Surface Observations in the Hurricane Environment

Joseph J. Cione National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, Hurricane Research Division, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by Joseph J. Cione in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Peter G. Black National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, Hurricane Research Division, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by Peter G. Black in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Samuel H. Houston National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, Hurricane Research Division, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by Samuel H. Houston in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Composite analyses of marine surface observations from 37 hurricanes between 1975 and 1998 show that the difference between the sea surface temperature and the surface air temperature significantly increases just outside the hurricane inner core. This increase in the sea–air contrast is primarily due to a reduction in surface air temperature and is more likely to occur when sea temperatures are at least 27°C. Results show that 90% of the observed cooling occurs 3.25°–1.25° latitude from the hurricane center, well outside the region of strongest surface winds. Since surface pressure only decreases 3 mb over this interval, the ∼2°C drop in air temperature is not a result of adiabatic expansion.

For the subset of observations that contained moisture measurements, surface specific humidity decreased 1.2 g kg−1 4.5°–1.75° latitude from the storm center. This finding suggests that the observed reduction in surface air temperature is not simply a result of near-surface evaporation from sea spray or precipitation. An alternate explanation may be that outside the hurricane inner core, unsaturated convective downdrafts act to dry and evaporatively cool the near-surface environment.

Between 3.25° and 1.25° radius, composite analyses show that low-level inflow is not isothermal, surface moisture is not constant, and the near-surface environment is not in thermodynamic equilibrium with the sea. Calculations based on these observations show that θe decreases between 4.0° and 1.25° radius and then quickly rises near the inner core as surface pressures fall and specific humidity increases. Surface fluxes of heat and moisture are also observed to significantly increase near the inner core. The largest increase in surface sensible heat flux occurs radially inward of 1.5°, where surface winds are strong and sea–air temperature contrasts are greatest. As a result, the average Bowen ratio is 0.20∼0.5° radius from the composite storm center. This increase in sensible heat flux (in conjunction with near-saturated conditions at low to midlevels) may help explain why average surface air temperatures inside 1.25° radius remain relatively constant, despite the potential for additional cooling from evaporation and adiabatic expansion within the high wind inner core.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Joseph J. Cione, NOAA/Hurricane Research Division, 4301 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, FL 33149.

Email: cione@aoml.noaa.gov

Abstract

Composite analyses of marine surface observations from 37 hurricanes between 1975 and 1998 show that the difference between the sea surface temperature and the surface air temperature significantly increases just outside the hurricane inner core. This increase in the sea–air contrast is primarily due to a reduction in surface air temperature and is more likely to occur when sea temperatures are at least 27°C. Results show that 90% of the observed cooling occurs 3.25°–1.25° latitude from the hurricane center, well outside the region of strongest surface winds. Since surface pressure only decreases 3 mb over this interval, the ∼2°C drop in air temperature is not a result of adiabatic expansion.

For the subset of observations that contained moisture measurements, surface specific humidity decreased 1.2 g kg−1 4.5°–1.75° latitude from the storm center. This finding suggests that the observed reduction in surface air temperature is not simply a result of near-surface evaporation from sea spray or precipitation. An alternate explanation may be that outside the hurricane inner core, unsaturated convective downdrafts act to dry and evaporatively cool the near-surface environment.

Between 3.25° and 1.25° radius, composite analyses show that low-level inflow is not isothermal, surface moisture is not constant, and the near-surface environment is not in thermodynamic equilibrium with the sea. Calculations based on these observations show that θe decreases between 4.0° and 1.25° radius and then quickly rises near the inner core as surface pressures fall and specific humidity increases. Surface fluxes of heat and moisture are also observed to significantly increase near the inner core. The largest increase in surface sensible heat flux occurs radially inward of 1.5°, where surface winds are strong and sea–air temperature contrasts are greatest. As a result, the average Bowen ratio is 0.20∼0.5° radius from the composite storm center. This increase in sensible heat flux (in conjunction with near-saturated conditions at low to midlevels) may help explain why average surface air temperatures inside 1.25° radius remain relatively constant, despite the potential for additional cooling from evaporation and adiabatic expansion within the high wind inner core.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Joseph J. Cione, NOAA/Hurricane Research Division, 4301 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, FL 33149.

Email: cione@aoml.noaa.gov

Save
  • Barnes, G. M., and G. J. Stossmeister, 1986: The structure and decay of a rainband in Hurricane Irene (1981). Mon. Wea. Rev.,114, 2590–2601.

  • ——, and M. D. Powell, 1995: Evolution of the inflow boundary layer of Hurricane Gilbert (1988). Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 2348–2368.

  • ——, E. J. Zipser, D. Jorgensen, and F. Marks Jr., 1983: Mesoscale and convective structure of a hurricane rainband. J. Atmos. Sci.,40, 2125–2137.

  • Betts, A. K., 1976: The thermodynamic transformation of the tropical subcloud layer by precipitation and downdrafts. J. Atmos. Sci.,33, 1008–1020.

  • Black, P. G., R. L. Elsberry, L. K. Shay, R. P. Partridge, and J. F. Hawkins, 1988: Atmospheric and oceanic mixed layer observations in Hurricane Josephine obtained from air-deployed drifting buoys and research aircraft. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,5, 683–698.

  • ——, and G. J. Holland, 1995: The boundary layer of Tropical Cyclone Kerry (1979). Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 2007–2028.

  • Bolton, D., 1980: The computation of equivalent potential temperature. Mon. Wea. Rev.,108, 1046–1043.

  • Brown, J. M., 1979: Mesoscale unsaturated downdrafts driven by rainfall evaporation: A numerical study. J. Atmos. Sci.,36, 313–338.

  • Byers, H. R., 1944: General Meteorology. McGraw-Hill, 645 pp.

  • Emanuel, K. A., 1986: An air–sea interaction theory for tropical cyclones. Part I: Steady state maintenance. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 1143–1155.

  • Fairall, C. W., J. D. Kepert, and G. J. Holland, 1994: The effect of sea spray on surface energy transports over the ocean. Atmos. Ocean Syst.,2, 121–142.

  • Fitzgarrald, D. R., and M. Garstang, 1981a: Vertical structure of the tropical boundary layer. Mon. Wea. Rev.,109, 1512–1526.

  • ——, and ——, 1981b: Boundary-layer growth over the tropical ocean. Mon. Wea. Rev.,109, 1762–1772.

  • Frank, W. M., 1977: The structure and energetics of the tropical cyclone. I: Storm structure. Mon. Wea. Rev.,105, 119–1135.

  • ——, 1984: A composite analysis of the core of a mature hurricane. Mon. Wea. Rev.,112, 2401–2420.

  • Garratt, J. R., 1977: Review of drag coefficients over oceans and continents. Mon. Wea. Rev.,105, 915–929.

  • Gilhousen, D. B., 1988: Quality control of meteorological data from automated marine stations. Preprints, Fourth Int. Conf. on Interactive Information and Processing Systems for Meteorology, Oceanography, and Hydrology, Miami, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 113–117.

  • , 1998: Improved real-time quality control of NDBC measurements. Preprints, 10th Symp. on Meteorological Observations and Instrumentation, Phoenix, AZ, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 363–366.

  • Gray, W. M., and D. J. Shea, 1973: The hurricane’s inner core region. Part II. Thermal stability and dynamic characteristics. J. Atmos. Sci.,30, 1565–1576.

  • Hawkins, H. F., and S. M. Imbembo, 1976: The structure of a small intense hurricane—Inez, 1966. Mon. Wea. Rev.,104, 418–442.

  • Hock, T. F., and J. L. Franklin, 1999: The NCAR GPS dropwindsonde. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,80, 407–420.

  • Holland, G. J., 1987: Mature structure and structure change. A Global View of Tropical Cyclones, R. L. Elsberry, Ed., Office of Naval Research., 13–52.

  • ——, 1997: The maximum potential intensity of tropical cyclones. J. Atmos. Sci.,54, 2519–2541.

  • Huschke, R. E., Ed., 1959: Glossary of Meteorology. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 638 pp.

  • Johnson, R. H., and M. E. Nicholls, 1983: A composite analysis of the boundary layer accompanying a tropical squall line. Mon. Wea. Rev.,111, 308–319.

  • Jordan, C. L., 1952: On the low-level structure in the typhoon eye. J. Meteor.,9, 285–290.

  • ——, 1958: Mean soundings for the West Indies. J. Meteor.,15, 91–97.

  • Jorgensen, D. P., 1984: Mesoscale and convective-scale characteristics of mature hurricanes. Part II: Inner core structure of Hurricane Allen (1980). J. Amos. Sci.,41, 1287–1311.

  • Korolev, V. S., S. A. Petrichenko, and V. D. Pudov, 1990: Heat and moisture exchange between the ocean and atmosphere in Tropical Storms Tess and Skip (English translation). Sov. Meteor. Hydrol.,3, 92–94.

  • Leary, C. A., 1980: Temperature and humidity in mesoscale downdrafts. J. Atmos. Sci.,37, 1005–1012.

  • Liu, W. T., K. B. Katsaros, and J. A. Businger, 1979: Bulk parameterizations of air–sea exchanges of heat and water vapor including the molecular constraints of the interface. J. Atmos. Sci.,36, 1722–1735.

  • Machta, J., 1969: Evaporation rates based on tritium measurements from Hurricane Betsy. Tellus,21, 404–408.

  • Malkus, J. S., and H. Riehl, 1960: On the dynamics and energy transformations in steady-state hurricanes. Tellus,12, 1–20.

  • Miller, B. I., 1958: On the maximum intensity of hurricanes. J. Meteor.,15, 184–195.

  • ——, 1964: A study of the filling of Hurricane Donna (1960) over land. Mon. Wea. Rev.,92, 389–406.

  • Neumann, C. J., B. R. Jarvinen, C. J. McAdie, and J. D. Elms, 1993:Tropical cyclones of the North Atlantic Ocean, 1871–1992. Historical Climatology Series 6-2, National Climatic Data Center, Asheville, NC, 193 pp.

  • Palmen, E., 1948: On the formation and structure of tropical cyclones. Geophysica,3, 26–38.

  • Powell, M. D., 1990: Boundary layer structure and dynamics in outer rainbands. Part II: Downdraft modification and mixed layer recovery. Mon. Wea. Rev.,118, 919–938.

  • ——, S. H. Houston, and T. Reinhold, 1996: Hurricane Andrew’s landfall in south Florida. Part I: Standardizing measurements for documentation of surface wind fields. Wea. Forecasting,11, 304–328.

  • Pudov, V. D., 1992: The ocean response to the cyclones influence and its possible role in their track formations. ICSU/WMO International Symposium on Tropical Cyclone Disasters, WMO, 367–376.

  • ——, and G. J. Holland, 1994: Typhoon and ocean: Results of experimental investigations. BMRC Research Rep. 45, Bureau of Meteorology Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia, 50 pp.

  • Riehl, H., 1950: A model of hurricane formation. J. Appl. Phys.,21, 917–925.

  • ——, 1954: Tropical Meteorology. McGraw-Hill, 392 pp.

  • ——, and J. S. Malkus, 1961: Some aspects of Hurricane Daisy (1958). Tellus,13, 181–213.

  • Simpson, R. H., 1978: On the computation of equivalent potential temperature. Mon. Wea. Rev.,106, 124–130.

  • Willoughby, H. E., 1995: Mature structure and evolution. Global Perspectives on Tropical Cyclones, R. L. Elsberry, Ed., WMO, 21–62.

  • Zipser, E. J., 1977: Mesoscale and convective-scale downdrafts as distinct components of squall-line activity. Mon. Wea. Rev.,105, 1568–1589.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 489 129 19
PDF Downloads 343 89 11