Comments on “A Multiscale Numerical Study of Hurricane Andrew (1992). Part I: Explicit Simulation and Verification”

Mark D. Powell NOAA/Hurricane Research Division, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by Mark D. Powell in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Samuel H. Houston NOAA/Hurricane Research Division, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by Samuel H. Houston in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

No abstract available.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Mark D. Powell, NOAA-HRD-AOML, 4301 Rickenbacker Cswy., Miami, FL 33149.

Email: powell@aoml.noaa.gov

Abstract

No abstract available.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Mark D. Powell, NOAA-HRD-AOML, 4301 Rickenbacker Cswy., Miami, FL 33149.

Email: powell@aoml.noaa.gov

Save
  • Bender, M. A., I. Ginis, and Y. Kurihara, 1993: Numerical simulations of tropical cyclone—Ocean interaction with a high-resolution coupled model. J. Geophys. Res.,98, 23 245–23 263.

  • Burpee, R. W., and Coauthors, 1994: Real-time guidance provided by NOAA’s Hurricane Research Division to forecasters during Emily of 1993. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,75, 1765–1783.

  • Donelan, M. A., F. W. Dobson, S. D. Smith, and R. J. Anderson, 1993: On the dependence of sea surface roughness on wave development. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,23, 2143–2149.

  • Fujita, T. T., 1992: Damage survey of Hurricane Andrew in south Florida. Storm Data, Vol. 34, NCDC, 25–30.

  • Garratt, J. R., 1977: Review of drag coefficients over oceans and continents. Mon. Wea. Rev.,105, 915–929.

  • Graham, H. E., and G. N. Hudson, 1960: Surface winds near the center of hurricanes (and other cyclones). NHRP Rep. 39, 200 pp. [Available from NOAA Library, 4301 Rickenbacker Cswy., Miami, FL 33149.].

  • Liu, Y., D. Zhang, and M. K. Yau, 1997: A multiscale numerical study of Hurricane Andrew (1992). Part I: Explicit simulation and verification. Mon. Wea. Rev.,125, 3073–3093.

  • Marks, F. D., Jr., R. A. Houze Jr., and J. F. Gamache, 1992: Dual-aircraft investigation of the inner core of Hurricane Norbert. Part I: Kinematic structure. J. Atmos. Sci.,49, 919–942.

  • Moss, M. S., and R. W. Jones, 1978: A numerical simulation of hurricane landfall. NOAA Tech. Memo. ERL NHEML-3, 15 pp. [Available from NOAA Library, 4301 Rickenbacker Cswy., Miami, FL 33149.].

  • Myers, V. A., 1954: Surface friction in a hurricane. Mon. Wea. Rev.,82, 307–311.

  • ——, and W. Malkin, 1961: Some properties of hurricane wind fields as deduced from trajectories. NHRP Rep. 49, 45 pp. [Available from NOAA Library, 4301 Rickenbacker Cswy., Miami, FL 33149.].

  • Powell, M. D., 1982: The transition of the Hurricane Frederic boundary layer wind field from the open Gulf of Mexico to landfall. Mon. Wea. Rev.,110, 1912–1932.

  • ——, 1987: Changes in the low-level kinematic and thermodynamic structure of Hurricane Alicia (1983) at landfall. Mon. Wea. Rev.,115, 75–99.

  • ——, and P. G. Black, 1990: The relationship of hurricane reconnaissance flight-level wind measurements to winds measured by NOAA’s oceanic platforms. J. Wind Engineer. Indust. Aerodyn.,36, 381–392.

  • ——, and S. H. Houston, 1996: Hurricane Andrew’s landfall in South Florida. Part II: Surface wind fields and potential real-time applications. Wea. Forecasting,11, 329–349.

  • ——, P. Dodge, and M. L. Black, 1991: The landfall of Hurricane Hugo in the Carolinas: Surface wind distribution. Wea. Forecasting,6, 379–399.

  • ——, S. H. Houston, and I. Ares, 1995: Real-time damage assessment in hurricanes. Proc. 21st Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, Miami, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 500–502.

  • ——, ——, and T. A. Reinhold, 1996: Hurricane Andrew’s landfall in South Florida. Part I: Standardizing measurements for documentation of surface wind fields. Wea. Forecasting,11, 304–328.

  • Roux, F., and F. D. Marks, 1996: Extended velocity track display (EVTD): An improved processing method for Doppler radar observation of tropical cyclones. J. Atmos. Oceanic. Technol.,13, 875–899.

  • SethuRaman, S., 1979: Atmospheric turbulence and storm surge due to Hurricane Belle (1976). Mon. Wea. Rev.,107, 314–321.

  • Shapiro, L. J., 1983: The asymmetric boundary layer flow under a translating hurricane. J. Atmos. Sci.,40, 1984–1998.

  • Tuleya, R. E., 1994: Tropical storm development and decay: Sensitivity to surface boundary conditions. Mon. Wea. Rev.,122, 291–304.

  • ——, and Y. Kurihara, 1978: A numerical simulation of the landfall of tropical cyclones. J. Atmos. Sci.,35, 242–257.

  • ——, M. A. Bender, and Y. Kurihara, 1984: A simulation study of the landfall of tropical cyclones using a movable nested-mesh model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,112, 124–136.

  • Wakimoto, R. M., and P. G. Black, 1994: Damage survey of Hurricane Andrew and its relationship to the eyewall. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,75, 189–200.

  • Wang, Y., and G. J. Holland, 1997: On the boundary layer structure under a translating tropical cyclone. Preprints, 22d Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, Fort Collins, CO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 403–404.

  • Willoughby, H. E., and P. G. Black, 1996: Hurricane Andrew in Florida: Dynamics of a disaster. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,77, 543–549.

  • Wu, J., 1982: Wind-stress coefficients over sea surface from breeze to hurricane. J. Geophys. Res.,87, 9704–9706.

  • Zhang, D.-L., Y. Liu, and M. K. Yau, 1999: Surface winds at landfall of Hurricane Andrew (1992)—A reply. Mon. Wea. Rev.,127, 1711–1721.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 93 24 1
PDF Downloads 41 13 0