev.,124, 2227–2244.

  • Carlson, T., 1991: Midlatitude Weather Systems. Routledge, 507 pp.

  • Charney, J., 1955: The use of primitive equations of motion in numerical prediction. Tellus,7, 22–26.

  • Davies, H., C. Schär, and H. Wernli, 1991: The palette of fronts and cyclones within a baroclinic wave development. J. Atmos. Sci.,48, 1666–1689.

  • Davis, C. A., 1992a: Piecewise potential vorticity inversion. J. Atmos. Sci.,49, 1397–1411.

  • ——, 1992b: A potential vorticity diagnosis of the importance of initial structure and condensational heating on observed extratropical cyclogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev.,120, 2409–2428.

  • ——, and K. Emanuel, 1991: Potential vorticity diagnostics of cyclogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 424–439.

  • ——, M. T. Stoelinga, and Y.-H. Kuo, 1993: The integrated effect of condensation in numerical simulations of extratropical cyclogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 2309–2330.

  • ——, E. D. Grell, and M. A. Shapiro, 1996: The balanced dynamical nature of a rapidly intensifying oceanic cyclone. Mon. Wea. Rev.,124, 3–26.

  • Eliassen, A., and E. Kleinschmidt, 1957: Cyclones and anticyclones. Dynamic Meteorology. Handbruch der Physik, S. Flugge, Ed., Vol. 48, Springer-Verlag, 112–154.

  • Gill, A., 1982: Atmosphere–Ocean Dynamics. Academic Press, 662 pp.

  • Hakim, G., L. Bosart, and D. Keyser, 1996: The Ohio Valley wave-merger cyclogenesis event of 25–26 January 1978. Part II: Diagnosis using quasigeostrophic potential vorticity inversion. Mon. Wea. Rev.,124, 2176–2205.

  • Holopainen, E., and J. Kaurola, 1991: Decomposing the atmospheric flow using potential vorticity framework. J. Atmos. Sci.,48, 2614–2625.

  • Hoskins, B., 1976: Baroclinic waves and frontogenesis. Part I: Introduction and Eady waves. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,102, 103–122.

  • ——, and N. West, 1979: Baroclinic waves and frontogenesis. Part II: Uniform potential vorticity jet flows—cold and warm fronts. J. Atmos. Sci.,36, 1663–1680.

  • ——, and M. Pedder, 1980: The diagnosis of middle latitude synoptic development. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,106, 707–719.

  • ——, I. Draghici, and H. Davies, 1978: A new look at the ω-equation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,104, 31–38.

  • ——, M. McIntyre, and A. Roberston, 1985: On the use and significance of isentropic potential vorticity maps. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,111, 877–946.

  • ——, M. Reeder, and R. Reed, 1988: A generalization of Petterssen’s frontogenesis function and its relation to the forcing of vertical motion. Mon. Wea. Rev.,116, 762–780.

  • Keyser, D., B. Schmidt, and D. Duffy, 1992: Quasigeostrophic vertical motions diagnosed from along- and cross-isentrope components of the Q Vector. Mon. Wea. Rev.,120, 731–741.

  • Korner, S., 1998: Piecewise frontogenesis from a potential vorticity perspective: Methodology and a case study. M.S. Thesis, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Wisconsin—Madison, 149 pp. [Available from Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Univ. of Wisconsin—Madison, 1225 W. Dayton St., Madison, WI 53706.].

  • Martin, J., 1999: Quasi-geostrophic forcing for ascent in the occluded sector of cyclones and the trowal airstream. Mon. Wea. Rev.,127, 66–84.

  • Miller, J., 1948: On the concept of frontogenesis. J. Meteor.,5, 169–171.

  • Morgan, M. C., and J. Nielsen-Gammon, 1998: Using tropopause maps to diagnose midlatitude weather systems. Mon. Wea. Rev.,126, 2555–2579.

  • Nielsen, J., C. Davis, and D. Keyser, 1991: Upper-level frontogenesis made easy? Preprints, First Int. Symp. on Winter Storms, New Orleans, LA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 82–87.

  • Nielsen-Gammon, J., and R. Lefevre, 1996: Piecewise tendency diagnosis of dynamical processes governing the development of an upper-tropospheric mobile trough. J. Atmos. Sci.,53, 3120–3142.

  • Petterssen, S., 1936: Contribution to the theory of frontogenesis. Geofys. Publ.,11, 1–27.

  • Ramos, R., 1997: The role of latent heat release on the development of an upper tropospheric outflow jet. M.S. Thesis, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Univ. of Wisconsin—Madison, 149 pp. [Available from Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Univ. of Wisconsin—Madison, 1225 W. Dayton St., Madison, WI 53706.].

  • Rotunno, R., W. C. Skamarock, and C. Snyder, 1994: An analysis of frontogenesis in numerical simulations of baroclinic waves. J. Atmos. Sci.,51, 3373–3398.

  • Sanders, F., and B. Hoskins, 1990: An easy method for estimation of Q-vectors from weather maps. Wea. Forecasting,5, 346–353.

  • Schultz, D. M., D. Keyser, and L. Bosart, 1998: The effect of large-scale flow on low-level frontal structure and evolution in midlatitude cyclones. Mon. Wea. Rev.,126, 1767–1791.

  • Shapiro, M., and D. Keyser, 1990: Fronts, jet streams, and the tropopause. Extratropical Cyclones. The Erik Palmén Memorial Volume, C. Newton and E. Holopainen, Eds., American Meteorological Society, 167–191.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 276 138 11
PDF Downloads 191 91 8