Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

A Numerical Case Study of Secondary Marine Cyclogenesis Sensitivity to Initial Error and Varying Physical Processes

Marco L. Carrera Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Search for other papers by Marco L. Carrera in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
John R. Gyakum Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Search for other papers by John R. Gyakum in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Da-Lin Zhang Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Search for other papers by Da-Lin Zhang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 May 1999
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1999)127<0641:ANCSOS>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
641–660
Restricted access

Abstract

Secondary cyclogenesis has been identified as a difficult forecast challenge. In this paper, the authors examine the dominant physical processes associated with the predictability of a case of explosive secondary marine cyclogenesis and provide a better understanding of the large variability in the recent model-intercomparison simulations of the case. A series of sensitivity experiments, involving changes to the model initial conditions and physical parameterizations, is performed using the Canadian Mesoscale Compressible Community Model with a grid size of 50 km.

It is found that errors in the model initial conditions tend to decay with time, and more rapidly so in “dry” simulations. The model fails to produce the secondary cyclogenesis in the absence of latent heating. Water vapor budget calculations from the control experiment show that the surface moisture flux from 6 to 12 h is the largest contributor of water vapor to the budget area in the vicinity of the cyclone center, and remains an important moisture supply throughout the integration period. During the first 12 h, these fluxes are crucial in inducing grid-scale diabatic heating and destabilizing the lower troposphere, thereby facilitating the subsequent rapid deepening of the storm. A secondary maximum in surface latent heat flux to the north and east of the primary maximum acts to force the cyclogenesis event to the south and east of a coastal circulation center. When the surface evaporation is not allowed, much less precipitation is produced and the secondary cyclone fails to develop. Calculations of the potential temperature on the dynamic tropopause (i.e., 2-PVU surface) in the absence of surface evaporation indicate a significantly damped thermal wave when compared with the control integration.

This result for a case of secondary cyclogenesis differs from those generally found for large-scale extratropical cyclogenesis where upper-level baroclinic forcings tend to dominate, and motivates the need for better physical parameterizations, including the condensation and boundary layer processes, in operational models. The authors speculate that the different treatment of condensation and boundary layer processes may have been partly responsible for the enhanced variability in the simulation of this case in a recently completed international mesoscale model intercomparison experiment.

* Current affiliation: Department of Meteorology, University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, Maryland.

Corresponding author address: Mr. Marco L. Carrera, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, McGill University, 805 Sherbrooke St. West, Montreal, PQ H3A 2K6, Canada.

Abstract

Secondary cyclogenesis has been identified as a difficult forecast challenge. In this paper, the authors examine the dominant physical processes associated with the predictability of a case of explosive secondary marine cyclogenesis and provide a better understanding of the large variability in the recent model-intercomparison simulations of the case. A series of sensitivity experiments, involving changes to the model initial conditions and physical parameterizations, is performed using the Canadian Mesoscale Compressible Community Model with a grid size of 50 km.

It is found that errors in the model initial conditions tend to decay with time, and more rapidly so in “dry” simulations. The model fails to produce the secondary cyclogenesis in the absence of latent heating. Water vapor budget calculations from the control experiment show that the surface moisture flux from 6 to 12 h is the largest contributor of water vapor to the budget area in the vicinity of the cyclone center, and remains an important moisture supply throughout the integration period. During the first 12 h, these fluxes are crucial in inducing grid-scale diabatic heating and destabilizing the lower troposphere, thereby facilitating the subsequent rapid deepening of the storm. A secondary maximum in surface latent heat flux to the north and east of the primary maximum acts to force the cyclogenesis event to the south and east of a coastal circulation center. When the surface evaporation is not allowed, much less precipitation is produced and the secondary cyclone fails to develop. Calculations of the potential temperature on the dynamic tropopause (i.e., 2-PVU surface) in the absence of surface evaporation indicate a significantly damped thermal wave when compared with the control integration.

This result for a case of secondary cyclogenesis differs from those generally found for large-scale extratropical cyclogenesis where upper-level baroclinic forcings tend to dominate, and motivates the need for better physical parameterizations, including the condensation and boundary layer processes, in operational models. The authors speculate that the different treatment of condensation and boundary layer processes may have been partly responsible for the enhanced variability in the simulation of this case in a recently completed international mesoscale model intercomparison experiment.

* Current affiliation: Department of Meteorology, University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, Maryland.

Corresponding author address: Mr. Marco L. Carrera, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, McGill University, 805 Sherbrooke St. West, Montreal, PQ H3A 2K6, Canada.

Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Anthes, R. A., 1977: A cumulus parameterization scheme utilizing a one-dimensional cloud model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,105, 270–286.

  • ——, Y.-H. Kuo, D. P. Baumhefner, R. M. Errico, and T. W. Bettge, 1985: Predictability of mesoscale atmospheric motions. Issues in atmospheric and oceanic modeling. Advances in Geophysics, Vol. 288, Academic Press, 159–202.

  • ——, ——, E.-Y. Hsie, S. Low-Nam, and T. Bettge, 1989: Estimation of skill and uncertainty in regional numerical models. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,115, 763–806.

  • Benoit, R., J. Côté, and J. Mailhot, 1989: Inclusion of a TKE boundary layer parameterization in the Canadian regional finite-element model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,117, 1726–1750.

  • Bosart, L. F., and F. Sanders, 1981: The Johnstown flood of July 1977:A long-lived convective system. J. Atmos. Sci.,38, 1616–1642.

  • ——, C. C. Lai, and E. Rogers, 1995: Incipient explosive marine cyclogenesis: Coastal development. Tellus,47A, 1–29.

  • Chouinard, C., J. Mailhot, H. L. Mitchell, A. Staniforth, and R. Hogue, 1994: The Canadian regional data assimilation system: Operational and research applications. Mon. Wea. Rev.,122, 1306–1325.

  • Daley, R., 1981: Predictability experiments with a baroclinic model. Atmos.–Ocean,19, 98–116.

  • Davis, C. A., and K. A. Emanuel, 1991: Potential vorticity diagnostics of cyclogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 1929–1953.

  • Dirks, R. A., J. P. Kuettner, and J. A. Moore, 1988: Genesis of Atlantic Lows Experiment (GALE): An overview. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,69, 148–160.

  • Errico, R. M., and D. P. Baumhefner, 1987: Predictability experiments using a high-resolution limited-area model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,115, 488–504.

  • Fouquart, Y., and B. Bonnel, 1980: Computations of solar heating of the earth’s atmosphere: A new parameterization. Contrib. Atmos. Phys.,53, 35–62.

  • Fritsch, J. M., and C. F. Chappell, 1980: Numerical prediction of convectively driven mesoscale pressure systems. Part I: Convective parameterization. J. Atmos. Sci.,37, 1722–1733.

  • Garand, L., 1983: Some improvements and complements to the infrared emissivity algorithm including a parameterization of the absorption in the continuum region. J. Atmos. Sci.,40, 230–244.

  • Gyakum, J. R., and Coauthors, 1995: First COMPARE Workshop: 3–5 October 1994, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,76, 1209–1218.

  • ——, and Coauthors, 1996: A regional model intercomparison using a case of explosive oceanic cyclogenesis. Wea. Forecasting,11, 521–543.

  • Hakim, G. J., L. F. Bosart, and D. Keyser, 1995: The Ohio Valley wave-merger cyclogenesis event of 25–26 January 1978. Part I:Multiscale case study. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 2663–2692.

  • Hoskins, B. J., M. E. McIntyre, and A. W. Robertson, 1985: On the use and significance of isentropic potential vorticity maps. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,111, 877–946.

  • Joly, A., and Coauthors, 1997: The Fronts and Atlantic Storm-Track Experiment (FASTEX): Scientific objectives and experimental design. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,78, 1917–1940.

  • Kuo, H. L., 1974: Further studies on the parameterization of the influence of cumulus convection on large-scale flow. J. Atmos. Sci.,31, 1232–1240.

  • Kuo, Y.-H., and R. A. Anthes, 1984: Mesoscale budgets of heat and moisture in a convective system over the central United States. Mon. Wea. Rev.,112, 1482–1497.

  • ——, and R. J. Reed, 1988: Numerical simulation of an explosively deepening cyclone in the eastern Pacific. Mon. Wea. Rev.,116, 2081–2105.

  • ——, ——, and S. Low-Nam, 1991: Effects of surface energy fluxes during the early development and rapid intensification stages of seven explosive cyclones in the western Atlantic. Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 457–476.

  • ——, J. R. Gyakum, and Z. Guo, 1995: A case of rapid continental mesoscale cyclogenesis. Part I: Model sensitivity experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 970–997.

  • Lackmann, G. M., L. F. Bosart, and D. Keyser, 1996: Planetary- and synoptic-scale characteristics of explosive wintertime cyclogenesis over the western North Atlantic Ocean. Mon. Wea. Rev.,124, 2672–2702.

  • Lapenta, W. M., and N. L. Seaman, 1992: A numerical investigation of East Coast cyclogenesis during the cold-air damming event of 27–28 February 1982. Part II: Importance of physical mechanisms. Mon. Wea. Rev.,120, 52–76.

  • Mailhot, J., 1994: The Regional Finite-Element (RFE) Model scientific description. Part 2: Physics. 42 pp. [Available from RPN, 2121 Trans-Canada, Dorval, PQ H9P 1J3, Canada.].

  • ——, and C. Chouinard, 1989: Numerical forecasts of explosive winter storms: Sensitivity experiments with a meso-α scale model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,117, 1311–1343.

  • Manabe, S., J. Smagorinsky, and R. F. Strickler, 1965: Simulated climatology of a general circulation model with a hydrologic cycle. Mon. Wea. Rev.,93, 769–798.

  • Miller, J. E., 1946: Cyclogenesis in the Atlantic coastal region of the United States. J. Meteor.,3, 31–44.

  • Mullen, S. L., and D. P. Baumhefner, 1988: The sensitivity of numerical simulations of explosive oceanic cyclogenesis to changes in physical parameterizations. Mon. Wea. Rev.,116, 2289–2329.

  • Reed, R. J., and A. J. Simmons, 1991: An explosively deepening cyclone over the North Atlantic that was unaffected by concurrent surface energy fluxes. Wea. Forecasting,6, 117–122.

  • ——, G. A. Grell, and Y.-H. Kuo, 1993: The ERICA IOP 5 storm. Part II: Sensitivity tests and further diagnosis based on model output. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 1595–1612.

  • Robert, A., T. L. Yeem, and H. Ritchie, 1985: A semi-Lagrangian and semi-implicit numerical integration scheme for multilevel atmospheric models. Mon. Wea. Rev.,113, 388–394.

  • Sanders, F., 1971: Analytic solutions of the nonlinear omega and vorticity equations for a structurally simple model of disturbances in the baroclinic westerlies. Mon. Wea. Rev.,99, 393–407.

  • Sasamori, T., 1972: A linear harmonic analysis of atmospheric motion with radiative dissipation. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan,50, 505–518.

  • Snyder, C., 1996: Summary of an informal workshop on adaptive observations and FASTEX. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,77, 953–961.

  • Stewart, R. E., R. W. Shaw, and G. A. Isaac, 1987: Canadian Atlantic Storms Program: The meteorological field project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,68, 338–345.

  • Sundqvist, H., E. Berge, and J. E. Kristjansson, 1989: Condensation and cloud parameterization studies with a mesoscale numerical weather prediction model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,117, 1641–1657.

  • Tanguay, M., A. Robert, and R. Laprise, 1990: A semi-implicit semi-Lagrangian fully compressible regional forecast model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,118, 1970–1980.

  • Trenberth, K. E., and C. J. Guillemot, 1995: Evaluation of the global atmospheric moisture budget as seen from analyses. J. Climate,8, 2255–2272.

  • Uccellini, L. W., 1990: Processes contributing to the rapid development of extratropical cyclones. Extratropical Cyclones: The Erik Palmén Memorial Volume, C. W. Newton and E. O. Holapainen, Eds., Amer. Meteor. Soc., 81–105.

  • Vukicevic, T., and R. M. Errico, 1990: The influence of artificial and physical factors upon predictability estimates using a complex limited-area model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,118, 1460–1482.

  • Yau, M. K., and M. Jean, 1989: Synoptic aspects and physical processes in the rapidly intensifying cyclone of 6–8 March 1986. Atmos.–Ocean,27, 59–86.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 724 583 234
PDF Downloads 116 43 1