Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Modeling and Analysis of Ageostrophic Circulation over the Azores Oceanic Front during the SEMAPHORE Experiment

Hervé Giordani Météo-France, Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques, Toulouse, France

Search for other papers by Hervé Giordani in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
Serge Planton Météo-France, Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques, Toulouse, France

Search for other papers by Serge Planton in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Jul 2000
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128<2270:MAAOAC>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
2270–2287
Restricted access

Abstract

In the conventional quasigeostrophic (QG) form of the ω equation developed by Hoskins et al., the unique forcing of vertical velocity is the geostrophic deformation. As the QG or even the semigeostrophic (SG) hypotheses are not adapted to study the frontal dynamics in the atmospheric boundary layer, this paper proposes a generalized expression of the Hoskins et al. form of the vertical velocity. Two thermal and three dynamical sources of the vertical velocity are identified. These forcings allow for identification of each of the physical processes acting simultaneously on the ageostrophic circulation in the boundary layer. This new form of the ω equation is used to explain wind increase in the atmospheric boundary layer over the warm waters of the sea surface temperature (SST) front observed during a fair anticyclonic day of the SEMAPHORE experiment (1993) and simulated with a nonhydrostatic mesoscale atmospheric model. Since the SST gradients are weak (of the order of 1.5°C 100 km−1), the surface turbulent heat forcing is not a dominant factor and all the five forcings of vertical velocity have rather the same intensity.

In order to answer the question of how and over what thickness does the oceanic thermal front disturb significantly the atmospheric flow in the marine atmospheric boundary layer in such conditions, the degree of coupling between the turbulent heat forcing and the net forcing directly linked to the atmospheric flow is examined. Their strong anticorrelations (r < −0.9) below 200 m indicate that the ageostrophic circulation and the turbulent heat fluxes are in interregulation in this atmospheric layer, which can be assimilated to an internal boundary layer for the flow. This interregulation works in such a fashion to minimize the atmosphere thermal wind imbalance through an adaptation of the atmospheric flow, but also, to some extent, of the surface turbulent heat fluxes themselves.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Herve Giordani, Météo-France, Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques, 42 Av. G. Coriolis, 31057 Toulouse Cedex, France.

Abstract

In the conventional quasigeostrophic (QG) form of the ω equation developed by Hoskins et al., the unique forcing of vertical velocity is the geostrophic deformation. As the QG or even the semigeostrophic (SG) hypotheses are not adapted to study the frontal dynamics in the atmospheric boundary layer, this paper proposes a generalized expression of the Hoskins et al. form of the vertical velocity. Two thermal and three dynamical sources of the vertical velocity are identified. These forcings allow for identification of each of the physical processes acting simultaneously on the ageostrophic circulation in the boundary layer. This new form of the ω equation is used to explain wind increase in the atmospheric boundary layer over the warm waters of the sea surface temperature (SST) front observed during a fair anticyclonic day of the SEMAPHORE experiment (1993) and simulated with a nonhydrostatic mesoscale atmospheric model. Since the SST gradients are weak (of the order of 1.5°C 100 km−1), the surface turbulent heat forcing is not a dominant factor and all the five forcings of vertical velocity have rather the same intensity.

In order to answer the question of how and over what thickness does the oceanic thermal front disturb significantly the atmospheric flow in the marine atmospheric boundary layer in such conditions, the degree of coupling between the turbulent heat forcing and the net forcing directly linked to the atmospheric flow is examined. Their strong anticorrelations (r < −0.9) below 200 m indicate that the ageostrophic circulation and the turbulent heat fluxes are in interregulation in this atmospheric layer, which can be assimilated to an internal boundary layer for the flow. This interregulation works in such a fashion to minimize the atmosphere thermal wind imbalance through an adaptation of the atmospheric flow, but also, to some extent, of the surface turbulent heat fluxes themselves.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Herve Giordani, Météo-France, Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques, 42 Av. G. Coriolis, 31057 Toulouse Cedex, France.

Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Arritt, R. W., 1987: The effect of water surface temperature on lake breezes and thermal internal boundary layers. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,40, 101–125.

  • ——, 1991: A numerical study of sea breeze frontogenesis. Preprints, Fifth Conf. on Meteorology and Oceanography of the Coastal Zone, Miami, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 26–29.

  • ——, 1993: Effects of large-scale flow on characteristic features of the sea breeze. J. Appl. Meteor.,32, 116–125.

  • Atkinson, B. W., 1981: Meso-Scale Atmospheric Circulations. Academic Press, 495 pp.

  • Bechtold, P., J. P. Pinty, and P. Mascart, 1991: A numerical investigation of the influence of large-scale winds on sea-breeze- and inland-breeze-type circulations. J. Appl. Meteor.,30, 1268–1279.

  • Bosart, L. F., and S. C. Lin, 1984: A diagnosis analysis of the Presidents’ Day storm of February 1979. Mon. Wea. Rev.,112, 2148–2177.

  • Bougeault, P., and P. Lacarrère, 1989: Parameterization of orography-induced turbulence in a meso-beta scale model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,117, 1872–1890.

  • Businger, J. A., and W. J. Shaw, 1984: The response of the marine boundary layer to mesoscale variations in sea-surface temperature. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans,8, 267–281.

  • Dalu, G. A., and R. A. Pielke, 1989: An analytic study of the sea breeze. J. Atmos. Sci.,46, 1815–1825.

  • ——, ——, R. Avissar, G. Kallos, M. Baldi, and A. Guerrini, 1991: Linear impact of thermal inhomogeneities on mesoscale atmospheric flow with zero synoptic wind. Ann. Geophys.,9, 641–647.

  • Doyle, J. D., and T. T. Warner, 1990: Mesoscale costal processes during GALE IOP2. Mon. Wea. Rev.,118, 283–308.

  • ——, and ——, 1993: Nonhydrostatic simulations of costal mesobeta-scale vorticies and frontogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 3371–3392.

  • Durand, P., H. Dupuis, D. Lambert, B. Bénech, A. Druilhet, K. Katsaros, P. K. Taylor, and A. Weill, 1998: Comparison of sea-surface flux measured by instrumented aircraft and ship during SOFIA and SEMAPHORE experiments. J. Geophys. Res.,103 (C11), 25 125–25 136.

  • Eliassen, A., 1962: On the vertical circulation in frontal zones. Geofys. Publ.,24, 147–160.

  • Estoque, M. A., 1962: The sea breeze as a function of the prevailing synoptic situation. J. Atmos. Sci.,19, 244–250.

  • Eymard, L., and Coauthors, 1996: Study of the air–sea interactions at the mesoscale: The SEMAPHORE experiment. Ann. Geophys.,14, 986–1015.

  • Garratt, J. R., 1987: The stably stratified internal boundary layer for steady and diurnally varying offshore flow. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,38, 369–394.

  • ——, and W. L. Physick, 1985: The inland boundary layer at low latitudes: Sea-breeze influences. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,33, 209–231.

  • Giordani, H., S. Planton, B. Bénech, and B. H. Kwon, 1998: Atmospheric boundary layer response to sea surface temperatures during the SEMAPHORE experiment. J. Geophys. Res.,103 (C11), 25 047–25 060.

  • Hoskins, B. J., and F. P. Bretherton, 1972: Atmospheric frontogenesis models: Mathematical formulation and solution. J. Atmos. Sci.,29, 11–37.

  • ——, I. Draghici, and H. C. Davies, 1978: A new look at the w-equation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,104, 31–38.

  • Hsu, H. M., 1987: Study of linear steady atmospheric flow above a finite surface heating. J. Atmos. Sci.,44, 186–199.

  • Keshishian, L. G., and L. F. Bosart, 1987: A case study of extended East Coast frontogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev.,115, 100–117.

  • Kessler, E., 1969: On the Distribution and Continuity of Water Substance in Atmospheric Circulations. Meteor. Monogr., No. 32, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 84 pp.

  • Khalsa, S. J. S., and G. K. Greenhut, 1989: Atmospheric turbulence structure in the vicinity of an oceanic front. J. Geophys. Res.,94, 4913–4922.

  • Kraus, H., 1990: An observational aircraft-based study of sea-breeze frontogenesis. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,53, 223–265.

  • Kuo, Y. H., R. J. Reed, and S. Low-Nam, 1991: Effects of surface energy fluxes during the early development and rapid intensification stages of seven explosive cyclones in the western Atlantic. Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 457–476.

  • Kwon, B. H., B. Bénech, D. Lambert, P. Durand, A. Druilhet, H. Giordani, and S. Planton, 1998: Structure of the marine atmospheric boundary layer over an oceanic thermal front: SEMAPHORE experiment. J. Geophys. Res.,103 (C11), 25 159–25 180.

  • Lafore, J. P., and Coauthors, 1998: The Meso-NH atmospheric simulation system. Part I: Adiabatic formulation and simulations. Ann. Geophys.,16, 90–109.

  • Lambert, D., 1997: Structure moyenne et turbulente de la couche limite atmosphérique au dessus de l’océan (expérience SEMAPHORE) [Mean and turbulent structures of the atmospheric boundary layer over the ocean (SEMAPHORE experiment)]. Ph.D. thesis, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France, 223 pp.

  • Lin, Y. L., 1987: Two-dimensional response of a stably stratified shear flow to diabatic heating. J. Atmos. Sci.,44, 1375–1393.

  • ——, 1989: Inertial and frictional effects on stratified hydrostatic airflow past an isolated heat source. J. Atmos. Sci.,46, 921–936.

  • Louis, J. F., 1979: A parametric model of vertical eddy fluxes in the atmosphere. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,17, 187–202.

  • Mailhot, J., and C. Chouinard, 1989: Numerical forecasts of explosive winter storm: Sensitivity experiments with a meso-α scale model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,117, 1311–1343.

  • Morcrette, J. J., 1991: Radiation and cloud radiative properties in the ECMWF forecasting system. J. Geophys. Res.,96, 9121–9132.

  • Ogawa, Y., T. Ohara, S. Wakamatsu, P. G. Diosey, and I. Uno, 1986: Observation of lake breeze penetration and subsequent development of the thermal internal boundary layer for the nanticoke II shoreline diffusion experiment. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,35, 207–230.

  • Physick, W., 1976: A numerical model of the sea-breeze phenomenon over a lake or gulf. J. Atmos. Sci.,33, 2107–2135.

  • Raman, S., and A. J. Riordan, 1988: The genesis of Atlantic Lows Experiment: The planetary-boundary-layer subprogram of GALE. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,69, 161–172.

  • Rotunno, R., 1983: On the linear theory of the land and sea breeze. J. Atmos. Sci.,40, 1999–2009.

  • Sawyer, J. S., 1956: The vertical circulation at meteorological fronts and its relation to frontogenesis. J. Proc. Roy. Soc. London,234A, 346–362.

  • Strong, A. E., 1972: The influence of a Great Lake anticyclone on the atmospheric circulation. J. Appl. Meteor.,11, 598–612.

  • Walsh, J. E., 1974: Sea breeze theory and applications. J. Atmos. Sci.,31, 2012–2026.

  • Warner, T. T., M. N. Lakhtakia, J. D. Doyle, and R. A. Pearson, 1990:Marine atmospheric boundary layer circulations forced by Gulf Stream sea surface temperature gradients. Mon. Wea. Rev.,118, 309–323.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1330 877 86
PDF Downloads 452 123 10