Three-Dimensional Applications of a Successive Corrections Analysis Scheme to Mesoscale Observations

Lily Ioannidou Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Lily Ioannidou in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Mike A. Pedder Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Mike A. Pedder in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

Bratseth’s scheme of objective analysis is applied to a mesoscale resolution dataset of dropsonde observations collected in the course of the Fronts ’87 experiment. The scheme is a version of the successive corrections method that converges, in the limit of the iteration cycle, to the statistical interpolation analysis. Following earlier applications on two-dimensional synoptic fields its performance is assessed here in a three-dimensional context. The convergence properties of the scheme are examined and its sensitivity to the prescribed values of the influence scale L and of the smoothing parameter ϵ0 is tested.

A modified version of the scheme, based on Pedder’s analytical formulation of the weight function, is subsequently applied to the data. In the modified version the weights are defined as convolutions of a background error correlation function and a continuous linear filter, so as to express the effect of filtering on the analyzed rather than the observed field. Results are compared with those obtained through conventional filtering in observation space. It is suggested that the improved scale selectivity of postanalysis filtering and the relative insensitivity of Bratseth’s method to ϵ0 make the combined scheme suitable for the analysis of mesoscale datasets, where background and observing error correlation statistics are often unavailable or unreliable. Finally, based on an investigation of the sensitivity of the temperature, humidity, and wind analyses to variations in the value of the filter scale Lg, it is argued that postanalysis filtering can be used to complement spectral studies of mesoscale data.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Lily Ioannidou, Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Earley Gate—Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6BB, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Bratseth’s scheme of objective analysis is applied to a mesoscale resolution dataset of dropsonde observations collected in the course of the Fronts ’87 experiment. The scheme is a version of the successive corrections method that converges, in the limit of the iteration cycle, to the statistical interpolation analysis. Following earlier applications on two-dimensional synoptic fields its performance is assessed here in a three-dimensional context. The convergence properties of the scheme are examined and its sensitivity to the prescribed values of the influence scale L and of the smoothing parameter ϵ0 is tested.

A modified version of the scheme, based on Pedder’s analytical formulation of the weight function, is subsequently applied to the data. In the modified version the weights are defined as convolutions of a background error correlation function and a continuous linear filter, so as to express the effect of filtering on the analyzed rather than the observed field. Results are compared with those obtained through conventional filtering in observation space. It is suggested that the improved scale selectivity of postanalysis filtering and the relative insensitivity of Bratseth’s method to ϵ0 make the combined scheme suitable for the analysis of mesoscale datasets, where background and observing error correlation statistics are often unavailable or unreliable. Finally, based on an investigation of the sensitivity of the temperature, humidity, and wind analyses to variations in the value of the filter scale Lg, it is argued that postanalysis filtering can be used to complement spectral studies of mesoscale data.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Lily Ioannidou, Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Earley Gate—Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6BB, United Kingdom.

Save
  • Barnes, S., 1964: A technique for maximizing details in numerical map analysis. J. Appl. Meteor.,3, 395–409.

  • Bratseth, A. M., 1986: Statistical interpolation by means of successive corrections. Tellus,38, 439–447.

  • Buell, C. E., 1972: Correlation functions for wind and geopotential on isobaric surfaces. J. Appl. Meteor.,11, 51–59.

  • Buzzi, A., D. Gomis, M. A. Pedder, and S. Alonso, 1991: A method to reduce the adverse impact that inhomogeneous station distributions have on spatial interpolation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 2465–2491.

  • Errico, R. M., 1985: Spectra computed from a limited area grid. Mon. Wea. Rev.,113, 1554–1562.

  • Franke, R., 1988: Statistical interpolation by iteration. Mon. Wea. Rev.,116, 961–963.

  • Gandin, L. S., 1963: The Objective Analysis of Meteorological Fields. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, 242 pp.

  • Hollingsworth, A., 1987: Objective analysis in numerical weather prediction. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan,65, 11–59.

  • Joly, A., and A. J. Thorpe, 1990: Frontal instability generated by tropospheric potential vorticity anomalies. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,116, 525–560.

  • Kotroni, V., Y. Lemaître, and M. Petitdidier, 1994: Dynamics of a low-level jet observed during the Fronts 87 experiment. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,120, 277–304.

  • Lagouvardos, K., Y. Lemaître, and G. Scialom, 1993: Dynamical structure of a wide cold frontal cloudband observed during Fronts 87. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,119, 1291–1320.

  • Lunnon, R. W., and Y. Lemaître, 1987: Mesoscale Frontal Dynamics Project ‘Fronts 87’ Report No. 4: Observational and logistical aspects of the project. MFDP Rep. 4, 28 pp.

  • Maddox, R. A., 1980: An objective technique for separating macroscale and mesoscale features in meteorological data. Mon. Wea. Rev.,108, 1108–1121.

  • Ooyama, K. V., 1987: Scale-controlled objective analysis. Mon. Wea. Rev.,115, 2479–2506.

  • Pauley, P., and X. Wu, 1990: The theoretical, discrete and actual response of the Barnes objective analysis scheme for one and two-dimensional fields. Mon. Wea. Rev.,118, 1145–1163.

  • Pedder, M. A., 1993: Interpolation and filtering of spatial observations using successive corrections and Gaussian filters. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 2889–2902.

  • Raymond, W. H., 1989: High-order, high-pass implicit filters for evaluating information within finite areas. Mon. Wea. Rev.,117, 2772–2781.

  • Rutherford, I., 1972: Data assimilation by statistical interpolation of forecast error fields. J. Atmos. Sci.,29, 809–815.

  • Seaman, R. S., 1982: A systematic description of the spatial variability of geopotential and temperature in the Australian region. Aust. Meteor. Mag.,30, 133–141.

  • ——, 1988: Some real data tests of the interpolation accuracy of Bratseth’s successive corrections method. Tellus,40A, 173–176.

  • Thorpe, A. J., and S. A. Clough, 1991: Mesoscale dynamics of cold fronts: Structures described by dropsoundings in Fronts 87. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.117, 903–941.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 245 173 40
PDF Downloads 54 12 1