Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Sensitivity of High-Resolution Simulations of Hurricane Bob (1991) to Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterizations

Scott A. Braun Laboratory for Atmospheres, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland

Search for other papers by Scott A. Braun in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
Wei-Kuo Tao Laboratory for Atmospheres, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland

Search for other papers by Wei-Kuo Tao in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Dec 2000
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2000)129<3941:SOHRSO>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
3941–3961
Restricted access

Abstract

The fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University–National Center for Atmospheric Research Mesoscale Model is used to simulate Hurricane Bob (1991) using grids nested to high resolution (4 km). Tests are conducted to determine the sensitivity of the simulation to the available planetary boundary layer parameterizations, including the bulk aerodynamic, Blackadar, Medium-Range Forecast (MRF) model, and Burk–Thompson boundary layer schemes. Significant sensitivity is seen, with minimum central pressures varying by up to 16 mb and maximum winds by 15 m s−1. The Burk–Thompson and bulk aerodynamic boundary layer schemes produced the strongest storms while the MRF scheme produced the weakest storm. Simulated horizontal precipitation structures varied substantially between the different PBL schemes, suggesting that accurate forecasts of precipitation in hurricanes can be just as sensitive to the formulation of the PBL as they are to the cloud microphysical parameterizations.

Each PBL scheme is different in its formulation of the vertical mixing within the PBL and the surface fluxes, with the exception of the MRF and Blackadar schemes, which share essentially the same surface flux parameterization. Detailed analyses of the PBL schemes describe the key differences in the surface fluxes and how they impact storm intensity. In order to isolate the effects of vertical mixing and surfaces fluxes, simulations were conducted in which each of the surface flux schemes was used in conjunction with the same vertical mixing scheme, and vice versa. These experiments indicate that simulated intensity is largely determined by the surface fluxes rather than by the vertical mixing, with the exception of the MRF PBL case, in which excessively deep vertical mixing acts to dry the lower PBL and reduce hurricane intensity. Simulations that vary only the surface fluxes suggest that the intensity of the simulated hurricane increases with increasing values of the ratio of the exchange coefficients for enthalpy and momentum, Ck/CD. However, even for identical values of Ck/CD, the simulated intensity varies depending on the wind speed dependence of the surface roughness parameter z0.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Scott A. Braun, Mesoscale Atmospheric Processes Branch, NASA GSFC, Code 912, Greenbelt, MD 20771.

Email: braun@agnes.gsfc.nasa.gov

Abstract

The fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University–National Center for Atmospheric Research Mesoscale Model is used to simulate Hurricane Bob (1991) using grids nested to high resolution (4 km). Tests are conducted to determine the sensitivity of the simulation to the available planetary boundary layer parameterizations, including the bulk aerodynamic, Blackadar, Medium-Range Forecast (MRF) model, and Burk–Thompson boundary layer schemes. Significant sensitivity is seen, with minimum central pressures varying by up to 16 mb and maximum winds by 15 m s−1. The Burk–Thompson and bulk aerodynamic boundary layer schemes produced the strongest storms while the MRF scheme produced the weakest storm. Simulated horizontal precipitation structures varied substantially between the different PBL schemes, suggesting that accurate forecasts of precipitation in hurricanes can be just as sensitive to the formulation of the PBL as they are to the cloud microphysical parameterizations.

Each PBL scheme is different in its formulation of the vertical mixing within the PBL and the surface fluxes, with the exception of the MRF and Blackadar schemes, which share essentially the same surface flux parameterization. Detailed analyses of the PBL schemes describe the key differences in the surface fluxes and how they impact storm intensity. In order to isolate the effects of vertical mixing and surfaces fluxes, simulations were conducted in which each of the surface flux schemes was used in conjunction with the same vertical mixing scheme, and vice versa. These experiments indicate that simulated intensity is largely determined by the surface fluxes rather than by the vertical mixing, with the exception of the MRF PBL case, in which excessively deep vertical mixing acts to dry the lower PBL and reduce hurricane intensity. Simulations that vary only the surface fluxes suggest that the intensity of the simulated hurricane increases with increasing values of the ratio of the exchange coefficients for enthalpy and momentum, Ck/CD. However, even for identical values of Ck/CD, the simulated intensity varies depending on the wind speed dependence of the surface roughness parameter z0.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Scott A. Braun, Mesoscale Atmospheric Processes Branch, NASA GSFC, Code 912, Greenbelt, MD 20771.

Email: braun@agnes.gsfc.nasa.gov

Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Anthes, R. A., and S. W. Chang, 1978: Response of the hurricane boundary layer to changes of sea surface temperature in a numerical model. J. Atmos. Sci.,35, 1240–1255.

  • Bister, M., and K. A. Emanuel, 1998: Dissipative heating and hurricane intensity. Meteor. Atmos. Phys.,55, 233–240.

  • Black, R. A., H. B. Bluestein, and M. L. Black, 1994: Unusually strong vertical motions in a Caribbean hurricane. Mon. Wea. Rev.,122, 2722–2739.

  • Blackadar, A. K., 1976: Modeling the nocturnal boundary layer. Preprints, Third Symp. on Atmospheric Turbulence, Diffusion, and Air Quality, Raleigh, NC, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 46–49.

  • ——, 1979: High resolution models of the planetary boundary layer. Advances in Environmental Science and Engineering, J. Pfafflin and E. Ziegler, Eds., Vol. 1, No. 1, Gordon and Breach, 50–85.

  • Burk, S. D., and W. T. Thompson, 1989: A vertically nested regional numerical weather prediction model with second-order closure physics. Mon. Wea. Rev.,117, 2305–2324.

  • Byers, H. R., 1944: General Meteorology. McGraw-Hill, 645 pp.

  • Deardorff, J. W., 1972: Parameterization of the planetary boundary layer for use in general circulation models. Mon. Wea. Rev.,100, 93–106.

  • Delsol, F., K. Miyakoda, and R. H. Clarke, 1971: Parameterized processes in the surface boundary layer of an atmospheric circulation model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,97, 181–208.

  • Dudhia, J., 1989: Numerical study of convection observed during the winter monsoon experiments using a mesoscale two-dimensional model. J. Atmos. Sci.,46, 3077–3107.

  • ——, 1993: A nonhydrostatic version of the Penn State–NCAR mesoscale model: Validation tests and simulation of an Atlantic cyclone and cold front. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 1493–1513.

  • Emanuel, K. A., 1986: An air–sea interaction theory for tropical cyclones. Part I: Steady-state maintenance. J. Atmos. Sci.,43, 585–604.

  • ——, 1995a: The behavior of a simple hurricane model using a convective scheme based on subcloud-layer entropy equilibrium. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 3960–3968.

  • ——, 1995b: Sensitivity of tropical cyclones to surface exchange coefficients and a revised steady-state model incorporating eye dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 3969–3976.

  • ——, 1997: Some aspects of hurricane inner-core dynamics and energetics. J. Atmos. Sci.,54, 1014–1026.

  • Ferrier, B. S., W.-K. Tao, and J. Simpson, 1995: A double-moment multiple-phase four-class bulk ice scheme. Part II: Simulations of convective storms in different large-scale environments and comparisons with other bulk parameterizations. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 1001–1033.

  • Fovell, R. G., and Y. Ogura, 1988: Numerical simulation of a midlatitude squall line in two dimensions. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 3846–3879.

  • Garratt, J. R., 1977: Review of drag coefficients over oceans and continents. Mon. Wea. Rev.,105, 915–929.

  • Grell, G. A., J. Dudhia, and D. R. Stauffer, 1995: A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-398 + STR, 122 pp.

  • Hawkins, H. F., and S. M. Imbembo, 1976: The structure of a small, intense hurricane—Inez 1966. Mon. Wea. Rev.,104, 418–442.

  • Holland, G. J., 1997: The maximum potential intensity of tropical cyclones. J. Atmos. Sci.,54, 2519–2541.

  • Hong, S.-H., and H.-L. Pan, 1996: Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a medium-range forecast model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,124, 2322–2339.

  • Houston, S. H., and M. D. Powell, 1993: Surface wind fields during Hurricane Bob’s (1991) landfall in New England. Preprints, 20th Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, San Antonio, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 139–142.

  • Jorgensen, D. P., 1984: Mesoscale and convective-scale characteristics of mature hurricanes. Part II: Inner core structure of Hurricane Allen (1980). J. Atmos. Sci.,41, 1287–1311.

  • Karyampudi, V. M., G. S. Lai, and J. Manobianco, 1998: Impact of initial conditions, rainfall assimilation, and cumulus parameterization on simulations of Hurricane Florence (1988). Mon. Wea. Rev.,126, 3077–3101.

  • Liu, Y., D.-L. Zhang, and M. K. Yau, 1997: A multiscale numerical study of Hurricane Andrew (1992). Part I: Explicit simulation and verification. Mon. Wea. Rev.,125, 3073–3093.

  • ——, ——, and ——, 1999: A multiscale numerical study of Hurricane Andrew (1992). Part II: Kinematics and inner-core structures. Mon. Wea. Rev.,127, 2597–2616.

  • Lord, S. J., H. E. Willoughby, and J. M. Piotrowicz, 1984: Role of a parameterized ice-phase microphysics in an axisymmetric nonhydrostatic tropical cyclone model. J. Atmos. Sci.,41, 2836–2848.

  • Louis, J. F., 1979: A parametric model of vertical eddy fluxes in the atmosphere. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,17, 187–202.

  • ——, M. Tiedtke, and J. F. Geleyn, 1981: Planetary boundary layer parameterization. ECMWRF Workshop Proc., 59–79.

  • Malkus, J. S., 1958: On the structure and maintenance of the mature hurricane eye. J. Meteor.,15, 337–349.

  • ——, and H. Riehl, 1960: On the dynamics and energy transformations in steady-state hurricanes. Tellus,12, 1–20.

  • Manning, K. W., and P. L. Haagenson, 1992: Data ingest and objective analysis for the PSU/NCAR modeling system: Programs DATAGRID and RAWINS. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-376 + IA, 209 pp.

  • Marks, F. D., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1987: Inner core structure of Hurricane Alicia from airborne doppler radar observations. J. Atmos. Sci.,44, 1296–1317.

  • ——, ——, and J. F. Gamache, 1992: Dual-aircraft investigation of the inner core of Hurricane Norbert. Part I: Kinematic structure. J. Atmos. Sci.,49, 919–942.

  • Meyers, M. P., P. J. DeMott, and W. R. Cotton, 1992: New primary ice-nucleation parameterizations in an explicit cloud model. J. Appl. Meteor.,31, 708–721.

  • Moss, M. S., and S. L. Rosenthal, 1975: On the estimation of planetary boundary layer variables in mature hurricanes. Mon. Wea. Rev.,103, 980–988.

  • Oncley, S. P., and J. Dudhia, 1995: Evaluation of surface fluxes from MM5 using observations. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 3344–3357.

  • Ooyama, K., 1969: Numerical simulation of the life cycle of tropical cyclones. J. Atmos. Sci.,26, 3–40.

  • Palmén, E., and H. Riehl, 1957: Budget of angular momentum and energy in tropical cyclones. J. Meteor.,14, 150–159.

  • Riehl, H., 1954: Tropical Meteorology. McGraw-Hill, 392 pp.

  • Rosenthal, S. L., 1971: The response of a tropical cyclone model to variations in boundary layer parameters, initial conditions, lateral boundary conditions, and domain size. Mon. Wea. Rev.,99, 767–777.

  • Rotunno, R., and K. A. Emanuel, 1987: An air–sea interaction theory for tropical cyclones. Part II: Evolutionary study using a nonhydrostatic axisymmetric numerical model. J. Atmos. Sci.,44, 542–561.

  • Rutledge, S. A., and P. V. Hobbs, 1984: The mesoscale and microscale structure and organization of clouds and precipitation in midlatitude cyclones. XII: A diagnostic modeling study of precipitation development in narrow cold-frontal rainbands. J. Atmos. Sci.,41, 2949–2972.

  • Tao, W.-K., and J. Simpson, 1993: The Goddard Cumulus Ensemble Model. Part I: Model description. Terr. Atmos. Oceanic Sci.,4, 35–72.

  • Vogelezang, D. H. P., and A. A. M. Holtslag, 1996: Evaluation and model impacts of alternative boundary-layer height formulations. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,81, 245–269.

  • Wurman, J., and J. Winslow, 1998: Intense sub-kilometer-scale boundary layer rolls observed in Hurricane Fran. Science,280, 555–557.

  • Zhang, D.-L., and R. A. Anthes, 1982: A high-resolution model of the planetary boundary layer—Sensitivity tests and comparisons with SESAME-79 data. J. Appl. Meteor.,21, 1594–1609.

  • ——, and E. Altshuler, 1999: The effects of dissipative heating on hurricane intensity. Mon. Wea. Rev.,127, 3032–3038.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 649 179 7
PDF Downloads 458 133 6