Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

The Interaction between Hurricane Opal (1995) and a Warm Core Ring in the Gulf of Mexico

Xiaodong Hong  North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Xiaodong Hong in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Simon W. Chang  Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, California

Search for other papers by Simon W. Chang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Sethu Raman  Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by Sethu Raman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Lynn K. Shay  Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by Lynn K. Shay in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Richard Hodur  Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by Richard Hodur in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 May 2000
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128<1347:TIBHOA>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
1347–1365
Restricted access

Abstract

Hurricane Opal (1995) experienced a rapid, unexpected intensification in the Gulf of Mexico that coincided with its encounter with a warm core ring (WCR). The relative positions of Opal and the WCR and the timing of the intensification indicate strong air–sea interactions between the tropical cyclone and the ocean. To study the mutual response of Opal and the Gulf of Mexico, a coupled model is used consisting of a nonhydrostatic atmospheric component of the Naval Research Laboratory’s Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System (COAMPS), and the hydrostatic Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory’s Modular Ocean Model version 2 (MOM 2).

The coupling between the ocean and the atmosphere components of the model are accomplished by conservation of heat, salt, momentum, as well as the sensible and latent heat fluxes at the air–sea interface. The atmospheric model has two nests with spatial resolutions of 0.6° and 0.2°. The ocean model has a uniform resolution of 0.2°. The oceanic model domain covers the Gulf of Mexico basin and coincides with a fine-mesh atmospheric domain of the COAMPS. The initial condition for the atmospheric component of COAMPS is the archived Navy Operational Global Atmospheric Prediction System operational global analysis, enhanced with observations. The initial ocean condition for the oceanic component is obtained from a 2-yr MOM 2 simulation with climatological forcing and fixed mass inflow into the Gulf. The initial state in the Gulf of Mexico consists of a realistic Loop Current and a shed WCR.

The 72-h simulation of the coupled system starting from 1200 UTC 2 October 1995 reproduces the observed storm intensity with a minimum sea level pressure (MSLP) of 918 hPa, occurring at 1800 UTC 4 October, a 6-h delay compared to the observation. The rapid intensification to the maximum intensity and the subsequent weakening are not as dramatic as the observed. The simulated track is located slightly to the east of the observed track, placing it directly over the simulated WCR, where the sea surface temperature (SST) cooling is approximately 0.5°C, consistent with buoy measurements acquired within the WCR. This cooling is significantly less over the WCR than over the common Gulf water due to the deeper and warmer layers in the WCR. Wind-induced currents of 150 cm s−1 are similar to those in earlier idealized simulations, and the forced current field in Opal’s wake is characterized by near-inertial oscillations superimposed on the anticyclonic circulation around the WCR.

Several numerical experiments are conducted to isolate the effects of the WCR and the ocean–atmosphere coupling. The major findings of these numerical experiments are summarized as follows.

  1. Opal intensifies an additional 17 hPa between the times when Opal’s center enters and exits the outer edge of the WCR. Without the WCR, Opal only intensifies another 7 hPa in the same period.

  2. The maximum surface sensible and latent heat flux amounts to 2842 W m−2. This occurs when Opal’s surface circulation brings northwesterly flow over the SST gradient in the northwestern quadrant of the WCR.

  3. Opal extracts 40% of the available heat capacity (temperature greater than 26°C) from the WCR.

  4. While the WCR enhances the tropical cyclone and ocean coupling as indicated by strong interfacial fluxes, it reduces the negative feedback. The negative feedback of the induced SST cooling to Hurricane Opal is 5 hPa. This small feedback is due to the relatively large heat content of the WCR, and the negative feedback is stronger in the absence of the WCR, producing a difference of 8 hPa in the MSLP of Opal.

@ Current affiliation: University Corporation for Atmospheric Research/Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, California.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Simon W. Chang, Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA 93943.

Email: simon.chang@nrl.navy.mil

Abstract

Hurricane Opal (1995) experienced a rapid, unexpected intensification in the Gulf of Mexico that coincided with its encounter with a warm core ring (WCR). The relative positions of Opal and the WCR and the timing of the intensification indicate strong air–sea interactions between the tropical cyclone and the ocean. To study the mutual response of Opal and the Gulf of Mexico, a coupled model is used consisting of a nonhydrostatic atmospheric component of the Naval Research Laboratory’s Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System (COAMPS), and the hydrostatic Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory’s Modular Ocean Model version 2 (MOM 2).

The coupling between the ocean and the atmosphere components of the model are accomplished by conservation of heat, salt, momentum, as well as the sensible and latent heat fluxes at the air–sea interface. The atmospheric model has two nests with spatial resolutions of 0.6° and 0.2°. The ocean model has a uniform resolution of 0.2°. The oceanic model domain covers the Gulf of Mexico basin and coincides with a fine-mesh atmospheric domain of the COAMPS. The initial condition for the atmospheric component of COAMPS is the archived Navy Operational Global Atmospheric Prediction System operational global analysis, enhanced with observations. The initial ocean condition for the oceanic component is obtained from a 2-yr MOM 2 simulation with climatological forcing and fixed mass inflow into the Gulf. The initial state in the Gulf of Mexico consists of a realistic Loop Current and a shed WCR.

The 72-h simulation of the coupled system starting from 1200 UTC 2 October 1995 reproduces the observed storm intensity with a minimum sea level pressure (MSLP) of 918 hPa, occurring at 1800 UTC 4 October, a 6-h delay compared to the observation. The rapid intensification to the maximum intensity and the subsequent weakening are not as dramatic as the observed. The simulated track is located slightly to the east of the observed track, placing it directly over the simulated WCR, where the sea surface temperature (SST) cooling is approximately 0.5°C, consistent with buoy measurements acquired within the WCR. This cooling is significantly less over the WCR than over the common Gulf water due to the deeper and warmer layers in the WCR. Wind-induced currents of 150 cm s−1 are similar to those in earlier idealized simulations, and the forced current field in Opal’s wake is characterized by near-inertial oscillations superimposed on the anticyclonic circulation around the WCR.

Several numerical experiments are conducted to isolate the effects of the WCR and the ocean–atmosphere coupling. The major findings of these numerical experiments are summarized as follows.

  1. Opal intensifies an additional 17 hPa between the times when Opal’s center enters and exits the outer edge of the WCR. Without the WCR, Opal only intensifies another 7 hPa in the same period.

  2. The maximum surface sensible and latent heat flux amounts to 2842 W m−2. This occurs when Opal’s surface circulation brings northwesterly flow over the SST gradient in the northwestern quadrant of the WCR.

  3. Opal extracts 40% of the available heat capacity (temperature greater than 26°C) from the WCR.

  4. While the WCR enhances the tropical cyclone and ocean coupling as indicated by strong interfacial fluxes, it reduces the negative feedback. The negative feedback of the induced SST cooling to Hurricane Opal is 5 hPa. This small feedback is due to the relatively large heat content of the WCR, and the negative feedback is stronger in the absence of the WCR, producing a difference of 8 hPa in the MSLP of Opal.

@ Current affiliation: University Corporation for Atmospheric Research/Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, California.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Simon W. Chang, Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA 93943.

Email: simon.chang@nrl.navy.mil

Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Anthes, R. A., and S. W. Chang, 1978: Response of the hurricane boundary layer to changes of sea surface temperature in a numerical model. J. Atmos. Sci.,35, 1240–1255.

  • Bender, M. A., I. Ginis, and Y. Kurihara, 1993: Numerical simulations of tropical cyclone–ocean interaction with a high resolution coupled model. J. Geophys. Res.,98, 23 245–23 263.

  • Black, P. G., 1983: Ocean temperature changes induced by tropical cyclones. Ph.D. dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, 278 pp. [Available from Department of Meteorology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.].

  • Bosart, L., C. S. Velden, W. E. Bracken, J. Molinari, and P. G. Black, 2000: Environmental influences on the rapid intensification of Hurricane Opal (1995) over the Gulf of Mexico. Mon. Wea. Rev.,128, 322–352.

  • Brand, S., 1971: The effects on tropical cyclones of cooler surface waters due to upwelling and mixing produced by a prior tropical cyclone. J. Appl. Meteor.,10, 865–874.

  • Brooks, D., 1983: The wake of Hurricane Allen in the western Gulf of Mexico. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,13, 117–129.

  • Bryan, K., 1969: A numerical method for the study of the circulation of the World Ocean. J. Comput. Phys.,4, 347–376.

  • Chang, S. W., and R. A. Anthes, 1978: Numerical simulations of the ocean’s nonlinear, baroclinic response to translating hurricanes. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,8, 468–480.

  • ——, and ——, 1979: The mutual response of the tropical cyclone and the ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,9, 128–135.

  • Cox, M. D., 1984: A primitive equation, 3-dimensional model of the ocean. GFDL Ocean Group Tech. Rep. 1, 75 pp. [Available from NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08542.].

  • Davies, H. C., 1976: A lateral boundary formulation for multi-level prediction models. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,102, 405–418.

  • ——, 1983: Limitations of some common lateral boundary schemes used in regional NWP models. Mon. Wea. Rev.,111, 1002–1012.

  • Deardorff, J. W., 1980: Stratocumulus-capped mixed layers derived from a three-dimensional model. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,18, 495–527.

  • DeMaria, M., and J. Kaplan, 1994: Sea surface temperature and the maximum intensity of Atlantic tropical cyclones. J. Climate,7, 1324–1334.

  • Emanuel, K. A., 1986: An air–sea interaction theory for tropical cyclones. Part I: Steady-state maintenance. J. Atmos. Sci.,43, 585–604.

  • ——, 1988: The maximum intensity of hurricanes. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 1143–1155.

  • Esbensen, S. K., and Y. Kushnir, 1981: The heat budget of the global ocean: An atlas based on estimates from surface marine observations. Climatic Research Institute and Department of Atmospheric Sciences Rep. 29, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 27 pp. [Available from Climate Research Institute and Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331.].

  • Fisher, E. L., 1958: Hurricane and the sea surface temperature field. J. Meteor.,15, 328–333.

  • Ginis, I., and G. Sutyrin, 1995: Hurricane-generated depth-averaged currents and sea-surface elevation. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,25, 1218–1242.

  • Goerss, J. S., and R. A. Jeffries, 1994: Assimilation of synthetic tropical cyclone observations into the Navy Operational Global Atmospheric Prediction System. Wea. Forecasting,9, 557–576.

  • ——, C. S. Velden, and J. D. Hawkins, 1998: The impact of multispectral GOES-8 wind information on Atlantic tropical cyclone track forecasts in 1995. Part II: NOGAPS forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev.,126, 1219–1227.

  • Harshvardhan, R. Davies, D. Randall, and T. Corsetti, 1987: A fast radiation parameterization for atmospheric circulation models. J. Geophys. Res.,92, 1009–1015.

  • Hodur, R. M., 1997: The Naval Research Laboratory’s Coupled Ocean/Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System (COAMPS). Mon. Wea. Rev.,125, 1414–1430.

  • Jacob, S. D., L. K. Shay, A. J. Mariano, and P. G. Black, 2000: The 3D oceanic mixed layer response to Hurricane Gilbert. J. Phys. Oceanogr., in press.

  • Kain, J. S., 1990: A one-dimensional entraining–detraining plume model and its application in convective parameterization. J. Atmos. Sci.,47, 2784–2802.

  • ——, and J. M. Fritsch, 1993: Convective parameterization for mesoscale models: The Kain–Fritsch scheme. The Representation of Cumulus Convection in Numerical Models, Meteor. Monogr., No. 46, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 165–170.

  • Klemp, J., and R. Wilhelmson, 1978: The simulation of three-dimensional convective storm dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci.,35, 1070–1096.

  • Lai, D. Y., and T. B. Sanford, 1986: Observations of hurricane generated slope modes. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,16, 657–666.

  • Leipper, D., 1967: Observed ocean conditions and hurricane Hilda, 1964. J. Atmos. Sci.,24, 182–196.

  • Levitus, S., 1982: Climatological Atlas of the World Ocean. NOAA Prof. Paper 13, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 173 pp.

  • Lorenc, A. C., 1986: Analysis methods for numerical weather prediction. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,112, 1177–1194.

  • Louis, J. F., M. Tiedtke, and J. F. Geleyn, 1982: A short history of the operational PBL-parameterization at ECMWF. Preprints, Workshop on Planetary Boundary Parameterization, Reading, United Kingdom, ECMWF, 59–79.

  • Marks, F., L. K. Shay, and PDT-5, 1998: Landfalling tropical cyclones: Forecast problems and associated research opportunities. Bull. Meteor. Soc.,79, 305–323.

  • Martinsen, E. A., and H. Engedahl, 1987: Implementation and testing of a lateral boundary scheme as an open boundary condition in a barotropic ocean model. Coastal Eng.,11, 603–627.

  • Miller, B. I., 1958: On the maximum intensity of hurricanes. J. Meteor.,15, 184–195.

  • Namias, J., 1976: Negative ocean-air feedback systems over the North Pacific in the transition from warm to cold seasons. Mon. Wea. Rev.,104, 1107–1121.

  • Pacanowski, R. C., 1996: MOM 2 (version 2.0) documentation user’s guide and reference manual. GFDL Ocean Tech. Rep. 3.2, 329 pp. [Available from NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08542.].

  • ——, and G. Philander, 1981: Parameterization of vertical mixing in numerical models of the tropical ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,11, 1442–1451.

  • Perlroth, I., 1967: Hurricane behavior as related to oceanographic environmental conditions. Tellus,19, 258–267.

  • ——, 1969: Effects of oceanographic media on equatorial Atlantic hurricanes. Tellus,21, 230–244.

  • Price, J. F., 1981: Upper ocean response to a hurricane. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,11, 153–175.

  • Rutledge, S. A., and P. V. Hobbs, 1983: The mesoscale and microscale structure of organization of clouds and precipitation in midlatitude cyclones. VIII: A model for the “seeder-feeder” process in warm-frontal rainbands. J. Atmos. Sci.,40, 1185–1206.

  • Semtner, A. J., 1974: A general circulation model for the World Ocean. UCLA Dept. of Meteorology Tech. Rep. 8, 99 pp. [Available from Department of Marine, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Box 8208, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695.].

  • Shay, L. K, S. W. Chang, and R. L. Elsberry, 1990: Free surface effects on the near-inertial current response to a hurricane. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,20, 1405–1424.

  • ——, P. G. Black, A. J. Mariano, J. D. Hawkins, and R. L. Elsberry, 1992: Upper ocean response to Hurricane Gilbert. J. Geophys. Res.,97, 20 227–20 248.

  • ——, A. J. Mariano, S. D. Jacob, and E. H. Ryan, 1998: Mean and near-inertial ocean current response to Hurricane Gilbert. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,28, 858–889.

  • ——, G. J. Goni, and P. G. Black, 2000: Effects of a warm oceanic feature on Hurricane Opal. Mon. Wea. Rev.,128, 1366–1383.

  • Sturges, W., J. C. Evans, S. Welsh, and W. Holland, 1993: Separation of warm-core rings in the Gulf of Mexico. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,23, 250–268.

  • Sutyrin, G. G., and A. P. Khain, 1984: Effect of the ocean–atmosphere interaction on the intensity of a moving tropical cyclone. Atmos. Oceanic Phys.,20, 697–703.

  • Tisdale, C. F., and P. F. Clapp, 1963: Origin and paths of hurricanes and tropical storms related to certain physical parameters at the air–sea interface. J. Appl. Meteor.,2, 358–367.

  • Vukovich, F. M., and G. A. Maul, 1985: Cyclonic eddies in the eastern Gulf of Mexico. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,15, 105–117.

  • ——, M. Bushnell, and W. J. King, 1979: Some aspects of the oceanography of the Gulf of Mexico using satellite and in situ data. J. Geophys. Res.,84, 7749–7768.

  • Xu, L., 1995: The study of mesoscale land–air–sea interaction processes using a nonhydrostatic model. Ph.D. dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 336 pp. [Available from Department of Meteorology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095.].

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 849 282 18
PDF Downloads 425 122 19