Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

A 4-yr Climatology of Pressure Disturbances Using a Barometer Network in Central Illinois

S. Grivet-Talocia Laboratory for Atmospheres, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland

Search for other papers by S. Grivet-Talocia in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
F. Einaudi Laboratory for Atmospheres, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland

Search for other papers by F. Einaudi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
W. L. Clark NOAA/Aeronomy Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by W. L. Clark in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
R. D. Dennett NOAA/Aeronomy Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by R. D. Dennett in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
G. D. Nastrom Department of Earth Sciences, St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, Minnesota

Search for other papers by G. D. Nastrom in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
T. E. VanZandt NOAA/Aeronomy Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by T. E. VanZandt in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Jul 1999
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1999)127<1613:AYCOPD>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
1613–1629
Restricted access

Abstract

This paper presents a climatology of coherent disturbances detected during 1991–95 by a network of barometers with a diameter of about 50 km located in a very flat terrain centered on the Flatland Atmospheric Observatory in east-central Illinois. An automatic, wavelet-based adaptive filter is used to extract the waveforms of all disturbance events with amplitudes larger than a frequency-dependent threshold. The extracted events cover characteristic temporal scales from about 30 min to 6 h, that is, the range that includes mesoscale disturbances that affect the weather and the forecasts.

The analysis resulted in two classes of events. One class, called coherent events, or CEs, consists of disturbances that propagated coherently through the barograph network and for which the phase propagation velocity, dominant period, and horizontal wavelength could be estimated with good accuracy. The propagation directions of 97% of the CEs were between 0° and 180° (i.e., had an eastward component) and the speeds of 96% were between 10 and 50 m s−1 with a mode at 25–30 m s−1. The other class, called incoherent events, or IEs, consists of disturbances that had significant amplitudes but that did not propagate coherently across the network, so that the propagation velocity could not be estimated. This class consists of localized disturbances and wave packets with short periods and/or wavelengths, or with pressure signatures that were too different at the network stations. The extracted events are attributed to gravity waves, wave packets, gravity currents, pressure jumps, solitary waves, bores, etc.

The rate of occurrence of events had a strong seasonal dependence, with a maximum in fall and winter and a minimum in summer. The CEs occurred about 20%–21% of the total time in fall and winter and 12% in summer, while all events occurred 34% in both fall and winter and 23% in summer. The seasonal dependence of events confirms the strong relation of these disturbances to the baroclinicity of the atmosphere.

Concurrent vertical velocity fluctuations observed by the 50-MHz radar at the Flatland Atmospheric Observatory showed that many of the large-amplitude events extended up to at least 7 km, the highest altitude reliably observed by the radar.

* Additional affiliation: Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Lanham, Maryland.

Additional affiliation: Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Studies, Boulder, Colorado.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Stefano Grivet-Talocia, Politecnico di Torino, C. Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, I-10129 Torino, Italy.

Email: grivet@polito.it

Abstract

This paper presents a climatology of coherent disturbances detected during 1991–95 by a network of barometers with a diameter of about 50 km located in a very flat terrain centered on the Flatland Atmospheric Observatory in east-central Illinois. An automatic, wavelet-based adaptive filter is used to extract the waveforms of all disturbance events with amplitudes larger than a frequency-dependent threshold. The extracted events cover characteristic temporal scales from about 30 min to 6 h, that is, the range that includes mesoscale disturbances that affect the weather and the forecasts.

The analysis resulted in two classes of events. One class, called coherent events, or CEs, consists of disturbances that propagated coherently through the barograph network and for which the phase propagation velocity, dominant period, and horizontal wavelength could be estimated with good accuracy. The propagation directions of 97% of the CEs were between 0° and 180° (i.e., had an eastward component) and the speeds of 96% were between 10 and 50 m s−1 with a mode at 25–30 m s−1. The other class, called incoherent events, or IEs, consists of disturbances that had significant amplitudes but that did not propagate coherently across the network, so that the propagation velocity could not be estimated. This class consists of localized disturbances and wave packets with short periods and/or wavelengths, or with pressure signatures that were too different at the network stations. The extracted events are attributed to gravity waves, wave packets, gravity currents, pressure jumps, solitary waves, bores, etc.

The rate of occurrence of events had a strong seasonal dependence, with a maximum in fall and winter and a minimum in summer. The CEs occurred about 20%–21% of the total time in fall and winter and 12% in summer, while all events occurred 34% in both fall and winter and 23% in summer. The seasonal dependence of events confirms the strong relation of these disturbances to the baroclinicity of the atmosphere.

Concurrent vertical velocity fluctuations observed by the 50-MHz radar at the Flatland Atmospheric Observatory showed that many of the large-amplitude events extended up to at least 7 km, the highest altitude reliably observed by the radar.

* Additional affiliation: Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Lanham, Maryland.

Additional affiliation: Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Studies, Boulder, Colorado.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Stefano Grivet-Talocia, Politecnico di Torino, C. Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, I-10129 Torino, Italy.

Email: grivet@polito.it

Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Allen, S. J., and R. A. Vincent, 1995: Gravity wave activity in the lower atmosphere: Seasonal and latitudinal variations. J. Geophys. Res.,100, 1327–1350.

  • Bacmeister, J. T., 1993: Mountain-wave drag in the stratosphere and mesosphere inferred from observed winds and a simple mountain-wave parameterization scheme. J. Atmos. Sci.,50, 377–399.

  • Balachandran, N. K., 1980: Gravity waves from thunderstorms. Mon. Wea. Rev.,108, 804–816.

  • Barnes, S. L., F. Caracena, and A. Marroquin, 1996: Extracting synoptic-scale diagnostic information from mesoscale models: The Eta model, gravity waves, and quasigeostrophic disgnostics. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,77, 519–528.

  • Bedard, A. J., Jr., F. Canavero, and F. Einaudi, 1986: Atmospheric gravity waves and aircraft turbulence encounters. J. Atmos. Sci.,43, 2838–2844.

  • Bosart, L. F., and J. P. Cussen, 1973: Gravity wave phenomena accompanying east coast cyclogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev.,101, 446–454.

  • Bull, G., R. Dubois, J. Neisser, and J.-G. Stangenberg, 1981: Untersuchungen über Schwerewellen in Gebirgsnähe. Z. Meteor.,31, 267–279.

  • Canavero, F., and F. Einaudi, 1987: Time and space variability of spectral estimates of atmospheric pressure. J. Atmos. Sci.,44, 1589–1604.

  • Christie, D. R., 1989: Long nonlinear waves in the lower atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sci.,46, 1462–1491.

  • ——, 1992: The morning glory of the Gulf of Carpentaria: A paradigm for non-linear waves in the lower atmosphere. Aust. Meteor. Mag.,41, 21–60.

  • Chui, C. K., 1992: An Introduction to Wavelets.Wavelet analysis and Its Applications. Vol. 1. Academic Press, 264 pp.

  • Clark, T. L., and T. Thomas, 1986: Convectively forced internal gravity waves: Results from two-dimensional numerical experiments. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,112, 899–925.

  • Daubechies, I., 1992: Ten Lectures on Wavelets. CBMS–NSF Series in Applied Mathematics, Vol. 61, SIAM 357 pp.

  • Einaudi, F., 1995: Gravity waves in the troposphere. Diagnostic Tools in Atmospheric Physics, G. Fiocco and G. Visconti, Eds., IOS Press, 307–340.

  • ——, and J. J. Finnigan, 1981: The interaction between an internal gravity wave and the planetary boundary layer. Part I: The linear analysis. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,107, 793–806.

  • ——, A. J. Bedard, and J. J. Finnigan, 1989: A climatology of gravity waves and other coherent disturbances at the Boulder Atmospheric Observatory during March–April 1984. J. Atmos. Sci.,46, 303–329.

  • Ferretti, R., F. Einaudi, and L. W. Uccellini, 1988: Wave disturbances associated with the Red River Valley severe weather outbreak of 10–11 April 1979. Meteor. Atmos. Phys.,39, 132–168.

  • Fritts, D. C., and W. Lu, 1993: Spectral estimates of gravity wave energy and momentum fluxes. Part II: Parameterization of wave forcing and variability. J. Atmos. Sci.,50, 3695–3713.

  • Fulton, R., D. S. Zrnic, and R. J. Doviak, 1990: Initiation of a solitary wave family in the demise of a nocturnal thunderstorm density current. J. Atmos. Sci.,47, 319–337.

  • Gossard, E. E., 1960: Spectra of atmospheric scalars. J. Geophys. Res.,65, 3339–3351.

  • Grivet-Talocia, S., and F. Einaudi, 1998: Wavelet analysis of a microbarograph network. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.,36, 418–433.

  • Grossmann, A., R. Kronland-Martinet, and J. Morlet, 1989: Reading and understanding continuous wavelet transform. Wavelets, Time-Frequency Methods and Phase Space, J. M. Combes, A. Grossmann, and P. Tchamitchian, Eds., Springer-Verlag, 1–20.

  • Hauf, T., and T. L. Clark, 1989: Three-dimensional numerical experiments on convectively forced internal gravity waves. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,115, 309–333.

  • ——, U. Finke, J. Neisser, G. Bull, and J.-G. Stagenberg, 1996: A ground-based network for atmospheric pressure fluctuations. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,13, 1001–1023.

  • Herron, T. J., and I. Tolstoy, 1969: Tracking jet stream winds from ground level pressure signals. J. Atmos. Sci.,26, 266–269.

  • Hines, C. O., 1997a: Doppler-spread parameterization of gravity-wave momentum deposition in the middle atmosphere. Part 1: Basic formulation. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys.,59, 371–386.

  • ——, 1997b: Doppler-spread parameterization of gravity-wave momentum deposition in the middle atmosphere. Part 2: Broad and quasi monochromatic spectra, and implementation. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys.,59, 387–400.

  • Hirota, I., 1984: Climatology of gravity waves in the middle atmosphere. J. Atmos. Terr. Phys.,46, 767–773.

  • ——, and T. Niki, 1985: A statistical study of inertia-gravity waves in the middle atmosphere. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan,63, 1055–1065.

  • Hooke, W. H., and K. R. Hardy, 1975: Further study of the atmospheric gravity waves over the eastern seaboard on 18 March 1969. J. Appl. Meteor.,14, 31–38.

  • Keliher, T. E., 1975: The occurrence of microbarograph-detected gravity waves compared with the existence of dynamically unstable wind shear layers. J. Geophys. Res.,80, 2967–2976.

  • Kitamura, Y., and I. Hirota, 1989: Small-scale disturbances in the lower stratosphere revealed by daily rawinsonde observations. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan,67, 817–830.

  • Koch, S. E., and C. O’Handley, 1997: Operational forecasting and detection of mesoscale gravity waves. Wea. Forecasting,12, 253–281.

  • Koppel, L. L., L. F. Bosart, and D. Keyser, 1999: A 25-yr climatology of large-amplitude hourly surface pressure changes over the conterminous United States. Mon. Wea. Rev., in press.

  • Lau, K.-M., and H. Weng, 1995: Climate signal detection using wavelet transform: How to make a time series sing. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,76, 2391–2402.

  • Lindzen, R. S., and K. K. Tung, 1976: Banded convective activity and gravity waves. Mon. Wea. Rev.,104, 1602–1617.

  • Mastrantonio, G., F. Einaudi, D. Fua, and D. P. Lalas, 1976: Generation of gravity waves by jet streams in the atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sci.,33, 1730–1738.

  • Mayr, H. G., J. G. Mengel, C. O. Hines, K. L. Chan, N. F. Arnold, C. A. Reddy, and H. S. Porter, 1997a: The gravity wave Doppler spread theory applied in a numerical spectral model of the middle atmosphere. Part I: Model and global scale seasonal variations. J. Geophys. Res.,102 (D22), 26 077–26 091.

  • ——, ——, ——, ——, ——, ——, and ——, 1997b: The gravity wave Doppler spread theory applied in a numerical spectral model of the middle atmosphere. Part II: Equatorial oscillations. J. Geophys. Res.,102 (D22), 26 093–26 105.

  • McFarlane, N. A., 1987: The effect of orographically excited gravity wave drag on the general circulation of the lower stratosphere and troposphere. J. Atmos. Sci.,44, 1775–1800.

  • Mengel, J. G., H. G. Mayr, K. L. Chan, C. O. Hines, C. A. Reddy, N. F. Arnold, and H. S. Porter, 1995: Equatorial oscillations in the middle atmosphere generated by small scale gravity waves. Geophys. Res. Lett.,22, 3027–3030.

  • Meyer, Y., 1992: Wavelets and Operators.Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Vol. 37, Cambridge University Press, 223 pp.

  • Murayama, Y., T. Tsuda, and S. Fukao, 1994: Seasonal variation of gravity wave activity in the lower atmosphere observed with the MU radar. J. Geophys. Res.,99, 23 057–23 069.

  • Nastrom, G. D., T. E. Van Zandt, and J. M. Warnock, 1997: Vertical wavenumber spectra of wind and temperature from high-resolution balloon soundings over Illinois. J. Geophys. Res.,102, 6685–6701.

  • Pokrandt, P. J., G. J. Tripoli, and D. D. Houghton, 1996: Process leading to the formation of mesoscale gravity waves in the Midwest cyclone of 15 December 1987. Mon. Wea. Rev.,124, 2726–2752.

  • Powers, J. G., 1997: Numerical model simulation of mesoscale gravity-wave event: Sensitivity test and spectral analyses. Mon. Wea. Rev.,125, 1838–1869.

  • Ralph, F. M., M. Crochet, and S. V. Venkateswaran, 1993: Observations of a mesoscale ducted gravity wave. J. Atmos. Sci.,50, 3277–3291.

  • Sato, K., 1994: A statistical study of the structure, saturation and sources of inertio-gravity waves in the lower stratosphere observed with the MU radar. J. Atmos. Terr. Phys.,56, 755–774.

  • Schmidt, J. M., and W. R. Cotton, 1990: Interaction between upper and lower tropospheric gravity waves on squall line structure and maintenance. J. Atmos. Sci.,47, 1205–1222.

  • Schneider, R. S., 1990: Large-amplitude mesoscale wave disturbances within the intense Midwest extratropical cyclone of 15 December 1987. Wea. Forecasting,5, 533–558.

  • Smith, R. K., 1988: Traveling waves and bores in the lower atmosphere: The “morning glory” and related phenomena. Earth Sci. Rev.,25, 267–290.

  • Stobie, J. G., F. Einaudi, and L. W. Uccellini, 1983: A case study of gravity waves–convective storms interactions: 9 May 1979. J. Atmos. Sci.,40, 2804–2830.

  • Uccellini, L. W., 1975: A case study of apparent gravity wave initiation of severe convective storms. Mon. Wea. Rev.,103, 497–513.

  • ——, and S. E. Koch, 1987: The synoptic setting and possible energy sources for mesoscale wave disturbances. Mon. Wea. Rev.,115, 721–729.

  • Warner, C. D., and M. E. McIntyre, 1996: On the propagation and dissipation of gravity waves through a realistic middle atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sci.,53, 3213–3234.

  • Wilson, R., M. L. Chanin, and A. Hauchecorne, 1991: Gravity waves in the middle atmosphere observed by Rayleigh lidar. 2. Climatology. J. Geophys. Res.,96, 5169–5183.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 94 39 10
PDF Downloads 56 20 1