Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Estimation of Cross-Tropopause Airmass Fluxes at Midlatitudes: Comparison of Different Numerical Methods and Meteorological Situations

J. Kowol-Santen Institute for Geophysics and Meteorology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

Search for other papers by J. Kowol-Santen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
H. Elbern Institute for Geophysics and Meteorology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

Search for other papers by H. Elbern in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
A. Ebel Institute for Geophysics and Meteorology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

Search for other papers by A. Ebel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Dec 2000
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2000)129<4045:EOCTAF>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
4045–4057
Restricted access

Abstract

Airmass flux across the tropopause modifies the budget of chemically reactive minor constituents in the stratosphere and the troposphere. Flux estimates reported in the literature exhibit large discrepancies, mainly due to the application of different estimation algorithms and examination of different episodes. The different studies also focus on different exchange mechanisms. With the aim of contributing to clarification of the situation, two different methods of cross-tropopause mass transfer calculations are implemented into the mesoscale-α European Air Pollution Dispersion model system and discussed: a trajectory-based analysis and the method developed by Wei. These methods are applied to an episode in February 1997, when a deep stratospheric intrusion occurred over the North Atlantic and western Europe. Comparison of the results shows good agreement between the net flux values computed by the different methods, both yielding values near 1 × 10−3 kg m−2 s−1 for the net airmass flux from the stratosphere to the troposphere. Analyzing the tendency of potential vorticity along trajectories, it is shown that in this case turbulent processes surpass the diabatic ones and are mainly responsible for the transformation from stratospheric into tropospheric air. Employing the method of trajectory analysis, different meteorological situations are investigated in order to establish a broader range of cross-tropopause transport estimates for middle latitudes. For all analyzed cases a net downward transport from stratosphere to troposphere was found. The results vary between 0.6 and 1.0 × 10−3 kg m−2 s−1 for the airmass flux across the two potential vorticity unit surface, taken as the dynamical tropopause.

Current affiliation: Service d’Aéronomie du CNRS, Paris, France.

* Corresponding author address: Dr. Johanna Kowol-Santen, Service d’Aéronomie du CNRS, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Tour 15-Couloir 15-14 4, Place Jussieu, 75232 Paris Cedex 05, France.

Email: kowol@aero.jussieu.fr

Abstract

Airmass flux across the tropopause modifies the budget of chemically reactive minor constituents in the stratosphere and the troposphere. Flux estimates reported in the literature exhibit large discrepancies, mainly due to the application of different estimation algorithms and examination of different episodes. The different studies also focus on different exchange mechanisms. With the aim of contributing to clarification of the situation, two different methods of cross-tropopause mass transfer calculations are implemented into the mesoscale-α European Air Pollution Dispersion model system and discussed: a trajectory-based analysis and the method developed by Wei. These methods are applied to an episode in February 1997, when a deep stratospheric intrusion occurred over the North Atlantic and western Europe. Comparison of the results shows good agreement between the net flux values computed by the different methods, both yielding values near 1 × 10−3 kg m−2 s−1 for the net airmass flux from the stratosphere to the troposphere. Analyzing the tendency of potential vorticity along trajectories, it is shown that in this case turbulent processes surpass the diabatic ones and are mainly responsible for the transformation from stratospheric into tropospheric air. Employing the method of trajectory analysis, different meteorological situations are investigated in order to establish a broader range of cross-tropopause transport estimates for middle latitudes. For all analyzed cases a net downward transport from stratosphere to troposphere was found. The results vary between 0.6 and 1.0 × 10−3 kg m−2 s−1 for the airmass flux across the two potential vorticity unit surface, taken as the dynamical tropopause.

Current affiliation: Service d’Aéronomie du CNRS, Paris, France.

* Corresponding author address: Dr. Johanna Kowol-Santen, Service d’Aéronomie du CNRS, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Tour 15-Couloir 15-14 4, Place Jussieu, 75232 Paris Cedex 05, France.

Email: kowol@aero.jussieu.fr

Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Ancellet G., J. Pelon, M. Beekmann, A. Papayannis, and G. Megie, 1991: Ground-based lidar studies of ozone exchanges between the stratosphere and the troposphere. J. Geophys. Res.,96, 22 401–22 421.

  • ——, M. Beekmann, and A. Papayannis, 1994: Impact of a cutoff low development on downward transport of ozone in the troposphere. J. Geophys. Res.,99, 3451–3468.

  • Austin, J. F., and M. J. Follows, 1991: The ozone record at Payerne:An assessment of the cross-tropopause flux. Atmos. Environ.,25A, 1873–1880.

  • Blackadar, A. K., 1979: High resolution models of the planetary boundary layer. Advances in Environmental Science and Engineering, J. Pfafflin and E. Ziegler, Eds., Vol. 1, Gordon and Breach, 3–49.

  • Danielsen, E. F., and V. A. Mohnen, 1977: Project Dustorm Report:Ozone transport, in situ measurements, and meteorological analyzes of tropopause folding. J. Geophys. Res.,82, 5867–5877.

  • Ebel, A., H. Hass, H. J. Jakobs, M. Memmesheimer, M. Laube, A. Oberreuter, H. Geiss, and Y.-H. Kuo, 1991: Simulation of ozone intrusion caused by a tropopause fold and cut-off low. Atmos. Environ.,25A, 2131–2144.

  • ——, H. Elbern, J. Hendricks, and R. Meyer, 1996: Stratosphere–troposphere exchange and its impact on the structure of the lower stratosphere. J. Geomag. Geoelectr.,48, 135–144.

  • Elbern, H., J. Kowol, R. Sladkovic, and A. Ebel, 1997: Deep stratospheric intrusions: A statistical assessment with model guided analyzes. Atmos. Environ.,31, 3207–3226.

  • ——, J. Hendricks, and A. Ebel, 1998: A climatology of tropopause folds by global analyses. Theor. Appl. Climatol.,59, 181–200.

  • Gettelman, A., and A. H. Sobel, 2000: Direct diagnoses of stratosphere–troposphere exchange. J. Atmos. Sci.,57, 3–16.

  • Gouget, H., G. Vaughan, A. Marenco, and H. G. J. Smit, 2000: Decay of a cut-off low and contribution to stratosphere–troposphere exchange. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., in press.

  • Grell, A. G., J. Dudhia, and D. R. Stauffer, 1993: A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR Tech. Note. NCAR/TN−398 + 1A, 122 pp. [Available online at ftp://ftp.ucar.edu/mesouser/Documents.].

  • Grewe, V., and M. Dameris, 1996: Calculating the global mass exchange between stratosphere and troposphere. Ann. Geophys.,14, 431–442.

  • Hoerling, M. P., T. K. Schaack, and A. L. Lenzen, 1993: A global analysis of stratospheric–tropospheric exchange during northern winter. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 162–172.

  • Keyser, D., B. Schmidt, and D. Duffy, 1992: Quasigeostrophic vertical motions diagnosed from along- and cross-isentrope components of the Q-vector. Mon. Wea. Rev.,120, 731–741.

  • Kowol-Santen, J., 1998: Numerische Analysen von Transport- und Austausch prozessen in der Tropopausenregion der mittleren Breiten. Ph.D. thesis, Mitteilungen aus dem Institut für Geophysik und Meteorologie der Universität zu Köln, 186 pp. [Available from jr@eurad.uni-koeln.de.].

  • Kuo, H. L., 1974: Further studies of the parameterization of the influence of cumulus convection on large-scale flow. J. Atmos. Sci.,31, 1232–1240.

  • Lamarque, J.-F., and P. G. Hess, 1994: Cross-tropopause mass exchange and potential vorticity budget in a simulated tropopause folding. J. Atmos. Sci.,51, 2246–2269.

  • Meyer, R., 1997: Quantitative Analysen von Luftmassenflüssen durch die Tropopause in mittleren Breiten mit einem mesoskaligen meteorologischen Modell. Ph.D. thesis, Mitteilungen aus dem Institut für Geophysik und Meteorologie der Universität zu Köln, 153 pp. [Available from jr@eurad.uni-koeln.de.].

  • Pedlosky, J., 1979: Geophysical Fluid Dynamics. Springer-Verlag, 310 pp.

  • Price, J. D., and G. Vaughan, 1993: On the potential for stratosphere–troposphere exchange in cut-off low systems. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,119, 343–365.

  • Ravetta, F., and G. Ancellet, 2000: Identification of dynamical processes at the tropopause during the decay of a cutoff low using high-resolution airborne lidar ozone measurements. Mon. Wea. Rev.,128, 3252–3267.

  • ——, ——, J. Kowol-Santen, R. Wilson, and D. Nedeljkovic, 1999:Ozone, temperature, and wind field measurements in a tropopause fold: Comparison with a mesoscale model simulation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,127, 2641–2653.

  • Shapiro, M. A., 1980: Turbulent mixing within tropopause folds as a mechanism for the exchange of chemical constituents between the stratosphere and the troposphere. J. Atmos. Sci.,37, 994–1004.

  • Spaete, P., D. R. Johnson, and T. K. Schaack, 1994: Stratospheric–tropospheric mass exchange during the Presidents’ Day Storm. Mon. Wea. Rev.,122, 424–439.

  • Vaughan, G., J. D. Price, and A. Howells, 1994: Transport into the troposphere in a tropopause fold. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,120, 1085–1103.

  • Wei, M.-Y., 1987: A new formulation of the exchange of mass and trace constituents between the stratosphere and troposphere. J. Atmos. Sci.,20, 3079–3086.

  • Wirth, V., 1995: Diabatic heating in an axisymmetric cut-off cyclone and related stratospheric–tropospheric exchange. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,121, 127–147.

  • ——, and J. Egger, 1999: Diagnosing extratropical synoptic-scale stratosphere–troposphere exchange: A case study. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,125, 635–655.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 120 28 0
PDF Downloads 50 16 0