Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Effects of a Warm Oceanic Feature on Hurricane Opal

Lynn K. Shay Division of Meteorology and Physical Oceanography, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by Lynn K. Shay in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Gustavo J. Goni Physical Oceanography Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratories, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by Gustavo J. Goni in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Peter G. Black Hurricane Research Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratories, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by Peter G. Black in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 May 2000
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128<1366:EOAWOF>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
1366–1383
Restricted access

Abstract

On 4 October 1995, Hurricane Opal deepened from 965 to 916 hPa in the Gulf of Mexico over a 14-h period upon encountering a warm core ring (WCR) in the ocean shed by the Loop Current during an upper-level atmospheric trough interaction. Based on historical hydrographic measurements placed within the context of a two-layer model and surface height anomalies (SHA) from the radar altimeter on the TOPEX mission, upper-layer thickness fields indicated the presence of two warm core rings during September and October 1995. As Hurricane Opal passed directly over one of these WCRs, the 1-min surface winds increased from 35 to more than 60 m s−1, and the radius of maximum wind decreased from 40 to 25 km. Pre-Opal SHAs in the WCR exceeded 30 cm where the estimated depth of the 20°C isotherm was located between 175 and 200 m. Subsequent to Opal’s passage, this depth decreased approximately 50 m, which suggests upwelling underneath the storm track due to Ekman divergence.

The maximum heat loss of approximately 24 Kcal cm−2 relative to depth of the 26°C isotherm was a factor of 6 times the threshold value required to sustain a hurricane. Since most of this loss occurred over a period of 14 h, the heat content loss of 24 Kcal cm−2 equates to approximately 20 kW m−2. Previous observational findings suggest that about 10%–15% of upper-ocean cooling is due to surface heat fluxes. Estimated surface heat fluxes based upon heat content changes range from 2000 to 3000 W m−2 in accord with numerically simulated surface heat fluxes during Opal’s encounter with the WCR. Composited AVHRR-derived SSTs indicated a 2°–3°C cooling associated with vertical mixing in the along-track direction of Opal except over the WCR where AVHRR-derived and buoy-derived SSTs decreased only by about 0.5°–1°C. Thus, the WCR’s effect was to provide a regime of positive feedback to the hurricane rather than negative feedback induced by cooler waters due to upwelling and vertical mixing as observed over the Bay of Campeche and north of the WCR.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Lynn K. Shay, Division of Marine and Physical Oceanography, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, FL 33149.

Abstract

On 4 October 1995, Hurricane Opal deepened from 965 to 916 hPa in the Gulf of Mexico over a 14-h period upon encountering a warm core ring (WCR) in the ocean shed by the Loop Current during an upper-level atmospheric trough interaction. Based on historical hydrographic measurements placed within the context of a two-layer model and surface height anomalies (SHA) from the radar altimeter on the TOPEX mission, upper-layer thickness fields indicated the presence of two warm core rings during September and October 1995. As Hurricane Opal passed directly over one of these WCRs, the 1-min surface winds increased from 35 to more than 60 m s−1, and the radius of maximum wind decreased from 40 to 25 km. Pre-Opal SHAs in the WCR exceeded 30 cm where the estimated depth of the 20°C isotherm was located between 175 and 200 m. Subsequent to Opal’s passage, this depth decreased approximately 50 m, which suggests upwelling underneath the storm track due to Ekman divergence.

The maximum heat loss of approximately 24 Kcal cm−2 relative to depth of the 26°C isotherm was a factor of 6 times the threshold value required to sustain a hurricane. Since most of this loss occurred over a period of 14 h, the heat content loss of 24 Kcal cm−2 equates to approximately 20 kW m−2. Previous observational findings suggest that about 10%–15% of upper-ocean cooling is due to surface heat fluxes. Estimated surface heat fluxes based upon heat content changes range from 2000 to 3000 W m−2 in accord with numerically simulated surface heat fluxes during Opal’s encounter with the WCR. Composited AVHRR-derived SSTs indicated a 2°–3°C cooling associated with vertical mixing in the along-track direction of Opal except over the WCR where AVHRR-derived and buoy-derived SSTs decreased only by about 0.5°–1°C. Thus, the WCR’s effect was to provide a regime of positive feedback to the hurricane rather than negative feedback induced by cooler waters due to upwelling and vertical mixing as observed over the Bay of Campeche and north of the WCR.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Lynn K. Shay, Division of Marine and Physical Oceanography, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, FL 33149.

Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Black, P. G., 1983: Ocean temperature changes induced by tropical cyclones. Ph.D. dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, 278 pp. [Available from The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.].

  • ——, and L. K. Shay, 1998: Observations of tropical cyclone intensity change due to air–sea interaction processes. Preprints, Symp. on Tropical Cyclone Intensity Change, Phoenix, AZ, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 161–168.

  • Bohren, C., and B. Albrecht, 1998: Atmospheric Thermodynamics. Oxford University Press, 402 pp.

  • Bosart, L., C. S. Velden, W. E. Bracken, J. Molinari, and P. G. Black, 2000: Environmental influences on the rapid intensification of Hurricane Opal (1995) over the Gulf of Mexico. Mon. Wea. Rev.,128, 322–352.

  • Cione, J. J., P. G. Black, and S. Houston, 2000: Surface observations in the hurricane environment. Mon. Wea. Rev.,128, 1550–1561.

  • Cooper, C., G. Z. Forristall, and T. M. Joyce, 1990: Velocity and hydrographic structure of two Gulf of Mexico warm core rings. J. Geophys. Res.,95, 1663–1679.

  • D’Asaro, E., D. M. Farmer, J. T Osse, and G. T. Dairiki, 1996: A Lagrangian float. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,13, 1230–1246.

  • DeMaria, M., and J. Kaplan, 1994: Sea surface temperature and the maximum intensity of Atlantic tropical cyclones. J. Climate,7, 1324–1334.

  • Elliot, B. A., 1982: Anticyclonic rings in the Gulf of Mexico. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,12, 1292–1309.

  • Elsberry, R. L., T. Fraim, and R. Trapnell, 1976: A mixed layer model of the ocean thermal response to hurricanes. J. Geophys. Res.,81, 1153–1162.

  • Emanuel, K., 1986: An air–sea interaction theory for tropical cyclones. Part I: Steady-state maintenance. J. Atmos. Sci.,43, 585–604.

  • Garzoli, S. L., G. J. Goni, A. J. Mariano, and D. B. Olson, 1997: Monitoring the upper southeastern transports using altimeter data. J. Mar. Res.,55, 453–481.

  • Geisler, J. E., 1970: Linear theory on the response of a two-layer ocean to a moving hurricane. Geophys. Fluid Dyn.,1, 249–272.

  • Goni, G. J., S. Kamholtz, S. Garzoli, and D. B. Olson, 1996: Dynamics of the Brazil–Malvinas confluence based upon inverted echo sounders and altimetry. J. Geophys. Res.,101 (7), 16 273–16 289.

  • ——, S. L. Garzoli, A. Roubicek, D. B. Olson, and O. B. Brown, 1997: Agulhas ring dynamics from TOPEX/Poseidon satellite altimeter data. J. Mar. Res.,55, 861–883.

  • Greatbatch, R. J., 1983: On the response of the ocean to a moving storm: The nonlinear dynamics. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,13, 357–367.

  • Holland, G. J., 1997: The maximum potential intensity of tropical cyclones. J. Atmos. Sci.,54, 2519–2541.

  • Hong, X., S. W. Chang, S. Raman, L. K. Shay, and R. Hodur, 2000:The interaction between Hurricane Opal (1995) and a warm core eddy in the Gulf of Mexico. Mon. Wea Rev.,128, 1347–1365.

  • Jacob, D. S., L. K. Shay, A. J. Mariano, and P. G. Black, 2000: The 3D oceanic mixed layer response to Hurricane Gilbert. J. Phys. Oceanogr., in press.

  • Kraus, E. B., and J. S. Turner, 1967: A one-dimensional model of the seasonal thermocline. II: The general theory and its consequences. Tellus,1, 98–105.

  • Leipper, D., and D. Volgenau, 1972: Hurricane heat potential of the Gulf of Mexico. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,2, 218–224.

  • Levitus, S., 1984: Annual cycle of temperature and heat storage in the world’s ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,14, 727–746.

  • Marks, F., L. K. Shay, and PDT-5, 1998: Landfalling tropical cyclones: Forecast problems and associated research opportunities. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,79, 305–323.

  • Maul, G., 1977: The annual cycle of the Loop Current. Part I: Observations during a one-year time series. J. Mar. Res,35, 29–47.

  • Namias, J., and D. R. Canyan, 1981: Large air–sea interactions and short period climatic fluctuations. Science,214, 869–876.

  • Palmen, E., 1948: On the formation and structure of tropical cyclones. Geophysics,3, 26–38.

  • Pielke, R. A., Jr., and R. A. Pielke Sr., 1997: Hurricanes: Their Nature and Impacts on Society. John Wiley and Sons, 279 pp.

  • Powell, M. D., and S. H. Houston, 1996: Hurricane Andrew’s landfall in south Florida. Part II: Surface wind fields and potential real-time applications. Wea. Forecasting,11, 329–349.

  • Price, J. F., 1981: Upper ocean response to a hurricane. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,11, 153–175.

  • ——, 1983: Internal wave wake of a moving storm. Part I: Scales, energy budget, and observations. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,13, 949–965.

  • Sanford, T. B., P. G. Black, J. Haustein, J. W. Feeney, G. Z. Forristall, and J. F. Price, 1987: Ocean response to a hurricane. Part I: Observations. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,17, 2065–2083.

  • Shay, L. K., 1997: Near-inertial wave energy fluxes forced by tropical cyclones. Preprints, 22d Conf. Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, Fort Collins, CO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 437–438.

  • ——, and S. W. Chang, 1997: Free surface effects on the near-inertial ocean current response to a hurricane: A revisit. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,27, 23–39.

  • ——, P. G. Black, A. J. Mariano, J. D. Hawkins, and R. L. Elsberry, 1992: Upper ocean response to Hurricane Gilbert. J. Geophys. Res.,97 (12), 20 227–20 248.

  • ——, A. J. Mariano, D. S. Jacob, and E. H. Ryan, 1998: Mean and near-inertial ocean current response to Hurricane Gilbert. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,28, 858–889.

  • Smith, S., E. An, J. C. Park, L. K. Shay, H. Peters, and J. VanLeer, 1998: Submesoscale coastal ocean dynamics using autonomous underwater vehicles and HF radar. Preprints, Second Conf. on Coastal Atmospheric and Oceanic Prediction and Processes, Phoeniz, AZ, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 143–150.

  • Vukovich, F. M., and B. W. Crissman, 1986: Aspects of warm core rings in the Gulf of Mexico. J. Geophys. Res.,91, 2645–2660.

  • WAMDI Group, 1988: The WAM model—A third generation ocean wave prediction model. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,18, 1775–1810.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 3917 1654 131
PDF Downloads 2019 550 40