Abstract
No abstract available.
Corresponding author address: Dr. Da-Lin Zhang, Department of Meteorology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-2425.
Email: dalin@atmos.umd.edu
Anthes, R. A., E.-Y. Hsie, and Y.-H. Kuo, 1987: Description of the Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model version 4 (MM4). NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-282, 66 pp.
Bender, M. A., R. E. Tuleya, and Y. Kurihara, 1985: A numerical study of the effect of a mountain range on a landfalling tropical cyclone. Mon. Wea. Rev.,113, 565–582.
——, R. J. Ross, R. E. Tuleya, and Y. Kurihara, 1993: Improvements in tropical cyclone track and intensity forecasts using the GFDL initialization system. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 2046–2061.
Blackadar, A. K., 1979: High resolution models of the planetary boundary layer. Advances in Environmental Science & Engineering, Vol. 1, Gordon and Briech Science Publications, 50–85.
Carlson, T. N., and F. E. Boland, 1978: Analysis of urban-rural canopy using a surface heat flux/temperature model. J. Appl. Meteor.,17, 998–1013.
Delsol, F., K. Miyakoda, and R. H. Clarke, 1971: Parameterized processes in the surface boundary layer of an atmospheric circulation model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,97, 181–208.
Dudhia, J., 1993: A nonhydrostatic version of the Penn State–NCAR Mesoscale Model: Validation tests and simulation of an Atlantic cyclone and cold front. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 1493–1513.
Franklin, J. L., M. L. Black, and S. E. Feuer, 1999: Wind profiles in hurricanes determined by GPS dropwindsondes. Preprints, 23d Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropcial Meteorology, Dallas, TX, Amer Meteor. Soc., 167–168.
Grell, G. A., J. Dudhia, and D. R. Stauffer, 1995: A description of the fifth generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR Tech Note-398 + STR, 138 pp.
Kurihara, Y., M. A. Bender, R. E. Tuleya, and R. J. Ross, 1990: Prediction experiments of Hurricane Gloria (1985) using a multiply nested movable mesh model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,118, 2185–2198.
Liu, Y., D.-L. Zhang, and M. K. Yau, 1997: A multiscale numerical study of Hurricane Andrew (1992). Part I: Explicit simulation and verification. Mon. Wea. Rev.,125, 3073–3093.
——, ——, and ——, 1999: A multiscale numerical study of Hurricane Andrew (1992). Part II: Kinematics and inner-core structures. Mon. Wea. Rev., in press.
Moss, M. S., and R. W. Jones, 1978: A numerical simulation of hurricane landfall. NOAA Tech. Memo. ERL NHEML-3, 15 pp. [Available from NOAA Library, 4301 Rickenbacker Cswy., Miami, FL 33149.].
Powell, M. D., 1982: The transition of the Hurricane Frederic boundary layer wind field from the open Gulf of Mexico to landfall. Mon. Wea. Rev.,110, 1912–1932.
——, and S. H. Houston, 1996: Hurricane Andrew’s landfall in south Florida. Part II: Surface wind fields and potential real-time application. Wea. Forecasting,11, 329–349.
——, and ——, 1999: Comments on “A multiscale numerical study of Hurricane Andrew (1992). Part I: Explicit simulation and verification.” Mon. Wea. Rev.,127, 1706–1710.
——, ——, and T. A. Reinhold, 1996: Hurricane Andrew’s landfall in South Florida. Part I: Standardizing measurements for documentation of the surface wind fields. Wea. Forecasting,11, 304–328.
Tao, W.-K., and J. Simpson, 1993: The Goddard cumulus ensemble model. Part I: Model description. Terr. Atmos. Ocean. Sci.,4, 35–72.
Tuleya, R. E., and Y. Kurihara, 1978: Numerical simulation of the landfall of tropical cyclones. J. Atmos. Sci.,35, 242–257.
——, M. A. Bender, and Y. Kurihara, 1984: A simulation study of the landfall of tropical cyclones using a movable nested-mesh model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,112, 124–136.
Wakimoto, R. M., and P. G. Black, 1994: Damage survey of Hurricane Andrew and its relationship to the eyewall. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,75, 189–200.
Zhang, D.-L., and R. A. Anthes, 1982: A high-resolution model of the planetary boundary layer—Sensitivity tests and comparison with SESAME-79 data. J. Appl. Meteor.,21, 1594–1609.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Full Text Views | 118 | 47 | 4 |
PDF Downloads | 54 | 20 | 2 |
Displayed acceptance dates for articles published prior to 2023 are approximate to within a week. If needed, exact acceptance dates can be obtained by emailing amsjol@ametsoc.org.
No abstract available.
Corresponding author address: Dr. Da-Lin Zhang, Department of Meteorology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-2425.
Email: dalin@atmos.umd.edu
No abstract available.
Corresponding author address: Dr. Da-Lin Zhang, Department of Meteorology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-2425.
Email: dalin@atmos.umd.edu
Anthes, R. A., E.-Y. Hsie, and Y.-H. Kuo, 1987: Description of the Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model version 4 (MM4). NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-282, 66 pp.
Bender, M. A., R. E. Tuleya, and Y. Kurihara, 1985: A numerical study of the effect of a mountain range on a landfalling tropical cyclone. Mon. Wea. Rev.,113, 565–582.
——, R. J. Ross, R. E. Tuleya, and Y. Kurihara, 1993: Improvements in tropical cyclone track and intensity forecasts using the GFDL initialization system. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 2046–2061.
Blackadar, A. K., 1979: High resolution models of the planetary boundary layer. Advances in Environmental Science & Engineering, Vol. 1, Gordon and Briech Science Publications, 50–85.
Carlson, T. N., and F. E. Boland, 1978: Analysis of urban-rural canopy using a surface heat flux/temperature model. J. Appl. Meteor.,17, 998–1013.
Delsol, F., K. Miyakoda, and R. H. Clarke, 1971: Parameterized processes in the surface boundary layer of an atmospheric circulation model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,97, 181–208.
Dudhia, J., 1993: A nonhydrostatic version of the Penn State–NCAR Mesoscale Model: Validation tests and simulation of an Atlantic cyclone and cold front. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 1493–1513.
Franklin, J. L., M. L. Black, and S. E. Feuer, 1999: Wind profiles in hurricanes determined by GPS dropwindsondes. Preprints, 23d Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropcial Meteorology, Dallas, TX, Amer Meteor. Soc., 167–168.
Grell, G. A., J. Dudhia, and D. R. Stauffer, 1995: A description of the fifth generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR Tech Note-398 + STR, 138 pp.
Kurihara, Y., M. A. Bender, R. E. Tuleya, and R. J. Ross, 1990: Prediction experiments of Hurricane Gloria (1985) using a multiply nested movable mesh model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,118, 2185–2198.
Liu, Y., D.-L. Zhang, and M. K. Yau, 1997: A multiscale numerical study of Hurricane Andrew (1992). Part I: Explicit simulation and verification. Mon. Wea. Rev.,125, 3073–3093.
——, ——, and ——, 1999: A multiscale numerical study of Hurricane Andrew (1992). Part II: Kinematics and inner-core structures. Mon. Wea. Rev., in press.
Moss, M. S., and R. W. Jones, 1978: A numerical simulation of hurricane landfall. NOAA Tech. Memo. ERL NHEML-3, 15 pp. [Available from NOAA Library, 4301 Rickenbacker Cswy., Miami, FL 33149.].
Powell, M. D., 1982: The transition of the Hurricane Frederic boundary layer wind field from the open Gulf of Mexico to landfall. Mon. Wea. Rev.,110, 1912–1932.
——, and S. H. Houston, 1996: Hurricane Andrew’s landfall in south Florida. Part II: Surface wind fields and potential real-time application. Wea. Forecasting,11, 329–349.
——, and ——, 1999: Comments on “A multiscale numerical study of Hurricane Andrew (1992). Part I: Explicit simulation and verification.” Mon. Wea. Rev.,127, 1706–1710.
——, ——, and T. A. Reinhold, 1996: Hurricane Andrew’s landfall in South Florida. Part I: Standardizing measurements for documentation of the surface wind fields. Wea. Forecasting,11, 304–328.
Tao, W.-K., and J. Simpson, 1993: The Goddard cumulus ensemble model. Part I: Model description. Terr. Atmos. Ocean. Sci.,4, 35–72.
Tuleya, R. E., and Y. Kurihara, 1978: Numerical simulation of the landfall of tropical cyclones. J. Atmos. Sci.,35, 242–257.
——, M. A. Bender, and Y. Kurihara, 1984: A simulation study of the landfall of tropical cyclones using a movable nested-mesh model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,112, 124–136.
Wakimoto, R. M., and P. G. Black, 1994: Damage survey of Hurricane Andrew and its relationship to the eyewall. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,75, 189–200.
Zhang, D.-L., and R. A. Anthes, 1982: A high-resolution model of the planetary boundary layer—Sensitivity tests and comparison with SESAME-79 data. J. Appl. Meteor.,21, 1594–1609.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Full Text Views | 118 | 47 | 4 |
PDF Downloads | 54 | 20 | 2 |