Further Studies of the Optimization of a Hurricane Track Prediction Model Using the Adjoint Equations

Robert W. Jones Hurricane Research Division, NOAA/AOML, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by Robert W. Jones in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Mark DeMaria Tropical Prediction Center, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by Mark DeMaria in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The method of model fitting, or adjoint method, is applied to a barotropic hurricane track forecast model described by DeMaria and Jones using a large sample of forecast cases. The sample includes all Atlantic tropical cyclones that reached hurricane intensity during the 1989–93 hurricane seasons (141 72-h forecasts of 17 storms). The cases considered by DeMaria and Jones are a subset of the present sample. Model-fitting calculations using strong, weak, strong followed by weak, or weak followed by strong model constraints are discussed for data assimilation periods varying from 6 to 72 h. Generally, the best track forecasts occur for shorter assimilation periods and for weak constraints, although only the 12-h assimilation with the weak constraint has less track error than the control forecast without assimilation, and only for the 12-h forecast. The principle reason for this lack of improvement is that the fit of the model to the observed track is good at the middle of the assimilation period, but not very good at the end where the forecast begins. When a future track position at 6 h is included in the assimilation, in order to improve the track fit at the synoptic data time, the resulting track errors average about 10% smaller than the control forecast. The control forecast may also be improved in the same way. In that case, the best assimilation forecasts have 2.5% smaller track errors than the modified control forecasts.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Robert W. Jones, Hurricane Research Division, NOAA/AOML, 4301 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, FL 33149.

Email: robert.w.jones@noaa.gov

Abstract

The method of model fitting, or adjoint method, is applied to a barotropic hurricane track forecast model described by DeMaria and Jones using a large sample of forecast cases. The sample includes all Atlantic tropical cyclones that reached hurricane intensity during the 1989–93 hurricane seasons (141 72-h forecasts of 17 storms). The cases considered by DeMaria and Jones are a subset of the present sample. Model-fitting calculations using strong, weak, strong followed by weak, or weak followed by strong model constraints are discussed for data assimilation periods varying from 6 to 72 h. Generally, the best track forecasts occur for shorter assimilation periods and for weak constraints, although only the 12-h assimilation with the weak constraint has less track error than the control forecast without assimilation, and only for the 12-h forecast. The principle reason for this lack of improvement is that the fit of the model to the observed track is good at the middle of the assimilation period, but not very good at the end where the forecast begins. When a future track position at 6 h is included in the assimilation, in order to improve the track fit at the synoptic data time, the resulting track errors average about 10% smaller than the control forecast. The control forecast may also be improved in the same way. In that case, the best assimilation forecasts have 2.5% smaller track errors than the modified control forecasts.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Robert W. Jones, Hurricane Research Division, NOAA/AOML, 4301 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, FL 33149.

Email: robert.w.jones@noaa.gov

Save
  • Aberson, S. D., and M. DeMaria, 1994: Verification of a nested barotropic hurricane track forecast model (VICBAR). Mon. Wea. Rev.,122, 2804–2815.

  • Bennett, A. F., L. M. Leslie, C. R. Hagelberg, and P. E. Powers, 1993:Tropical cyclone prediction using a barotropic model initialized by a generalized inverse method. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 1714–1729.

  • Cressmen, G. P., 1958: Barotropic divergence and very long atmospheric waves. Mon. Wea. Rev.,86, 293–297.

  • DeMaria, M., and R. W. Jones, 1993: Optimization of a hurricane track forecast model with the adjoint model equations. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 1730–1745.

  • ——, M. B. Lawrence, and J. T. Kroll, 1990: An error analysis of Atlantic tropical cyclone track guidance models. Wea. Forecasting,5, 47–61.

  • ——, S. D. Aberson, K. V. Ooyama, and S. J. Lord, 1992: A nested spectral model for hurricane track forecasting. Mon. Wea. Rev.,120, 1628–1643.

  • Derber, J. C., 1989: A variational continuous assimilation technique. Mon. Wea. Rev.,117, 2437–2446.

  • Fletcher, R., 1987: Practical Methods of Optimization. John Wiley and Sons, 436 pp.

  • Leslie, L. M., J. F. LeMarshall, R. P. Morison, C. Spinoso, R. J. Purser, N. Pescod, and R. Seecamp, 1998: Improved hurricane track forecasting from continuous assimilation of high quality satellite wind data. Mon. Wea. Rev.,126, 1248–1257.

  • Lord, S. J., and J. L. Franklin, 1987: The environment of Hurricane Debby (1982). Part I: Winds. Mon. Wea. Rev.,115, 2760–2780.

  • Zupanski, D., 1997: A general weak constraint applicable to operational 4DVAR data assimilation systems. Mon. Wea. Rev.,125, 2274–2292.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 101 31 4
PDF Downloads 24 15 2