Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

A Transparent Method for the Analysis and Quality Evaluation of Irregularly Distributed and Noisy Observational Data

Reinhold Steinacker Department of Meteorology and Geophysics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Search for other papers by Reinhold Steinacker in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Christian Häberli Department of Meteorology and Geophysics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Search for other papers by Christian Häberli in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Wolfgang Pöttschacher Department of Meteorology and Geophysics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Search for other papers by Wolfgang Pöttschacher in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Jul 2000
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128<2303:ATMFTA>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
2303–2316
Restricted access

Abstract

Observational errors may have a serious impact on objective analyses. Before conducting an objective analysis, that is, interpolating irregularly spaced observations to a uniform grid, the data should be checked thoroughly for errors. For this procedure a piecewise functional fitting approach is proposed, which is based on a variational algorithm. As for thin-plate splines, an integral of squares of second temporal and/or spatial derivatives is minimized. The second derivatives are obtained from overlapping finite elements using a polynomial approach. In a slightly different mode, the same approach may also be used to interpolate the observational data to a regular grid. The method is formulated for and applied to scalar and vector quantities in a one- and a two-dimensional domain. The basic advantages of the method are on the one hand the fact that no first guess or (prognostic) model field is necessary and on the other hand that no a priori knowledge about structure or weighting functions is required. Furthermore the spatial anisotropy of meteorological fields may be treated explicitly. One of the most valuable features of the method is its simplicity. For a single station it is possible to recalculate by hand each step, which may make the procedure transparent. The comparatively inexpensive computational effort renders it especially well suited to model-independent quality assessment procedures and mesoscale objective analyses. It is presently used within the framework of the Mesoscale Alpine Programme.

Corresponding author address: Prof. R. Steinacker, Institut für Meteorologie und Geophysik, Universität Wien, Silbergasse 45/7, A-1190 Vienna, Austria.

Abstract

Observational errors may have a serious impact on objective analyses. Before conducting an objective analysis, that is, interpolating irregularly spaced observations to a uniform grid, the data should be checked thoroughly for errors. For this procedure a piecewise functional fitting approach is proposed, which is based on a variational algorithm. As for thin-plate splines, an integral of squares of second temporal and/or spatial derivatives is minimized. The second derivatives are obtained from overlapping finite elements using a polynomial approach. In a slightly different mode, the same approach may also be used to interpolate the observational data to a regular grid. The method is formulated for and applied to scalar and vector quantities in a one- and a two-dimensional domain. The basic advantages of the method are on the one hand the fact that no first guess or (prognostic) model field is necessary and on the other hand that no a priori knowledge about structure or weighting functions is required. Furthermore the spatial anisotropy of meteorological fields may be treated explicitly. One of the most valuable features of the method is its simplicity. For a single station it is possible to recalculate by hand each step, which may make the procedure transparent. The comparatively inexpensive computational effort renders it especially well suited to model-independent quality assessment procedures and mesoscale objective analyses. It is presently used within the framework of the Mesoscale Alpine Programme.

Corresponding author address: Prof. R. Steinacker, Institut für Meteorologie und Geophysik, Universität Wien, Silbergasse 45/7, A-1190 Vienna, Austria.

Save
Cover Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review

  • Andersson, E., and H. Järvinen, 1998: Variational quality control. ECMWF Tech. Memo. 250, 31 pp.

  • Assamoi, P., and H. Isaka, 1979: Application d’une methode d’analyse objective des donnees au reseau meteorologique de l’Europe de l’ouest. J. Rech. Atmos.,13, 189–200.

  • Baker, N. L., 1992: Quality control for the navy operational atmospheric data base. Wea. Forecasting,7, 250–261.

  • Barnes, S. L., 1964: A technique for maximizing details in numerical weather map analysis. J. Appl. Meteor.,3, 396–409.

  • Benoit, R., M. Desgagne, P. Pellerin, S. Pellerin, S. Desjardins, and Y. Chartier, 1997: The Canadian MC2: A semi-Lagrangian, semi-implicit wideband atmospheric model suited for finescale process studies and simulation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,125, 2382–2415.

  • Bergthorson, P., and B. Döös, 1955: Numerical weather map analysis. Tellus,7, 329–340.

  • Bluestein, H. B., 1993: Synoptic–Dynamic Meteorology in Midlatitudes. Vol. II. Oxford University Press, 594 pp.

  • Bougeault, P., P. Binder, and J. Kuettner, Eds., 1998: Mesoscale Alpine Program: Science plan. ETH, Zurich, Switzerland, 64 pp. [Available online at http://www.map.ethz.ch.].

  • Buzzi, A., D. Gomis, M. A. Pedder, and S. Alonso, 1991: A method to reduce the adverse impact that inhomogeneous station distributions have on spatial interpolation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 2465–2491.

  • Caracena, F., 1987: Analytic approximation of discrete field samples with weighted sums and the gridless computation of field derivatives. J. Atmos. Sci.,44, 3753–3768.

  • Cressie, N. A. C., 1991: Statistics For Spatial Data. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics, J. Wiley and Sons, 900 pp.

  • Cressman, G. P., 1959: An operational objective analysis system. Mon. Wea. Rev.,87, 367–374.

  • Daley, R., 1991: Atmospheric Data Analysis. Cambridge University Press, 457 pp.

  • Doswell, C. A., III, and F. Caracena, 1988: Derivative estimation from marginally sampled vector point functions. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 242–253.

  • Schrodin, R., Ed., 1997: Quarterly report of the operational NWP. Models of the Deutscher Wetterdienst. Ref. 12, DWD Offenbach, Germany.

  • ECMWF, 1998: ECMWF Newsletter. No. 78, 20 pp.

  • Fritsch, J. M., 1971: Objective analysis of a two-dimensional data field by the cubic spline method. Mon. Wea. Rev.,99, 379–386.

  • Gandin, L., 1965: Objective Analysis of Meteorological Fields. Israeli Program for Scientific Translations, 242 pp.

  • ——, 1988: Complex quality control of meteorological observations. Mon. Wea. Rev.,116, 1137–1156.

  • Gilchrist, B., and G. P. Cressman, 1954: An experiment in objective analysis. Tellus,6, 309–318.

  • Goodin, W. R., G. J. McRae, and J. H. Seinfeld, 1979: A comparison of interpolation methods for sparse data: Application to wind and concentration fields. J. Appl. Meteor.,18, 761–771.

  • Hollingsworth, A., D. B. Shaw, P. Lönnberg, L. Illari, K. Arpe, and A. J. Simmons, 1986: Monitoring of observations and analysis quality by a data assimilation system. Mon. Wea. Rev.,114, 861–879.

  • Lanzinger, A., and R. Steinacker, 1990: A fine mesh analysis scheme designed for mountainous terrain. Meteor. Atmos. Phys.,43, 213–219.

  • Lorenc, A. C., 1986: Analysis methods for numerical weather prediction. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,112, 1177–1194.

  • Lu, C., and G. L. Browning, 1998a: The impact of observational and model errors on four-dimensional variational data assimilation. J. Atmos. Sci.,55, 995–1011.

  • ——, and ——, 1998b: The impact of observational errors on objective analyses. J. Atmos. Sci.,55, 1791–1807.

  • Maddox, R. A., 1980: An objective technique for separating macroscale and mesoscale features in meteorological data. Mon. Wea. Rev.,108, 1108–1121.

  • Majewski, M., 1991: The Europa Modell of the Deutscher Wetterdienst. ECMWF Seminar of Numerical Methods in Atmospheric Models, Vol. II, ECMWF, 147–191.

  • Orlanski, I., 1975: A rational subdivision of scales for atmospheric processes. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,56, 527–530.

  • Panofsky, H. A., 1949: Objective weather map analysis. J. Meteor.,6, 386–392.

  • Pöttschacher, W., R. Steinacker, and M. Dorninger, 1996: VERA—A high resolution analysis scheme for the atmosphere over complex terrain. Preprints, Seventh Int. Conf. on Mesoscale Processes, Reading, United Kingdom, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 245–247.

  • Ripley, B. D., 1981: Spatial Statistics. J. Wiley and Sons, 38–44.

  • Sasaki, Y., 1958: An objective analysis based on the variational method. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan,36, 77–88.

  • ——, 1970: Some basic formalisms on numerical variational analysis. Mon. Wea. Rev.,98, 875–883.

  • Seaman, R. S., 1999: Quality control of Australian sea-level pressure observations. Aust. Meteor. Mag.,48, 123–131.

  • ——, and M. F. Hutchinson, 1985: Comparative real data tests of some objective analysis methods by withholding observations. Aust. Meteor. Mag.,33, 37–46.

  • Thiebaux, H. J., and M. A. Pedder, 1987: Spatial Objective Analysis. Academic Press, 299 pp.

  • Wahba, G., and J. Wendelberger, 1980: Some new mathematical methods for variational objective analysis using splines and cross validation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,108, 1122–1143.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 784 329 57
PDF Downloads 177 46 10