Probabilities for a Period and Its Subperiods: Theoretical Relations for Forecasting

Roman Krzysztofowicz Department of Systems Engineering and Division of Statistics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia

Search for other papers by Roman Krzysztofowicz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

Consider an event definable in terms of two subevents as, for example, the occurrence of precipitation within a 24-h period is definable in terms of the occurrence of precipitation within each of the 12-h subperiods. A complete forecast must specify three probabilities; these may be marginal probabilities, one for the period and two for subperiods. Theoretical relations between these probabilities are investigated and solutions are presented to three problems encountered in operational forecasting: (i) guaranteeing that the marginal probabilities jointly obey the laws of probability, (ii) structuring admissible procedures for adjusting the initial (guidance) probabilities by forecasters, and (iii) formulating optimal estimators of the probability for period in terms of the probabilities for subperiods.

Corresponding author address: Prof. Roman Krzysztofowicz, University of Virginia, Thornton Hall, SE, Charlottesville, VA 22903.

Abstract

Consider an event definable in terms of two subevents as, for example, the occurrence of precipitation within a 24-h period is definable in terms of the occurrence of precipitation within each of the 12-h subperiods. A complete forecast must specify three probabilities; these may be marginal probabilities, one for the period and two for subperiods. Theoretical relations between these probabilities are investigated and solutions are presented to three problems encountered in operational forecasting: (i) guaranteeing that the marginal probabilities jointly obey the laws of probability, (ii) structuring admissible procedures for adjusting the initial (guidance) probabilities by forecasters, and (iii) formulating optimal estimators of the probability for period in terms of the probabilities for subperiods.

Corresponding author address: Prof. Roman Krzysztofowicz, University of Virginia, Thornton Hall, SE, Charlottesville, VA 22903.

Save
  • Carter, G. M., J. P. Dallavalle, and H. R. Glahn, 1989: Statistical forecasts based on the National Meteorological Center’s numerical weather prediction system. Wea. Forecasting,4, 401–412.

  • DeGroot, M. H., 1970: Optimal Statistical Decisions. McGraw-Hill.

  • Hughes, L. A., and W. E. Sangster, 1979: Combining precipitation probabilities. Mon. Wea. Rev.,107, 520–524.

  • Krzysztofowicz, R., and D. Long, 1991: Forecast sufficiency characteristic: Construction and application. Int. J. Forecasting,7, 39–45.

  • ——, and A. A. Sigrest, 1997: Local climatic guidance for probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasting. Mon. Wea. Rev.,125, 305–316.

  • Lehmann, E. L., 1966: Some concepts of dependence. Ann. Math. Stat.,37, 1137–1153.

  • Murphy, A. H., and B. G. Brown, 1984: A comparative evaluation of objective and subjective weather forecasts in the United States. J. Forecasting,3, 369–393.

  • Ruth, D. P., and M. R. Peroutka, 1993: The interactive computer worded forecast. Preprints, Ninth Int. Conf. on Interactive Information and Processing Systems for Meteorology, Oceanography, and Hydrology, Anaheim, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 321–326.

  • Wilks, D. S., 1990: On the combination of forecast probabilities for consecutive precipitation periods. Wea. Forecasting,5, 640–650.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 305 206 23
PDF Downloads 69 29 4